Welsh Newspapers
Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles
13 articles on this Page
...._-----_-¡..--:..--"-"-'T"'-"",,,=<,"=---MomitoiiilisMre…
.¡.T"=<=- MomitoiiilisMre Miclsimiiaer Quarter f' Sessions. (COXTIXUE!) I'llOTd THE FOURTH PACE.) WEDNESDAY. The Court assembled at half-past nine precisely. Present:—The Chairmm, Sir D: Maekworth, Captain King, R.N., Rev. J. 1,. Davies, W. A. Williams, jun., Esq., Captain Roberts, and F. M'Dowell, Esq. George Sharp, aged 32, read and write imp., charged by the oaths of Richard Richards and others, with feloniously stealing and carrying awav 011 the lllh day of June instant, one silvef watch, the property of Richard Richards. Pleaded Guilty. Six. months imprisonment and hard labour in the House of Correction. Elizabeth aged 30, read imp. not write, charged upon the oaths of William Jenkins and others, with feloniously steal- ing one check shirt, the property of William Jenkins. Pleaded Guilty. Six weeks imprisonment and hard labour in the County Gaol. Henry Langdon, aged 52, not read, charged upon the oaths of James Sims and others, with feloniously stealing 5 lbs. of hay, the property of James Procter, Esq., of Chepstow. Pleaded Guilty. One months imprisonment and hard labour in the House of Correction. Elizabeth Kent, afjed 23, read imperfectly. charged upon the oaths of Mary Ann Dubberley and Thomas Stevens, with steal- ing in the borough of Monmouth, 3 damask table cloths, one diaper pillow case, three hand towels, and other articles. Pleaded Guilty. After a suitable address from the chairman, the prisoner was sentenced to three mouths imprisonment in Usk House of Correction. f Henry Dyke pleaded guilty to a charge of stealing 20 cwt. o bark, the property of Mr- Richard Powell. Recommended to mercy. Sentence: 2 months imprisonment in House of Correction, with hard labour. William Johnson, as;ed 24, read and write well, charged bjr tlie oaths of William Davies and others, with feloniously stealing one silver watch, one brass chain, a brass key, and a brass seal, the property of William Davies. „r,n] Pleaded. Guilty. 4 months imprisonment in the County Gaol ■with hard labour. i James Barrett, the Elder, aged -lo, road imp."not write and Janes Barrett, the. younger, aged 22, read and write well ch<^ec by the oaths of Henry Roper and others, with felomoa.1} stal- ing 32 pounds of sugar, two pounds of tea, five pounds of nee, and one pair of gloves, the property of Henry Roper. Mr. Rickards appeared for the prosecution, T Mr Henry Rc.per, examined by Mr. Rickards, said I am a grocer, carrying on business at Newport. The young man was in iry employment about three months, and during that time he had access to all the goods, &c. lie was m the habit of rising early in the morning, and getting tlit^ key of tne shop iron,"my room. In April I missed tea from a large canister that was kept up stairs, and on the 20th April a pair of gloves. On the 94th (the prisoners being in custody) I went to the council- house at Newport, and there constable Ilill, from Weston-super-Mare; he had two or three trunks, from one of which I saw him take some parcels of tea, which I considered to be mine; also 12 lbs of moist sugar, in one lb. parcels, and some rice There were marks upon the papers containing these things, which I know were made by the younger P'oner. P. C. Hill, of Weston-super-Mare, examined by Mr. Kiekaras, said I took the prisoners :into custody upon a diiierent charge from that for which they are now being tried. I took from them the parcels of tea, sugar, &c., which I now produce, t he witness here produced several parcels of tea, sugar, &c iiom a Mr.Roper,' recalled, identified all the articles produced as his Pr°i-S' Roper cross-examined bv the younger prisoner 1 can swear that the figures upon the parcels were made by James Barrel jun During the time he was in my service he slept mostJ I' at my house, sometimes he slept elsewhere. — Edmunds sworn: I am an apprentice with Mr. Roper, and have been with him about six months. I generally came down about half-past six in the morning. I was several times sent by the younger prisoner, early in the morning, to the Bridge Inn for a parcel, but I never obtained one, there being lW- thing there for him. Cross-examined by the younger prisoner The younger Bar- rett used to get up about six o'clock in the morning he used to call me sometimes during the time he slept out of the house, to come to the shop, and sometimes scolded me for not coming in time. There was a side-door from the shop, which was generally kept closed The warehouses were always closed at dusk. I never saw him take anything that he ought not to take; when he went up to fetch paper from the warehouse, I never saw him bring anything else down. Mary Ann Thomas, examined by Mr. Rickards: I was servant with Mr. Roper when the prisoner lived with him. The gloves now produced belong to my master. I saw them some time before they were missed, in a box up stairs, in Thos. Williams' room, and a week or a fortnight before the prisoner left. I noticed a spot of green paint on the gloves, like that which appears on these. I have seen the elder prisoner in my master's shop, and remember his being there once very early in the morning, perhaps about hall-past seven, when I asked the younger prisoner "who that ugly old man was in the shop." I don't know whether the younger prisoner was accustomed to come to the shop before Edmunds, the apprentice. Cror.s-examined by the younger prisoner The gloves were not shown to me in order that 1 might know them, before I went before the magistrates; but I saw them before I swore they belonged to my master. Re-examined by Mr. Rickards Mr. Woollett showed me the gloves just belore I went to give evidence. P.C. Hil1;.re-called: I found the prisoners in a house in Gas-street,V eston-supei-Mare, and took the elder to the prison, and left another constable to take care of the younger one. I showed the box produced to the elder prisoner on the following day, and he said It belonged to him. Two days after taking them into custody, I brought them and the box to Newport, and deposited the box in a room in Newport that I hired for the purpose, where it was sealed and locked up. Cross-examined by the younger prisoner I asked if your father had been in business, fancying he had from seeing some address cards, &c., in the box. I did not ask what groceries they were that I found in the box.. Here a number of licences, invoices, cards, &c., were pro- duced frolr- the box, at the request of the younger prisoner, intended to show that the elder prisoner had been in the grocery business in Gloucester, and that the goods found in the box were left from his grocery stock. It was found, however, that the invoices and licences produced' were dated 1842, and did not show that he had been in business for any considerable period after that time. Edward Fisher, examined by Mr. Rickards I assisted I .C. Hill to take the prisoners into custody. The younger prisoner said he wished to have the box taken care of. He had a book, 'which he was examining while in my custody, and tore out a leaf, and threw it into the tire. I took the leaf out of the fire, and took the book from him, as he was tearing out another leaf. John Meyer: I kept a second-hand clothes shop at Newport before the 26th March. The elder prisoner lodged with me six months, and left on the ]9th April. The young one lodged with me before he went to Mr. Roper's; he was often at my house in the morning as early as five or six o'clock during the time he was employed by Mr. Roper. They left mv house very suddenly I went to Tredegar on Saturday, the 19th April and before '1 returned on the following day they were gone/ I learnt they were gone to Weston-super-Mare, and fol- lowed them, and had them taken into custody, on a charge of stealing things from my house. After the younger prisoner went into Mr. Roper's employ, they had much more tea in their possession at a time than before. Barrett, the elder, used to get up in the morning to let in the son, and sometimes the father would go out in the morning, and return with quantities of cheese, bacon, eggs, &e., before the shops were open. Cross-examined by younger prisoner: I never saw younger prisoner bring any groceries to my house, but often thought his pockets looked very full, and fancied it very strange he should always go up stairs immediately on coming to my house. John Tinney: I am a porter at the Weston station of the Great Western Railway. Eighteen packages directed to John Davie", arrived there on the 20th of April, and were afterwards paid for by the elder prisoner, but I cannot swear that the box produced was among the things. Mr. Whitley I let a house at Weston to the prisoners. They told me they intended to keep a green-grocer's stall in the Tnnrket a clothes shop, &c. Mr. Roper recalled: I sell bacon, cheese, and eggs, as well aS fallies "Barre11, the elder, said, the articles found in the box were some things left from his grocery business m Worcester T "Rirrett the younger, on being asked if he wished to the iury'entered into a rambling statement, intended »f »• ™,h rfer™ce»',he naner &c. He also made some observations de- sugar up to this time he had borne a good charact°r and said that he left Mr. Roper, on a dispute about •wages, Mr. Roper refusing to give him £ 2o. a year, which he dèmanded.. deMr"lloper, being recalled, said the prisoner had not left him inconseouence of a dispute about wages, but that he had come to the shop one morning and said he meant to leave him unless he would give him the amount he claimed; he seemed >eij anxious to leave him, and he therefore, after remonstrating .with him upon the abruptness of his notice, paid him after the rate of £2;5. a year, and allowed him to go. The Chairman ably recapitulated the evidence, clearly showing the distinctions between the cases arising out of the evidence, and the jury, after a lengthened consultation retured a verdict of Not Guilty against the elder prisoner, and ot uui y against the younger. The prisoners were then charged with a second offence, tnai of having stolen from John Meyer, at Newport, on 25th of April last, two beds and bedsteads, a watch, tea-caddies, and several other articles. Mr. Rickards appeared for the prosecution. John Meyer, examined by Mr. Rickards I left my house on the 18th April; I went to Tredegar on Saturday the 19th April, and on my return on the following day, I found the goods laid in the indictment were gone—Mrs. Meyer was also gone, and the prisoners. I went to Weston-super-Mare; and went to a house where the prisoners were; Mrs. Meyer was there with them. I saw P.C. Hill at Weston, and described to him the goods I had lost. I found the bedsteads 1 had lost put up in the prisoners' house at Weston, apparently for use; and a knife I lost was found in the pocket of the elder prisoner. The boxes and other things I had lost were also there. Cross-examined.by elder prisoner The elder Barrett, on being searched by the policeman at Weston-super Mare, and when the kniie was being taken from him, took the watch from his pocket, and attempted to shuflle it over to my wife. The younger prisoner cross-examined the witness, in order to show that the goods had been sold to his father by the wife of Meyer; and the elder prisoner immediately after, in cross-ex- ammg the witness, said that the wife of Meyer had taken the goods to the house taken by him m W estOIl, as her own, in order to lodge there. Edward Tinney, the porter at YY eston-super-Mare station, proved the arrival of the goods at the station, addressed to John Davies. He said the younger prisoner rubbed out the address on the box as soon as they were paid for. The elder prisoner paid for the carnage, the younger one signed the book. Mr Whit lev proved having let a house to the elder prisoner. P C Hill examined by Mr. Richards From information I received I went to the house where the Phoneys were, and on