Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

9 articles on this Page

.BUDGET BULL'S-EYES,

News
Cite
Share

.BUDGET BULL'S-EYES, (FROM THE BUDGET LEAGUE.) During this week the House of Commons "ilas had a test from the Budget, and both -sides have taken a holiday, but the fighting •'Will begin again in a few days, and this -ft-ime it will pass oil to the Licensing Duties. It is notorious that the town pub- lic-houses in England pay an extraordi- narily low licence duty, especially the large -public-houses. The new licence duties pro- posed by the Government in the Budget '.Bill will equalise the licences between the ■ big public-houses and the small. At present is a scandalous inequality. The small public-houses pay very heavily, and the big public-houses pay very lightly. Let. us compare London and New York in ,¡the matter of licences. The London public- s'ltonse pays on an average in licence duties £ 38. The public-house of Greater New pays £ 205. London, as a whole, pays £ 200,000 in revenue on her licences, .vhlle New York pays £ 2,200,000. Last year the Government offered to leave .the brewers alone if they would limit their ;licences for the good of the community on ,JIle- lines of the report of the Licensing Com- mission. They refused, and under the leadership of Lord Rothschild they induced iAhe House of Lords to throw out the Licens- ing Bill. They preferred to keep the 30,000 liieette.es above the proper limit, which ac- cording to the Licensing Commission exist >2ft England. Having, therefore, preferred "to keep those licences they must pay duty them. They cannot have it every way. ".Remember that every other trade that is given a monopoly pays something for the n I- e. Even a poor hawker pays some- lUri'fcg for a hawker's licence. It is perfectly therefore, that a brewer being given i .3 IJwnopoly of selling drink in a certain "cdistrict should have to pay something for sfhat privilege. Nor should he pay less, but stfctVr more, if the public-house is a tied and not a "free" house. We are opinion that the publican who goes bail in liis own character for the goodness of his fnlvlic-house and the purity cf his beer ;.ought to be encouraged and helped against "dito big companies which so often really own ;>€W }>nbl ic-houses. Nwr forget when the licence struggle kSioiwes on next week that the brewers have r made the public pay for their liiisences, although the duties are not yet n llortv, The working man has already been -Asked to pay d. a pint extra for his beer, 2 "iwhieh amounts to 12s. a barrel on beer. "Tl\e barrel licence which has been col- lected does not mean more than Is. on the barrel. The brewers have, therefore, been Us, on the barrel already in vir- f," ir higher licences. As they have ,o:t. :11. m-oney from the public, it is only fair that they should hand it over to the "Ifmaiimry. That is what they are going to At a.ketl to do next week. While the debate pauses- in tr;le House of ,Zorn in the country it goes on as as ever, and it still turns very on the land taxes. Those taxes are -popular. Meetings are pronouncing •iR f.lvour all over the country, and it '^5 indeed for those who oppose '■m&m to carry their resolutions. We strongly "^pxec&te any disorder at these Budget Pro- huntings, as we are of opinion that (he to the Budget only require to be hi order to be refuted. It is quite "Certain th;t nothing has done the Budget m^ch good as the extraordinary display selfishness on the part of the very •A landowners who have been asked to W&y their share of taxation. ]Biit these gentlemen do not seem to have wisdom from the attitude of the Here is Lord Londonderry, who ought to know better. He is an ^*reme*y wealthy man. He owns over acres one big house in London two English provinces; and one in Ire- l! .draws immense revenues in min- Jft'yalties, and a large income as a coal JP^chant and a wharf-owner. There are -■"&W richer men in England. yet this very rich man, instead of --j^Vety undertaking to pay his share, like fe!* fathom, practically threatens to ii&i- the Dukes by cutting down the expendx- Im* estate. He goes down to one of Ft'operties and practically threatens to '^inployment. I | fading this speech it is impossible, avoid one reflection. Here is a noble-, v Wot a bad nobleman, but a public-' ittajj up to his lights, who, when With new taxation, seems to have no 'how to recoup except by dismissing But is there no other way out < difleulties? Take the case of Lord When he came into his estates kj i himself with three country houses, vlji '^ided that he wanted only one to live promptly sold two, and both those are now occuP'ed instead of being tord Londonderry owns five houses, .^jjj ■ai^y given time four of them must be Py, Is there not a way out here? » j possible that in England the :-jfcc r^Using of the people at one end of sea» may have some connection with of the people a,t the other ? ,e crowding of one family into one ifl towns like Glasgow and Devonport y n<,t have some connection with the families over five houses at the oi society ? We would advise Lord Merry to take a day and think it out. \t ''iot;b'b Tord Londonderry talks more in tvll- ,an8er Lord Wemyss does t W aM-> bnt acts, and acts in anger. f^JTSS ^a^r it''appears, closed all his •I tlif. 1 Public in the neighbourhood ce Wir, Wa 01 He thiiiks that 1 e' ,ja. town to its knges by a We think that he is *i.a ..se great noblemen are mistak- of modern England. What Lord ss will do will not be to Drmg Peebles to its knees, but to turn the people of Peebles into Socialists. If that is his ob- ject, then n3 is going the right way about to carry it out. The only chance of prevent- ing it is for the Liberals to show that they can prevent a great landlord from defying the public and abusing his rights. The Marquess of Tullibardine, who hap- pens to be a Unionist candidate in a, Scotch town, ia wiser than Lord Wemyss. He has found out in his electioneering experiences that a nobleman must justify himself in the possession of his property'; so he has in- vited a party of working men to go, over his deer forest at Atlioll and issue a report as to whether he is putting it to its best pos- sible use. -it- But we really do not know what he is driving at. Deer forests unhappily are not taxed under the Budget Bill; certainly not deer forests like the Forest of Atlioll. The real question in regard to deer forests is quite another thing. It is whether these great spaces of vacant forest, land would not be better used by being afforested than by being devoted simply to the sport of killing deef.

-----,--------PREFERRED DEATH…

BARMAN'S MURDER CONFESSION.

AIRSHIP I A RIVER.

— 'i "ART" FRAUDS.

SAVED BY A DOG.

TEA TABLE TALK. j

IFUN AND FANCY.

Advertising