Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

17 articles on this Page

HOUSE OF COMMONS.—WEDNESDAY,…

News
Cite
Share

HOUSE OF COMMONS.—WEDNESDAY, APRIL 20. LlCFNSED LUNATIC ASYLUM BILL. Mr. Waldey objected to the appointment of barristers instead of medical men as commissioners. Lord Granville Somerset considered that, as the duties of these commissioners were merely to see that the law was pro- perly carried out, there was no necessity for the change. After a conversation, Mr. Wakley proposed that neither the term barrister" nor "medical men should be inserted, so as to leave the responsibility of the appointments with the Lord Chancellor. An amendment to this effect was carri' Lord Gtanville Somerset expressed an opinion that the car- rying of this amendment had embarrassed the machinery of his bill. The Chairman reported progress, and obtained leave to sit again this day fortnight. COPYRIGHT BILL. The house then went into committee on Lord Mahon's copy- right bill. On clause 15 being read, Mr. Wakley objected that it would prevent the publication of extracts such as were made in school books. Mr. Godson supported the clause. Ultimately the committee divided upon it, when it was carried by 36 to 11. Theremain- ing clauses were then agreed to, and the report was ordered to be brought up on Friday. The public-house bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed on Friday, 29th April.—Adjourned. THURSDAY, APRIL 21. EXTENSION OF THE SUFFRAGE. Mr. S. Crawford brought forward a motion, stated at consi- derable length, the purport of which was to pledge the house to take into its early consideration what are commonly known as the "five points of the Charter," namely, extension of the suf- frage, division of the country into equalised electoral districts, vote by ballot, annual Parliaments, with the payment of mem- burs of Pailiament, and abolition of qualification. He did not usk the house to pledge itself to all these points, but to go into 1!. consideration of them, with a view to a full and fair discus. sion. He was aware that the proceedings of many of those ■ailing themselves Chartists, had brought great discredit on the (Muse of reform, but he brought his motion forward from a con. viction of duty, and without reference to individual consi- derations. Mr. O'Connell seconded the motion. Mr. Wallace gave the proposition his cordial support, and said that the Reform Act had pioved an entire failure, as evi. denced by the gross corruption which prevailed in the country during the last genera! election, and also by the composition and character of the majority of the house. Dr. Bowring urged the necessity of attending to the petitions of the people, more especially of the unrepresented. He was of opinion that franchise, so far from depending on property, uught rather, on a principle of compensation, to be most largely bestowed on those who lacked all other valuable possessions. He had always been for annual elections; our habits, our na- ture, the course of the seasons, seemed to recommend that ar- rangement. He was for abolishing all property qualification, and paying members for their services. > After some observations from Mr." W. Williams and Mr. Ward in support of the motion, Sir J, Graham rose and briefly opposed it. He said there wus no disrespect shown on his side of the house to the masses (If the people. AI the time of the Reform Rill it was frankly that the suffrage was 10 on Bi";11"" not un numbers and the safety of the monarchy and\he YrMocracJ depended on the maintenance of the same principle. Mr. O'Connell said he was surprised to hear this from Sir J. Graham, seeing that he himself had repudiated the same notion when it was used against the extension of the suffrage created by the Reform Bill. The people of England, he considered, were divided into two classes, the master class and the slave lass, the latter being the numerous unrepresented portion of the community. He should support the motion. Mr. Wakley said he had high constitutional authority for the assertion that every man who had not a vote was a slave, for money was taken from him without his consent. He was for a ivide extension of the suffrage, and was astonished to find it contended that that extension, giving, as it would, contentment to the people, would endanger the monarchy. Messrs. Yorke, Protheroe, and Bernal, spoke in favour of themotion. Sir J. Easthope made a few remarks in opposition to it. Sir C. Napier said he should neither support universal suf- frage nor annual parliaments. He should, however, vote for Ibe motion, as Itadlng to inquiry. Mr. Villiers considered that, after ten years' experience of the working of the Reform Act, and the glaring proofs of its ill working, he had sufficient ground for his support of the mo- tion, as one of inquiry. r i Sir R. Peel reminded the house of his own prophecy, uttered ten years ago that the day would come when he should himself be found defending the reform bill against further changes. the hon. baronet proceeded to express his conviction that what. ever concession s IOU d be made now, a further concession would ,e! etl.ye;rs hence. If the house wished to do that w .c i won real y gratify the people, let them support the in- come taxand the tariff, That step, he believed, would give more condusive cadence of a sincere desire on their part to ue- nnH ,Kle,ma;y 'ar,z- a'' ,'lese m°lions about Radical refoim Ml in ih a >'Ca S' 'ey 'bought their leaders had used them Ipniin a>sence to-night, would do well to retaliate by ab- r. tcnri^ i iemse;ves in their lutn to-morrow, when those leaders e to resist his income tax. He would give his most ear- ne;« OpposItIon to the present motion. n r r" u^nlZ ^e''eved that the country had not got the real Reform Bills as originally intended. 