Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

16 articles on this Page

..------.-_._--_._-....:----------s…

News
Cite
Share

s CAnnIFF TOWN OOUNCHí8. I !nUtiqnarJ;c^ meeting of the Cardiff Town *«r"fm W:i'r °n in tie Council Cliam- ^er ott! io-An- i'rese-it—the Mayor, Mr J. a.u>un-c.uc (who presided), Aideimeu Jones, en'ttHione, j^vans, Elliott, Bow. 11, Alexander, i«sni8, Watkins Counc llors Slo: er, Rees Jones, f/UMCiw., J. Rowlands, J. Evans, Stone, Thomas, J Armstrong Yora h, Wanders, Tre>eder, button. Jacob-, K. Divvies, David .lone?, Rees Enoch, LoueLer, Proper, Trounce, Newbery, and Beavan. SUE CABDIpx? riLCTAGE BILL—IMPORTANT DISCUS- SIuN ON THE EVIPENOi' Mr JACOBS rose, in accordance with notice, to call attention to the instructions given by the Council on tie 9th of February last to the i'arlia- In ary Committee in opposing the Cardiff j Pilotage Bill, and to the evidence given on btlialf if tt.e Coi poratiou before the Committee of he House of Lords an I the Committee of ILutMc 1 Commons, and to a k for :itaiii explanations theieon. lIe said: la o dlu.g attention to the opposition altered by he t « rporauon to the passing of ti e Cardiff L'ilotage i 5 i, n y C 'U lfc wiJ1 be "ece^ry for h me t ) tn er v,ry nunuielv into deti.ils SuEP™ r "Kt ui" r !>roi-'te 1 '• j™ avvaie, J .n.tiy by the shipowners. the Chamber of Coioinc: ee, 1V..U the Pilots of th^J^ Forrea8ons that -ati.shed us, we felt it HIT I V JK,r rea8"n?i > Bill, and :» petition u as t ,dut,y ,lo/,ppose .th0 it staling the gn um!s ,,f lodged »nain« be wiihiu vou'i- vecolic "f.°^e.Ct,l0nS- A™'1 _j,„ 'etonec.) tlJi:t t ()|r|,t; it my hat- -V "<v.y?'u'.l;o* somewhat qualify the nature rfei.ro BY 11 resolution referring to the I \i i0,1* ^'ie pilots, and, upon the motion reanT1*? Alderman Bo en, the following r *Uu-on as very cordially supported, and Tn f- • du,y carried That it be an s juction to the Parliamentary Committee not 0 jject to the pilots bein^' rep esent.d." No>v it 8o this lesijhition I wish to call y ui attention— 1 r'll6 S° Sei'°us do I consider the matter tl at it 0,,r lno,t earnest at entiun and caterui in- Q llt V, inasmuch a.i it affects not only the consis- leni y ot our concti c: and ti e dignity of our pro- ceedings, but as reflecting mo t seriously upon the Possibility of any one me mber or any select muri- ner of memheis of tiiis board overruling the ex- pressed opinion of a majority of its members. J he petition was, it ia true, duly submitted for our t afprovnl; it is also equally tue that this lesoln- 1 'cWas a's<> can ied at the name meeting, and yet if fiud it possible that this petition, instead of ei,1g altered in accordance wit*i t e ex- preg instructions of the boar<(, still it re- I raIned unaltered and unaffected by it. caanot think but that must all feel that an *plauation ought to be demanded, or else stul- » "iy <>urstlves iu the eyes of the rattpayers and P'iblic of the town. Th. », again, how is 'hat the counsel who had be<n instiucted to 1 us as a Corporation h- d no knowledge f t'us resolution, and if he had knowledge of it, |ow is it that 1 e did not see fit to elicit repues { 0 the witnesire'j on our behalf bearing upon it, k instead of which we nd it had to be extracted ^leni by the counsel for the promoter* of the '>•11 Itself; tnis also calls for some expa atiou. 