Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

3 articles on this Page

----.gfurport gotice Matdtigeuce.…

News
Cite
Share

gfurport gotice Matdtigeuce. ——♦ BOROUGH POLICE.—FRIDAY. [Magistrates: THOMAS GHATKEX, Esq, Mayor; R. F WOOLLETT Esq.; and E. J. PHILLIPS, Esq.1 Charles Gibbs was charged with threatening Martha Reed, and breaking some or!.m'nts belonging to her. The case was dismissed. Henrietta S*e Mman, a ruler of planets, was charged with assaulting Isaac Fienburg, ir. a dispute which arose concerning the complainant's portrait. Defendant was mulcted in 6;. 6d. costs. John Strode was fined 2s. 61. and costs, for assaulting Ann Thomas. His wife, summoned for the same offence, was discharged. George Jones, a well-known pickpocket, found on the platform of the Western Valleys Railway, was discharged on promising to leave the town. COUNTY POLICE—SATURDAY. [Magistrates: The REI". THOMAS POPE, M.A., and Lieutenant Sir GEO. WALKEB, Bart.] A SOLICITOR CHARGED WITH AX ASSAULT. Mr. J. E. G.thing was charged with assaulting David Richards under the subjoined detailed circumstances. Mr. C. B. Fox appeared in support of the accusation. For the defendant Mr. R. J. Catncart attended. The witnesses were ordered to retire. Mr. Fox remarked that tho prosecution was insti. tuted by the Newport "Water "Works Company, against, he was sorry to say, one of his own profession, the charge against him being that he assaulted one of their servant who wps endeavouri: g to protect the ponds of the C mpany from intrusion and from being filthified by dogs going there, &c. The object ot the company was to prevent Mr. Gething from intruding upon their pro- perty for the purpose of shooting wild fowl because if that were permitted, and dogs allowed to go into the water, the public must suffer, and the company, in all probability, be injured. The particular charge upon which the case was founded was with reference to an oc- currence on the 19th of last month. Mr. Gething had made it a practice to shoot over the pond, and on that day he was there with two men and a number of dogs. Richards, who was in the employ of the Company, went up to him, and, he (Mr. Fox) must admit, abused him in no measured terms, hough, it must be remembered that he had been repeatedly warned off; whereupon the defend- ant took a gun from one of the other men and threatened him with it, ;;nd afterwards thitatened him with the butt end. H"(Mr.Fcx) could only say on behalf of the directors, and for himself, that the only object in view was to prevent further trespass, and the case might terminate if Mr. Gething would give a public undertaking that he would not again intrude. The Rev. Thomas Pope Is this for an assault or for an intrusion ? Mr. Fox: It is for an assault. I was merely stating my object in proceeding. David Richards was then sworn, and deposed I live at Cefn, in Bassalleg, about a q'iaucr of a mile from the reservoir, belonging to the Water Works Company I am employed to look after the ponus; I know the de, fendant I have on several occasions seen him on the Company's property; I have ordered him off several times; about six weeks ago, I saw him on the banks of the p Jtid, the property of the company. Mr. Cathcart here objected to the reception of evidence except with regard to the charge of assault. He ob- lerved, too, on the part of the defendant, that he bad no desire to trespass on the Company's property, and that had he not been rudely insulted by Richards, he would have gone away, and this charge would not have arisen. Mr, Fox said he wanted to sh.,T that the defendant had been repeatedly warned off, and reiterated that the only d» sire of the directors was that the annoyance might ce.,se. Mr. Cathcart rejoined that he did not wish it to go forth to the world that the sole blame rested upon the dstendant. The company's servant acted most rudely upon the occasion. Mr. Fox: I admit, as I have already said, that he abused the defendant in no measured terms. Mr. Cathcart: He was most abusive, and abused his employers. Mr. Fox: If Mr. Gething will give a promise that he will not intrude again the matter rcay rest here. Mr. Cathcart: Of course he will. Mr. Fox: Don't say of course. Mr. Gething has been repeatedly warned off; but as long a3 wild fowl are at the place, he will go there. No doubt it is to be attri- buted to a love of sport. The directors, however, must See to the proper preservation of the water suppiied for public use. Mr. Cathcart said the pond was frozen over, and Mr, Gething was merely throwing his stick across the ice for his dogs to retrieve. As to the ca.e dropping here, Mr. Gething was desirou9 tha the facts should be made public. It had been imputed that he threatened to shoot the man and he felt he could not alio v.