Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

17 articles on this Page

REMOVAL OF DR PIERCE'S PORTRAIT.

News
Cite
Share

REMOVAL OF DR PIERCE'S PORTRAIT. TO THE BDITOR OF THE "NORTH WALES EXPRESS." SIR,-At the last quarter sessions held at Den- bigh a very unseemly discussion took place in re- ference to the removal of this work of art. Mr R. "CK Johnson, who by some- accident found his way years ago to the bench of the great unpaid," has been endeavouring to gala a little eheap notoriety by trying to dispose of what, to his diseased Vision, appears to be an eyesore. Having under- taken to bring forward a motion for the removal of Dr Pierce's portrait from the Town Hall at Denbigh, he took pains to explain that he had no "luarrel with the owners of thp picture, His protestations remind one of the character in Shakespeare, who was very loud in her demonstra- tions of innocei-,ce, when an incredulous listener remarked, "Me thinks the lady protests too much." Or the fable of the ostrich, who buries her head in the sand and thinks, weak creature, that her hugq body cannot be se m by her pursuers. In speaking of the owner of the picture and his innocence of heart Mr Johnson betrayed his ignor- ance as well as his disingenuousness. Had he con- descended to inquire into the facts of the case, he Would have found that the Corporation of Denbigh, and not Dr Pierce, were the owners of the picture. Has this gentleman forgotten that it Was owing to the repeated annoyance he was •ubjectedtoat his hands, and the hands of his Worthy colleague, the Warder of Ruthin, that Dr Pierce, much to the regret of the guardians and the public, resigned his appointment as vaccina- tion officer for the Llanrhaiadr district of the Ruthin Union, an appointment which he had held for twenty-five years without having a single Complaint preferred against him. Now it is curious to note that the question of placing this picture came before the same bench of magistrates six months ago at Wrexham. The Purveyor, Mr Lloyd Williams, who has throughout acted in the most regular and straightforward manner, explained fully at that time the circum- stances of the case. He stated how the presenta- tion had been made in the Town Hall, and the handsome manner in which the recipient of the testimonial had presented it to the Corporation of Denbigh for ever, and he gave the reason for leaving the picture temporarily in the large hall, pending the decision of the magi; trates. Upon hearing th*t statement Sir Watkin Williams Wynn proposed, and the deputy chairman, Mr Douglas Wynn Griffith, seconded, a resolution which was carried by a majority of fourteen to seven, that the picture Should remain in the Denbigh Town Hall. One Would have thought that the matter might have tested there, but some of the seven who composed 'the minority were not satisfied. Led by their re- doubtable champion, they began to make a special 8tudyof obsolete precedent and antiquated stand- ing orders, and their diligence was at last rewarded by the discovery of a standing order at Ruthin, Established, it is said, about 70 years ago in rela- tion to a portrait of the late Sir W. W. Wynn, Which was removed by that order from the Town Hall to the grand jury room. In regard to this matter the question arises as to whether a resolu- tion passed in reference to a single portrait at one particular place has a general and perpetual appli- cation. It is possible that special reasons may have existed for the removal of the portrait of Sir Watkin Which do not exist in the present instance. Again, what may be right and proper for Ruthin as an assize town may not be at all applicable to a town like Denbigh, where no higher court than that of quarter sessions is held. Then one might naturally ask what is a standing Order ? Can it be supposed for a moment that by Some mysterious process it becomes like a law of the Medes and Persians which altered not." Is it anything more than a resolution of the bench Of magistrates ? If eo, does not the resolution come to at Wrexham, six months ago, constitute as Valid a standing order" as the resolution passed at Ruthin 70 years ago ? And is not a standing order of their own creation quite as binding upon the magistrates of the present day as one (stab. lished by their forefathers ? Why should they be 10 ready to undo their own work, and bow so implicitly to a shadowy precedent of a former generation P As to the cesfchetical aspect of the Case, I do not see any more impropriety in the display of portraits at Denbigh than there is in the Guild Hall of the city ef London, or the assizes court in Chester Castle. The portrait of Dr Pierce was originally intend- as a companion picture to that of Mr Hughes Ot Ystrad both of them having been eminent public Officials in the county for many years, and bosom friends of each other up to the time of Mr Hughes's death. Evea when the presentation took place, this intention wa3 entertained, as is evident from the Doctor's reference to his departed friend. I am very pleased," said he, to learn