Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

23 articles on this Page

be ffifjcsfjtre fJeaf.

News
Cite
Share

be ffifjcsfjtre fJeaf. NEW SERIES. LEdited by the Rev. FRANCIS SANDERS, M.A., F.S.A., and Mr. "WILLIAM FERGUSSON IBVINE.] Being Local Gleanings, Historical and Antiquarian relating to Cheshire, Chester and North Wales, from many scattered fields. 0 let me teach you how to knit again, This scattered corn one mutual Sheaf. Titus Andrsniev.s. Act V., Scene 3, Line 70. NOTES. [233] MR. E. W. COX'S ARTICLE ON THE ANTI- QUITIES OF STORETON. (See Nos. 106, 112,115, Sf 117.) In Vol. I present aeries of the Sheaf, is a very interesting article by Mr. E. W. Cox, on the Antiquities of Storeton, in which he mentions the Stanleys of Stourton and Hooton. May I remind its mauy readers that Stourton, or Storeton, came into the possession of the Stanleys by what used to be called a stollen marriage." Some thirty years ago someone discovered a record of it in the Palatine Plea Rolls, and it is mentioned in the new edition of Ormerod's Cheshire, 1882. Stanley was, I should say, a younger son of the House of Staneley, or Stonelegh of Stonelegh, within the borders of Staffordshire, near the Cheshire 'lyme/ or boundary. According to Seacombe, or Secombe (a Cheshire-man himself, by his name), who early last century wrote a History of the House of Knowsley, the Stanleys, circa temp. Hen. II., were really called Audeleghs, from their sole manor of that name. But, about the reign mentioned, the then lord of Audley exchanged it. with his brother, for the manor of Stanley, which lies in the same neighbourhood. From Audley descended all known to be of that name—after the exchange—a very celebrated line of men at least two or three of them in various generations were distinguished for their military skill and enterprise. These Stanleys, however (after the exchange), first made their name known in the person of one of their younger sons, of Hooton, towards the end of the 14th century, and by his marriage with the very great heiress of the Lancashire Lathoms, of Lathom, he and his descendants also acquired that manor and j many others, including Knowsley, on the extinction of the elder line of the Knowsleys of Knowsley, who were a presumed branch of the Lathams. The early Latham history pre- sents another example of the acquisition of far more than ordinary manorial dignity by a younger brother, or son, in the person of Torbok, or Tcrbock, of Torbock (Thorbeck, in Dutch Holland), alias Tarbock, near Huyton. For, there existed, soon after the Conquest, two brothers, one of whom, the elder, acquired the name of Latham, and the other the name of Torbok, from their respective chief manors. The Torbocks, however, survived the extinction of the Lathams for some 300 years—the last heir male dying a couple of generations since at Dove- cote's, near Liverpool—his ancestor of the 17th century having, by well-known family tradition, conveyed nearly all his estates to Molyneux, of Sefton, in satisfaction of a gaming debt; and according to the late Rector Aehton, of Huyton, all the successive lords Sefton, up to Torbock of Dovecotes time, took the precaution of pur- chasing the Torbock signatures to all dis- positions of at least parts of the Torbock Btate-probably because of the existence of some old entail ? The Knowsley Stanleys therefore gave the same peculiar lustre to all of their name, as did the great bastard of Egerton of Ridley to all the Egertons. But, to return from this digression to the first Cheshire Stanley of Storeton. He it was who bolted with Bamville of Storeton's daughter and heir; and as Bamville was ^Hereditary Chief Forester of the Forest of Wirral, the office (held by grand Serjeantry) passed to the Stanleys, lords of1 Storeton and subsequently of Hooton. And thus, between heirs and heiresses, like all other families of any antiquity, they managed to have a pretty long reign and no doubt their deserts as enterprising suitors, and suitees endeared them to each other, until the fatal disease of gambling, which no professional infallibility could stave off, terminated their race in favour of a flourishing shopkeeper. But the" Biddlemoor men" (Bidulph Moor, near