1 Viul erea-t difficulty in rec<.ncil n* the evidence s«me members of this board, w.io.at the tune ot P{«si„g t|)e resolution, very cordially supported review of the pilots being represented yet in 5i!eU- evidence "before the Committee of the p""B0 of Commons they go in a cou- rary direction. Possibly they have rea- bohs to give that satisfy themselves and I trust • 'at will s-atisfj us. Now as to the evidei ce given i ? V'e maT°r before the Committee of the House Commons, I am und' r the iu pression that he Ptesiged over the meeting at which tue resolution o Air Alderman Bowen as carried—in this im- pression I find I am supoorted by the re; ort of 11r meeting in the newspaper—yet he is reported have said l>e was not p cseut. However,this may be a small matter. What I wish more particu- larly to come to ia tbis-that surely some couitesy or deference is due to the deliberations of this board, apart from the estimate that may be formed of its members. Yet it would seem the mayor was more anxious to express his own inoi- vidual opinion than to carry out the instructions of this board. Then, when we pass to hie evidence befoie the Committee of the House TI ri'8' ? a,n -LEAI,Y a 'osS understand it. How was it possible for him to so misrepresent the real facs of the case as to he able to state that ■]h our or>position was mainly and, as he said, solely J-; 3;.ec'ed against the pilots. Here he hail before him ti e express instructions of the Corporation not f oppose the pilots, and yet he goes on to state >at our opposition as soUy against them, and °"Y 8o, but that as we had, as a Corporation, •need the number the pilots sought to put. ou, dre«>ere sat's^c^i and that, therefoie, we with- I f»>r°lU °P'M>B'on before the Lords' Committee. 1 mint, 0MP,' 5(111 ,n,,st anxious for an explanation of I Ho i>f>C0 U|Ct" "'is is a serious matter. It is I er onal matter, gentlemen; it concerns every 1 of this board alike. There is this pi in- I involved in it—whether it is possible the expressed opinion of this board to be rode over in this rough-shod manner, and whether it is in the power of one member or a few meinberaof this board, for reasons best known to themselves, to set aside at their will ana pleasure any decision arrived at by a majoiity of this board. I ask for these explanations in the interest ) of tl.e consistency of our ov n conduct and the dignity of our proceedings. Alderman JONES s dd that,as he happened to be d he should like to kuovv to whom Mr Jacobs I referred. i Mr JACOBS Mr Rees Jones and Mr Rowlands. I Mr KKES .JONES said that so far hs he was "1 aware lie ha I gone there at his o > u expense—he J( ertainly was not a.sked to g>» there by the Cor- .1/ poratiou. When examined he did not profess to a .tpeak in the name of the Corporation, on behalf < of the » orpo'ration, or in any way in a rei resen a- tive capacity. But had he been asked to give his I views on the pirt of tIe Corporation, the evi- t I, 1nce he gav. would not have been al ered in the I ighteslj degree. He maintained that a large l>r portion of tlie members of this bo I d fam e to the cOlflclusion in I ere. ence to the representation of pilots on the boanl iu deference to a very strong I armiment put forward by Mr Jacobs, relative to I Vlie amount of money the pilots had gathered ogether in t e snare of a fund. But there was nothing in t e Bill which in 'any way I ivas addressed to the management of the fund; and the only feeling of approbation Df the course of Mr Jacobs, he (the speaker) Sntertained, was brought about solely he might lay by what WitS stated as to the ma axement of ilie fund. If it had been, therefoie, that the pilutswere to be introduced on the hoard for the management of the fund, he would h ve had no tbjeution whatever. But the Bill was 'tddressed to the management of affairs (eneraify, instead of to the management of the money ) art of it—a part winch had been arged as the main fulcrum around which Me Jacobs cl iiued the assistance of the Corporation • iu placing pilots on tie boa d. He reo udillted 1 the riJ(doC; of Mr Jacobs or anyone else at kis. I Hoard to interfere with what he did in his private •picity. Alderman ELLIOTT said the Bill was now J Msed. Ti.e pilots lad had what they .teBu ed, he was at a loss to know why the tnat.ter had been brought forward at all. The sup- I potters of the Bill had given Mr Jacobs no Vithority to c'uallence the members of the council ill the fashion he had done, and neither had the "ilots. If the pilots were satisfied