Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

7 articles on this Page

AGRICULTURE.

News
Cite
Share

AGRICULTURE. (Continued). LANDLORD AND TENANT. (By an Occasional Correspondent). There are good and bad land.ords and there are gouu and bau armors. in the overhauling ox l>ruisn agriculture, which wid take piace alter the war there will not be room ior bad landlords or bad farmers. This overhau.ing will certainly take place and some of the greatest men of the agri- cultural world are already being retained by the Government for the purpose. Generally speaking, the position as re- gards the tenancy system is at present anything but satisfactory. Undoubtedly the best system of holding land is to rent from a good landlord. By a good land- lord I mean the person wno studies the welfare of his tenants a wel, as himself a per-on who systematically repairs the buildings on his estate; who does not pre. serve game to the detriment of his tenants; and, if not able to transact the business of his estate personally, has an experienced and sympathetic agent who knows his work. The characteristics of the bad landlord are of course too well known—the person I who never comes in personal contact with his tenants, whu never cares about- the buildings on his estate, preserves game, and has several gamekeepers of the usuai type-the natural enemies of every tenant —whose agent knows nothing about his work, apart from receiving rents, issuing receipts, and warding off repairs. The sacred dutj* of land-holdiing has not been looked upon from the right point of view by landowners generally, a duty which carried with it tremendous responsibilities. They have not taken a personal interest in their affairs, but have delegated the work to others; some capable, some in- capable. Amongst many of the latter class are relatives know ing less than the landowner himself. A gulf has been created between land- lord and tenant which, to say the least of it, has been detrimental to the inter- ests of the country. A good landlord is a blessing; but a bad one is a curse to the country-side. If our landlords had realized their re- sponsibilities in the past they would have done something more than receive rents. They would have made every effort to re- tain the rural population and taken steps- to develop the social side of country life. Had they taken half the interest in their tenants and others living around them in pre-war times as they do now in matters appertaining to the war. what a difference it would have made in the history of our country. Peril has awakened them to a sense of duty. May peace not bring the usual apathy. There are remarkable in- stances of landowners when spent their time in London taking no interest what- ever in their estates before the war who at present are not only taking more in- terest in their tenants, but farming them- selves, and going through the experience of actual husbandry. It is unfortunate that such people did not realize their re- sponsibilities sooner, before the country- side began to be denuded of its popula- tion and had its spirit broken, as is the icase to-day. It looks like being "too late," in the memorable words of Mr Lloyd George; but let us hope not, as such men have it in their power to regenerate their neigh- bourhoods and send the thrill of ii'jfe through them. < The absentee landlord has been one of the curses of rural England and Wales— the man who never came in; ollc-h with his tenants, who reared game, and had a sllooting tenant. Of all the high-handed personalities who trod a farmers land the shooting tenant was the most unwelcome. The shooting tenant can only be describcdi as a trespasser, as he had no interest in; anything apart from providing sport for himself and his friends. (I use the past tense because surely no one is preserving game at present, and let us hope that there are no shootino- tenants throughout the length and breadth of the land). To those landowners who intend holding their land in the future I would say—get into personal touch with your tenants: get rid of mediums agents, keepers, and others: bring your sons up to work and make them agents, or, if young men, I work yourselves; do not preserve game. If you want sport, till the land on your home farms, thus growing the neces- saries of life; and whatever you doj get rid of your gamekeeper, be- cause the future generation of farmers will hate them more than the present. They are the spies of the countryside and have never improved the relations between land- lord and tenant. There will be no room for game preserving in a little country like ours. Every square yard will be required for growing food in order to make us less dependent on imported supplies. Wihat happened in the past will not be tolerated in future; and the sooner the landowners of this country will realize this fact the better. Enquiries have been made lately by the Board of Agriculture, through the War Agricultural Committees, regarding the depredations of game and the effect on the food supply. To many members of these committees these enquiries came as a surprise because the idea prevails that pheasants are prae-. tically fed by the landlord. Of course, we hear so much about the cost of each pheasant, etc., to him, but we never hear of the cost to the tenant. Lord Selborne who; until lately was president of the Board, knows the two sides of the ques- tion, and during the present crisis had courage enough to defend the defenceless tenant. When the circular letter from the Board of Agriculture was read at a certain committee the only landowner member answered by saying that he was not preserving game this year and that his keeper was devoting his time