Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

6 articles on this Page

THE MAIDEN'S LOVER.

.-RAIN.

[No title]

PROGRESS OF THE SICILIAN REVOLUTION.

I INFAMOUS CONDUCT OF A SCHOOL-MASTER.

News
Cite
Share

I INFAMOUS CONDUCT OF A SCHOOL- MASTER. A few days ago, a respectable looking man about 60 years of age, named John Spencer, proprietor of an educational establishment at Hackney, was brought before Mr. D'Eyncourt, at the Worship- street Police Court, London, charged with revolting conduct, of a kind which cannot be particularly de- scribed, towards more than one of his pupils. The prosecution bad been instituted at the wish of a gen- tleman named Roberts, a neighbour of the prisoner, who had sent his son to Spencer to be educated. The first case inquired into was that of Leon Morisco, a well-dressed and fine boy of 13, who gave his evidence in a very direct and intelligent manner, and said My father is dead, and my mother resides at Brussels. I was sent to England in January two years ago, and was put to school with Mr. Philpotts, at Hackney, where at that time I was a day scholar. The defendant succeeded Mr. Philpotts in the school, at which there are now about 30 pupils, but there were more then. About seven weeks ago I went to Brussels, and returned about four weeks since. A lady who also lodged in the house told me that the defendant was a Roman Catholic priest. Mr. D'Eyncourt: Is that so, prisoner are you a Catholic priest? Prisoner: No, Sir, I ain not. Sergeant Maveety: It has been ascertained, Sir, that his right name is John Benedict Spencer, that he is a Roman Catholic priest, and that he has preached at Liverpool. Prisoner: It is totally false, and I have never been out of the house. Witness: Mr. Philpotts left at Midsummer last, and after this gentleman came he treated me in a very vulgar manner. On my return from Brussels I went to live there. Mr. D'Eyncourt: Did anything occur before you went to Brussels ? Witness Yes, about four or five months ago. Mr. D'Eyncourt: Be very particular in describing his conduct. (The witness here detailed, in an apparently truth- ful manner, and in language which a boy of his age would naturally make use of, conduct on the part of the prisoner which, if true, established conclusively an offence ot so horrible and infamous a character that it cannot be more nearly described.) Mr. D'Eyncourt: How came this to happen,—that you allowed him to commit such conduct ? Witness: He opened the door of a parlour, which was used as a bedroom, and told me to come in there and be whipped, but I did not know what for. About four or five weeks afterwards, upon a Sunday, though I cannot recollect what Sunday, he did the same thing. I complained to him of it, and he promised it should not occur again. Mr. D'Eyncourt: Why did you not complain? Witness Why sometimes the door was locked. Mr. D'Eyncourt: Then, how often has this oc- curred ? Witness. A good many times three or four times before I went to Brussels, which was on the 23d of March. Mr. D'Eyncourt: Did you say anything about this while at Brussels ? Witness No, Sir. Mr. D'Eyncourt: Where did you sleep ? Witness: In the same room as he did. Mr. D'Eyncourt: Is he a married man ? Witness No, Sir. Mr. D'Eyncourt: How long did you sleep there? Witness About ten days altogether. One Sunday morning lie called me to his bedside to take a rag off one of his hands which was bad, and he then took hold of me and repeated his conduct. Cross-examined by Mr. Heritage: How came you, aa intelligent boy, as you evidently are, to let this go on, and not comDlain ? Witness: One of the boys, named Hoskins, knew about it after the first time, aud I was ashamed to speak of it afterwards. (The witness then stated another fact, which apparently seemed to imply an assent on his part, and on being asked if the prisoner had not complained of his stealing money from him, he acknowledged that be had done so, about seven or eight months ago). Mr. D'Eyncourt: And had you stolen his money ? Witness Yes sometimes I took 4d., sometimes 6d., for a week or two, but I don't think I took more than 3s. altogether. I never did take 6s. from his purse at one time. He said he would forgive me if I paid him back, and I did so a. halfpenny at a time, till I had paid about half of it, and he then forgave me the rest. He also charged me with stealing 4s. 6d., but I did not; and he then charged me with stealing his sugar, which, was true, and said I was not to do it again. He told me he would adopt me himself, correct my faults, take care of me, and get me a place. He bears the name of a very kind- hearted man in the neighbourhood. I was always ashamed and afraid to tell of his conduct to me. This is not a false charge got up against him because lie said he would punish me. Mr. D'Eyncourt: How was the prisoner taken ? Williams, of the N division: I apprehended the prisoner at eleven o'clock this morning, in Iligh- street, Camden-town. On catching sight of him I said, You are Mr. Spencer, I believe ?" He said, No, I am not," but I told him I knew that he was, that I was a police-constable, and that he must go with me to the station, as I wanted him upon this charge. He asked me to go round the corner of a street with him and he would speak with me there, but I refused. We then walked some distance to- gether, when he said, I will give you a sovereign if you will lot me go." I said, No and he then said, I will give you two," but I refused, and said I would not if he even offered me 50. On reaching St. Pancras-road he suddenly asked to look at the warrant issued for his apprehension. I did not hold the warrant myself, and so told him, on which he refused to go any further, and on a struggle ensuing between us he bit one of my fingers. A gentleman, however, tendered me his assistance, and with his help I was enabled to lodge the prisoner in the station. The prisoner was remanded.

A GANG OF BURGLARS CLEVERLY…