Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

14 articles on this Page

.. BANGOft AND SEAUMARiS GUARDIANS.

News
Cite
Share

BANGOft AND SEAUMARiS GUARDIANS. The foi-fiijghtly meeting was 'pld at the Bangor Workhouse on Friday, th., Chair- man (Mr Hugh Thomas) presiding. FINANCIAL. The 'Clerk (Mr R. B. Evans) reported that the amount due to Mie union was £ 743 compared with £ 745 8s 3d a fortnight ago. 11 THE CASE OF A LLANDEGAI SOLDIER Mr Hughes, chemist, Bethesda, in- quired whether anything had been heard from the War Office regarding the com- plaint made by the Rev W. Morgan at the iast meeting as to the treatment of a sold- ier named Williams, living at Llandegai. The Chairman pointed out that the Board had not parsed any resolution on the point.—Mr Hughes: They might cor- rect- the errors in the neAvspapers.I,lr Harry Clegg observed that inquiries wer? being made. APPOINTMENT OF HEAD NITRSE. The sub-committee appointed to con- sider the ten applications for the post of head nurse at the Workhouse Infirmary, recommended that Miss Sarah Fussell Union Hospital, Rotherham; Miss Oeorgxna Jones, Holywell Workhouse; Miss Elizabeth A. Rees, Union Infirmary, Coventry; and Miss Mary Davies, 13, Elfed terrace, Bethesda, should anpear be- fore the Board. The committee further reported that the application of Mass Davies was received after the appointed date, but they advised that it be enter- tained.The Chairman: That is irregu- lar, and the committee have gone beyond their power in bringing four before us. Mr J. Evan Roberts also objected to the action of the committee, and it was decided not to consider Miss Davies's ap- plication at present.—Mr Williams, Rachub, asked if the three ladies selected by the committee understood the Welsh langnage. It was essential that they should have some knowledge of the lan- guage, as most of the patients at thf u\ firmaxy were Welsh.—Mr Hugh uen (Cefn) concurred, saying that as the matron did not the Welsh lan- guage it was very desirable that the nurse should (hear, hear).—Mr Hugh Willuvms (Gaerwen): Let us go in for efficiency ir- respective of language (hear, hear) .1 he only candidate who at the appointed hour appeared before the Board, was Nurse Fussell, the voting resulting as fol- lows:-Miss G. Jones, 18; Miss Fussell, 9- and Miss Rees, 1. It was decided not to' make the appointment until Jones (who missed her train) appeared be- fore the Board. At a subsequent staze of the meeting Nurse G. Jones received the appointment. A STATIONARY RATE. The Clerk reported that the amount re- quired for the purpose of the union during the coming half year was £ 7766, less V-38 received under the Agricultural Rates Act. -This would necessitate a rate of lid in tile. £ being the same as its T)redceessor.The Tate was adopted. THE SETTLEMENT LAW: NO ACTION. In accordance with notice, Mr W. Ro- berts, Bangor, proposed -'that an ™ ™nge- ment be made with the Carnarvon I n whereby the operation of the o ment and removal be suspended, except in the case of pauper lunatics m asvlum. Supporting his motion, Mr W Roberts re- marked that the Board had already agreed to the principle of his motion, by which they would enter into a practical arrange- ment with the Carnarvon rnion. He was sorry that the other unions invited to fall in with the arrangement had not seen their way to do so, and he thought that they were under a misapprehension as to the pecuniary loss on the year's working, but if they had looked further ahead they would have found that the statement of the unions balanced. He instanced Conway from where, according to the blue book, they had two paupers; one of them had died, so that they had only one belonging to the Conway Union now. The Conwav Union, on the other hand, had eight of their --The Chairman: Will you kindly confine yourself to the Carnarvon Union only.—Mr W. Roberts (proceeding) said that the difference between the Ban- gor and the Conway Unions in respect of non-settled paupers was greater ten years ago, but now the positions had been re- versed. With regard to the Carnarvon Union he found that three years ago the Bangor paupers in the Carnarvon Union rost £ 194 17s. The Carnarvon paupers in the Bangor Union cost £ 201, the difference being only tC). 9s 6d. That was in 1900.- The Chairman But the Clerk's returns show a difference of £ 14.—Mr Roberts pro- ceeded to explain the discrepancy^ and stated thn-c last year the Bangor Union paid C189 3s 6d to the Carnarvon Lnion, whose contribution amounted to E189 3s, t a difference of 6d.—The Chairman: 1 can- not agree with your figures. The differ- ence for that year is t30 lis 6d. Mr W. Roberts: That cannot possibly be.The Chairman: I am going by the Clerk's fltrures.