Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

9 articles on this Page

Advertising

[No title]

News
Cite
Share

Lord LONDONDERRY referred to a published report of a conversation between Lord Melbourne .ind a ntifeibes- of delegates for the repeal of the Corn Laws, and asked his Lordship if the statement were true. Lord MELBOURNE answered, that he had not read that statement. But when he was a»ked whether lie delivered his onn opinion or that of the Government, be said generally as his own opinion. The presentation of petitions on the Corn Laws induced some discussion, in the course of which The Duke of RICHMOND said that wages had increased, and would continue to increase, if the Corn Laws were not agitated; but the farmers would not do so now, because they did not know how Boon they might be overthrown fit his part of the country the farmers were giving 12s. a week regular wages, and some of the labourers were making in task-work about 15. Lord ABERDEEN, in reference to the Scotch Church, stated he should immediately after Easter present to their Lordships a bill calculated to give peace to it. Lord DUNCANNON moved, that there be laid before the House copies or extracts of all despatches or correspondence between the government of Canada and the Secretary of Slate for the Colonies, from the year 1819 to 1839 on the subject of the clergy reserves in that part of her Majesty's possession. The Bishop of EXETER expressed his satisfac- tion at the motion. After an examination of some of the papers already Ititblislied, the [tight Rev. PrelRie conelude(I by mov- ing that there be laid on the table "such part of a despatch front Sir Peregrine Maitland to Mr. Hus- kissoit of the loth of December, 1827, as relates to the clergy reserves in Canada and also a copy of a despatch to Lord Bathurst, referred to in the above. mentioned despatch, containing the opinions of the legal advisers of the Crown in Canada on the right of the Cleigy of the Church of Englaud in that pro- vince to the said reserves. After a conversation it was ultimately understood, that if Lord Duncannon should not lay on the table all the papers necessary, iliey might be moved Itir. Lord KENYON gave notice for Lord VVynfnrd, who was absent in consequence of a domestic af- fliction, that on Pritlay he would present a petition from the Dublin Corporation against the Irish Muni- cipal Bill. The Marquess of WEST.MEATH gave notice, that on Thursday he would bring under the noticeof their Lordships a bill introduced during the last season by a member of her Majesty's Government, for the simple purpo-e, as lie stated, of rectifying a clerical error, but which had, in Ieality, altered the whole constitution of the election of Poor Law guardians in Ireland. He would also on Friday present a peti- tion signed by nearly 7,000 person-, assembled ill the King's roo-n, at the Lord Nlayor's house, in Dubliu, against tlaeMullicipal Corporations (Ireland) Bill. On the motion of the Duke of RICHMOND, cpr. tain returns connected ,ilh savÎIII(l'I-bauk. slid Fiietidly Societies ware ordered. The House then adjourned to Thursday, .ø.#ø. HOUSE OF COMMONS,—TUKSOAY, MARCH 31. A va.t titinibei- of chiefly f,), and a,diiiat the repeal of tbe Corn Laws, was presented. Mr VVARBURTON expressed a hope that his friend the member for Wolverhampton would be able to bring on the discussion the next day. In answer to a question hy Mr Horsman, Colonel PERCEVAL stated, that he was au- thorised to ..ay. that the Commissioners of Woods and Forests had applied to the King of Hanover for the use of his apartments, which application had been refused, and that subsequently the Noble Lord at the head of the Government, Lord Mel- bourne, had made the same application, which was also refused. He repealed, his statement went only thus far, and he denied that any such application had been made by the Duchess of Kent and declared that Her Royal Highness had expressed her disap. probation of the application." The Sergeant-at-Arms having, on the motion of the ATTORNEY GENERAL, been suinmoned to the bar, acquainted the House that a declaration had been served in Mr Howard's action against the offi. cers who executed the Speaker's warrant for his apprehension. The ATTORNEY GENERAL then, with the concurrence, as he stated, of Lord John Russell, who was absent,proposedthatthe defendants should be permitted to plead. After some debate the House permitted the mell- sengers who arrested Mr Howard to defend the action brought by that gentleman. After some discussion about the mode of filling vacaucies in charitable trusts, and a short speech, on Lord Seaton's grant, from Sir Robert lnglis, who recommended Sir Francis Head to the favourable consideration of Government, the House proceeded with the other orders of the day. The only matter with the other orders of the day. The only matter which gave rise to a debate was the order- for the second reading of the Beer Bill. When this was moved, Mr ALSTON proposed that the hill should be read a second time on that day six months. He said that, under the naine of an amendment, it was, in truth a repeal of the Beer Act. That act had dine much good it had raised up 45,000 beer-houses, and vastly increased the growth of barley. Was the House prepared to destroy such an extent of tra le I Mr JAMES, admitting the evils of beer.houses, thought the true remedies would be an improved police and an extended education. Mr PALMER, of Berkshire, supported the Bill, declaring that a large proportion of all the offences tried at the Quarter Sessions originated from the beer-houses scattered over lone purls of the country. Mr W AH BURTON said the regular public- houses harboured us much immorality as the beer shops. Mr GI LLON charged the supporters of the Bill with a desire to destroy the comforts of the poor This imputation Mr Estcourt repelled, observing that the last speaker seemed to look only to the comforts of the drunkard. Several other members addressed the chair. Lord GRANVILLE SOMERSET said he could not concur in all the clauses of the Bill, but he thought himself bound to attest the unlortunate effect produced in the Monmouthshire district by these beer houses, which had most injuriously fos- tered the spirit of disaffection. Mr PAKINGTON, the parent of the Bill, con- cluded the debate. He said that the IIlIlgiturates of between$0 and 40 counties had petitioned Par- liament for some alteration in the existing law. There were petitions on the other side also, but they all came from interested persons, front brewers, maltsters, and beersellers. The House divided, and carried the second reading by a la' ge majority. The Bill, however, is not likely to pass in anything like its present shape. The House adjourned at 11 o'clock.

[No title]

TO CORRESPONDENTS. .

[No title]

[No title]

[No title]

©liimovgangtu'rr.

iilo ttmoutitgittre.