Stanley or Stoneley), whose supposed Paynim patriarch was contemporary with their neigh- bouc, Stanley the FlrEt of Cheshire, still exist— "th ,ugh th-y are trreatiy decayed in numbers and physique, compared with what they were half a century since. All this Stanley-history reminds one of a little-known story of much later date. in which ono of the culprits was a descendant of that Stanley-Bamville marriage, but was of the Junior line of Knowsley. About the middle of last century there dwelt an elderly family Earned Smith, who were of considerable estate, a.nd resided at South or North Weald, in Essex. It was, even in Elizabeth's reign, a very un- usual name for a person occupying their worldly position but. originally they were probably of some other family, and acquired the name from trade rather than from mar riage--as did a younger son of the Torbocks who lived in Newcastle- nnder-Lyuie in the reign of Hen. VIII. (Tho. Smith alias Torhok,' and Tho Torboke alias Smythe: whose last descendant, Mrs. Smith of the same town, bore the arms of Torbock difforeaccd, and died a few years ago. Our Mr. Smith, however, of Hall, had in the rein cf Goo. II. ;.nà Geo. III. two beautiful daughters, who ultimately became his co- heiresses. He had also, at this fatal time, two young friends, in the persons of Mr. Barry, and Lord Strange, son and heir apparent of Lord Derby. Mr. Barry was of a family originally Norman, surnamed de Barry, from a now well- known port in South Wales, and of whom is said to have come Gildas, the great Monk and antiquary of the 12th or 13th century. Mr. Barry's father was Earl of Barrymore in Ireland. The story, as I first heard it related so far back in my Essex days that I half forgot it, was probably precisely the same as the one long afterwards related to me in town and Cheshire. Lord Strange, it seems., in the first instance, became sensibly well-affected towards one of Smith of Weald's two daughters, and one fine morning the pair were missing. The two friends were at the time guests of old Mr. Smith, who, when he heard from Mr. Barry the latter's suspicions," confirmed by a note left by the lady, became highly enraged, and besought Mr. Barry to follow the leave-taking ■couple in hot haste to Gretna. Follow them he did—with the other sister! And after a wild post chase, in a post-chaise, the second couple just arrived at the hospitable and Rev. blacksmith's altar in time to take part in a double solemnisation of holy matrimony—the Smith's forged bonds., of which the two other Smiths, his clients, never lived to regret— whatever the parental Smith may have thought Of the matter. But, after the Mayor's mare is stolen, shut 'Pepper' Gate"! To say the least, they were a pair of pretty little brides, and there still exists, in Cheshire, the Extremely small satin shoe of one of them *hieh is not only some attestation of their beauty, but of the skill and taste of another shoe-smith. There was, however, an early branch, if not the original stock, of these Smiths, which was settled, in the later days of Queen Elizabeth, on the borders of Epping Forest, some miles away from Weald. For generations, all the daughters of this branch, or stock, were of the same beautiful type—this latter family only becoming extinct about 100 years ago by the death of Thomas Smith, Esq., on the Continent leaving a tall, married daughter and heiress, Recounted a "matchless beauty," whose classical features bore the expression of those an angel" — though, doubtless, there is Variety even in paradise. This branch claimed descend from one of the Cheshire family of Smith, the field of whose coat (as emblazoned, 1Vlth others, in the 17th century, on some of tae windows of their old Epping dwelling), bore three Fleur-de-lis — though there was no descent of any of the two families recorded at all events, the extant Essex V isitations In the present College of Arms. T. HELSBT. [234] THE ANCIENT BOUNDARY OF WIRRAL AND BROXTON HUNDREDS. In a paper read before the Chester Archaeo- logical Society some years ago on Notes on the Domesday Survey so far as it relates to Wirral (Chester Arch. Journal, vol. v., part 1, p. 72) I pointed out that the Hundred of Wirral at the ~jpie of the Conquest