cm'rio- nn stiirs I found the prisoners and Mis. Meyer in a room together 'The box was there,.and the elder prisoner said It was ll I found akmfe; and a watch with the elder prisoner, atever came to the house when I was searching the pnsoners, aS daimed all the goods, except the box containing the The^ekler "prisoner said he had taken the house and that Mrs. r ^leyer had come to lodge with lam. a coat, &c„ which wi^rSCSe^ftt^were all identiiied by 1v.t:eyer as his property. tn examined by Mr. ltickariis • search the house where the prisoners were, and inm test.l- • inerit, a coat &c. There were two rooms, in each ot WlllC? was a bed—one of the rooms was said to belong to the elf ei p —in that room there was some female apparel, shaving' > &c., which the elder prisoner said belonged to him. i 1C prisoner took a book from his pocket, tore out a leaf, and ir it on the fire; this book contained a list of the things in house.. In reply to the Chairman, Meyer said his wife had no autnont) to sell the testament, the box, &c., which were found in pos- session of the prisoners at Weston. The younger prisoner called Mr. lvesick, magistrates clerk, to prove that the magistrates had not considered the case sul- ficiently strong to commit the prisoners and that Mrs. Meyer had engaged a carter to take the things from the house. Mr. Rickards addressed the jury for the prosecution, the Chairman clearly summed up the evidence, and after a few minutes consideration, the jury returned a verdict of Guilty against both prisoners. The Chairman, in passing sentence upon the prisoners, said he could not perceive a single extenuating circumstance in the case brought before his notice, affecting these primers: far otherwise, the Cullll ware of opinion thai the evidence before a. them went directly to prove that they vrete confirmed and prac- r: tisei!. swindlers: there was, however, a manifest distinction n between the cases of the two prisoners and the elder had been p convictcd only upon one indictment, whilst the younger had s been convicted on both, and the court would make a eorres- nondin"' difference in the sentence to be passed upon the pri- o sobers The sentence of the Court, therefore, was, that James 1 Barrett, the elder, should be transported for seven years, and James Barrett, the younger, for fourteen years. i William Hroten, out ou bail, charged, upon the oaths of Ed- ward Phillips and others, with having on the 2Jfh day of March, i 1845, at the parish of Llaudogo, feloniously received five bushels 1 of wheat, of the value ot Ms., knowing the same to have been s stolen the property ot Robert Wnittlesea Purehas. i Mr.'Smythies appeared for the prosecution and Mr. Rick- ards, for the defence. — Phillips, constable of Llaudogo On Wednesday morning before Easter, I put ten full sacks and one partly full, into Mr Purchas's barn. I subsequently missed one of the full sacks I apprehended the prisoner on the charge of stealing the wheat on the 15th of April; he said he had not stolen the wheat, but that I was right in supposing that Stephen Williams and James Morgan had stolen the wheat. Cross-examined by Mr. Rickards I said to Mr. Oakley and master that I thought Stephen Williams and James Morgan had stolen the wheat. I never heard of any such wheat as that stolen being in this neighbourhood, except that belonging to master—it was of a particular kind. Thomas Price, examined by Mr. Smyfhies I am a miller living at Penalt. On the 14th of April William Hughes brought a bushel of wheat to my llÜll; afterwards he brought some more. ■I thought the wheat belonged to Mr. Purehas, because I had a sample of Mr. Purchas's wheat in the mill at the time; I afterwards compared the two wheats before the ma- gistrates, and am satisfied they ware of one kind. [Samples of the two wheats were here produced, and Price said he considered them to he of the same crop, and the same that were brought to his mil1.] Phillips, being re-called, was cross-examined at some length by Mr. Rickards, with a view to invalidate the testimony of the witness as to the identity of the wheat. William Hughes, examined by Mr. Smythies: I am a labourer living at Llandogo. The prisoner about a week before Easter olfered to scll me some wheat; it was nearly a bushel and a half; I agreed to have it and went to his house to fetch it. William Gwynne, examined by Mr. Smythies I am a wood- ward to the Duke of Beaufort. I was at the Lion public-house, on the evening of the day the prisoner had been before the ma- gistrates, and there I saw Brown, with whom I had "ome con- versation. I asked how he got on before the magistrates; he said he was bound over to appear at the Sessions, but he said he had not stolen the wheat; but Stephen Williams and James Morgan had taken it out of the barn. Mr. Oakley, examined by Mr. Smythies, proved that the de- positions attributed to the prisoner had been made by him. This deposition professed to account for the manner in which he obtained the wheat—the prisoner saying he purchased it. Mr. Rickards addressed the jury on behalf of the prisoner. Messrs. James Morris, of Whitebrook, William Hodges, farmer, William Reynolds, firmer, and William Morgan, farmer, Trelieck, gave the prisoner an unexceptionable cha- racter. The Chairman summed up the evidence, and the jury re- turned a verdict of Not Guilty. Michael Yatps, aged 28, read and write well, charged by the oath of Philip Davies, with feloniously stealing and carrying away, on the 1st day of September last, a gun, the property of the said Philip Davies. Û Mr. Rickards appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Barrett for the defence. Philip Davies I am a maltster, living at Llanvrechva, In Au- gust last I had a gun, which I afterwards missed; I have since seen it at Mr. Phillips's, Abergavenny. Edwin Phillips I received a gun of the former witness, to take care of, and placed it on a lobby at the White Lion, Polity- pool, a house kept by my father. Cross-examined by Mr. Barrett: Mr. Owen, the solicitor, often goes to the White Lion, Pontypool. I never saw Mr. Owen there with a gun, nor did I ever see the prisoner there with a gun. When Owen came to Pontypool he came in a gig, and the ostler took care of his things I don't know whe- ther the prisoner ever took care of his things. The gun could not be seen on the lobby by a person standing in the room. Elizabeth Phillips Sly husband keeps the White Lion Pon- typool .Mr. Davies came to my house to-enquire for a gun that he had left there to be taken care of. I saw the prisoner going out of the Commercial-room, in my house, with a gun in his hand, and asked him where he was going with the gun. He said he did not know. I afterwards saw a dirty chair beneath the lobby, as if a person had been standing on it. Cross-examined by Mr. Barrett: The lobby is about 2 yards from the floor: I don't know how the dirt got on the chair, but it looked as if a person had been standing on it. George Leach, examined by Mr. Rickards I lived at Aber- gavenny last Autumn. The prisoner came to my house on the 4th of November, bringing a gun with him. We were going Ínto.\Vales to shoot. I asked him where he got the gun, and he said his master gave it. him, he (Mr. Owen) having had it given to him for getting a prisoner out of gaol I asked him several times the same question, and he made the same reply. After coming back from Wales I saw him at Crickhowell, and told him he "was accused of stealing the gun. He said he aid not care, but afterwards asked me to "make away with it," I wrote to the keeper of the house in Llandovery, where was left, and they sent the gun up to me. I gave it to Mr. Da- vies, and Mr. Roberts, the policeman. John Roberts, superintendent of Police: I received a gun from Mr. Leach. I cannot swear there were not two guns pre- sent at the examination before the magistrates at Pontypool. Mr. Davies, cross-examined by Mr. Barrett: I do not consider my gun at all like Mr. Owen's gun 1 went to Mr. Owen's and asked if my gun was there he told me it was not. I further prosecuted my enquiries, but got no intelligence of it till Ire- ceived it from the witness jjeacli. Mr. Barrett ingeniously defended the prisoner—the Chairman summed up the evidence, and the jury returned a verdict of Guilty. A previous conviction having been proved against the pri- soner, he was sentenced to fourteen years' transportation. John Williams, out on bail, charged with feloniously stealing, in the parish of Goitrey, a quantity of cordwood, the property of Rees Hees. Mr. Rickards for the prosecution. liees Rees sworn I am a farmer living at Goitrey. Last Mar I missed a quarter and a half of cordwood from my farm. I fixed two pieces of stick and a piece of cordwood on my stack in order to know them. I looked into the prisoner's field, aud saw some cordwood there. I got into a bush in that field, at ten o'clock at night, and after waiting some time I saw the prisoner come with a little hoy; they made a search about the field, and sent a do" to search ahout; they thcn took the cordwood whIch I had seen in the field, and were going away with it, when I pushed out and asked them where they were going with my wood; the prisoner said he didn't want my wood, that he had plenty of his own. On the 7th June, the day we were going before the magistrates, the prisoner asked me three times to make it up. Ir. Barrett cross-examined the witness, with a view to dis- prove his statements respecting the identity of the wood. Isaac Iiilliett sworn: I am a servant to Rees Rees, and saw him place the pieces of wood on the stack to mark the timber. Mr. Barrett adopted a similar course of cross-examination with this witness to that employed with the last. Mr. Barrett energetically addressed the jury on behalf of the prisoner, and called Messrs. George, Morgan, Matthews, and W illiams, who gave the prisoner an excellent character. The Chairman having recapitulated the evidence, the jury re- turned a verdict of Not Guilty. Mary Moursgoud, aged 25, read imp. not write, charged with stealing 170 yards of ribbon, the property of Charles Llewellyn, draper, Newport. Mr. Rickards appeared for the prosecution. William Dyker sworn I am shopman to Mr. C. Llewellyn, draper, Newport. I rememher the prisoner coming to the shop in company with a man. The woman asked me to show her some cap and bonnet ribbons. She bought some cap ribbons; and when she put down the money for the ribbon the man went towards the door, and I went after him. I beckoned to Mrs. Llewelyn, and she came into the shop. I went after the man and on returning, the prisoner was gone. Twelve pieces of bon net and cap ribbon were found on the man, who had handled the ribbons while the woman was looking at them. The ribbon found upon the man was about] 70 yards. P.C. John Huxtable, examined I went with the last witness and apprehended the prisoner, and charged her with beirif an accomplice in the theft of the ribbon. P. C. Hill examined: I searched John Hoursgocd, and took a quantity of ribbon from him. The Chairman explained to the jury that if they were of opinion the prisoner. was in company with the man upon whom the ribbou was found, they must find her guilty of the offence laid to her charge. The jury, after a few minutes consideration, returned a ver- dict, of Guilty, and the prisoner was sentenced to two months imprisonment, with hard labour, in the House of Correction. Charles Carter, aged 30, read well, not write, charged by the oaths of Richard Rennels and others, with having on the 2-itli day of May last, at the boiough of Newport, unlawfully ob- tained by false pretences, of one Mary Ann Manchip, five shirts, two jackets, two coats, five pairs of trousers, three vvaistcoals, two pairs of shoes, and other articles, the property ot Richard Rennels, with intent to cheat and defraud him of the same. Mr. Barrett, for the prosecution. RIchard Rennels sworn: I was at the Sailors' Arms, New- port, on the 23rd of May; I saw the prisoner there. I had some