he ielt that >ey ought to let tlie matter drop. | Mr Rowlands stated that he went to London in his private cap city, and at his own expense, for another plrty-uol. for the Council. Mr PEES JONKS said tnat to show how innocent he Was he had no idea when Mr Jacobs was speaking that that gentleman was referring to 8¿ «im. Air Jacobs was certal/lly looking at him— I (1 ughter)—but he (Mr Jones) thought, that was I because he as in tlie uirect line of vision. (Laughter.) He had no more idea that he was teferred to t1,an he hall expectation of beillg made Afchbisliop of Cauteibury. (Laughter.) He went Jo London to give his views, ami he gave his vieu s ""Uestly and independently, as to the constitution •f the Pilotage Board. They had here no right °C:ill hi n to accou it.. .1r JACOBS thought it was within the province of 1 ny member of the Council to question the f ^Oediuug of any of those who weie de egateo to t?T,X out certain instruct ors. Hri '"at he ha 1 challenged the act.on of the Mayor the Town-clerk as well. An explanation was i e1'iiied, Alderman WATKINS, sp^akit g from long ex| eii- t. Ce of pilota.e, said he believed the Bill was as satisfactory a HIli as it was g'^sible to obtain. The ende.ivo r of the Cham- ».ep of Commerce to put three shipowners and ».lree merchants on the board had been u. set, and as well constituted as i. could be. i.^Ir 1;UNCAN Baid he could not sit in ,s !>lape and allow this meeting to pass without ?^kiiig some observations. la j,jg 0p nioii Mr ■■A t.ac°b8 was quite witiiiu his right in tue co rse had taken. I«<jeel bethought it w..s the of this Corjw>rath>n to take notice the cbar«cter of tt.e evidence piven on bebaif to take notice the cbar«cter of tt.e evidence piven on bebaif ?f tiie Corporation, iiiey had arrived lit a de- "berate resolution that no opposition should be ffi^ied to the pdots being rep esented on the I Pilotage Board. No one, so H8 had heaiii, || frfettiudtd to nay t"at waa, ,IM)t •* diatinc-t •l '•Mution How did the Lorporation proceed to out this resolution? the P'V' ,nat" r before iliem it appeared that tlie resolution was » j^Med. and that a memorial or petition intended i w P'esentation in the House was t e" ftitum contained in the 7th clause the ^"tence That it is not expedient that lj o> J0lil sit on the boartl." Now it seeded to /St ex raordinary thing that a petition Ot should be adopted after the passing o* ^"lution, Mr Jacobs had, ho vever, thrown ^"lution, Mr Jacobs had, ho vever, thrown light npon that matter. The petition, it was ti st rea l, and afterwards this resolu- t|°n was carried; and he (Mr Jao>b-») complained Sl^t t' e.petiUon was not remodelletl and altered. It .,ex" incoflllilltency was that the Parliamentary y^iiiuiit'tee, 6r"t of all, aud afterwards the Cor- ••aiioit, elected four Al,tenultu to goto represent IIJ. tWCl of them members of the Pilotage and ttie whole having expressed individi-al t ^nio ta entirely opposed to ttie princ photon -11ered constitution ot the board. This expression f their own iiulividual opin on the^ AtOfimen ^•requite entitled to, but, having accepted tt e ))q"itioll of delegates fro u this Corporation, their Jlity Wi. to see the resolutions arflved at was *^rly aud houourably ciirr,ef' °,u« The Hldermen were, he belnved. Alderman David, ^derman Alexander, Alderman Jones, ami ■^Ulerman Wi stone.. ..Alderman ALEXANDER saic lie did not g. at 'instance ot the vorpoiation. Mr Dukcan had thought Alderman Alexamjei ^as one of ttie number, but after that » ateme-1 -course ue w.thdrew thrt aideimau s n»me. They evidence Alderman WIMSTONE Ioid not. > Mr 1 on CAN, pi oceeding, said that Alderman •«n«3 gavo evidence, Alderman lJavid gave ,¡deuce, and the Mayor gave evidence, )*d the evidence they gave h'd io refer- jj*»ce whaterer to this resolution of the Lon>o> a- i.either directly nor in irectly ami in ee<j iW witnesses had te be cross-examined by coun-el r>r the