Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

25 articles on this Page

TAXING IMPORTS.r

News
Cite
Share

TAXING IMPORTS. r WOULD THE FOREIGNER PAY? WE have seen that t},('. very fevr I imports, if any, which wo tax with- out injuring some British i:tu.x. try, or in- flicting hardship upon some section of the community. The people who support Pro- tection are mostly those who hope to benefit by such a policy. They are. per'uixr.. engaged in some trade whei\j they would like to be able to charge more for thoir goods without increasing their expenses. It is no use arguing with these people tust such a policy would be extreme. eitUh and unjust. It is no use appeaiin; to their better nature. They think t:kC y making everybody pay more for what they have to sell they will make more nioi.oy. Now what we have to try and prove to these people is that higher prices me,u less sales and smaller proiits. A Comical Delusion. ALTHOUGH the above may be the real and only reason why people support Pro- tection, it is not a reason they talk m-.e'i ahout. On the contrary, they would like ns to believe that their motives are both patriotic and philanthropic. They tell us they support Projection— 1. Because the foreigner will be rn-ide to pay the taxes. 2. Because it will encourage home in- dustries. 3. Because it wi!! enable employers to pry higher wajjes. 4. Because it will give more employment to British workmen. All that Hounds very well. and one might I he led to believe that the Protectionist had no personal interest in the matter at all. But those reasons are delusions. Perhaps tie most comical delusion of all is that which supposes we can make the foreigner pay our taxes by putting a tax npon foreign goods. It is most comical, because if it were true then all the other reasons given in support of Protection would fall to the ground. If the foreigner were to pay the tax upon the goods he sent to this country then Protection-- 1. Would not keep out foreign goods. 2. Would not increase the price of British goods. 3. Would no' increase the demand for British goods. 4. Could not give either more employment or higher wages. The Protectionist cannot have it both ways. I

Protection and Prosperity.

Protection Unlimited.

Argument In Brief. I

Exports and Imports.

[No title]

- HOW ABOUT YOUR TEA CAKES…

> THE EDUCATBOM ACT,

LAW ABIDING, BUT RESOLUTp.

S&W SCHOOLS ARE "MANAGED."…

"STMTLATEDV RESISTANCE.

PROBABLE MANDAMUS.

jHOW TO AMEND.

THE RELIGIOUS DIFFICULTY.

RESISTANCE IN THE COUNTRY.

THE PREMIER'S DEFENCE.

NOW IS TUB TIME.

GWILYM EVANS' QUININE BITTERS

OUGHT TO BE IN EVERY HOUSE.

GWILYM EVANS' QUININE TUTTEPS

RF.W»"r: IMITATIONS.

DONT LOOK OLD.

ITf**I,■■I),.II>L-THE CLEANING…

-'-----THE IMPORTANCE OF HIGHER…

Advertising