Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

19 articles on this Page

AGBICCLTCBAL NOTES.

* FARM SPBING WORK.

TENANT FARMERS AND THEIR .…

[No title]

OUR LONDON LET

OUR OLD MOBILITY.

THE AMERICAN CATTLE TRADE.

-..--..-------THE AKEMAMT…

[No title]

" THE RETIVALTST MOVEMENT…

A MODE UN SERMON.

THE ALLEGED RITUALISTIC PRACTICES…

News
Cite
Share

THE ALLEGED RITUALISTIC PRACTICES AT ST. M'AB Y'8 CHURCH CABDIFF. At an adjourned meeting of the Consistory Court of thia diocese, held at Llandaff, ou Mon- day, before Mr. R. 13. Ollivant, the Chancellor, and the Registrar, the petition of tbe Rev. G. å. Jenea, vicar of St. Mary's Church, Cardiff, for a faculty to authorise certain alterations in the church, again came under consideration. As at the first application, Mr. F. de C. Hamilton ap- peared as proctor tor the petitioner, and the opponents, who are headed by Mr. John Griffiths, one of the churchwardens, were represented by Mr. T. H. Staphena. Considerable interest waa manifeated in the proceedings, about 50 of the leading parishioners being present. Mr. Hamilton, in opening the proceedings, reiterated the objects of the petition—namely, to obtain authority for the removal of the pulpit to a more convenient position in the body of the ohureh, the removal of the organ from the west gallery to the chancel, and the conversion of oertain pews on the centre aisle into free seats. He added that the proposed alterations, were devoid if any doctrinal significance, and tended Bimply to the comfort of the congregation and the con- venience of oonducting the services, and pointed out that the cost was fully] guaranteed. It was the unanimous wish of the congrega- tion that these alterations should ba made, and he submitted that a clearer case had never been made out for the granting of a faculty, and he was bound to say that it appeared thp the opposition were animated by a previous existing feeling of hostility to the vicar, and < enmity to the Church of England. Having r.. stated the grounds of the petition, Mr. Hamilton called the following witnesses, whose evidence wfn taken upon oath Mr. John Priohard, dioceaa t architect, deposed to having prepared the plana for the proposed alterations, and he stated thatj he considered they would improve the ay-, pearanoe of the ohureh and add to the eon- venience of conducting the services. At pra. sent the pulpit obstructed the gangway, and the position in which it was proposed to place the organ was the usual one in the churches of the diocese. He could not recollect an instance in which the existing arrangement of the pulpit and organ were in force elsewhere in the diocese; such arrangements were now obsolete. There would be an increase- of 72 in the number of sittings by the new plan.—The Rev. C. Parsons, rector of Penarth, aaid he ha.d preached from the pulpit at St. Mary's Churoh for many yeara, and he considered it waa decidedly objectionable.—By Mr. Stephens He believed the proposed altera- tion would be an improvement, and it depended upon the height of the new pulpit whether the preacher would be heard from it in the north gal- lery. Had heard good oongregational singing in the church, but that was when the choir waa in the organ-gallery. Re-examined: He thought the singing might be improved by placing the choir at the east end, and that the choir and organ should be together. The Revs. E. F. Puller, vicar of Roath, and C. J. Thompson, vicar of St. John's, also testified to having preached from the pulpit, and to having found it inconveniently placed.—Mr. R. S. Fisher, organist of St. Mary's Church, said he had been organist for 20 years, and he now found it difficult to accompany the choir. He considered that the best position for the organ was on one aide of the church in juxta-poaition to the choir. In its present position the organ was injuriously affected by the damp in winter, and by the aun in the summer. By Mr. Stephena The organ had twice undergone extensive repairs during the last 20 yeara, and had been partially tepairea many other times. It was now incon. venient to accompany the choir because they were away from the gallery.—Mr. Atkins, organist of St. John's^ Church, said he had been organist at St. Mary's Church for four years, and during that time he noticed that the choir and those around the organ were doing all the sing- ing themselves. At St. John's, where the organ was in a similar position, they found great incon- venience from it, as the congregation in the galle- ries and body of the church were often singing different time. Cross-examined Had not heard that the congregation had refused to have the organ removed from its present place, and be- lieved they had no other place for it. His belief was that at the parish meeting upon the subject thepariahionora were generally in favour of re- moving the organ.—The Rev. H.A. Coe, curate of St. Mary's, also expressed an opinion that the present pulpit was very inconvenient and in the way. This was the case for the peti- tioners.— Mr. Stephens, addressing the court for the opposition, emphatically denied that they were actuated by any feeling of hostility to the vicar or of enmity to the Church. They were adopting the present course from a sense of duty, and he maintained that Mr. Griffiths had as much right as any other man, even of greater influence, to come there and state his opinion upon the subject. He submitted that the peti. tioners had not made out any case whatever, and that the effect of the alteration of the sittings would ibe to banish 160 people to the gallery, where they could not hear the preacher. The proposed removal of the pulpit and organ were both unnecessary, and inas- much asa the parishioneta had not been oossultcd in the matter, he contended that the vicar was in no way justified in asking for the faculty. The petitioners in favour of the altera- tiona were desoribed as "seat-holdera" and "■communicants," and they might be parishioners, or come from anywhere. Not a tittle of evidence had been brought forward to show that there was any hostility to the vicar, or enmity to the Church, on the part of the opponents. And, 011 his side, it was contended that the alterations would in. crease the ill-feeling among the parishioners, which had been referred to, and give increased opportunities for objectionable practices in the Church. He'pointed out that the alterations were refuse 1 by the court some time ago, because the consent of the parishioners had not been given to them, and a large majority of them still maintained the same opposition. Both organ and pulpit had anawered the purpose well for the last 20 years; the principal obstruction to the view of the communion table had beenjjremoved it was shown that the organ had only required extensive repairs twice within 20 years; and no Berious objections had been made to the pulpit except on the part of the few clergymen who had been called. In conclusion, Mr. Stephens urged that no case had been made out by the petitioners which would justify the Court in granting the faculty, and that to interfere with the property of the parishioners against the wishes of the ma- jority would be contrary to all principles of common law and equity. He then called Mr. John Griffiths, who denied having any feeling of enmity to the Church, or hostility to the vipar, and &sid that in opposing the proposed alterations he felt he was simply doing his duty. He could hear very well from the present pulpit, and see the communion table from where he sat in the friddle aisle, and he thought the alter- ations were unnecessary. In cross-examination he admitted that he waa present when two petitions were presented to the churchwardens in favour of the alterations. When he went about getting signatures to the petition he very likely told people that Mr. Jones was making the church like a Roman Catholic Chapel, but he did not authorise anyone to say that the alterations would increase the rates. Mr. Carr, a former churchwarden, gave evidence in support of the opposition, but, upon being pressed in cross- examination, admitted that he was no longer a member of the Church of England, and that he occasionally preached in Nonconformist chapels. Mr. Hamilton, having replied upon the whole case, the court reserved judgment.

Advertising

PROPOSED SUNDAY CLOSING BILL…

A RELIGIOUS DIFFICULTY AT…

MERTHYR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL.

--....----.-----.--..-.---CURIOUS…

THE RIGHTS OF BRISTOL CHANNEL…

BREACH OF THE MINES REGULATION…