biead and cheese, and used my knife to cut it. Soon after eatmg my bread and cheese, I missed my knife when I looked for my knife, prisoner was gone. P.C. Hopklns deposed to having taken the prisoner into cus- in a barge 111 Bristol river, and found the knife upon him. 1 he jury returned a verdict of Guilty. Upon another indict ment the pnsoner was acquitted—Sentenced to three months' imprisonment in the County gaol, at hard labour. Mary Ann Davies, 21, and Margaret charged by the oath of John Jones, with feloniously stealing and carrying away from the person of the said John Jones, a promissory note ior the payment, and of the value of £5 a sovereign, and a leathern purse, hi, property. n Mr. Rickards appeared for the prosecution and called John Jones, who said I am a labourer, and live at Aberga- venny. On the 10th of April, as I was going home at night, the prisoners caught hold of me. On the prisoner Davies ask- ing me where I was going, I said I was going home. She said she would go with me. I told her 1 did not want her, and that I was a married man. They then put their hands' into my pockets, and took out my purse; a man came tip at the time, and the women ran aw.ty. I saw them again at four o'clock the next afternoon. I am sure the prisoners are the same persons. Mr. Smythies cross-examined the witness, but did not elicit anything material in behalf of the prisoner. William Roberts, police-constable of Abergavenny, said I received information of the robbery, and went to the place, where I found the purse in the middle of the street. Mr. Smythies addressed the jury for the prisoners, both of whom were, however, found Guilty. A former conviction was proved against Mary Ann Davies. Sentence-Marv Ann Da- vies, 14 years' transportation. Margaret Rushmore six months' imprisonment in the House of Correction. Elisha JOh", aged 14, read imp. not write, charged by the oaths of Eliza Fawn, and others, with feloniously stealing and carrymg away on the loth day of May, a frock coat of the value of three shillings, the property of Maria James. Also charged <Tf hi:lT0US^ ihll'?11and c<lri-.vi«g away a pair of slippers, NeX;?:hoL,\hieei!h'n'"8S' «- "W»' Mr. Somerset appeared for the prosecution. Kniid1 Xfk^r'Arms' ?Iaria James' which amounted to the followin "-Th^T8' t s.tatef"lts the house on the 15th of May-'hat tho ',1'0 1",sse{1lfrof,t1 having it-that he subsequently acfno vVT" 7as*axe(1 ™th constable that he had stolen it— that he sol, fitto°T ivr' nell, at the same time knowing it was imf 1, Z > ° ,T substance of this case having been <>iVlni *1^ PJ°PGlty- l'16 time the transaction took place, we have deemedTunneces! To" be imprisoned^ix moiuhf moS lab°lU"' aUd t0 WllippCd of theTecond Matilda Morgan, aged 14, not read, out on twn „\ the oaths of Ellen Richard's and 'j ing on the 15th of April last,one shirt, one blantt "nd'a pe«L coat the property of Thomas Jenkins. P.C. Bath, of Newport, produced the articles named in the indictment, which he had procured from Miss Leek and Moses Wilde. Cordelia J. Leek deposed that the prisoner pledged a sheet and two petticoats at her mother's shop; and Moses Wilde stated that the blanket had been pawned at his shop. Ellen Richards was washing with Lydia Jones at the house of the vroeCuWr, and liWPg up the things Ipst, in the garden, Tile j trHcle fhaudcCu Were identiiied by Lydia Jones, who corrobo- ralftd tH« evidence of the former witness. Mrs. Jenkins, the ivife of the prosecutor, identified some of the things as the pro- perty of her husband. The prisoner was found Guilty, and sentenced to three calendar months, at hard labour. Thomas Kelly, aged .37, read and write imperfectly, charged on the oaths of Charlotte Wakefield and others, with Stealing- 14 lbs of feathers, the property of John Wakefield. Mr. Rickards appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Barrett for the defence. Charlotte Wakefleld I live at Caerwent. About one o'clock in the afternoon, 011 the 26th Mav, the prisoner came to my house with a woman. They had a pack with them. The man stood outside the gate, and the woman came in. They offered me a dress for sale, which I took for 2s. and a pound of feathers. The woman went up to my bed-room, and called the man up stairs. I said he should not go, but he would go up and when he was up stairs, the woman cut open my bed and the man took some feathers out of it; I should think 201bs. I told him he should not have more than 1 lb he said if lie had taken more, he would give the rest back. I said he should not have the feathers, and I would not have the gown. He said as I had given him all the trouble for nothing, I should not have the feathers back. I bolted the door, to prevent his going away, but he got out, and ran away, and I threw the gown piece after him. The womarl brought back the dress, and the man went awav with the feathers. The bag the man put the feathers into had about half a pound of feathers in it before he put mine into it. I gave the prisoner no money. Cross-examined by Mr. Barrett: The feathers which the pri- soner took were not weighed the dress which the prisoner wanted to sell me was not measured. I did not pay him any money,and told him I would not have the dress because he took so much feathers. Thomas Wigmore, examined by Mr. Rickards I am a con- stable, I took up the prisoner at a public house in Caerwent, on the 26th May, in consequence of information I received. I found a bag of'feathers in his possession, containing, perhaps, from 50 to 60 lbs. After an address to the jury by Mr. Barretts on behalf of the prisoner the Chairman summed up the evidence and the jury returned a verdict of Guilty. Sentence, twelve months' im- prisonment, with hard labour, in the county gaol. This closed the business on Wednesday. THURSDAY. Half-past nine being the time appointed for the meeting of the Court this morning, there were at that tune Present:—The Chairman, W. A. Williams, jun Esq., Rev. J, B. Davies, F. McDonnell, Esq., and Capt. Roberts, R.N. A number of prisoners having been arraigned, the following pleaded guilty, and were sentenced as follows :— L'homas Morgan, aged 19, read imp., not write, charged on the oaths of William James and others, with stealing, on the 13th of April, one duck, the property of James James. The prisoner called several witnesses to character. 14 days im- prisonment, at hard labour, in the House of Correction. John Harard, aged 21, read and write imp., charged on the oath of George Gorreli, with stealing, on the 14th of June. 21 buckles, and one pound weight, of leather, the property of George Gorreli, saddler. One calendar month, at hard labour, in the House of Correction. Edward Clarke, aged 17, read imp., not write, charged on the oath of Catherine Jones, with stealing, on the 31st of May last, two tea caddies, and one pocket handkerchief, the propeity of George Jones. One calendar month, at hard labour, in the House of Correction. Sarah Ann Harris, aged 14, read imp., not write, charged with stealing, at the borough of Newport, on the 29th of April last, 261bs. weight of iron, the property of Thomas Cruttwell and others. Recommended to mercy by the prosecutor. Fourteen days imprisonment, at hard labour, in the House of Correction. Emm* Jenkins, aged 12, read imp., not write, charged on the oaths of William Chessell and others, with stealing 15 pounds of iron, the property of Thomas Cruttwell and others. Recom- mended to mercy by the prosecutor. Fourteen days imprison- ment, at hard labour, in the House of Correction. The above cases having been disposed of, the Court called on the case of Itohert Ball, aged IS, read imp., not write. Wm. Crook, aged 18, read imp., not write. Cornelias Hadnutt, aged 18, read and write imp., charged on the oaths of Thomas Iiartreeand others, with stealing, on the 6th day of June, two pairs of boots, and one pair of shoes, the property of Thomas Ilartree, shoemaker. Thomas Hartroe, examined by Mr. Rickards 1 am a boot and shoemaker, living in Newport. On the 6th June last the prisoner Crook came to my shop and purchased a boot-lace. When the prisoner went out of my shop I went out to my work- shop. On returning to the front shop, I missed two pairs of boots and a paii of shoes, that had been in the window. I saw the vacancy caused by the boots and shoes being removed, im- mediately I entered the snop. I am quite positive the prisoner Crook is the person who bought the lace of me. They were slipper shoes that I missed. P. C. Huxtable: I received one pair of boots from Mary Price, and another from Elizabeth Davies, at the Britannia beer-house, bj the canal side. The girls had the boots on their feet. [The policeman here produced the boots, which were identified by Mr. Ilartree, by a letter H" oh the sole.] Thomas Hopkins, P C., said he had received a pair of shoes from Mrs. Elliot, of the Britannia beer-house. [The witness produced the shoes, which were identified by Mr. Hartree.] Mary Price, examined by Mr. Rickards: 1 was at the Bri- tannia beer-house on the 6th of June, and on that day I saw the prisoner, there Ball had two pairs of boots with him he asked Mrs. Elliot if she would bay a pair of boots; she would not buy them the prisoner Ball then asked me to buy them I bought a pair for myself, and a pair for Elizabeth Davies, Mrs. Elliott's servant. Ball came into the house alone the others eatrie aftewards Emma Ranks, examined by Mr. Rickards: I was at the Britannia beer-house ott the 6th of June: about one o'clock on that day I saw the prisoners in the tap-room at that house. They o fie red me a pair of slippers, and asked if I would buy them all the prisoners were talking about selling the slippers they asked me, 011 my saying I would not buy them, to try to sell tbem for them: I went to Mrs. Elliott, and sold them to her for two shillings. Elizabeth Davies, examined by Mr. Rickards: I am servant at the Britannia Mary Price sold me a pair of boots on the (jih of June. I saw all'the prisoners in the tap-room of that house on the 6th of June. The prisoner Ball cross-examined the witness Elizabeth Davies and Emma Banks, in order to show that he had been in the Britannia beer-house all the night of the oth of June, and therefore bad no opportunity of committing the theft. P.C. Huxtalile deposed to having taken the prisoners into custody at the Coach and Horses beer-house, and stated what propjrty he found upon them. Mrs. llyan, keeper of a low lodging-house, in Charles-street, said the pi isoners lodged at her house the week the robbery was committed and that Ball had given her some money to take care of for him. Ball and Crook cross-examined Mr. Ryan, to show that they had never been in the habit, during all the time (between two and three years) they had occasionally lodged at her house, of taking anything to the house, except what they required for food, &c. The prisoner Ball stated that he had received the boots from Crook, and sold them for him. The Chairman lucidly explained the duty of the jury, in de- ciding upon the evidence before them, and after a few mi- nutes consultation, they returned a verdict of Guilty against all the prisoners. Previous convictions were proved against Cornelius Hadnc-tt and William Crook, and the prisoners were then sentenced as follows :-Cornclius Hadnott and William Crook, twelve months' imprisonment each, at hard labour, m the county gaol. Robert Ball, six months' imprisonment, at hard labour, 111 the CUTdw(5d°hreen aged 22, not read, charged on the oath of Thomas Kelly with feloniously stealing on the 19th of April, a sledge hammer, and a pickaxe, the property of Sir Digby MMr.