—Mr W. Roberts Where does he Get them from? That cannot possibly be right. I am quoting from the blue book, and I challenge you or the Clerk to dispute the figures.—The Chairman replied that he was not quoting from the ^ll,« book, but from the Clerk's return.Mr W. Ro- berts My figures are taken from the blue book.—The Chairman explained that if Mr Roberts's motion had been adopted, the Carnarvon rllion would have benefited to the extent of £7 15s in 1899; JE14 5s in 1900; and £30 lis 6d in 1901 and £ 11 lis in 1902, making a total in their favour of £ 64 2s 6d.— The Clerk said that those figures were correct.—Mr W. Roberts: Is the blue book correct ?--The Clerk: Yes. —Mr W. Roberts: Then I am quoting from the blue book, which is from June to Dee.exiber, and to June back again. The Clerk's figures are from March to March. —Dr Roberts pointed out that the totals for the four years in both sets of returns must be the sai-ne.-Mr W. Roberts ack- nowledged that, there were differences in the totals paid by the two unions, but the advantages were many. There was no fear of litigation between the two unions if the arrangements were carried into effect; but if matters remained un- changed there was the constant fear of costly litigation. There would also be per- fect freedom for the poor to move from parish to -parisli.Nir T. Edwards seconded t'he motion. Mr W. Lester Smith agreed that the proposed arrangement would have many advantages, hut they would neutralised by the fact that it could onJy be partially carried out. If all the other unions had agreed to the ar- rangement it could no don bt be satisfac- torily carried out. He proposed that the question be referred to the next Poor-law- Conference, so that it could be thoroughly discussed, and Mr W. Roberts might read « paper there.—After further remarks, it was agreed to refer the matter to the Poor-law Conference, Mr W. Roberts re- marking that lie would not pledge himself to read a paper. PUBLIC VACCINATION. The Chairman remarked that there was "nothing special" in the reports of the vaccination officers. In the district- of Mr Robevt Jones, Bangor, there had been four I conscientious objectors. I VAGRANTS TO BE DAILY EXAMINED. I The Local Government Foard, by letter, impressed upon the Board the urgent necessity of vaccinating all vagrants re- lieved by thm.-The Chairman But we cannot compel them. I notice that some mrons have been bribing the vagrants.— Mr Harry Clegg thought that the Board should direct the master to exercise special care the vagrants so that any doubt- ful case might he immediately reported to the medical officer.-Di- Roberts did not think it was right to impose extra, duties on the medical officer unless he received additional pay.-It. was decided to instruct the medical officer to make a daily ex ami- ation oi the vagrants for a month. THE BANGOR CORPORATION BILL. The L-ocal Government- Board wrote stating that tlie observations of the Guard- ians in regard to the Bangor Corporation Bill, by mean" of which the City Council are seeking powers to appoint the poor- rate collector, and to dismiss the present holder of the ofrice on payment of compen- sation, would receive the attention of the Department.—The Chairman observed that the thanks of the Board were due to Mr Thomas Edwards, who referred to the matter at the public meeting of the Ban- gor ratepayers (hear, hear-).—Mr J. Evan. Roberts said that- the complaint of the Guardians would be carefully considered by the City Council. He had called at- tention to it himself.—The ("liairmaii stated that he had spoken to a city coun- cillor with regard to the Bill, but the lat- ter had not carried out his promise. FIRE PRECAUTIONS. Mr J. Gill, the Bangor Borough Sur- veyor, replying to a communication from the Board with regard to the pressure of water at the workhouse, stated that in case of fire the Corporation could not accept responsibility other than was placed upon it by law. THE MASTER'S REPORT. The ma.ster (Mr J. Jones) reported that the number in the house was 123, com- pared with 121 last Board day. During the fortnight 88 vagrants had been re- lieved, as against 26 during the corres- ponding period of last. year.—The Chair- man I don't know what is the matter.— The Rev W. Morgan suggested severer re- r-19 gulations in the issue of tickets.—Gifts for the inmates of the house were ack- nowledged from Mrs Clegg. Mrs Howard Lewis, Miss Vincent, and Miss Dew.

-_-.---WOMAN'S CHARM AND DR…

MADOC MIDGETS PORTRAITS.

Advertising

;DISPUTE ABOUT A TOMBSTONE.

HAD ANAEMIA -FROM 18 TO 26.

THE NATIONAL EISTEDDFOD.

-------------. SOLDIERS' HEADDRESS…

[No title]

■A BANGOR PUBLICAN FINED.

HOLYHEAD BOARD OFI GUARDIANS.

Advertising

A LLANGEFNI LICENSEE FINED.

DON'T BREAK DOWN.