promoters before the fact th:it irnch a r<o. tloD had been passed was brought UI der, the tioe of the Committee of the House of Com- It had been said at a previous that it was not the business of a wit- v*«s to make speeches; but it was the g^tiness of the gentlemen who represented the ^poiatioa to rc^xeeent tbo vi«w» of to* Corporation, and not their own individual yieu g. If they were not content to represent the views of the Corporation they ought to have declined. Had they gone as Mr Itees Jones did, aud as Caut, Lowlands diil, to represent the Bute inte- I re,t, or the, Puotage Board, it would have perfectly fair and right; but when they wen the representatives of the Corporation, they were bound in honour to cariy out their wish. Sup- po-.il g the counsel not to have asked Ques- tions, was it not quite possible for t^e witnesses, in some way or another, to ha\"4 insisted upon bosi'l 1° An-attei" l,e,f,)I'e the 'committee ? Luc ev'id-iM-p41 tit t f tad "een ,;luofs of the eviau,.e taken befoteha-^ jtj.i this show tiiit the witnesses w,<re before they went to London, desirous of bringing out the resolutions of the Corporation ? Or if the counsel had neg]. Atcd to ask the question, then tne le.\$:ave been put lip that it was through the <««tgleot of the counsel. But he had taken ti e jj0;,ble to examine tlie proof evidence, always bero: ell n I, and he had found notion? there in reference to ti is matter, except l the case of Alderman Joues. On the contrary, the proof evidence and the way they gave the evidence showed that they were distinctly of opinion that the constitution of this board was perfectly right, and that ic would be prejudicial to the interests of the board to have it altered. There must l ave been some prompting too, for two ot the witnesses' (Alderman David and Alderman Alexander) evidence «as in part woid I for II ord exactly the same. Alderman David said :—" I do not consider that pilots should form a part of the body who appoint and judge pilots. It seems to tue that it would be very objection- able to allow pilots to select their own masters, and still more so if these m stirs are tLemselves ^pilots. From a board so constituted we con' ititrdlv expect decisions affecting the pilots which would Command respect for their justice and impartiality. No v this would, of course, have the effect: of up- Betting the decision of the Corporation. Again, theie was Alderman Jone3, who, in his proof evidence, said: "That tie Corporation, taking into consideration the laTge interest possessed by the pilots themselves in the pilotage board, are willing, in their behalf, to waive their objection to an increase of members to the nCC. nt that the pilots may elect, by ballot, two representatives who are not acting pilots, but to be elected by from the neighbourhood, say, not to live more than — miles fiotn Cardiff." Ho » different was this, Mr Duncan proceeded, to the resolution arrived at by the Gon oratll/o. That resolution did not say anything about the ballot, nor about acting pilots, for instance. In fact, Mr Jones' had formed yn i ea of l is own apart from the reso- lution of what the Corporation should do. As for A dertnau Winstone.he was not asked to give evi- dence, and he was not asked to give [roof evidence. Alderman WINSTONE: You have no proof of that. (A laugh). Mr Lcncan said the Parliamentary Committee w re salii to have asked the alderman to come to London, and that was all he could find out, ex. cept that the alderman appeared to i ave done nothing. No doubt, however, he fulfilled the use- ful function of court jest r, and afforded a great deal of amusement in the evenings over his grog an I his p p'. (Laughter). Such as the ouly part which Alderman Winstoue, who claimed to be the pr-moter of tile original Bill, porfoimed. (Laugh- ter). In the course of some concluding remarks, he said th t he thought it > as the duty of these witnesses to give