included the townships of Worvin, Picton, Mickle Trafford, and Guilden button, and therefore that the river Gowy "ormed the eastern boundary of the Hundred a. most as far south as the Tarvin-road, the and southern limits of Guilden Sutton algo those of the Hundred. In n e maP which was published with this evft6r townships of Upton and Hoole how- h j.r> Were excluded, thus making the boundary ween Wirral and Broxton a very broken and irregular one. In doing this I followed Mr. Beamont in assigning the first Upton men- tioned under Wirral Hundred, and held by the Earl Hugh to Upton in Overchurch. Mr. Helsby in his edition of Ormrod, however, points out that the reference should probably be to Upton by Chester; and if we adopt this suggestion, the Hundred boundary is much straightened, and the division of Wirral and Broxton at once assumes a reasonable shape. Everything seems to point to this being the correct solu- tion, as the Optone in dispute occurs in Domesday Book bracketed with Stanney, a neighbouring township, while Upton in Over- church is accounted for later on in the survey, where its appears in its proper grouping along with its neighbours Saughall-Massey, Landican, Upton, Thingwall, and Knocktorum. In the paper alluded to above, I tried to explain away the second Upton by suggesting that the copyist at Winchester mistook the letter x in Oxtone for p, and so entered Optone, when really Oxtone had been in the original draft. It was, however, very soon pointed out to me that the similarity of the letters x and p dates from a later period than this, and that at the time of the survey the letters were radically different in appearance. It is with pleasure, therefore, that I adopt this new explanation, for which I am indebted to Mr. Helsby. The only difficulty that now remains is that there is yet another Opetone, entered under Broxton Hundred, also belonging to the Earl and as a possible explanation I would suggest that the Upton of Domesday lay in the two Hundreds, that which we now know as Upton by Chester being the part in Wirral, while the Upton in Broxton was that land which is now Hoole township. Little is known of the early history of Hoole, but it is a significant fact (bearing in mind that the Upton in Broxton belonged to Earl Hugh) that it has descended in a precisely similar manner as Mickle Trafford has done, another of the manors of the great Earl. As a further proof that Upton-by-Chester was included in the Hundred of Wirral at an early date may be mentioned the fact that in the earliest allusion to Moston in the Chartu- lary of St. Werburgh it is entered under Wirral Hundred. Yours, WM. FERGUSSON IRVINE. Birkenhead. QUERY. [235] POWNALL FAMILY. A lady of Chicago enquires for information concerning one of her own English ancestors, who emigrated with Sir W. Peen's settlers in 1682. The records give the clue to the Pownalls of the neighbourhood of Northwich in the six- teenth and seventeenth centuries, and the registers of Witton, and Great Bud worth give a long record of the family. The emigrant, George Pownall, having become a member of the Society of Friends, caused by this estrange- ment, a hiatus in the family story. Can your friendly columns unlock the secret by revealing any notes of Quaker births about the year 1670, and earlier ? JOHN WESTON. Northwich. ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. [236] ARRIAGE REGISTERS OF ST. OSWALD'S, CHESTER. 1600. ThurStan Yellis & Jane Glecke, April 29 Wm. Hilcson & Market Hilcson, July 23 Richard Jainson & Marget Parre, July 27 John White, schoolmaister to the bishop of Chester*, & Bridget Earwood, September 1 John Johnson & Jane Kenidghe, Nov. 1 Wm. Fisher & Jane Warmisham, Nov. 11 Robert Harrison & Elizabeth Salusbery, Nov. 30 Josephe Phasakerley & Jane Robinson, Feb. 15 JltDr. Richard Vaughan, Bishop of Chester, 1597- 1605. _———

[No title]

DISTRICT AND PARISH COUNCILS.

HES WALL.

TARPORLEY.

NESTON.

. BUCKLEY.

QUEEN'S FERRY.

HOLT ANITFARNDON,

. HAWARDEN.

SHOTTON.

NORLEY.

SAUGHALL.

NANTWICH.

. HELSBY.

. MOLD.

BARROW.

[No title]

Advertising

""""-'-'-"-/"""r.......................-.,-.....-..."......"..."",-"",,,,,..-...........,…

QUOITS.

[No title]

[No title]