^S°omerfeTti'br the prosecution. The prisoner was unde- feThomas Kelly examined by Mr. Somerset: On the 21st of ApJr losf smu'e tools (a pickaxe and sledge) that I had been accustomed to use; they were the property of Sir Digby Mack- worth I placed them behind a haymow, on the 19th ot April, where I had usually kept them, and on the 21st I could not find them. I saw them afterwards at Caerleon, in the hands of t'1 Jam't's'Dutfield, examined by Mr. Somerset: On the 19th of April the prisoner asked me if I would buy some tools—a pick- axe and sledge; he said he had bought them. He said he was starving, and wanted some money to buy victuals. I gave him Is., and took the tools from him, and told a man I saw work- ing on the road if he heard any one enquiring for tools, he was to send him to mv house, and he should have them. Ann Duffield said her husband, James Duffield, had left the tools at her house and told her to give them to any person who should come and enquire for them, and who would pay a shil. ling for them. Constable Limerick said he had received the tools from Mr Duffield, having gone, from information, to his house to en. quire for them. The prisoner, who presented a very idiotic appearance and seemed an object of the most wretched destitution, on bein<<- asked by the Chairman, if he wished to say any thing, stated that he had bought them of a man 011 the road to Caerleon for 6d. and 3d. worth of bread and cheese. After a short address from the Chairman the jury returned a verdict of Guilty. Sentence One calendar month's impri sonment in the house of correction, at hard labour. ROBBERY or THE SCREW PACKET CO.'S WAREHOUSE. Wil'iam Morgan, aged 2.5, read imperfectly, not write charged with breaking and entering the warehouse of the Screw Steam Packet Company, at Newport, on the 27th April last, and stealing therefrom one shawl, the property of George Taylor. Mr. Rickards appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Bar- rett for the defence. The learned counsel for the prosecution gave a lucid detail of the facts of the case, as be intended bringing them before the jury, in the course of the evidence and which will be found in the statements of the following witnesses: Mr. James Hill, chief clerk of the Screw Steam Packet Company, examined by Mr. Rickards It is the duty of the head porter to lock up the warehouse containing the goods brought by the packets. On the 25th April last, I observed that the warehouses were safely locked up. I have a manifest book with me, containing an account of the goods brought by the packets from Bristol. On the following Monday, I ex- amined this book and found that the original manifest of the 26th had been correctly copied into it. We depend as much upon this book as upon the original manifests, this being re- irarded as a tiauscnpt of those manifests. Cross-examined by Mr. Barrett: We have several porters irenerally engaged. There were two clerks at the time of the robbery. The prisoner (who had been employed as a porter) was discharged at a day's notice. The clerk who made the entries in this book, (the manifest-book), was discharged at three weeks' notice. Thomas E. Turberville, examined by Mr. Rickards; I am delivery clerk to the Screw Company. On the 26th April 1 remember a box, directed G.Taylor,"arrived by the packet. I did not see the warehouse shut up on that evening. I went on the following morning, about eleven o'clock to the ware house and discovered a hole in the door; boh doors were open when I went there. Ongoing into the warehouse I missed a chest of coffee, that was there the night before. Cross examined by Mr. Barrett: A great number of boxes and packages arrived on the night of the 26th and I missed a box of drapery for Mr. Taylor, because I had previously ordered a porter to take it home. Thorn-is Davies am head-porter to the Screw Company. It is my duty to lock up the warehouse. I bolted up the ware- house at eight o clock on the. night of the 26th. On going ther- the morning, 1 observed that one of the doors was broken, and several pieces of boatding gone from The hole was large enough for a man to pass through. On gomg into the warehouse I missed a box that had been there, directed to Brecon. The small door was locked as I had U The cross-examination by Mr. Barrett elicited nothing par- ticular in favour ol the prisoner. Thomas Turberville, recalled and exam.ncd by Mr Bar- rett • When 1 first went into the warehouse, 011 Sunday, I did not 'miss the box for Mr. Taylor, but I missed a box for Bre- con, and a chest of coilee.. Edward Hopkins, superintendent of police: I received a warrant to search the house of a person named John Hughes, at Pilhnvenllv. On the following morning I took Hughes, his wife, and a Mrs. Hale to the station. The prisoner was then there. 1 asked Mrs. Hughes whose shawl she had-she said she bought it of the prisoner and he said he bought the shawl from a packman, Morgan was taken mto custody on th is charge. Cross-examined by Mr. Bai-i-ett I had a warrant given to me by Mr. Hill to search Hughes' house. I afterwards went to Mrs. Hale s house, the warrant to search it having been given to me by the same person. At the time I had a war- rant to search Hughes' house, I had 110 warrant to apprehend the prisoner. The conversation respecting the shawl took place at Mrs. Hale s house. At the «econd conversation, at my house Mrs. Hugh-s, her husband, and Mrs. Hale being present, Mrs. Hughes mentioned Morgan's name. 1 knew Morgan, tne prisoner, and his wife, andl think they are rather in low circumstances. P.C. Huxtable I went to the houses ofHlJghes and Hale, with last witness. 1 found a box there, and took a shawl from it. At the same time 1 received a warrant to search Hale's house, I received one to apprehend Morgan. I t°olc Morgan at his own house, and took him to the station house. I showed the shawl, that I took, to Mr. Taylor Cross-examined by Mr. Barrett: On Monday I received a warrant to search Mrs. Hughes' house, and on Tuesday two warrants, one to search Hale's house, another to apprehend the prisoner, whom I took into custody but did not search his house His wife was in the room when I took him. There might have been boxes there without my seeing them, if they had been under the bed. I searched Hughes's house, but did not find any of the missing property. 1 went to Hale's house. I found the box containing the shawl in a room belonging to Mrs. Hale. Mis^ Hughes was present when I found the shawl. I was not present when Mrs. Hughes said she had the shawl of Morgan. The shawl was here produced by witness. George Taylor examined by Mr. Rickards: I am a draper, living m Newport. On the 22nd of April I bought some drapery in London-some shawls, and instructed the parties to send them to .Newport, per screw steamer from Bristol. None of the goods I had ordered came to my hands. [The witness here identified the shawl which had been produced by P. C. Hux- table, by a mark on the corner.] Mary Hale, examined by Mr. Rickards: I am a widow, living at Pill. My house was searched in April bv P. C. Huxtable. A box was found there, containing a bundle out of which the constable took a shawl. Mrs. HUghes brought the bundle to my house on the 28th, and it was found on the 29th. I never saw it opened until the policeman opened it. Cross-examined by Mr Barrett: Mrs. Hughes said it was her bundle, and that all the things were hers. Mary Ann Hughes, examined by Mr RIckards I live at Pill. I have known the prisoner some years. I took a bundle to the last witness's house. 1 don t think the shawl produced is the one which I took in the bundle to Mrs. Hale's house. William Morgan sold me the shawl which I put into the bundle. He asked me four months before to buy a shawl. I bought the shawl from him, and gave him 0$. worth of beer and 3s. for it on the Saturday nigiit. He said he had it of his wife, who pot it from a packman. I had taken an apartment at Mrs. Hael's and therefore put it there. Cross-examined by Mr. Barrett: I have known the prisoner for eight years and when he brought the shawl for me to buy 1 ,\10tothink 11 necessary to make any inquiries about it. P. C. Penmmore examined by Mr. Rickards: I was present when Mr. and Mrs Hughes and Mrs. Hale were in the station house together; and Morgan heard Mrs. Hughes say she had had the shawl from hun; he said it was so, and that lie had got it from a (luffer." Mr. Barrett, on the part of the defence, objected that the f2 I-!e,1CefeS00dSWe(tlken' described in the in- d ctment a, a warehouse, was not m fact a warehouse within the meaning of the act, and that therefore the charge of steal- ing from a warehouse must be invalidated, and the prisoner be tried only for simple larceny.. r Mr. Rickards replied to the observations of Mr. Barrett, and tne Court decided that Mr. Barrett's objection was good. Mr Barrett then addressed the jury with some ingenuity, on behalf of the prisoner, and the Chairman clearly recapitulated the evidence. The jury returned a verdict of Guilty, and the Cnairman, after a uitable address, sentenced the prisoner to 7 years transportation. John Shepherd, aged 23, read and write well, and George lioe, aged 2S, read imp., not write, charged 0.1 the oaths of Thomas Morgan and others with steahng, on the 19th of June, one silver watch, the property ot lhomas Morgan. Mrs. Morgan examined: Said she hung her husband's watch up in the back kitchen; wnile she was out of the kitchen, she heard some one in it, and on going there, she found the watch was gone; on going out to the door, she saw the prisoners run- ning away. She toid her husband, and he immediately pur- sued them. John Edmunds Said lie saw the prisoners on the road from Rhymney to CardirF, and they were running b<?in°- pursued by a man, who shouted Stop thief." Shepherd thiw some- thing like a watch over the hedge into a field, and a watch was afterwards found there. Emanuel Carde corroborated the testimony of former wit- nesses, as to the prisoners being on the road, running towards Cardiff, and as to Shepherd having thrown the watch over the hedge. He added: On hearing a person who was running after hollowing Stop thief." I ran after them, and pushed Shep- herd down, and after a scuffle, with the assistance of some per- sons passing, I took him. The jury, without any hesitation, found the prisoner Shep- herd guilty, acquitting Roe and Shepherd was sentenced to 6 weeks' imprisonment, in the House of Correction, with hard labour. John Walker, aged 22, read imp., not write, was charged, on the oaths of Wm. Williams and others, with stealing on-'the 19th of April, at Newport, £ 1 17s. in coin, one razor,'and one clasp knife, the monies and goods of the said Wm. Williams. Walker was acquitted, the prosecutor not being in court. Charles Havard, aged27, read imp., not write, charged by the oaths of Sarah Morgan and others, with stealing a goose, the property of Sarah Morgan. 3 Mr. Rickards for the prosecution. Sarah Morgan, examined by Mr. Rickards: I am a widow, living at Lanwenarth. On the 12th May last I had a gander, a goose, and five goslings. At night, I used to put them in a cot by the end of the house they were fastened up. I next saw the gander after the 12th May with P. Cusack, policeman, at Abergavenny. Elizabeth Morgan, examined by Mr. Rickards On the 12th, I saw the gander and goose safe in the cot, about eight in the evening; between five and six 011 the following morning I missed them. P. C. Cusack, examined by Mr. Rickards, said, I went to a beer-house in Monk-street, Abergavenny, on the 13th ot May, where I saw the prisoner I also observed a- goose there. I afterwards took the goose, and went, in consequence of informa- tion, to look for Havard, who left the house on seeing me there the first time. He was taken into custody at the Hay, and handed over to me. On the road to Abergavenny from the Hay, where the prisoner was taken, he told me he had seen two men, one of whom gave him a goose, which he said he had thrown into a field, but. that lie fetched it the same morning, intending to cook it for his dinner, and left it for that purpose at the beer- house in Monk-street. Other evidence was produced. The jury found the prisoner Guilty.—A former conviction was proved against him, and he was sentenced to be transported for fourteen years. To be concluded in our next. =
SOUTH WALES RAILWAY.