some explanation to the Council of th, ir conduct, for he still hoped that they would be able to show that the case was not so bad as it appea. ed to be. Alderman JONES said he did not wish to satisfy Mr D ncan. He knew he could not do that were he to try, but for the satisfaction of the Council he would state a few facts. A more spiteful bit of special pleading than that they had just listlned to he had never heard but he would say nothing more about it. As some of them would remember, the Corporation decided at one time to oppose the Bill as a whole, but after that it was. determined thai, they would not object to t e pilots themselves being represented on the board. It was, however, at the same time dis- tinctly und#i stood that these representatives should not be acting pilots. His dutv, he took it, was to oppose the Bill entirely, but if the Bill were to pass, to say that the Corporation woulu not object to two pilots being put on. If they intended to oi pose the Bill, they must, of cOllrbe, oppose the preamble first. When they went into the committee-room, they found an immense amount of business of the kind going on. Counsel ou both sides were out and in all day long, going off to take different cases, and as a matter of fact the counsel engaged for the Cor- poration asked the counsel for the promoters to examine him. In the course of his utoof he pointed out the 1 rge amount of funds which had been accumulated, how they had partly been ex- pended, that the pilots did not complain of any mismanagement, but had in fact expressed their approval of the pres, nt system. He was in- structed, o be understood, to admit two pilots on the Board, and for this reason that if six ship- owners and merchants were placed there, these addItIOnal lepresentatives would Ilave in some cased interests antagonistic to those of tl e pilots. A to what ad been said about speaking, a witness could not tpeak unless in answer to a. question. And now ne challenged them to look over his ) roof to say whether it was not an exact nummary of what was said here at the board. The Town Clerk (Mr Wheatley) also replied. He said the petition was read after the resolution I was parsed. No doubt that petition was pre- pared very generally and very broadly, as peti- tions were, so aa to include everything. However, Clause 7, which had been referred to—that it was not expedient that pito,s should sit on the board —was quite consistent with what he understood from the Council. His brief to counsel would show that that resolution was mentioned therein. It was | art of his instruct ons to bring that matter forward, and he did. They used to hold consultations nearly eveiy morning, and decide as to the best course to be pursued. O uusel for the Corporation did not call him. Counsel for the promoters did call u: on him to produce the linuiite books. He had not received a pioper warrant, and he was not com: elled to accede to the request, but he thought the resoiuti n which had been spoken of might as veil come out i" evi- dence that way as any other way; and he accordingly reall it, and brought out t at it was passed unanimously. Indeed, it was brought out as distinc Iy as any resolution could possibly be at least 20 times in the course of the proceedings. Mr G. A. STONE said it « as quite clear that the Town Clerk had done his duty in the matter. The To n Clerk remaiked that Alderman David paid his own expenses, but he was stnt up by the Parliamentary Committee. Mr SANDERS said of course the Council had no right to say auytiling aboui. what Mr liees Jones did when in London on this occa>i< n, nor about Mr Rowlands. The others wete,as representatives of the Council, iu a different position. He had listened att. ntively to the explanation of Alder- man Joties; he admired him for making the explanation* for the matter was one of grtve consideration. He might say, however, that he* thought Alderman Jones was