Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

10 articles on this Page

[No title]

News
Cite
Share

(FROM THE BUDGET LEAGUE.) The month of October is likely to be the rmost critical time in the history of Eng- land since 1832. The HouW" o £ Commons iftave now finished the Committee stage of the Budget Bill, and the remaining stages will be disposed of within the next fort- night. The bill will reach the House of rLords about the middle of the month. What will happen then? The Lords may slacken or quicken the crisis, but before the Slid of the present month they must come itù a decision. It is probable that before (October 30th they will have decided whether to pass or reject the Budget Bill. There remains, therefore, a month for -them to make their decision, and it is to be tfioped that during that time the wild coun- sels at present in favour may have become ,1'J, little tamer. But if we may judge from the present outlook, it would appear al- rmost certain that they are going to reject "the bill. How has that situation come /about ? Be it noted that the responsible iOonservative leaders have never advocated i-rejection. Lord Lansdowne has been known ito be against it throughout the summer. ;Ix>rd Rothschild is said to be against it on ^financial grounds. Lord St. Aldwyn is also eputed to be opposed to rejection, together •With most of the other responsible heads of it-he old Tory Party. They realise that to ihrow out the Budget means to begin a re- solution which may not end in the way desire, It is, in the phrase of the Spectator, a "political gamble." They rmight have added the words of Lord {,Goschen's old epigram—" A gamble with ilie food of the people." No, it is not the old Conservatives who i&re precipitating this crisis. It is the tariff Reformers on the one hand and the brewers on the other.' Lord Rosebery hesi- tated to take so momentous a step, but Mr. -Joseph Chamberlain did not hesitate at .all. Writing to the Bingley Hall meeting -for the Tariff Reformers, he urged the Mouse of Lords to throw out the bill. But the strongest force of all is probably :the brewers. They are not- being asked to ay more than a fair share of the increased -value of the monopoly which they possess; tmt, encouraged by their triumph of last year, what is called "the Trade" have from the very beginning shown the greatest t-gonndence in their power to upset the Bud- get. Led by the London brewers, they have ftfused to accept Mr. Lloyd-George's most •moderate overtures. At a critical moment iin the history of the Eudget, they refused -to supply the Treasury with the material ;for revising the scale of on-licence duties. They thus lost all chance of compromise; "for it was impossible for the Treasury to anake any revision without material which •could only be provided for them bv the .> Trade" itself. They thus staked every- thing on a fight. rumour speaks correctly, the brewers '"•Ve during the past fortnight carried this ttitude a step further. They have told the ;on.servatives quite plainly that unless the throw out the Budget they will with- -«Taw their contributions to the Conserva- tive funds. That is a threat which reminds :!18 rather ominously of some of the worst Wicidents in American politics, and it is -fincerely to be hoped that if the threat has made the Conservative Party is still pUe enough to British traditions of poli- purity to treat it with scorn. If the Trade" have been speculating in a "re- :!l'ltiO,n," they must take the result on "'tIUll' own shoulders. ~t» Meanwhile, as the campaign against the ^Udget goes on in the country it becomes, .3° the words which Alice used in Wonder- curiouser and curiouser." For in- there is a decide^ rift, in the lute subject of the land clauses. The .Party of the Dukes wants to throw out the S^dget because of its land clauses; but ia meantime the Tariff Reformers want to adopt the land clauses for their own pur- The only difference between these tfiP"ticians and the Government is that the Tariff Reformers want to keep the revenue rates alone, and the Government to divide it between the rates and the es. Really, the talk about the Budget ng a "revolution" becomes rather thin! Several very amusing instances of this have occurred during, the past '^ight. One has been Mr. F. E. Smith's 'ernbairassrnent at Liverpool. The story of lr. 1.. E. Smith and the land clauses is > rtainly somewhat entertaining. The sud- Jf1* appearance of Mr. F. E. Smith in the cj0Use of Commons over the licensing jftUseg reminded us that he had been on a while the* land clauses were being 1 This led to some energetic Liberals up his election speech. There they ^covered that when standing for Liver- he had actually advocated the very |^Po:sals of the Budget, with the only dif- i 1B^ce that he wanted the revenue for ^al purposes. other amusing incident about the ? c^auses has occurred in the Morninq member of the staff of that paper 4<'Scw. n a^owe^ .to write some articles on ^e^orm-" In the course of those he has actually been advocating n§ capital land values in towns, a correspondent who has been FTR ON SPeeches of Lord Rosebery and still keeps an inno- ,.tic. i-qind in the midst of latter-day p<Ji- s^mewhat horrified by this proposal. alls it Socialism." Bu T, simple of him! He quite forgets S te>r e w°rd "Socialism" is now simply ^Scpu"- abuse used by Conservatives in Liberal proposals. Th J? C .manoeuvre of the Opposition e Pretend that the dissolution which "t ,ouse of Lords threatens to bring ia fought on the Budget alone, attempt to make out that tne House ol .Lords are taking qmte a democratic step. "After all," they SI"I"il what are they doing but asking for. A popular mandate. Even if they are beaten, they would have done quite a useful thin, They will have allowed the people to d'e- cide! Now, just see where that leads. It means that the people are to be forced to have a General Election on every Budget to which the Lords object. If that view is accepted, then we may have another Gene- '1 ral Election next year on the same issue. The country may be kept in a perpetual state of chaos. It will be impossible for any Liberal Government to levy its taxes. That view is clearly intolerable. The great point to remember is that if the Lords compel a dissolution this year on the Budget, it must be the last dissolution of the kind. The question to be decided at the coming General Election is not only tha "Budget," but the It Lorcls."

DEATH A FT K R VACCINATION.

A VOTE FOR MRS. PANKHCTRST.

\ ! HOME HINTS. .

A BRITISH IBRIDE o

SIXTEEN-YEAH-OLD BURGLAR.

......,-SPELL IT WITS AN "…

Two FACTS FOR COOKS.

.''.. | USEFUL RECIPES. I

Advertising