Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

23 articles on this Page

Proposed" Increase" to Clerk.

News
Cite
Share

Proposed" Increase" to Clerk. Application Refused Unheard But Work Increased I At the monthly meeting of the Fishguard Urban District Council, held at the accus- tomed venue, on Monday evening, Mr Levi Evans, J.P., presiding, the recommendation of the Finance Committee-adjourned from the April meeting—that the Council consider the advisability of increasing the salary paid to the Clerk (Mr A J Hodges) came up for consideration. Mr D G Thomas said it was desirable that there should be a resolution before the meet- ing. He understood that Mr Hodges had already made an application for an increase. He would like to consolidate that application into a definite resolution which would elimin- ate all personal feeling out of the matter, and he would, therefore, move that the Council now take into consideration the salaries of the officials. In reply to the Chairman he said that he meant this to be independant of Mr Hodges' application, explaining that he did so because he took it that the salary of one official was indirectly connected with the salaries of all in office. Mr W J Vaughan said he was not aware that any other official had applied for an in- crease of salary there was nothing on the agenda to indicate that such was the case. The Clerk said there had been no such application so far as he was aware. Mr aughan put it to the Chairman whether the motion were in order or not. Mr 0 D Jones asked if there had been any other application. The Chairman replied in the negative, saying that Mr Thomas was probably under a misapprehension it was only fair that he (theChairmanj should explain that that parti- cular application had been withdrawn. Mr Thomas said he was not referring to any particular application. It was necessary to have a definite resolution before the meet- ing in order to be perfectly in order, and, in order to eliminate all personality, he had moved that resolution. Mr Jones seconded. Mr Vaughan rose to a point of order, and asked if such a proposition could be put in the absence of an application from any other official. He contended that notice of motion was necessary. The Chairman said it was quite possible that objection to such procedure might be taken by absent members. Mr 'D Rees moved, as an amendment, that the Council do not consider any official's salary for one twelve-months.' He found, he said, that Fishguard was on the down-grade. The poor rate precept was for £53 I and there were nearly fifty or sixty working men's houses empty. Where were the rates going to come from ? That was not a personal matter he only spoke from a business point of view, and he strongly urged the Council to see first what Fishguard was going to do during the next twelve months-whetller the town was going to boom or go backwards. Mr Vaughan said he quite agreed with Mr Rees, but asked for the Chairman's ruling on the point of order which he had raised. The Chairman said he failed to see that Mr Thomas was in order. Mr Thomas said he was prepared to abide by the Chairman's decision. The Clerk said he was sorry that the Council should have a resolution before he had put his case before it. Mr Rees said his amendment would stand as a resolution. < Mr Thomas asked if the Chairman would allow any discussion until there was a resolu- tion before the meeting. The Chairman said they must have a resolution. Mr Thomas pointed out that he had moved one. The Chairman said the resolution must be in accordance with what appeared on the agenda. Mr Thomas remarked that there was noth- ing on the agenda except business arising out of the minutes." The Clerk asked if he should make his statement. Mr Thomas objected to his doing so until there was a resolution before the meeting, adding that the Chairman would not accept his resolution. the Chairman said he believed that the resolution was contrary to the Standing Orders. Mr Rees said he now moved his original amendment as a resolution. Mr John seconded, stating that he repre- sented the working people of Fishguard, who were responsible for the payment of the, greater part of the rates. We had no large companies, no gentlemen-it was all working- men, who did not earn more than £1 or 251- per week (less on the average), whereas the rates were 2/10 in the 3/6 altogether. He ii n°* tbink that the ratepayers would allow the Council to give a rise to any official. Mr Thomas condended that, if his resolution were out of order, this one was also. The Chairman said they had a simple pro- position and a seconder. Mr Thomas said he understood that they were discussing the Clerk's salary. The Chairman said they appeared to be discussing the question of increasing the burden of the ratepayers. Mr Jones asked if that were before the meeting. Mr Thomas said an application had been made to the Finance Committee, who had passed it on to the general meeting. The Chairmain enquired if Mr Thomas would alter his resolution, substituting official" for officials." Mr Thomas said he did not know whether he lacked clarity or the Council Jacked ability to understand the question. The adjourned business was to take into consider- ation the salary paid to the Clerk. His pro- I posal was to eliminate personalities—that would be Mr Hodges' name. It would be quite competent for the Council to discrimi- nate between the singular and the plural after it had accepted his resolution. He was not actuated by any desire to prevent him from having that increase, neither did he hold any brief for him attaining it. Mr Jones contended that Mr Rees' proposi- tion was a direct negative to the one which had been ruled out of order, and asked if the Chairman would rule it also out of order. The Chairman proposed that the Council consider the Clerk's application for an increase of salary. Mr Rees pointed out that there was al- a proposition before the meeting. The Chairman said he moved it as an amendment.. Mr Thomas said the Chairman must accept the legality of the proposition before he could move an amendment thereto. The1 Chairman Yes very good. Mr Jones seconded the amendment. A vote was about to betaken, whereupon, The Clerk said he considered it to be very unfair to defer the matter if he made out a bonafideca.se. Mr D John If Mr Hodges don t Like his position, nor his wages, will he kindly give somebody else the chance ? The Clerk No) I w6n't; if you like to sack me, do so Mr Thomas said he must point out the Chairman's inconsistency. He had accepted an amendment, which had become a proposi- tion on the ground that the original proposi- tion was inconsistent and illegal, whereas the fact remained that the proposition which he had accepted had been an amendment to that The Chairman Yes, bdt Mr Rees proposed that the consideration be deferred. Mr Thomas But, if you have no resolu- tion that it be gone on with, an amendment that it be deferred is not in order. The Chairman It is. Mr Thomas Is mine in order ? The Chairman It is not. A division was then taken, whereupon only the proposer ond seconder voted in favour of the amendment, and Messrs J R Richards, D John, H Williams, W J Vaughan, F George, D p Lewis, D Rees, and W Bateman against it Two members did not vote. The aniendmeud was, therefore, lost, and, there being no further amendment, Mr Rees proposition was carried without a division. The matter therefore stands adjourned for twelve months.

The Clerk's Case. -

No Increase in Salary:

Advertising

----------Lower Town Mystery.

URBAN COUNCIL ON ITS DIGNITY.

Family Notices

Advertising

Advertising

[No title]

Death of Mrs. Rees Brinn'

OLD FISHGUARD,

DIVERSION OF FISHGUARD HILL.

glimiks GROSS

----------LETTERSTON.

Advertising

[No title]

! BOOPWIOK

[No title]

AN ADDITIONAL MEMBER SOUGHT.

LIBERAL ASSOCIATION.

PILFERERS PUNISHED.

Advertising