Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

33 articles on this Page

THE MISSING WORD COMPETITIONS.

News
Cite
Share

THE MISSING WORD COMPETITIONS. ALLEGED INFRINGEMENTS OF THE LOTTERY ACTS. Defendants Convicted and Fined. At Bow-street police-court, on Tuesday, before Sir John Bridge, Mr Henry Reichhardt,' pro- prietor, publisher, and editor of Pick-Me-Up, and Messrs Wurtheimer, Lee, and Co., printers of that paper, were called upon to answer several summonses for alleged infringements of the Lottery Acts. Mr Chas. Matthews and Mr Bodkin (instructed by the Treasury) prosecuted and Mr Poland, Q.C., and Mr llaldnnstein appeared •or tho defence. Sir Augustus Stephenson, Solicitor to the Treasury and Director of Public Prosecutions, occupied a seat on the Bench. Thero were six summonses, which included charges of publishing' a schema fer tIp sale of chances in a lottery known as the missing word competition," and the weekly art coin- Petition." Upon Sir John Bridge taking his seat at half- past eleven Mr Matthews rose to open the case for the prosecution. He said there were six sum- monses against the three defendants who were Present in the court. He explained at the outset that Mr Poland desired to call Mr Reichardt during the ccurse of th.. case, if he wished to do so, and he would offer no objection to such a course. The first four of the summonses, he went on to say, were founded upon the 41st section of the 4th of George IV., ch. 60, and the other two were founded upon thesecond section of the42ndGeorge ch. 119. He then directed tho atten- tion of the magistrates to Pick Me Up ■of the 6th November, 1892, page 141, aad read the rules of the competition thereon, one ;of which was that the whole of the money received (in entrance fees would be divided amongst those competitors who filled in the missing word of the paragraph correctly. The missing word it was stated would be known only to the editor seaied up in an envelope, which would teftain unopened until the day when the awards Were made. The missing word in respect to tho competition in question was Peacefnl," and the 79 competitors who selected it each received £ 114s. The length to which these competitions had gcr.tf 'Was somethiug extraordinary. He did not say that jthe proprietors and printers of this journal were Responsible for all the length it had gone. Certain It was that this missing word competition had become popular in an exceedingly widespread ;Bense. Ihe magistrate would have to say whether there was not be found in what was there set i forth a. scheme for the sale of a share, "or part of a share, of a chance in a lottery, Ilot permitted by Parliament. The number who subscribed in this competition was 2,800. This Paper never had had the extensive circulation Which others had been so fortunate as tti securo, and in that sense it might be said for the paper .that it was a minor offender, but none the less an 'Offender. Counsel next directed attention to the i Weekly art competition in Pick-Me-Up, and Pointed out that directions were given according to which those who desired to do so might take a chance by paying a shil)ing,and sending a coupon ,.from the paper. It was stated here again that the whole of the money received in entrance fees •'Would be divided amongst the competitors who Were to take the pictures in the paper and place ^Jjhem according to their notions in theorder of merit. The competitor, who placed them nearest in the h °rder decided by the popular vote, would receive | £ 25 in cash, tho next J310, the third £5, and the remainder of the money would be divided in (. Prizes amongst the other competitors, according j to their selections. Then again there was a scheme for the sala of a share or chance in a lottery, and under the section of the Act if George III. they would have a contrivance or device by which a lottery shall be played, drawn, or exposed to bo played í()1' drawn." It was not alleged that there was an Unfair distribution of the money it was not said that the pool made by the public was unfairly or Unequally divided. What was said was that by Reason of the attraction afforded by the advertise- ments and tho chance of competing in these lotteries very largo profits were placed in the Pockets of the proprietors of the publication by reason of the increase of circulation. After evidence, Mr Poland, for the defendants, said he in no j*ay complained that the summonses had been t*kcn out for the purpose cf taking John's decision as to whether ;?*hat had been done was illegal. If Was illegal, and the public authorities thought to take proceedings—of course, if the magis- trate hold it to be illegal—his clients would in n~ j attempt to break the law. In fact, his clients thought it right to take action to stop the pub- 'vcation cf their paper befora the deci- iI¡Ol1 of the caurt. They could not Actually stop one of thf- papers, as they were /Printed three weeks in advance. He conld not claim for his clients that they invented or ConHnenced tho competition. They found other papers doing the same thing, and hey thought it only fair that they should *'so havo the advantage which the gave to their competitors, and they in no r^y thought it illegal. The cases which had '»on .deeded, he ventnred to submit, in no way Established that the present scheme was a lottery ""■not one of them; and the decision of Sir John .^ould have to be given for the first time upon the Point raised. Sir John Bridge, in giving judgment, said if the scheme was one of skill and judgment, and JJot of chance, then it would not be a lottery. In "^ifferent cases there would very often bo *"osa which camo very near chance, but depend upon the proper construe- 1011 of tha facts of the case. With ■efereuce to the question as to the word comreti- ■•on, he thought there would be a great deal to bo "ud in favour of Mr Poland's contention if the •^att^r were one of skill; but competitors had not' *? £ cleefc a suitable word, but the actual word pre- viously chosen by tho owners of the paper. o get at tbe word which had been previously Elected .by the editors of tho paper must be matter of cjjancc, and on that ground he .•'ght tha case must come within the Lottery p?t. With reference to the art competition there t?'Rht be a slight dilference, but they must regard tiling as a whele, It seemed to him that object of th-3 owners of the paper was induce men to stake their money hi chance, and it led men to so stake their 'onoy. That being so it oujht to be considered j '?ttery. He believed he had also to convict the pendants as "rogues and vagabonds," and he 9ji'd fine them Is in each case. Judgment was stayed for a week in view of tho i°ssibility cf an appeal.

INSANITY OF MR--WM. WATSON.

THE CHAMPION CYCLTST FINED

[No title]

THE TITHE AGITATION, j --

local qovebnment-inquiry AT…

FATALITIES ON THE ICE.

----"'---'-'--THE OPEN COUNCIL…

THE CHURCHES. " ;

-----------LLANELLY HARBOUR…

THE BISHOP OF STASAPH AND…

^^SThoweT

[No title]

IPretty Mantle Collars

Advertising

CHILDREN'S HOUR | AN T) […

SUICIDE IN THE OGMORE VALLEY.

! I MESSRSMAPPiN BROS.'GHRiST.…

[No title]

NEWPORT COUNTY COUNCIL

[No title]

i CARDIFF MUNICIPAL BUILDIRBS

"THE UNEMPLOYED.

A CARDIFF DIVORCE CASE.

- -"-------------THE LOSS…

[No title]

I SHEBEENING IN CAflDIFF.

THE rONDU EXPLOSION,

A CHILD BURNT TO DEATH AT…

A CARDIFF CHURCH IN THE MARKET.

[No title]

[No title]

!RATEPAYERS' MEETING AT BARRY…