Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

15 articles on this Page

PORTMADOC PETTY SESSIONS-i…

News
Cite
Share

PORTMADOC PETTY SESSIONS- FRIDAY.—Before Dr S. Griffith and other tnagistrates- BEGGING.—A fine of 5s and costs was im- "posed upon Thomas Jones, a native of Anglesey, *for begging in Beddgelert. ADJOURNED.—A charge of illegal fishing 571 the Dwyfor River had1 been adjourned so as "to procure" a copy of the advertisement in the ""Carnarvon and "Denbigh Herald" to explain the. course taken by the Fishery Board. The -defendant was 'Mr" Evan Jones, Dolbenmaen, "JOT whom Mr J. T. Roberts apneared at the pre- vious court. Mr Thomas Roberts, Portmadoc, appearing for Mr David Jones, the clerk to the Board. The advertisement referred tb wa. Tend, but Mr J.T. Roberts could not be present. —A fine -of 2s 6d and costg was imposed.—A similar charsre was made against John Morris ';1Thd W. Williams. Dolbenmaen-. Defendants ordered to pay 15s and costs each. DRUNKENNESS.—The following were fined fined for 'being dnmk :—Robert Lloyd. Tre- madoc; Amelia Osleff. High-street; W. Da- -vites. Cottage. Criecieth (drunk on licensed jrremises) Griffith Roberts, 0. Prichard. Owen ♦and John Prichard. Beddgelert • and Richard Goodman, -of the same place.—A charge against Richard Lewis, Penygroes, was dismissed with rauticm. ^vETS. -Richard admitted that. he and man named Caradoc Williams were caught -• ilh, nets in their possession. The latter did Tot answer the summons, rnaa, warrant was Issued.—Lewis was fined 10s and costs, or in. -default fourteen davs' imprisonment. ALLEGED CRUELTY. — W. Prit chard1, grocer, Portmadoc, and his servant E. Owen Jones, were charged, the former with causing and the latter with showing cruelty to a. mare -which was worked* whilst hi an unfit state in the parish of Dolbenmaen on the 5th of this month.—Mr J. Humphreys defended.—It was alleged that there was a sore three inches by four inches under the collar, which caused pain. Tritchard's attention had. it was stated, been -called to the fact.— It was stated that the ser- vant had not told the master abcut thcondi,ton of the mare.—The case was dismissed. AFFILIATION ORDER,—J. Morris. Market- square, Tremadoc, was ordered to contribute 2s per week towards the maintenance of the child of Hannah wen. Garn.—Mr W. Caer Jones appeared for the girl, and Mr J. Hum- phreys defended A PAINFUL CASE.—The Clerk to the Fes- tiniog "Board of Guardians applied for an order compelling the sons of W. Hughes, Borthysrest, ttO maintain him. It was stated that the eldest son, W. Hughes, was a master mariner: Ro- hert Hughes also a captain: Hugh Hughes a schoolmaster under the Ynyscynhai-am School "Board; and Owen Hughes an engineer. No- thing was asked of the daughter "and another .son who had just gone out of the workhouse. It vas si-ated that another son was in Australia. It was alleged that Hugh Hughes had contri- buted nothing. William Hughes had contri- buted until lately.—Defendant Yes, all my life.—-The old man said that he had to go to thie workhoiuise "heeaufee hits sons ¡oT>;ld not. maintain him. William 'had been contributing 2s per week for years, and Owen 2s 6d per "week until his Wife died. Hugh had contri 1:mted nothing.—William Hughes was ordered 1:0 pay '28 per week. Hugh Hu-rhes Is 6d. and the other two 2s each, making a total of 7s 6d r week. "LICENSING.—W. Tobias applied the •transfer of a grocer's license which was in the "name of Richard Williams, Market-square, to -the name off W. H. Saver, a new tenant.—Mr W. George opposed, and the application Tefused. CRUELTY TO ANIMALS.—Ellis Jones. Portmadoo, was fined 5s and ■costs for ilHTeating a horse. ADULTERATED WHISKEY. — Inspector H. 