8 an S°.m,6 °'J3erv:ons from Mr. Turner, Capt. Plumbridge, r*v-°hden, in support of the motion, 1 r* Roebuck disapproved of the taunting spirit and laugh- n„ manner with which Sir Robert Peel had treated the motion, e point at issue was, can a large portion of the labouring people he mitted to the franchise and the answer was, No. e aristocracy had no monopoly of virtue or intelligence why should they shut the door against inquiry? They dreaded the downfa! of their nionopoly of political power. Lord Stanley asked, had nothing been done for the popular mfluence by the Reform Bill which had admitted membeis for so many of the large towns, and destroyed so many of the ier. boroughs, where corruption and nomination prevailed? He denied all intention to disparage the labourers, but it was 0 vious that the higher classes, from their advantages and op- portunities, were more likely than the labourers to be fit and in- tel hgent trustees for the public. Periodical recurrences of poverty and distress had a natural tendency to warp men's judgements. He protested against vague motions for unsettling the public mind, at a time when it was so important that the relations between the various classes of the state should be fixed andcertato. Mr. Blewitt observed there was much truth in the old adage that fair words buttered no parsnips," as indeed the speech just made by the right hon. bart. fully proved—a speech which admitted of no other interpretation than that put upon it by the hon. and learned member for Bath. Such a speech as that of the right hon. baronet ought not to have been made. (Loud cheers and laughter.) The right hon. baronet. (Here the most pertinacious and indecent inieruptions continued to annoy the hon. gentleman.) It the house thought proper to in'cnupt him mthat manner, he would move the adjournment. (Cheers.) rhc light hon baronet. (Laughter.) He begged to move that the debate be adjourned. (Cries of "go on, go on.") lie had a peculiar right to be heard on the present motion, for he had represented for five years popular constituencies, and having been solicited to represent them in the house, he was entitled to deliver his sentiments-(laughter and cheers)—on such a ques- tion as that before the house. (Continued interuptions ) It was very unfair to attempt to stop any member from speaking (Cries of "go on.") It was very easy to say go on but ( how was he to do so. (Repeated annoyances.) Hebeesedto move the adjournment of the debate. (Cries of P "> Mr. Collins seconded the motion. °n" The Speaker put the question, and asked the lion, member if he meant to divide. Mr. Blewitt said that having sat during the last five years in that house, and having very seldom troubled them he consi- dered he hart not been fairly treated^—(loud cries of* n0 an divide"). 6 The Speaker put the question, that the debate be adjourned which was decided in the negative n thout a division Mr. Sharman Crawford said a few words by way of a reply. i he house then divided—Against the motion 226 for it 67 majority against the motion, 159,djourned.' F.UUAV Aptui. 22. On the order lor the second leading of the Income-tax Bill, Mr. C. buller moved that it be read that day S1* lnonlhs. fn a speech o some length he contended that „ was mquisito ial, H„d sa.dt.e only just tax was that which affected inioyment and expendituie, not that wtuchan-ccted merc 11Icome; and that the house ought not to tax as heavily the father of a family, who was oblIged to lay by a part of his income, III order to afford them a prov.s.on, as the bachelor, who could expend his .vhole income upon n»s own enjoyments Mr. Ewurt and Sir J. Walsh spoke in favour of the measure. After some observations from Sir W. Clay, Mr. Waklev Mr. IJ'Jsraeh, i\c., '.tie house divided i<or the amendment For the second reading. 15" Majonty for the second reading of the bill -72 1 tie Din was then read a second time, and ordered to be committed on Monday next. WAYS AND .MEANS. Upon the morion of Sir G. Clerk, The house resolved itself into a committee of ways anti means; Mr. Greene in the chair. Sir G. Clark moved the resolution that a vote of £ 9.100,000 be granted for the service of the year 1842-1843. In answer to Mr. Blewitt, The Chancellor of tho E*chcquc. ^id that her Majesty's government had no intention whatever to piopose any ali.cirttion in the law es to thc mode in which thc commissioners of the national debt possessed the power of investing the money de. posited in saving banks. He believed the existing law to have no tendency whatever to impugn the interests of the depositors of money in such banks. (Hear, hear.) The vote was then agreed to. The house resumed, and the repoit was ordered to be com- mitted on Monday. Several orders of the day were next disposed of, and the house went into committee on the clauses of the Railway Bill, and had proceeded as far as the loth clause, when, on the mo- tion of Mr. Brotherton, the chairman reported progress, and thc house adjourned.

DOMESTIC NEWS.

THE DIVISION ON THE REPORT…

ADDRESS TO POESIE.

IDLE WORDS.

OUR LETTER BOX.

USK FISHERY.—LETTER XII.

To the Editor - of the, Monmouthshire…

To the Editor of the Monmouthshir…

HOUSE OF LORDS,—TML'HSDAV,…

I NEW TARIFF.

- -0.- ' MISCELLANY.

THE FORSAKEN.

„,,MEDICAL LOVE.

[No title]

LONDON MARKETS. lb

PRICES OF SHARES AT LONDON.