Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

19 articles on this Page

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.I

News
Cite
Share

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. I HOUSE OF LORDS.—THURSDAY, JUNE 6. Marquess Normanby expressed his willingness tn n>- .k papers regarding the removal of certain Wal o^ '"fllf, but proposed lo the Earl of Rip0n to d- "!lCers at Ma,ta 5 count of the absence, from indispo«-' on ac" The Earl of Ripon acqu,V of L4or,luGIeune bring forward the sub- -ced' and stated that he sll0ul(1 on the question as ear'y fts possible.—Several papers quess of y ..ere then ordered on the motion of the Mar- Ii" ..ormanby, .-rl Stankoipe presented petitions complaining of the Poor- law Amendment Act, and one from an individual complaining of oecttliarly harsh treatment. Lord Brougham, in presenting a petition in favour" of the government plan of national education, said that he was against I the plan, not for reasons expressed by others, but because it I did not go far enough." The Marquess of Lansdowne observed that among the num- berless falsehoods circulated on the subject, was one that it I would be compulsory in every part of the country. The Bishop of Exeter moved for a copy of the commission under which the Dean of the Arches holds his office, which I was ordered.—Adjourned. FRIDAY, JUNE 7. Marquess Londonderry again called the attention of their lordships to the case of those officers and others who had been inveigled into the Spanish service, and said he should move for returns of what had been done on the subject.—Lord Mel- bourne said that the committee appointed by the Spanish go- vernment and by the officers had proceeded in their labours; bat as our government had no controul or part in the proceed- i\\g8) fteithef he nor that house had any power to order returns his lordship, however, thought he could procure the accounts and he was perfectly ready to do so. Earl Stanhope presented the petition, of which he had given bobca, regarding the poor law commissioners. Lord Lyndhurst, pursuant to notice, moved for a series of returns respecting the rtate of business, &c., in the Court of CSancety and Exchequer. In the Court of Chancery, in 1750, the amount locked up by proceedings there was £8,000,000 how the amount is f40.000.000. He directed the attention of the house to the absolute inefficiency of the Court of Chancery, as now constituted, to meet the wants of the country, so far as the dispensation of justice is concerned. The Court of Chan- cery is, in fact, borne down by the weight of business. There are, at this moment, cases in arrear to the number of 850 whilst, on the average, a period of between two and three years must elapse before a case can be brought forward for decision. This state of things constitutes, the learned lord observed, an intolerable grievance. His lordship proposed that there should be two new judges one to assist the Lord Chancellor by hear- ing appeals from the Vice Chancellor, &c.; and the other to «id in the equity part of the Court of Exchequer.— Lord Rrougham professed himself opposed, on principle, to the mul- tiplication of judges. That practice—besides the expense to which it gives rise, and the patronage which it creates—tends, according to his opinion, to lessen the vigilance and industry of the judges, and to induce in them a feeling that, in the event of theit shrinking from the laborious discharge of their duties, and permitting arrears of business to accumulate in their courts, parliament will interfere to relieve them from their difficulties, by multiplying the number of their coadjutors.—To him it ap- peared not at all impossible, to work out the end desired, by greater industry on the part of the learned judges—by a sterner •coaomy of time-and, above all, by a separation to a consider- able axtent. of the Chancellor's jndicial functions from his te gislative.—The Lord Chancellor expressed his concurrence in the general principles laid down by Lord Lyndhurst-althou}!h that noble and learned lord's remedies did not appear to be adequate in their extent, to the emergency of the case. The Lord Chancellor utterly denied the accuracy of Lord Brougham's opinion, that the judges in equity could, by any amount of personal toil, cope with the immense chancery business.—After remarks from Lord Langdale, Lord Li/,idhmst observed that he was not prepared to acquiesce in giving two new judges to the Court of Chancery-it would be better to trv what first could be effected by one.—The Lord Chancellor said that he had made such arrangements that he should commence the diminition of the arrears of his court after Wednesday nexl. I he motton for papers was then agreed to and their lordships ( adjourned till Monday.

.-HOUSE OF COMMONS.—YV EDNESDAY,…

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.-SATUIWAY,…

THE CZAREVITSCH AND THE WELSH…

.--MANSION-HOUSE.—SATURDAY.

[No title]

[No title]

DOMESTIC NEWS.

MlNlNd.

RAILWAYS.!

BANKING.

[No title]

[No title]

COURT AND FASHION. -

LTNES

LONDON MARKETS. ! n

THE TAKING OF THE SALMON.

[No title]

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.