- it to res;. Besides he denied that he had committed a tresp-iss on the com- pan\'s property. Mr. Fox Very well, I it with a mental reservation of my own. It is painful to me to ha?e to proceed against Mr Gething, ar.d if Mr. Gething will net go there again I am quite willing 'p on that promise to retire from 1 he cise. The Rev. Thomas Pope All the company require is an understanding. I suppose Mr. Gething will give that promise. The promise was given by Mr. Cathcart, and Mr. Fox was leaving the court, when Richards exclaimed that he would have the defendant again, and if the charge were not gene into he would bring it before other magistrates. J!r. Cathcart said upon that exhibition he must ask that the case should proceed. Mr. Gething; wa3 not satisfied, but desirous that it should go on. The magis- trates saw Rnhards's violence, and he (Mr. Cathcart) would ask whether he was a-m..n to be trusted. The examination of Richards was then continued I remember Monday, the 19th of December; in the even- ing of that day I saw the deb- uT;t near the pond I was grir.g up to the house, and ri-un i a gun go off the direc,ion whlfe I thought gs were I went i-* the pord; I saw Mr. Gething .a <-0 men; there > ere dc^s with them; "the pond « ••nrtially frozen; o-ut half an acre was not; the dt; and two meruro on the bank close by he water side; I went up t toe defendant, and saiC: Gt.thing, how long are you going to keep on this game he said Vv nat is the matter, what are you bothering about;" "What is the matter with you," said I, "you ar a nasty impudent scamp coming and teasing me in this way j" I meant in keep- ing me walking backwards and forwards to turn him off; at that time the defendant had a piece of stick flinging on tie ice for the dogs to fetch and carry; one of the men had a gun the defendant had no gun, but he se:z,. i the gun out of the hands of the other man; the mis. said, "Mind what you are up to; he said, you' I'll shoot von" he then held up the butt towards me over my head Gething," said I, don t think you'll frighten mc and I told hira he was a pretty law) er to do that. Cross-examined I haveci\tioned Urn many and many a time I have known him these years backward and for- ward troubling me about six weeks ago, I warned him offar.d his men as they were flocking the ducks up into a corner; I had not seen him before thia season I did not se. him last season, because he had not liberty to go on the adjoining land; I cautioned him about two years ago, once I collared him, but he did not bring me before the magistrates; on this occasion I did not put up my fbt, and threaten to strike him I did not put up my leg, and threaten to kick his —— out he came up close to me, and shoved me when he put the gun before me, he did not say, "Now strike me j" he held the gun up wit." the muzzle towards me afterwards he held the gun by the muzzle, up over my head; the defendant did not tell me he would report my conduct to the directors I did not say the directors might g" to Ro-examined The defendant has not reported me, or ccnulaincd of me to the directors. Mr. Fox That is my case. T-e Rev. Thomas Pope (to Mr. Cat!.car') D„es your a'.ieut still wish to proceed r, Cathcart: My client certainly wishes his witnesses to be heard, And before they are called, I do not think I she:.I t he doing justice to Mr. Gething, did I not offer a few ."bservations. My friend, Mr. Fox, seems to have made the theme of his observations that this proceeding haj &rU n on the part of the directors for the purpose of restraining Mr. Geuung from trespassing on their pro- perty. The minor part is with him and them the as- sault. The major part is the restriction they wish to put upon Mr. Gething. Permit mo to say this—that if the directors had instructed my friend to address Mr. Gething in the polite language which he is in the habit sf using, — had he forwarded Mr. Gething a little note setting forth the wish of the directors, that would have been the proper course and all further trouble would have been spared. Mi. Fox I ought not to be put in that position. He had been warned by the directors before. Mr. Cathcart: I can only reiterate that I think that would have been the proper course. With regard to the trespass, how does it turn out ? That Mr. Gething two years ago was cautioned not to go on this property, and thft he was cautioned again six weeks before the 19ih of December. His conduct, then, was not desperately bad, as might be imagined from the statements that b-tve been u male. I do not think that it can be imputed to him that he has done anything to foul or filthify the directors' j.rcr.erty. When the charge of assault was come to, and* case was about to be settled, did you not observe the feeling and temper of that man. Richards ? I think it would have been well, had the case rested there; but you heard his words, and saw his violent manner, and I consider that Mr. Gething was justified upon that, in preferring to proceed with the matter. You have Richards's own words that when he first came up to Mr. Gething, he said-" Gething, how long are you going on this game ?" What was the reply? Nothing very ag- gravating yet what did Richards again exclaim?