SOUTH WALES RAILWAY. °ntt!'e re"assembling of the committee on Tuesday morn- ing, at the usual hour, Mr. E. Buller, the chairman, announced tnat on Monday the standing orders committee were unable to form a quorum, and, inconsequence, no business was trans- acted. According to the rules of the house, Mr. Eseott was obliged to give notice for leave to sit for a quorum of three he had given that notice, and the subject would be brought before the house on Tuesday night; the standing orders committee count not therefore sit until Wednesday, and this committee would adjourn till Friday, in order to have the report of the M °rders C0lnm'"ee. Mr.Daniel, on behalf of various landowners on the line, and he corporation of Gloucester, requested the committee to ad- journ until beyond Friday, otherwise he would be perfectly unable to mept any new case that might in the iivterim be set uP begged an adjournment till Tuesday next. lr • hillips objected to any adjournment beyond Friday, as unnecessary. Oil Wednesday afternoon, at three o'clock, the decision 011 the standing orders would be known. jenerat Johnson, M.P., refused to entertain the application- lie hau, at great inconvenience to himself, come a distance of a liuu red miles to attend the committee yesterday, and next we x he walitfd to be four hundred miles away. There was no instance of a bill in committee, at so advanced a period as July, being passed during the session, and he certainly should not agree to adjourn the committee to Tuesday next. The Chairmån observed, if any case should arise requiring further delay, there would be sufficient time, to consider the application but under the present circumstances, the com- mittee had distinctly decided that they must adjourn till Fri- day—Ihe committee then adjourned.' On the motion of Mr. Estcourt, it was ordered that, during the remainder of the session, the select committee on standing orders have leave to sit and to proceed to business with a quo- rum of three members. THE ADMIRALTY AND PRIVATE RAILWAY BILLS. Captain Berkeley moved the following resolution without observation, That no private bill for the construction of a railway or public work, to which the consent of the Board of Admiralty is required, shall be committed until the decision of the Admiralty shall have been communicated to this house." Lord G. Somerset objected mainly on the ground that it would give the Admiralty the power of suspending the pro- ceedings of the. house by withholding its consent. Mr. Warburton concurred in this opinion. If the objections of the Admiralty to works were not removed, that body had the power to pull down the works. Mr. S. Wortley also resisted the resolution. Captain Berkeley said a few woids in reply, contending that the public ought to be protected against the Admiralty, which might interpose only after the parties had incurred a heavy expense. Sir George Clerk opposed the motion, after which the house divided- For the motic >n 20 Against it 70 Majority ••••• — Mr. Darby moved the third reading of the Newport and Pontypool Railway Bill. It was read a third time and passed. Mi. uieene rose, pursuant to notice, to move the further consideration of the report on railway bills. In consequence or the proceedings in the House of Lords, however, he would not press the resolutions, but would move that the committee be revived. Lord G. Somerset thereupon postponed the amendment of xr ft1(1 Sken notice. thought the proposed course was the only one that could be taken. He complained that no means had been adopted to ascertain the feeling of the House of Lords witli reference rn Mr r v! e Measure. vr. Vk 0rtlp>' ,ioPed some arrangement would be made Hp thn? °|l ler, h(>USe o1' Parliament on questions of this kind. lie inojg.it also, the time had arrived when some announce- ment snould be made as to the mode of conducting tailway Lulls next session, and more particularly with reference to the continuance of the Railway Department" ol the Board of Trade. I "ii • 1 °n usted the house would consider the cases of hills which committees midit not wish absolutely to reject, but were desirous to postpone until another session, when other contemplated proposals might be before the house. i-'Ora u. Somerset was understood to say that he was not lust then prepared to make the announcement which the lion, gentleman wished. He thought, however, that the time had arrived when some statement should be made on the subject, aU,(.le wou'd give his best attention to it- 1 he motion that the committee be revived was earned.
[No title]
ASSASSINATION OF MR BOOTH.—The magistrates of Cavan assembled last week, in the Court. House, Lord Farnham pre- ing, and in a temperate, though forcible, memorial to the Lord Lieutenant, besought' the interposition of the executive on behalf 0f the peaceable inhabitants, Catholics as well as Protestants, against the lawless violence now dangerously in action against both. It is supposed that the murder of Mr. ooth( rind other outrages in th&t p^rt ot the kingdom^ sre the deeds of strangers to this locality and it is hoped, that vigorous measures, such as are contained in the 3 and 4, Vfm, 4th, c, 4, \viii be adppted.
POLICE INTELLIGENCE. --+---
POLICE INTELLIGENCE. --+- MONDAY—JUNE 30, 1845. Before E. Dowling (Mayor) and Thos. Hughes, E Henry Williams, a staid and contrite looking person, then perfectly sober, was placed at the Bar, charged with having, on the previous day, been found utterly drunk at three o'clock in the afternoon, and whilst in that state, not duly observing the common rules of decency. P. C. Pennimore proved the offence, and the defendant hav- ing admitted the charge, was lined 5s. and costs. He left the bar, vowing that beer should never again put him in the hands of the Philistines. REFUSING A CERTIFICATE TO A SEAMAN. Captain Robert Anderson, a fine Corsair looking fellow, was summoned by a seaman named Samuel Brockhall, for refusing to give him a certificate upon leaving the vessel. The Captain applied to the Bench to allow him to settle the matter out of Court, but the Magistrates refused to comply, stating their belief that the present apprehension of serious consequences, 011 the part of the defendant, was the only cause of his readiness to do tardy justice to the complainant, and that the case should be heard as a lesson to others. Brockhall was consequently called, but did not appear, negotiations no doubt having taken place elsewhere; and the Captain, upon paying the expenses, left the Court. A BACCHANAL PROSTRATE, A young man, named Benjamin Bird, who seemed scarcely to have recovered from the soporific effects of too copious pota- tions of cwrw-da, was brought forth on a charge of drunken- ness. It appeared, by the evidence of one of the force, that the toper was found lying, as blind asabat, on the Marshes road, on Saturday night last, and in such a position that had a vehicle come that way it would be very likely to Macadamize the poor fellow. The municipal guardian fortunately removed him from his perilous situation and, on taking him up, found a clasp- knife open lying under his head. Bird said the beer came over him unknown to himself, and that he knew no more what followed than the man in the moon. Fined 5s., and lectured. Wm. Curran, a sharp-looking Emeralder, who first breathed the vital air in the same county that gave birth to the immortal orator of the same name, but who appears to have devoted his energies to the orgies of Bacchus more than to the pursuit of nobler objects, appeared to answer the complaint of Mistress Honora Leary, who stated that the 11 desperate boy" at the bar had nearly knocked the seven sinses out of her good man, Mister Leary, and had torn her cap into smithereens," tear- ing as much hair from her head as would stuff a palliasse how- ever as Cnrran had made friends with her husband the night before, she would fvrgive-though, upon her conscience, she could not forget—if he would enter into a cognovit" never to harm herself nor the man that owned her whilst grass rows, (')1' water runs. This being acceded tù by Mister Curran, the party departed in peace. THE GREAT CLUB CASE, Kilmartin rUSH, Patrick Crowley and others, was postponed upon the application of the plaintiif, in consequence of the absence, at Sessions, of his advocate, Mr. Owen. A charge againl David Sullivan, for evading the payment of toll, was, upon application, adjourned to Thursday. Thomas Roberts, a person for nearly two years in the em- ployment of Mr. Richard Powell, was brought before the magistrates on a charge of stealing one ton of bark, the property of the said Richard Powell. After a lengthened investigation of the case, he prisoner was committed tor trial. A report of his case appears in our Ses- sions report. The court did not sit on Thursday.
