Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

17 articles on this Page

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

News
Cite
Share

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. In the HOUSE OF LORDS May 11, The Duke of St. Albans moved the Second Reading of the Railway Companies Servants' Bill, which, he said, sought to remove a source of danger which arose from the overworking of Railway Ser- vants. In support of the object of the Bill, he quoted from the evidence given before the Railway commission and from other documents, and stated that the Bill would restrict the number of hours during which Railway Servants should be employed to 12 hours a day. Having explained the subsidiary provisions of his measure, he concluded by moving the second Reading. Lord Bury proposed to postpone the second reading for six months. He said that the Bill was far more sweeping in its enactments than any proposal he had ever heard sug- gested by any Railway Servant. He denied that Railway Servants were habitually overworked, and he believed that the present Bill would have the effect of bringing the operations of Railways to a standstill. In opposition to the news of the Duke of St. Albans, he adduced the testimony jf Mr. Gait, and observed that at present the men were generally well content, if they were paid for working over- time. The Duke of Somerset, in the interest of the travelling public, expressed a hope that when it was shown that any .Railway Companies repudiated the adoption of all improve- ments, juries, in case of accidents, would give heavy damages against them. Lord Belmore referred to the recommendations of the Railway Commission and, after iltating that it could not be expected the Government should propose any general legisla- te >n on the subject during the present year, added that he thouglft in reference to the matter of brake power some- thmg might be done. Lord De La Warr approved the object of the Bill, though he feared that it would not be attained under the Bill as proposed. It would be better promoted by inducing the Railway Companies to enforce their own rules and regu- lations. The Duke of Richmond thought it would be dangerous to interfere between employers and employed as to the number "f bom's the latter should continue at work, and he believed that the Bill would prove impracticable, for under its pro- visions it would be perfectly impossible for the Railway Companies to carry on their traffic. The matter, no doubt, Was one of the gravest importance, but the Government were Hot prepared to legislate on it during the present year. After the expression of a hope by Lord Aberdare that the Government would not overlook the fact that Railway Ser- vants were in many instances overworked. The Duke of St. Albans withdrew the Bill. <j,The Earl of Derby, in reply to Lord Stanley of Alderley, jyjmied the authenticity of a report that Mr. Layard had in- :ui7med the Porte that England had guaranteed the integrity dtti independence of the Ottoman Empire only under con- oojVis Is id down by treaty stipulations for tne it;ifining business on the paper having been dis- posed of, their Lordships adjourned. In the HOUSE OF COMMONS, Mr. Bourke, in answer to Mr. Srrington, stated that the Government had received infor- ¡":ll.ím of an intention to close the Suez Canal against -Russian ships of war, but no regulations on the subject had been recehed. Mr. Bounce, in resuming the debate on the Eastern Question, referred first to Mr. Forster's speech, with much of which he weed; and with regard to the mediatory func- tions which the Government might be called on to discharge, lie said they were perfectly alive to their duties in that "espect, and that was one of the reasons why they did not wish to have their hands tied beforehand. Commenting on the Resolutions, he admitted that it was to be deplored that the demands of Lord Derby's Despatch of the 21st of September had not been complied with but the main rea- son was that the whole Moslem population was of opinion that the Russian Armies had been massed for their destruction and as to the wise policy of 1826, he read from & Memorandum of a conversation between Mr. Canning ana the Greek Deputation, and other documents, to show that never at any time had that statesman contemplated the use ct force. Sir R. Anstruther supported all four Resolutions, but entirely appro zed Mr. Gladstone's course in withdrawing the Third and Fourth. Deprecating the distrust of Russia so loudly expressed on the other side, he pointed to her mode- ration in the Conference, and to the numerous attempts she lJarlmade to corne to terms with Turkey. It was chiefly eur fault that she W, now in a position of advantage from which it would be difficult to dislodge her. Sooner or later we should be compelled to interfere, and it ought to be on the side of humanity atd good government. Lord Elcho considered that Ministers had conducted the foreign affairs of the country most ably, under circumstances of unparalleled difficulty. He was earnestly desirous of maintaining neutrality in the present struggle, but he Warned the House that the time might be near at hand when England would have to say, either with or without the Powers, that Russia should not go to Constantinople. After some observations from Mr. Anderson, Mr. Newde- gate, Mr. Shaw Lefevre, Mr. R. Yorke, Sir J. Lubbock, and Ur. Grantham, Mr. Walter argued that the cardinal mistake in the Ministerial policy was its disinclination to employ con- certed action for the coercion of Turkey. No State, he maintained, could deprive itself, by Treaty or otherwise, of its right to interfere with other States by force of arms for the maintenance of public peace or the suppression of some system of persecution. He believed that the Problem of the Eastern Question would be solved, and though he would spend anything to keep Russia out of Con- stantinople, he would not spend a shilling to keep the Turks in. Disclaiming any wish to censure the Government, he in- tended to vote for the Resolution. Mr. Hermon strongly supported the policy of neutrality, and declared that he would go to war neither for Turkey nor Russia, but solely for the protection of British interest and honour. Mr. Goschen thought the main result of the debate would be to explode the idea that the Turk was a British nterest.' The Turk had been deposed from his position of 81 favoured ally to that of a de serted offender. He trusted that the Government would do nothing to inflame Public feeling, but would use all their influence to Maintain the tone of MB. Cross's speech. Lr. Kenealy spoke for some time in opposition to the Res* lutions, denouncing Russia in strong language, and j<,v"-ug a cordial approval to the general policy <>f the -JUV. rnment. the motion of Ir. Waddy, the debate was adjourned. Sad the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in consenting to it" ,);rJ' resumed on Monday, on the understalldiug tht it 'd then be brought to a close, held out to the House the j^U-Viiative of giving Tuesday to the Gvernment business 01' of the Whitsuntide helydays. III the ciuime thv conversation which ensued, complaints were made of tlK 'eugth of the speeches. Hoiue other business was then disposed of, and the House adjourned.

[No title]

A STRUGGLE FOR LIFE.

[No title]

DEATH OF LORD SHREWSBURY.

.ST. JAMES'S HATCHAM.

THE FOLKESTONE RITUAL CASE.

ENCOUNTER WITH TIGERS.

TEACHING BY EXAMPLE.

THE LAND OF MIDIAN.

AN INCIDENT OF THE WAR.

WHITHER ARE WE DRIFTING? -

THE CZAR'S ARRIVAL AT ST.…

WEEKLY REVIEW OF THE CORN…

AMERICAN HUMOUR.

EPITOME OF NEWS.

THE MARKETS.