—" You are a nasty impudent scamp to give me this trouble." Jtr. Getting, however, had not given him much trouble. --s.w..tiiøl!, He had only been there once before for two years, namely, six weeks before. Would any man, under such circumstances, call a gentleman a nasty scamp ? But Richards did not stop at that. His conduct was most offensive. He threatened to strike and kick Mr. Gething, at the same time using language not fit to be repeated. Then, as I am instructed, Mr. Gething did put up the n gun but he had taken the precaution to take the cap off; aid then he put it up, saying—" Now strike me if you dare." That, as I am told, was the head and front of Mr. Getbing's offending. That being the case, and Mr. Gething being ready to give undertaking not to trespass upon the Water Works property again, I hope, after my witnesses are heard, the magistrates will consider that justice will be done in dismissing the case. The Rev. Thomas Pope: I still think now that the offer made ought to have been accepted. Mr. Fox It is clear that an assault in law took place. Mr. Cathcart: If my friend will admit my statement of facts, then I think the case may be settled. Mr. Fox could not but admit that Mr. Gething had been repeatedly warned. As to a note to him, the direc- tors had considered tho matter, and they felt they could not take any but the present steps. As the matter had gone so far, be (Mr. Fox) must ask Mr. Gething to pay the costs of the proceeding. With the costs of the sum- mons, he would be quite content. Mr. Cathcart: I think that would be admitting the ac- cusation, whereas Mr. Gething merely endeavoured to protect himself. Mr. Fox There were three to one. Consequently, there was not much reason for apprehending violence. Mr. Cathcart: Mr. Gething is not willing, as paying the costs of the summons would be an implied admission of the charge. Samuel Evans was then called for the defendant. He said I am a farmer, living in Henllys parish on the day in question I was with Mr. Gething and Daniel Hayes; I had Mr. Getbwg s gun; Mr. Gething was throwing sticks on the pond a dog was retrieving the sticks; while this was being done, 1 saw xueuarus come up; when he came up, he said-" Hillo, yoti are here to-night,—what business have you here ?" it was lust dusk Mr. Gething said—"What harm do I do here;" Richards said, "You have no business here on this property he up with his fist and right leg, and threatened to kick Mr. Gething's out; Richards was very angry, and made use of very bad and offensive language towards Mr. Gething Mr. Gething took the gur?from me, rose it with the stock towards Richards, and said, "Now, you blackguard, come on." The Rev. Th-mas P- pe Did he hold the gun up more than once ? The R^! Thomas Pope: Was it with the stock or muzzle towards himself? Witness: The muzzle. Examination continued It wr.3 m a defensive atti- tude; when he took the gun from me he took the cap off; there was a great more said Mr. Gething said h, would report him to the directors he made a very dirty and blackguard reply. Cross-examined: There were three of us together; I had been out shouting with Mr. Gething; we thought we had shot a duck but the dog could oot find it; I don't know how many dogs Mr. Gething had I cau't remember there were a good many one of the dogs was on the ice after the stick more of the dogs had been in the water after the duck when we thought, the duck was shot, the dogs were coupled Mr. Gething shot at the ducks as they were walking on the ice Mr. Fox Did he ? Then I am sorry to hear it. Mr. Cathcart: There is no offence in that, I hope Mr. Fox It certainly is not in accordance with my ideas of a sportsman. Cross-examination continued: The stick was not thrown in the direction of the ducks; the dogs were not running after the ducks, but for the stick; when Mr. Gething took the cap off the gun, he did not hold it so as to point the tmizzle towards Richards the point of the gun was up when he took it off; the point of the guc was not towards Richards Mr. Gething did not seem very angry he said nothing out of the way. Re-examined Mr. Gething was about a yard off when he put the gun up he held it up by the barrel, the stock being uppermost. Daniel Hayes, living on Stow-hill: Mr. Gething was throwing his stick on the ice for the degs to retrieve it I saw Richards, ome up he said—" You are here again, Gething,-what business have you here ?" Mr. Gething said "What harm do I do," then Richards began calling Mr. Gething everything he could mention; he called him all the nasty scamps and scoundrels he could; he rose his right hand and right foot, and threatened to kick his out; Mr. Gething then said, Give me the gun, Sam;" and then he said to Richards, 11 Now, vou old rascal, come onbe held the butt towaids him; he took the cap off; Evans hell the gun whiie Mr. Gething took the cap off; Mr. Gething said he would tell the directors Richards said the diiectors might go to Cross-examined: Mr. Gething said nothing to him before he threatened