CARDIFF POLICE.—JUNE 28, 1845.
CARDIFF POLICE.—JUNE 28, 1845. Present—Henry Morgan, and John Homfray, Esqrs. Thomas Fisher, captain of the William, of Waterford, was charged with the offence of smuggling, David Rees, tide-waiter, sworn, said On the 16th of May, between ten and eleven o'clock at night, I was at the upper end of the Bute Dock, and James Tulton was with me. I saw Wm. Parry coming from the eaft side of the dock with a bag on his back, and asked him what he had got in it. He replied, I don't know; it is something for master." I felt the bag and found there was a cask in it. I asked him where he had it, and he said, from on board the William. I took him with the cask to the custom-house, bored a hole in the cask, and found it contained whiskey, but not quite full. I marked the cask, and locked it up, and then took Parry to Mr. Thomas, the tide- survevor. I am sure the cask contained whiskey, and it was about a six-gallon cask. I can't say whether any one else tasted the whiskey at that time; but I afterwards showed the cask to Mr. Thomas, at the custom-house, and he tasted it, and said it was whiskey. Captain Fisher: Did not you and Mr. lhomas come down on board that evening.—Witness Yes. Thomas Thomas, sworn I am tide-surveyor of the customs, at Cardiff. About eleven of the night in question, David Rees came to my residence, and called me up. I came down and found he had a man, or rather a boy, in charge, and he told me he had taken him with a keg of whiskey, which he had locked up in the custom-house. I took the boy to Mr. Stockdale, and left him there, and went with Rees to the custom house, where he showed me the cask, which I found contained whiskey. I am not judge enough to say whether it was Scotch or Irish whiskey, but I think it was Irish. I took a sample, which I now produce. 1 measured the contents and found it to be four gallons and seven jnnts, and the strength 12 and 8-lOths over proof. I put my official seal on it, and on examining the cask I found an impression of a seal in coloured wax, with the in- scription Fisher, Quay, Waterford." W m. Parry, sworn: I work with my father in the boat under Mr. Edward Morgan, of Merthyr. About nine o'clock on the morning in question, I met Mr. Fisher by the pump on the wharf, at Cardiff, and he asked me where my father was, and I said 1 did not know. He said he told him to come down to the vessel about nine at night—that he had some business for my master. I met my father afterwards and told him, and he and I went down about four in the afternoon to the vessel. When we got there the captain was not on board, but the mate sent the cook to look for him. He soon came back and told us to come about nine at night. We then went back to our boat, and about nine I wont down on board the vessel, and asked about the business for my master. The mate gave me a cask in a bag, and told the cook to go and help me to carry it, and we carried it by spells. When we were about half-way up the dock the cook went back, and I went on towards town, and was taken by David Rees. I have been at the vessel before. Captain Fisher: Did you see me that day after I met you by the pump.—Witness Xo. Captain Fisher I had brought 500 sacks of flour for Mr. Morgan, and that was the business I wanted to see your father about. In answer to questions put by Mr. Homfray, Mr. Thomas said, when vessels came in from Ireland, they were merely ex- amined, and not minutely searched; that examination took place when the William arrived, and the only liquor visible to the officer was from one to two gallons of whiskey. Three gallons fit generally allowed, but that depends on the number of hands on board, and if the officers see more spirits than they think sufficient, they seal it up until the ressel is ready for sea. When I examined the William, I saw nothing of this cask. She was laden with coal, and quite ready for sea. Captain Fisher said, with regard to the seal, he had a seal of that description; that he kept a spirit store in Waterford, and was in the habit of supplying ships with spirits, and always put that seal on the casks, and he had no doubt plenty of them were in port with the same mark at the present time; and, with regard to the keg, it might have been on board, but he could only say that he had not seen it throughout the voyage. Several gentlemen present spoke of Capt. Fisher as being a highly-respectable man, and of unimpeachable character. Mr. Morgan said the Bench had closely considered the case, and looking at the evidence as it stood linked together, no doubt existed in their minds as to the course to be adopted. They would convict, but were induced to be as lenient as possi- ble, believing the act was not done with an intent to defraud the revenue. Under that impression, they would fine him £ 25., the lowest amount the law would admit, which was immediately paid. Daniel Thomas, labourer, charged William Morgan, butcher, with furiously driving his horse and cart, and with not having his name and address on the said cart, and with being drunk. —Fined 40s and 10s. costs.—Paid. JUNE 30. Present—Henry Morgan, Esq., and Rev. James Evans. Mr. Stockdale said a great noise and disturbance had taken place in Mary Anne-street, during Sunday last, and that the prisoner, Thomas Hewson, was the principal cause; that he was drunk, and quarrelled with a woman who was with him, and they came out to the street to fight-the woman almost in a state of nudity that a considerable crowd were round them, and he was apprehended for being drunk and disorderly. That since he has been in custody a charge was laid against him for, on Saturday and preceding days, begging in Cardiff, he not being in want at the time, for when he was searched at the sta- tion house he had in his pocket £1. 13s. 6d. Mary Lewis, sworn: She lived in Tabernacle Court, Cardiff; on Saturday evening last prisoner came and asked her for money she said she had none, when he asked her for bread she then gave him two slices of bread, and he left. Mr. Stockdale said the officer that took him was gone to the Quarter Sessions at Neath, but he could prove his being drunk when brought to the station house. Committed to the house of correction for one calendar month with hard labour. Thomas Dunn, seaman, charged William Thomas and James James with an assault. It appeared this arose out of Dunn offering to work for reduced wages. He had entered himself to go a voyage to London for £2., when the defendants said it ought to be £3. 10s., aDd by such conduct they were materially injured. Dunn said they met him by the dock, and called him a varmint" for doing so, and that he ought to have his figure head knocked off. Having differed in opinion on this subject, Thomas first struck him, and then James. Defendants having acknowledger that they slightly pushed him, were each fined IDs., and 5s. costs, wluch they severally paIQ.
I l PER I ALP A R L I A I…
I l PER I ALP A R L I A I j IV T. HOUSE OF LORPS. THURSDAY, JUNE 26. Lord Gardner, from a written document, explained why he had absented hitiself from the Glasgow bridge committee. Lord Brougham got his lordship out of the scrape, and the apology was received. SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE IRISH LAND-TENURE BILL Lord Stanley moved the nomination of twenty-one peers as a select committee to which the Tenants (Ireland) Compensa- tion Bill should be referred. The Marquess of Londonderry, Marquess of Clanricarde, the Marquess of Normanbv, and the Earl of Roden, all objected to serve on the committee. Lord Brougham and the Earl of Wieklow said it was not competent for noble lords to decline. After Lord Stanley declared on his honour! that he made the committee on impartial principles, and some discussion, the committee was appointed. The English Land-Tenure Bill was negatived, on a division, by 11 to 7. T 0_ FRIDAY, JUNE 27. The report of the Ecclesiastical Courts Bill was agreed fo. MONDAY, JUNE 30. The Lords Commissioners appointed to give the Royal assent to various bills, took their seats about four o clock, when the Royal assent was given in due form to upwaids of 80 bills. The third reading of the Scotch Banking Bill was carried by 47 to The Marquess of Normanby expressed his regret that there was no hope of a general sanitary measure this session he looked to the next. Lord Campbell drew the attention of the government to the mode by which certain railway companies were superseding or crushing all competition, by buying up or amalgamating with opposing lines—a course detrimental to the interests of the public. The Earl of Dalhousie admitted that there might be attempts of this nature, but considered that the law was quite sufficient to reach all collusive proceedings in such cases. Various bills were carried forward different stages, and the House adjourned early. TUESDAY, JULY 1. The Granting of Leases Bill was passed. Lord Brougham, on the advice of the Lord Chancellor, post- ^iday, important lesolutions on Railway Legislation The Protection of Property Bill, (to provide a punishment tor such fellows as broke the Portland vase,) inflicting six months' imprisonment with hard labour, or a whipping, was passed.
HOUSE OF COMMONS.