that my portrait is to be placed on the same wall as that of my excellent and sincere friend the late Mr Hughes, of Ystrad, chairman of the quarter Sessions, though I know I am not worthy of the honour, for he did far more good than I have ever done." When Major Mercier, of London, was Commissioned to paint Dr Pierce, through some oversight he was not made aware that the picture was intended for the council chamber. He therefore determined the size according to what he deemed most suitable for a full length portrait the consequence being that when the picture was finished it was found to be too large br that room. Now that the mistake has been made quite un- intentionally, instead of cutting down Dr Pierce's portrait, and thereby perhaps spoiling it, so as to adont it for the council chamber, why not place the two pictures side by side in the Town Hall as has already been suggested? The portrait of the Chairman of the quarter sessions (Mr Hughes, of Tetrad) would look much better in the large hall than in such a small apartment as the council chamber. These are progressive times, and, as has been proposed, the standing orders of. the court might with advantage be revised to suit the times- This appears to be the only solution of the dim • culty. In course of time these two pictures will become historical; they will represent to future generations two men who had done distinguished service in their day who, while they Jived, were fast friends, and in death were not divided." It ii needless to refer to personal inconsistences, or one might instance the forgetfulness of Sir W. Wynn, who, with his customary liberality, was a subscriber to the portrait, and six months ago moved and voted for its retention in the place where it was. The decision come to at the last meeting was not like the first arrived at by vot- ing. Had a vote been taken, in all probability the majority would have been in favour of con- Arming the resolution passed at Wrexham. The iresult of the loose and reckless talk at Denbigh has been to show thnt wisdom does not always reign supreme even in a court of justice. The at- tempt to extract an apology from the county sur- veyor, Mr Lloyd Williams, was extremely absurd. He has acted with scrupulous care from beginning to end, and was fortified by the decision of the magistrates at Wrexham. It was unreasonable to expect him to say that he was sorry for what he did after it had been clearly proved that he had Hot in any respect exceeded his duty. Bow was it that Mr Johnson did not enter his protest at Wrexham? Was it because Sir Watkin W. Wynn had moved the resolution there P The magistrates as a rule are in favour of Dr Pierce, for they know what he has done for the county. They are aware he has saved the county Icores of pounds by his discretion in not holding any unnecessary inquests, and we can say that by his t mely aud appropriate remarks he has called the attention of the country to matters which have since been reformed. I need not refer to the Abergele accident, when 1.3 a coroner he sj distinguished himself as to gain the .admiration of the who'e kingdom nor to the inquiry into the discovery of human b .nea at Bettws Abergele, which the corcner proved to have been used in the study of a skilful anatomist. One notable instance may be named, one of his very last acts, his remarks on tbe wreck of the Hecla which will uo doubt have the effect of placing the life boat service of this country under Government inspection by which the most efficient service will be rendered to humanity in times of the greatest need. Atter all this desultory talk, this miserable zeal tor precedent was quite unnecessary. Shortly before the meeting was held the secretary of the testimonial committee had written to say that the picture should be removed if the authorities wished it in the coarse of a week. Some members of the corporation were opposed to its being at the Town Hall, lest the county magistrates should claim it as their property. These facts must have been known to the mover of the resolution at the time. The testimonial com- mittee had no desire to act contrary to the wishes of anyone in authority. Dr Pierce himself cares very little in what room the picture may appear, provi ied the public are satisfied with the disposal of what has become public property. The time will come when the small detractors of Dr Pierce will have passed away from the scene, and their n^mes buried in oblivion. But the name and noble qualities of the venerable Doctor will shine forth undimmed, and no place of honour will be considered too sacred for his portrait or any other relic endeared by his memory. I trust that the magistrates will again consider their hasty decision, and have the two companion pictures placed together in the Denbigh Town Hall.—I am, sir, your obedient servant, SUUM CUIQUE TRIBUTO

MONDAY, APRIL 17TH.

TUESDAY.

WEDNESDAY.

ICONWAY.

HOLYWELL.I

Advertising

| DENBIGH.

PENMAENMAWR.

MOLD.

Advertising

RUTHIN.

BOARD OF GUARDIANS, APRIL…

[No title]

,BANGOR.

VALLEY.

[No title]