to kick him, except What harm do I do;" Mr. Gething had four dogs; he had shot a duck there just ber re; be did not get the duck; we did not try to get it out; it -vas dark, and the dogs would not go in; only one dog was near the place of the ducks; the pond was frozen except in one corner; he did not send the dogs for the duck they were coupled till we loosed them. By the Rev. Thomas Pope I should say that a man who was out with us all day should know how many dogs were with us. Mr. Fox I think it is now pretty clear that an assault was committed. Mr. Cathcart I think quite the other way. The Rev. Thomas Pope Is there anything to be gained by continuing the inquiry ? Mr. Fox Tiie case so far has made bad worse. It now onlv awaits vour decision. The Rev. Thomas Pope asked if Mr. Gething wculd publicly state that he would not trespass again. Mr. Cathcart said Mr. Gething was not prepared to submit to Richards's evidence and if the magistrates were of opinion that an assault had been committed, the matter would not be allowed to rest there, but the man would be brought before the assizes, Mr. Fux observed that Mr. Cathcart had no right to make that statement to the Bench. The evidence for the defence contained the most glarieg discrepancies which, C f however, it was not for him (Mr. Fox) to point out. Mr. Cathcart did not wish to impute anything to the Bench, who had behaved very courteously indeed but Mr. Gething laboured under considerable disadvantage in not being alia to give his version of the affair. Mr. Fox There are two witnesses to one. I ask no more than that Mr. Gething shall pay the costs of the summons I do not ask anything for my attendance. I have my instructions from a body of directors, who have advised me to a certain course. The Rev. Thomas Pope We don't wish to inflict any penalty. Mr. Cathcart must say that the magistrates had been very courteous indeed. After some farther conversation, The defendant said—1 would rather a conviction, and I can then take other proceedings. Mi. Fox rejoined that he spoke in perfect sincerity and good will towards Mr. Gething, whfcn he advised him not to take farther proceedings. Ultimately, Mr. Cathcart, having consulted with Mr. Gething, saiù the matter bad been left in his hands, and he would pay the costs. These amounted to lis. 6:1. MAGOB.—James Harris was charged with cutting un- derwood, the property of W. P. Ilerrick, Esq. The policeman said the wood was for besom handles, and the dama -e was stated to be 5-. The defendant, who pleaded "uilty her orevioaslv beer, convicted for stealing clover. lIe was ofdered to pay £1 16s. 6u., or to be imprisoned for a month. RISCA,—John Williams was charged with steaung half a round of raisins, belonging to Mr. Ben Jonson Allen, grocer. The prisoner was at the shop begging, lie re- turned in about two hours, and asked for a quarter of currants and half a pound of-ra:Sms. Upon being sup- plied with the fruit, he opened the packets, and com- le menced eating it. Prosecutor asked him for the money, when he pulled some out of his pocket, but put it back again. lie ate the raisins, and then left the shop, re- fusing to pay. One month to hard labour. BOROUGH POLICE. -MOND.-Y. The EX-MAYOR and Alderman EVANS.] Catherine Regan was charged with stealing coal, the pro .erty of the Red Ash Coal Company. She was de- tected in the act on Saturday afternoon by P.C. Robert Smith, a basket she hid with her containing 321bs. of coal. Three other women were also at the stage at the time. Her defence was thutshe was Lot aware that she was committing any crime, and that she had had no money from her husband for the last seven weeks. It seemed she had lived in the town for seventeen years, "el no similar offence having been alleged against her before. She was ordered to be lucked up until eight o'clock in the evening, r John Price was brought up on a charge of stealing half a hundredweight of coal, the property of L. A. Ilomfray, Esq. The prisoner was met by P.C. bmith coming from the Tredegar Company s wharf with the coal on his shoulder; and on being accosted by the officer, he threw the coal down, and wished to know, if a fellow couldn't pick up a lump of coal he found on the ground?" Smith said on inspecting the trucks he found a place whence a piece of coal had fallen or been taken. Mr. Ion said there was no excuse fur the pri- soner, inasmuch as the Messrs. Homfray never refused coal to the poor inhabitants, when they believed it to be really wanted. The Chief Superintendent of Police remarked that the company were most liberal. The prisoner was committed for seven days. Maria Palmer Thomas, of Oak-terrace, Thomas-street, was charged with stealing a shoulder of mutton from Mr. Hugh Morgan. Elizabeth Summers, servant to the prosecutor, stated that on Saturday evening, sht was in the parlour which has a window looking into the shop she saw the prisoner there; the prisoner covered a shoulder of mutton with a cloth, and then placed it under her shawl