HOUSE OF COMMONS. WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25. SOUTH WALES RAILWAY BILL. Mr. Vivian, in order to remove the objections which had been nade by the Admiralty to the bill, moved that the house take nto consideration the matters specially reported on by the committee, with a view to the bill being proceeded with, and ;hat the committee have leave to sit and proceed thereon on Monday next. Captain Berkeley opposed the motion on the ground that the committee had already decided that the promoters of the bill ivere unable to carry into effect the measure which they had Jefore them, in consequence of the Board of Admiralty having ■efused to allow a bridge to be constructed over the Severn at :he spot proposed by the Great Western Railway Company. fhe proper course would have been to have carried the line through Gloucester, but the Company had not thought fit to do that. The present proposal was not contained in the bill which lad been brought in the first instance into that house. It was now proposed to enable the company to make a tunnel under the Severn, not for the benefit of the public, but for the benefit jf the Great Western Railway Company. The Severn at the place where it was proposed to make the tunnel was half a mile broad; the expense of making it would be at the least £1,500,000, ind ten or twelve years must elapse before it could be com- pleted. How much better would it have been to have taken the line through Gloucester! Under these circumstances, he hoped the house would not accede to the motion of thehon. gentleman. Lord G. Somerset said he was not altogether an impartial party in this case, because he felt a deep interest in the com- pletion of a work of such great national importance. He did not agree with the hon. and gallant member who had last spoken that a great work like the one in question should be put a stop to, merely because it might happen to interfere with the traffic of Gloucester. The undertaking must be very important, as the committee had unanimously adopted the preamble of the bill, and he hoped, therefore, that the house would not stand in the way of the completion of the work. He would, assuredly, support the motion. Mr. H. Berkeley opposed the motion on the ground that the bill now was different from that which had originally been brought in. Mr. H. Hinde said that the question was, whether the house would allow parties to go on with a bill totally different from that which they had at first brought in ? He thought that to accede to the motion would be a direct violation of the standing orders. After a few words from Mr. Osborne Mr. Estcourt did not think that the proposition had anything to do with the standing orders. The question at present was simply, whether the committee should or should not be allowed to resume their proceedings. Mr. C. Wood thought that the question was, whether the committee were justified in staying their proceedings on the Admiralty intimating to them, 'that they refused to allow a bridge to be built across the Severn ? He did not think the committee justified in so doing; they ought to have gone on, and have left it to the Admiralty to come forward and object on the third reading of the bill In answer to Mr. W. Collett, the Speaker said, that as the proposed tunnel would necessarily alter the levels of the sec- tions, it would be necessary for the promoters to petition the house so as to have the matter referred to the committee on standing orders. Colonel Wood was of opinion, that a tunnel under the Severn would be impracticable, and that it would be better if the line were, to he car/ied round by Gloucester. Captain Berkeley, seeing that the sense of the house was op- posed to the amendment, begged to withdraw it, on the under- standing that the matter would come under the cognizance of the committee on the standing orders. THE GAUGES. Mr. Cobden moved for the appointment of a commission of in- qmry for the purpose of ascertaining whether, in all future rail- way bills, It would not be advisable to establish one uniform gauge, and whether it would not be practicable to take mea- sures to bring the railways already constructed, or in progress ot construction, into uniformity of gauge. progress Sir G. Clerk, on the part of the Bnarri nfr„j. ceded to the motion, which was unanimously agreed tS °"Ce The Statute Labour (Scotland) Bill, the DStr-Stealino- Rii? and the Smoke Prohibition Bill, were severally passed through committee. The Smoke Prohibition Bill led to protracted dis- cussion, occupying the entire evening. THURSDAY, JUNE 26. Captain Berkeley moved that the petitions of Charles Owen Cambridge, Esq., James White, and others, Charles Cother and others, and the Corporation of Gloucester, presented on the 24th June, against the level of the South Wales Railway Company, be referred to the Committee on Group P., and that the several petitioners be heard by counsel against the said bill. Agreed to. PRIVILEGES OF PARLIAMENT. On the order of the day for taking into consideration the re- port of the case of Howard v. Gosset," the Solicitor General moved that a writ of error be brought upon the judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench, pronounced in the above-mentioned case. Mr. Hume said it appeared to him that the proposed course was only calculated to plunge them deeper and deeper into dif- ficulty. He moved, as an amendment, that it was inexpedient to entrust the maintenance of the privileges of the House to any other authority than the House itself. The House divided, when the amendment was negatived by a majority of 78 to 46. Mr. Roebuck said that if the writ of error should issue, and if the court of error should decide against the house, they would find themselves m a worse position than they were in at present for then they would have the declaration of all the judges of the land against them. He thought the better course would be, as they had made the mistake of allowing their pri- vileges to be discussed in a court of law, to abide by the loss of the £200. Let it go by the board—let the matter drop. But then there were three other cases, in one of which the damages were laid at £100,000. Let them take their stand on those, and let any one who dared to move in them be at once laid by the feet. Let them at once prepare themselves by a resolution to maintain their privileges themselves, and let them unflinch- ingly act upon it, or take the only other alternative of abandon- ing their privileges altogether. After several members had spoken, Sir R. Peel advocated the course recommended by the committee of which he was a member, as the only one which now remained for them to adopt, -in order to bring the question to a decision as to whether or not the recent judgment of the Court of Queen's Bench was that of the judges at large. The motion of the Solicitor General, that the house should sanction the writ of error, was then carried, on a division by a majority of 82 to 48. FRIDAY, JUNE 27. SOUTH WALES RAILWAY AND THE RIVER SEVERN. Captain Berkeley said that he 'had given notice of his inten- tion to bring before the house the hardship and injustice of the promoters of railway schemes proposing to cross or interfere with any tidal rivers, arms of the sea and creeks, over which the Board of Admiralty had controul, appearing before com- mittees of that house with private bills, without having first ob- tained the written sanction of that board in accordance with the provisions of the act 8 Victoria, c. 20. He had given that no- tice in consequence of what had taken place with respect to the South Wales Railway. He thought some remedy was required, because if the decision of the Admiralty had been made known at an earlier, stage great expense would have been saved to the parties, and a great deal of trouble to the committee. He there- fore begged to move that the question be referred to the select committee on standing orders. Mr. Hume thought some means ought to be adopted to have the decision of the Admiralty made known to that house. Mr. Fitzroy said that the Admiralty had objected to the rail- way being carried across the Severn, because it would interfere with the navigation. The proposed tunnel would require to be constructed at a depth which would alter the level of the sec- tions of the original plans and the committee on the standing orders, and not the Admiralty, were the parties with whom the matter rested. After a few words from Mr. H. Berkeley, Mr. Fitirov said that the Admiralty had never consented to permit a bridge to be built over the Severn. When the parties proposed to go under the river, he said, First let me see your plans." (Hear hear.) Mr. Warburton thought the proposition of the hon. member for Gloucester an extremely reasonable one. He also thought, whenever the Admiralty decided against any railway crossing a tidal river, that their reasons for so deciding shnnlrl v>» ported to the house. S be re" Sir G. Clerk said that the Admiralty had not only the power to refuse its consent to any railway crossing over a tidal river but they had also the power of interfering and putting a stop to the progress of any such railway, if the consent of the Admi- ralty had not been obtained. He thought no parties possessed of common sense would ever think of proceeding with their scheme without having first obtained the sanction of the Board of Admiralty. Captain Berkeley said he would withdraw his present motion and would give notice of one of a more general nature on the subject for Monday. MONDAY, JrNE 30. A new writ was ordered for the borough of Abingdon in the room of Sir F. Thesiger, appointed Attorney-General. After some railway business had been transacted, the House on the motion of Sir James Graham, went into committee on the Irish College's Bill, when, after much discussion in which the Irish members, aided by the leading members of the Oppo- sition, opposed several of the provisions, the government sue -ed<Ld insf1r7in* "ch clause> contested by Targe majorities. The Dog Stealing Bill was passed. TUESDAY, JrLY 1. A great many Railway Bills were forwarded Capt. Berkeley moved that the resolution "That no private Bill for the construction of railways, or other public works,*to which the consent of the Admiralty is required, will be com- mitted until the decision of the Admiralty shall be communi- cated to the House," be made a standing order. Lord G. Somerset opposed the motion, which was rejected, on a division, by 70 against 22. Mr. Greene and Lord G. Somerset severally postponed the resolutions of which they had given notice, touching the future regulation of Railway Bills and the committee on railways was revived, with the object of agreeing to resolutions in conjunc- tion with the House of Lords, to carry out the common inten- tion of both Houses. A new writ for Exeter was ordered to issue in the room of the late Sir W. Follett.. On the motion of Lord J. Russell, the Ecclesiastical Courts Bill was read anrsttime. Captain Layard brought the present system of enlistment in the army under consideration, and moved for an address to the Queen, praying her Majesty to direct an inquiry to be made how far the reduction of the period of service in the army, from the present unlimited term to ten years, would tend to procure a better class of recruits, diminish desertion, and thus add to the efficiency of the service. Mr. Sidney Herbert opposed the motion. He would not as- sert th4t the system now in practice in the management of the British soldier was perfect, but he would say that it did not seem very easy to improve it. Both under the direction of Lord Howick and Mr. Macaulay, great care had been taken of the moral culture of the army. Regimental schools had been established-care had been taken to suit the food, the hours, and the clothing, to the climate m which the regiment was stationed-the system of reliefs had been improved-libraries for the men had been collected, and fives-courts and. similar recreations provided for them. These were amongst the im- provements recently made, and to them he might add the plan of giving rewards for good conduct, and of military savings b"After remarks from Mr. Hume Sir H Douglas, and Mr. Williams, the motion was negatived without a division. Mr. M. Milnes was proceeding with his motion respecting the evils attending the present mode of conducting the public execution of criminals, when the House was counted out.
[No title]
The Rev. Mr. Capes, minister of the church of St. John the Baptist. Bridgwater, has, in a letter to his congregation, an- nounced his secession from the Lstablishment, to join the Church of Rome. Mr. Capes is, it appears, a gentleman of considerable property, and some years since intended building a church for himself in yells; but learning afterwards that the spiritual destitution of a certain district in Bridgwater was much greater, he visited that town, and a public meeting hav- ing been held, he undertook, on the sum of £ 1,600 being sub- scribed by the inhabitants, to supply the rest towards building a church, a sum of between two and three thousand pounds. ATTENDANCE UPON RAILWAY COMMITTEES.—Mr. Smith O'Brien, andMr. JohnO Connell, in reply to a notification from the chairman of selection of railway committees, informing them that they would be required to attend during the week begin- ning July 14th, for the purpose of serving, if requested, upon committees, refuse to attend. It Jj said the (natter wiil be brought before Parliament.