'Vaughan Davies. Carnarvon, charged Cap- tain John Williams, of the Australia Inn. Port- madoc. with selling adulterated whiskey.—Mr W. 'George prosecuted, Mr E. Breese de- fended. and r J. Humphreys represented the company who had sold the whiskey.—The In- spector said that he sent a quantity of the whiskey to be analysed.—In re-ply to Mr Breese, "he'Said that he did not analyse the whiskey that day. and was? not in the habit- of doing so f*viously. He believed that Irish whisker was a "bit darker than Scotch, for -which he asked at the Australia Inn.—For the defence, it was contended that a mistake had been made with regard to the whiskey used.—In reply to Mr Breese, Captain Williams said that his custom was to be careful. After lie had understood that the whiskey was defective, he ijnmediatelv wrote to the company who had supplied it.—Bv Mr ^George-. Defendant admitted that the whiskey was under proof. — After a prolonged cross- examination, Mr Breese made some remarks dealing with the importance of the charge if it could be proved, but the circumstances were different as the defendant was verv careful in I keeping a record of the spirits supplied. How- ever. a misake had been made, and the whiskey used had1 rot Icn tested. Mr Bree-se appealed to the Bench to be lenient and to fully con- fer the c:rciim-?i.7i>ces. — Thj Chairman si:J that tnar l'-d fully consider'd the case, nrd sympathised with -Captain Williams.—A fine of 108 and costs only would be imposed CHARGE AGAINST A FARMER-Thomas Beckett Bracken, Wern Ddu. Criecieth. charged Robert Davies. Tanyrhaiarn. with assaulting him on the 30th nit- — Mr John Humphreys prosecuted, and Mr W • Caer Jones defended.— I' Mr Humphreys said that plaintfff and Mr Brack- en, Plashen had crone to defendant's field from the sea shore, where they And their family were having a picnic. Plaintiff and Mr Bracken walked m- the wall. Defendant suddenly came there, and fiercely kicked plaintiff in dangerous part of the body, and Mr Humphreys asked the magistrates to impose a heavy penalty. e en. dant verified his solicitor's remarks. examined: They went to the hay neidhrst. Then they went to the corn field. W 'tness denied having walked through the corn- De- fendant assaulted him fiercely at once, and kicked him many times. Afterwards a doctor had been attending him.—Mr Bracken, Plashen, corroborated the last witness' statements. — Cross-examined Witness went about- twelve yar in front of plaintiff. He was sure that ipWiit-iff did not. go through the com.—Dr Gladstone a evidence to the effect that he had been attending plaintiff. He had been kicked many times in the body.—In cross-exa- mination. witness satd that he was sure that plaintiff had been kicked, and that it was not the effect of a, fall.—Mr Powell, a visitor, testified that he saw defendant kicking plaintiff. -Cross-examined: Witness was on the shore 'below, and he could see the assault being com- mitted.— Defendant, in his evidence, said that plaintiff and Bracken were going through the corn, field with two dog*. H«? held tktf plain- tiff made for his neck, nnd that he only en- tfeavonred to defend hrrrwlf- For th oefence. Mr Caer Jones said that this case would not; have come before them had plaintiff and Mr Bracken stood within their own property, and i jyt' trespassed on other peoples nnd.—lha i Bench retired, and upon their return, fined j defendant 40s and costs.

VALLEY PETTY SESSIONS.I

- PORTMADOC BANKIiLTTCY' COURT.

- THE EDUCATION BLL. J

THE BODEDERN SHOW.

ANGLESEY AGRICULTURALI SOCIETY.

MARKETS FOR THE WEEK.

I WELSH MARKETS

---_._------------.---" ANGLESEY…

[No title]

[No title]

Advertising

ANGLESEY BAPTISTS.

Family Notices

Advertising