in error ou one point. The alderman had said that they had decided to oppose the Bill tntirely, and that npoi reconsideration, it was decided not to 01 pose the lepiesentation of the pilots. Such walt not the eae. For the ques ion as to the re; resellta- tion of t! e pilots 011 the I'ilotage Board was con- sidered before it was decided to oprose the pre- amble of the Bill. If t ey went back to the time when t' ey were engaged in getting their general Bill in 1»79. they would find that it was then pro- posed by himself, and seconded by Alderman Elliott to give the. pilots a seat on the Pilotoge Board a motion which, how. ever was lost by four votes. When, however, the Council decide I to opi ose the pre- amble it was cle rly understood t! at the evidence sonld he ghen in such a torin as to make it clear that the Council we:e of opinion the pilots should be let-resenied. Mr Rees Jones had said that at the time referred to the question was considered to be one of frnds. But he re, mded Mr Pees Jones that the question of the nature of the representation liS also taken into account as to the de«ir, bility of having men on the board* who would beat the same time accusers and judges. That matter was certainly brought out as strongly as the question of funds. On the 10th of March, Mr Sandets conti ued, Alderman Jones, Alderman David, and Aldermau Altx n- tiff were at pointed by the Parliamentary Ccm- mittee for ti e purpose of going to London. Akleiman ALEXANDER: I have been ve y little here recent y, and ,eally did not know ot it. \1r ^A>Di RS said it was cleai ly understood twtho e time gentlemen wete to represent the • nf this Corpora ion, not their own. Then, VlVin he could i ot understand how the petition cune'to be sent off uMiont the uordmg f'av'"2 iltered • but after the explanation they had & ir,lu'"m<l'"< .emclMon that tl.e.r ™ ueBkct.,1 In Loi.,l..n "j ti.e cm.el for it appeared thatti ey ere not present Itw. s now clear toat in the evidence the lesoli.t'on was brought out, but he t:.ought Alderman Jones nught have availe! himself of an opportunity and d0Al Small JONES; We had to oppose the pre- amble of th. Bill. I »1 '1 ™01 PiloU be,n* re' presented t the Pilot-age Board. Mr BANDEBS But the committee ought to .;ave had a-, explanation. Coming to deal with the evidence given befo e tile Committee the Cardiff there stated that the Co, notation wituorevr because they were satisfied when the T. ,n,>t *et 're than 01 e. Surely have been drawn into aon>t'thin5 1 he would not have .iOd W ^naKi?tULi,enl-V' w/ch to think of it. U,a imle time I„ Miswer to several appeals for 1 the MAYOR, Who spoke 11. a very low undetstood to say the Council were «Jt sen ted in the House of Lords. I wa, a-kerf ™ had wither v n, and I i-aid because we were «kus! fie,i that the Bill se.it frota the Commons wM a S°The subject then dropped. HFPARATE COURT OF QUARTER SESSIONS. f)i^the motion of Air THOMAS, seconded by Mr T^VANS the consideration of this subject, on *'• • 7 u T .w„ Clerk ad prepared a report, was which the Town ClerK a v r t<) {h(J Couucil< referred to a committee, THR market Kof w" defer, ed until t,, /^rpe. ty ««-' \fa ke s Committee had prep ared their 1 • He though a i-pe.-ial 1.rating of the t 1 should l-e called to consider thwirrr ortant qiKfltion. Mr 1 ONCAif express* d approval ot fcu^t,e Ition which was adopted. A NEW 8WIMHIKG CLUB. The Swimming Chh in coimeotion with the Youne Ale 's < hri*tian Association h 'd applied fe Alu^v^^bniLht' thTJubject* fo. ward, Htating tliat he thought it would be ss we.i wti« the committee to encourage twiriinmeg, Alderman EVANS said the young men att«n<Jm* the association named could afford I usual charge—a very small one j: .fjould be nnfc ee saw no r< ason why an exce.