witness told the prosecutor, who went into the shop as the prisoner was walking out; the cloth was found under her arm. The prisoner said she had always borne a good character, and had no intention of stealing the meat. She merely took it up for inspection, but before she could put it down again she was seized by Mr. Morgan's man. Mr. Butt, of Pill, told the magis- trates that he knew the prisoner twenty years since in Bristol. She was then the wife of an extensive sculp- tor and marble mason in Maudlin-street. The Chief Superintendent stated that the prisoner when brought to the station was under the influence of drink. She at first resolusely refused to give either her name or address. With her husband she had betn in Newport about a twelvemonth. The magistrates considered a link in the evidence to be wanting in consaquenoe of the absence of Mr. Hugh Morgan's man and they, therefore, dis- charged the prisoner. Margaret Brian was charged with stealing a shawl,the property of Alice Brown, Ivor-street. Oa the loth of April last, the shawl was lost from prosecutrix's parlour. Last Saturday evening, as she was walking through Commercial-street, she saw, and immediately recognised, the shawl on the back of Mrs. Crowe, of King's Parade, whose statement was that she purchased the article of the prisoner for hal-fa-crown. A son of Mrs. Crowe was present at the time of the transaction, and corroborated his mother's testimony, both clearly identifying the pri- soner but she denied strongly all knowledge of them or the shawl. The Chief Superintendent remarked that L the prisoner was a most drunken and dissipated woman, and enumerated several convictions against her for lar- ceny. She expressed a wish to be rather tried by the magistrates," but the magistrates sent her to the sessions for trial. John Williams pleaded guilty to having been drunk and disorderly on Saturday night. Alderman Evans (to defendant) Drunken and disorderly cases are now very seldom; consequently, the more disgrace to you. lined 7s. 6d. William Dare, of the Three Cranes beerhouse, George street, was summon id for keeping his house open at twelve o'clock on the previous Tnursday night. De- fendant said he had had a little Christmas party, but he did not de-ire to break the law, neither was be aware of the lateness of the hour. The house bearing a good name, the case was dismissed without costs. Peter Taylor, for indecent conduct in High-street, was fined as., and costs, or to be imprisoned for seven days. The def-ndant came from Glasgow. Matthew Crowley was fined 5s., or, in default, to go to prison for seven days, for having been drunk and disor- derly on Saturday night. WEDNESDAY. [Magistrates: Alderman HOMFRAY, HENRY SHEPFARD, E q., GEORGE GKTHIXO, Esq., and WILLIAM WIL- LIAMS, Esq.] Mary Troy was charged with stealing coal, belonging to Roger Lewis and others. While in the dock, the prisoner fainted. She was cautioned and discharged, it being her first offence. Henry and Mary Hookey, for having been drunk and disorderly on Stow-hill, were fined 5s, each. Mr. T. Eborall Cooke, one of the managers of the Usk; side Ironworks, appeared to a summons taken out by one of the workmen, named Thomas, for one week and one day's wages, the week being the Christmas holidays, to which the complainant and others of the men alleged they objected. Mr. Pain, who appeared for the com- plainant, sifid the case would settle several similar ones. It appeared that a tender of a day's wages had been made, and Mr. Cooke still expressed himself willing to P',y it, but as to the week, the Beuch had no jurisdiction, no work having been done and Mr. Paine was recom- mended to go to the County Court. John Decker, a Warwickshire militiaman, was charged with stealing a silver watch, belonging to Thomas Hutton. Prosecutor is a hair-dresser, living in Upper Market-street. He stated that on Tuesday, the 27th of December he wore his watch, to which a steel chain and locket, in the shape of a book, were attached; he was in the Coach and Horses during the day playing bagatelle, the prisoner marking the game prosecutor looked at his watch about eight o'clock, and wont home immediately afterwards, the prisoner accompanying him. Jacob Isaacs, pawnbroker, said a young woman, named Emma Fry, pledged the waich identified by the prosecutor at his shop, on the evening of the 27th December. Emma Fry, servant at Mrs. Jones's, in Dolphin-street, said the prisoner brought the watch to the house, and asked her to pawn it; he accompanied her to Mr. Isaacs's shop, and she went in and pledged the watch the prisoner told her it w-.is his own. Mary Jones deposed to seeing the prisoner haad over the watch to Fry. The prisoner pleaded guilty, alleging that while taking the prose- cutor home, he fell down, and the watch flaw out of his pocket. lie (prisoner) then picked it up. The prisoner received a good character from his sergeant, and was sentenced to a month's imprisonment.

Advertising

NEWPORT MUNICIPAL ELECTION.