To the Editor of the Monmouthshire…
To the Editor of the Monmouthshire Merit n. SUL,-In your last week's paper, Mr. John Owen, attorney, has appeared in your correspondence, as complainant of the judgment of the magistrates, who sat at the hearing of a case on the 11th ult., at the Petty Sessions in this town, in the case of George Gale, who was convicted for absenting himself from his service to the Cwm Celyn and Blaina Iron Company, with- out having given notice to leave. As your reporter I aver that that report was correct, "as far as the men were concerned," 1abstain from making any observation on the manner in which this case was conducted by their legal adviser. I am, Sir yours obediently, Abergavenny, July 1, 1845. J. HILEY MORGAN. —-——
To the Editor of the Monmouthshire…
To the Editor of the Monmouthshire Merlin. think your contemporary was verv unfortunate last week in quoting Southey's lines "For thirty >ears, secluded from mankind," &c. It can hardly be supposed that the poet ever visited Chepstow castle; but, as he was at one period of his life as great a Re- publican as Marten himself, (vide Wat Tyler,") he probably placed his captive in a dungeon, after the manner of STERNE, and then took a peep at him through a hole-fancy supplied the rest. A pleasanter prison for Marten could not have been selected. Take the following description By a staircase of easy ascent you reach the rafters of the first floor, which was the real apartment occupied by Marten. The floor, through lapse of time, has fallen in, but it measured fifteen paces long, by twelve wide, and was very lofty. On one side in the centre, there was a fire place two yards wide, and the windows, which arc spa- cious and lighted both ends of the apartment, gave it an air of cheerfulness not frequent in such buildings. In add-on to this, the state prisoner enjoyed one of the most delightful prospects in Bntam a considerable part of the town of Chepstow at that time interspersed with pleasant orcharding and gardens—the river Wye adorned with vessels passing to and fro from the foreground of the picture and, carry the eye a little further, the vast expanse of the Severn sea, with the rich counties of Gloucester, Somerset, and Devon unite, and form a scene of all that is beautiful in nature." How does this beams ^r^soner never seeing the sun's delightful Setting aside the flights of poetry, it appears from various accounts that, although Marten's confinement was at first very strict, yet, as party rage subsided, he was afterwards indulged with the company of his two daughters, had occasional liberty to walk about the town, and if any family in the vicinity in- vited him to partake of its hospitality, he had permission to do so, his host engaging to return him to the castle at night. Finally, he died at a good old age (78), and was buried in Chepstow church. By the way. Southey has added ten years to his confinement. The foregoing remarks are occasioned by perusing the re- ports of our late Horticultural Show in the MERLI and Beacon. Our first exhibition having passed off so well, re- doubled exertions will, no doubt, be made for the ensuing September fête. Improvements for the arrangement of shrubs, flowers, &c., are understood to be in preparation, by extending the awning both in length and breadth, so as to give full effect to the various productions sent for exhibition. It has been suggested by many that the Ivy Warrior," so ingeniously contrived by Mr. Hartland, did not occupy its proper station in the castle; it was pushed up in a corner, almost out of sight, instead of standing prominently forward as a defender of the fortress. Should the veteran make another appearance, he should be found at his proper post. Returning thanks for the zeal you have displayed in furnish- ing so good a report of the proceedings at our show, particu- larly as your publication was so close upon its termination. I remain, sir, your obedient servant. Chepstow, 1st July, 1845. Q. ».
To the Editor of the Monmouthshire…
To the Editor of the Monmouthshire Merlin. SIB.,—Is it not a gross violation of the existing laws, that workmen should be compelled to take shop goods in place of money, as remuneration for their labour ? I ask the question, because it is currently reported here to day, that the managing partner, as well as the agents, of a certain iron work, have given public notice to the workmen in their employ, that every one who does not deal at the company's shop shall be discharged. Should this evil example be followed by the rest of the iron- masters in this district, what is to become of us poor shop- keepers ? Our occupation, like Othello's, would soon "be gone." Is there no cure for this evil? Can public opinion effect nothing ? Surely it has been expressed often enough, and one might imagine forcibly enough, already. I purpose making further enquiries'into the subject, and may perhaps give you the names of the parties concerned, together with a full and particular account of the system pursued by them, in hopes that by directing public attention to the subject this attempt of theirs to defeat the law and coerce the poor workmen, may be eventually defeated. Perhaps, too, the subject may not be deemed unworthy the attention of some more influential individual than is Your obedient servant and reader, T « A GROCER. Abergavenny, July 2nd, 1845. [Our correspondent is evidently aware that the Truck System violates the law of the land; and, as a reader of the he must know that the practice has been unequivo- cally denounced in our columns, and put down in Newport. If the writer again favour us with a communication, he had better not address us anonymously.]
TOTAL LOSS OF A SHIP BY FIRE.
TOTAL LOSS OF A SHIP BY FIRE. The following are copies of the letters from Lloyd'e agents, received yesterday morning:— "Portsmouth, June 30. The Duke of Argyll, Bristow, arrived off this port, re- ports that on the 26th mst., at eleven p.m., in lat. 47 28 Ion, 16 12, discovered a light on the larboard bow. At made it out to be a ship on fire; up foresail, and stood towards it. At midnight hove to, with head to the southward, about 16 miles to the windward of the wreck, showing lanterns fore and aft, and burning blue lights every quarter of an hour At three a.m. passed under the lee of the ship on fire, at about two cables' distance, but saw nothing but the figure head standing, apparently a bush; she wa.s lying head to wind and burnt to the water's edge. At daylight bore away under e8-EY sail, m hopes of falling in with the boats, if any had left her At 5 16 a.m. she entirely disappeared." ,T „R Dartmouth, June 30. The Herald, Warren, arrived off this port on the 27th inst., at midnight, fell in with a vessel on fire, and on going near her at daybreak, found her, by appearance, a barque laden with eot- ton she was nearly burnt to the water's edge. but the fire was stilt raging fiercely. Ran from her under easy sail, but could see nothing belonging to her. The Duke of Argyll was lying-to, near the fire, at the time." » W AthUW* BABRACKS.—On Thursday se'nnight, bv a soldier nf fh W-an j°mmitted >1 the barracks of Athlone, UaopearL X" on one of his comrades, satorv to th»» nr'f* r deceased used some language dero- about eleven o'clock a^d sTra^T'h ^h P' °Ut °f h'S could be rendoivut 7 strangled him before any assistance We renet to hearth r ^ty men at the time. daughter of the Marquess an^M k^ de ?A\rgh'. the eldest with a serious accident on Tuesda^'aft11688 Cla £ ric!jr(ie, met in company with Visceunt Lascelles to" ?y p' be married, was riding on horseback in T 1 ls.a ,out t0 reaching Constitution-hill her horse stnmhf^ thiU,on forward on her head, by which fall her EdS, J™ I severe contusions about the head jjer hip received se\eral raised from the ground, appeared stunned bv the °n fall, and was immediately conveyed in LorH P ^lolence of the riage, which was passing at the time to the^rIenKW° ^far~ ricarde's mansion on Carlton-house-terrace Xr? °, ) > advice was promptly obtained. At a late ho ii t ladyship was in a condition not at all alarming to her faS v LONDON AND YORK RAILWAY —ConsiJw»M was caused in the Committee Room on MonZy%\lTchT man announcing their decision on certain points w their deliberation the main point of which was that it was <-r>m petent for the Committee to authorise the London and Ym L Railway Company to raise the sum proposed as their caDital under the provisions of their Bill, three-fourths of that amount having been subscribed. The decision was received with shouts of exultation, and numbers hurried off immediately to the Stock Exchange. Mr. Hildyard continued to address the Committees against the line up to the time of adjournment It is said that not less than tiUU,IXX) has been alreapy spent in the-contest of the two rival lines. A man named Chalk was, on Monday last, committed for the- manslaughter of his son (by a severe punishment for disobey- ing him) at a brick field at Camden Town, London. .A
Family Notices
BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS. BIRTHS. June 27th, the lady of Thomas Edwards, Esq., Clifton place of a son. June 27th the wife of Mr. Frederic Chapman, of this town of a daughter. June 28th, ,t Risca, the lady of Edward Robathan, Esq. surgeon, of a son. n July 2nd, at Cardiff, the wife of Mr. Richard Leyshon, sad- dler, of a soa. J • ou vMaRRIAOES. At Trevethin Church, on Tuesday, July 1, by the Rev Tho- mas Davies, M.A., Incumbent Minister M, A. Miss Eliza P. Carter, both of the town of PontVTDOoh t0 26th ult., at Skenfrith, by the Rev. G. D. Miller John Davis the church strewn with flower" byX'kSd'riSwS' £ ,*d to Miss Jane George, of Rodmarton, Gloucestershire June 3, at New York, U.S bv the Rov fi t b j 11 at thf rhi.rr.Vi nf ,e rtev- G- J • Bedell, rector M.D l £ Tr'nA1exander B. Cleland, Esq., youngest DAUGHTER at P I ^ment> to Fanny Kemp, the port of Bristol rU' Es(* > surTey°r of customs at Inn, Brynmawr, to Miss Elizabeth Jenkins, late of Merthyr. /•» i? .j DEATHS. son nf m tj year, Benjamin Price, youngest son of Mr. B P. Hyam, Monmouth. Last week, Miss Fanny Williams, who formerly kept the otamp-office, Chepstow. v On Saturday last, agCd 68 years, Mr. Edward Wrench. farmer, of the New Inn, near Pontypool. Vear o?hi?iL,,1,Vfpt £ ^l1'G^orge Brewer. Esq in the 70th an inhabitant Newport and\rneihlouSi)art S T residents in that town, his worth wasfoo weU in'to rej-dre a laudatory comment on his death Tn 1 H life Jie resided at Coalbrook Vale Iron y''ars ot thft establishment, where his loss S be s £ r,>w f f, "iT f the pleasure of hi. «cqaatauu^w,fci!. and Vi" on whose kinHK- v WUI experience the loss ol one acei? 13U1WiUfa j at Ilotwalls, Bristol, Sitw, W Jorden' y°un8est of Mr. F. G. Sherrard, HanifO^t^»a a ,sflort illness, aged 72, the Rev. Uamel Evans, Trinity Chape Carmarthen, who had been for the 1^ 3/ years a faithful Minister in the Calvinistic Metho- dist connection. Lat,e! ™ddfnly. TW« Lloyd, Esq., of Bronwydtf, one of the Magistrates and Deputy lieutenant of the co»nt>' of Cardigan. The sudden demise of this amiable and highly has cast a deep and universal gloom over the whole neighbourhood in which he resided; aad his loss will XSS 1 hW family and a l«g«™cie 0^ relatives and Bristol, aged 33, Mr.' n >'• Sl! S'(°f.lhe Arm of » Messrs. R. Fletcher, & Monmouthshire Mt' Richard Jeakins' of NeWP01t' wipfoJShL a! tYlA T^ect07' Abbotts, near Kos", fhp R^v KnK Majgaretta, the beloved wife o Strong The deceased lidy was great-niec of Governor Drake, of Madras, and was related t the noble houses of Heathfield and Paulett. Her father, th late Mr becretary Bean, was descended from the ancient fanul of Grant, of Grant Castle, now Earl of Seafield. May & at Beyrout, the Rev. Henry D. Lecves, formerly of Wrjngton, Somerset, minister of the English Episcopal church at Athens, and for upward, of 26 years agent to the British and Foreign Bible Society.