shooting rabbits for the tenants. Let us hope that this gentleman and his brother landowners will never revert after the war to their programme of waste and extravagance. All sorts of game, after ail, are only para- sites. Their food is a toll on legitimate husbandry. If game, (including the sacred pheasant, is a source of contention, the on.y remedy is to get rid of the creature once and for all, and let the land of the country be put to its right use— the growth of food. This reminds me of a case when a farmer in the Vale of Glamorgan was actually impnisoned for shooting a pheasant early in the present year. The whole thing savoured of the Middle Ages; but this in- stance only shows what a bench of magis- trates thinks of the pheasant. The rarmers opinion ot the bird is diirerent. It is his opinion that should prevail if real progress is to take place in British farming. The only solution of the game trouble is no preserving, however un- pleasant th:s may sound to landowners. According to a census published by the Board of Agriculture in 1914, 2,695.COO acres of land were tilled by the owners in England and 266,874 acres in Wales. Anglesey showed the greatest percentage of occupying owners and Glamorgan the smallest. A good deal of land has changed hands since. The tendency has been for farmers to buy their holdings, whenever opportunity has been afforded; but stnl our country remains a country of landowners and tenants. Before the war the land question was coming prominently to the front. One of the political parties was for ownership by tho occupier. The other was working for security of tenure whoever owned the land. Wales is primary a land of small hold- ings, as the following figures will prove:— In 1914 the number of holdings between 1 and not execeding 5 acres was 916— Angleesv having the largest number (142), and Radnor the lowest (21). Number of holdings above 5 and not exceeding 20, 1902, the largest number being in Cardigan- shire and the lowest in Breconshire (52). Number of holdings above 20 and not ex- ceeding 50 acres, 1,317—the largest num- ber in Carmarthenshire, and the lowest in Radnor. The total number of holdings between 1 and 50 acres in the whole of Wales was 4,135. Holdings above 50 acres and not exceeding 100 were 978-the largest number in Carmarthenshire and the lowest :n Flint. Holdings above 150 and not ex- ceeding 300 acres, 285, the largest number in Carmarthenshire and the lowest in Carnarvon. Holdings above 300 acres. 42 —the largest in Breconshire and the lowest in Cardiganshire and Flint, having one only each; There were two such holdings in Carnarvonshire, Radnor, and Glamor- gan. Small countries have generally small farms. Out of a total of 209,300"holdings in the Netherlands, there are about 182,000 between 2h and 50 acres in extent. Out of about 290,000 holdings in Den- mark. there are about 76,000 averaging 90 acres; 33,000 averaging about 15 acres; and 80,000 holdings of less than 3 acres in extent. The smaller countries of he Continent have, as is well known, developed their agriculture on the most modern lines; and the land is mainly owned by the occupiers themselves, a feature which is different to eS the position of tilings in Wales. The small farmer in all countries has the hardest fight and that is especially true of IVales. During the past twenty years many of our smaller holdings have been merged into the bigger farms, mainly be- cause of the readiness of the iarger farmers to absorb them at all times, and also be- cause the owners did not want to incur the expense of repairs. This policy, of course, has been responsible for driving people from the land; and it can safe'y be sand that the smaller farmers of Wales have not had much encouragement in the past from landowners or the State. In- deed, their lot has been anythiluo- but prosperous. I have known many of them to make a gallant struggle to pay the rent. In the neighbourhood in which I was brought up they had large families ciSenrS h UhlC(h turned °"t to be useful cit.zens; but unfortunately hardly anv of them remained on the land. Welsh landowners have' naturally a large number of small farms on thpir Sod stat Iffthe h° d',n-8 vvere k(1Pt *n good state of repair there would be but little return in the florm of net n-e,the hom them; but, generally speak- m&, the reparrs are not attended to and I hiT-p'n8 i°|f hoUsm" accommodation, and rtfT/l aimvie^e of such estates, and the besu thing that could be done id'lS ELd The problem of the small farmer will he the problem of the future. The large rrV8 We" aWe to look after himself is I! 1? generation of small farmers i helped in anv way, the State the tenants to acquire their holdings individually or the property t°r^tr:r^:d en bloc and admini- tered by the State. The equ/ onient of small farms in Wales generally is anything but satisfactory—bad dwelling houses, poor and stuffy' out, houses, dairies without Proper ventilation. In short, there is no suitable accommo- dation on them for man or beast, Un- doubted y there arc scores of landowners who cannot afford to undertake the, ex- pensive work of building the necessary accommodation on their farms. Thev should be aided in doing so by advances from the State, or tlior properties should be acquired and administered by the State. There is no other solution of the problem. Many small and large farmers would im- prove their holdings themselves in the matter of housing if they had security of tenure or if they were enabled to buy their farms, but with yearly tenancies they cannot be expected to do so. (To be continued).

Brevities.

[No title]

Advertising

Advertising

THE ifelsh tecttc Friday,…

. CARDIGANSHIRE EDUCATION…