-tio made in their case. (He;r, bear.) ATION *HB MEDICAL OFFICER'S REPORT—IMPORTATION made in their case. (He;r, bear.) ATION MEDICAL OFFICER'S REPORT—IMPORTATION OF SMALL-POX. The Medical Officer 01 fieaitb. Dr FalDe. II. {.ortesi the total number of daths during, the iiton^n »t r»l males an 1 42 females. Ihe bi'.ths we!e 108 males and 102 females makm,: a «t?i of 2iiiriirdS.r^wri4l ill births over deaths, xue 1,000 inhabitant t;.| ical (.e-'th-iate "lurin" > by t[ie l>egister-Geueral. large tov. ns eni.m j 000 inhabitants.. Tne birth-rate ^eveVi chief zMnof,,c d £ S««-h-been 1*5 S^nTl^th tS t! e captain was taken ill durin? the passage tha tie I 1 jieij from that disease on the JotKi '»& off tt rifio)! 1 «« Sond ease occurred soon after '1 he sick seaman was immediately conveyed to the infectious Ward f IVIA fTAiMalrvad, in which establishment, al- ISSoSSe ia. in the confluent furm, he iJ now recovering. The remainder of the crev w«re all examined, and were found to be in c«od health. On inspecting the crew the marks of previous vaccination were Satisfactory. Communication was made with the dock authorities, aud by their co-operation the ve-sel was isolated from all others, and com- munication with the ship limited to the absolute necessity of its business requirements. Such portion of the clothing belonging to the sick man as was deemed necessary was destroyed, the remainder was effectively disinfected by exposure to the action of dry air heated to a temperature exceeding 240 degrees. The ship was from time to time exposed to the operation of fumigation. The ship and crew were kept uuder repeated super- vision, and no extension of the disease occurred up to the time of the departure of the vessel. I think it necessary to report to your board the cir- cumstance that 110 information was given by the pdet who took charge of the vessel, that so serious a di-ease existed on board the ship, an omission w ich might have entailed serious consequences to the public he 1th of the port. In answer to several inquiries instituted by Mr Trounco and others, Dr. PAUlE stated that he could not order a ship not to enter a port simply because she had a case of small-pox 011 board— that disease not being included in the quarantine list. THE NEW FREE LIBRARY, The Town Clerk was, on the motion of Mr Boweii, seconded by Mr Sanders, instructed to advertise for tenders for the erection of the new free library. A PROPOSED NEW ROAD AT CANTON. • The Rev. VINCENT SAULEZ had sent the follow- ing letter to the Council :—Permit me to ask your kind consideration with regard to buildings about to be erected behind Wyndham-cresceut, and which, if erected at the north end, will effect- ually cut off the possibility of connecting the Severn and King's-roads, whereon the Commis- sioners have granted a portion of land for the erection of church, schools, and clergyman's house. This connection, which is possible at present, would be a great boon to the inhabitants of both roads, as it u ould considerably shorten the way to church and chapel of the several worshippers. The reading of the letter created considerable discussion. It was ultimately resolved that a committee should visit the spot and take what steps were thought necessary, THE GAS SUPPLT. It appeared from the gas report that the illuminating power of gat dnring the month at the Town Hall was on an average 14'36 candles. The mean of the experiments at the gasworks was 15'96 candles. THE COMMON SEAL Was ordered to be affixed to three mortgages to the trustees of the Abercarn Relief Fund for the loan of the following amounts, viz, :-£5,00Q for five years £10,000 for 10 years £10.000 for 15 years. There WAS no other business of public interest.

GLAMORGANSHIRE ASSIZES.

WELLS' CHARITY.,

IMPORTANT COLLIERY CASE.

InOCAL LIQUIDATIONS..

Advertising

AN IMPROVEMENT IN WULL MAYlGATIOii.…

DEAN STANLEY AT L LAN DA IF…

Advertising

THE WELSH BAPTIST UNION. .?---

WRECKS OF LOCAL VESSELS.

- SWINDLING BY A WELSH 'GENTLEMAN.

[No title]

^Bgassag ! SWANSEA TOWN COUNCIL.,."…

SUNDAY TillOTlciiNNESS IN…

Advertising