Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

17 articles on this Page

--------------------A "Bisnors…

News
Cite
Share

A Bisnors AND PRIESTS. ^RFECT tempest, of indignation lias been raised 9fith respect to the circulation of indecent litcra- e and the action taken in two prominent cases illnStratos the strong class-feelings which °Qiiiiate the minds of English people. Two 80cieties have been guilty of publishing and circu- lating obscene books. The offenders, on the .()lle hand, were the Frecthought publishers, re- Prosented by Mr BHADLAUGII and Mrs BESANT, .and on the other, the Society of the Holy Cross, teprescnted by some hundreds of clergymen of e Established Church. The Freethought people summoned before the bar of justice, and bjected to the risk of fine and imprisonment; e members of the Society of the Holy r°Ss> up to the present time, havifc 'Oot found themselves within the clutches )f the law. The only difference between the two cases is that Mr BRADLAUGH'S volume was ^"culated extensively while The Priest in Abso- was circulated privately amongst clergymen against this, it is to be remembered *hat the who had the book were generally believed Aculeate its doctrines orally to a considerable ■f^tent. A jury has declared that Mr BiiADLArofi'.s °k is obscene the priestly volume is pro- nounced obscene, disgusting, loathsome yet those 0 circulate it are allowed to go scatheless. The *>nes denounces it; Lord REDESDALE and the „°Usc of Peers condemn it the ATTOHNFA- 'GENERAL one of the chief law-officers of the ovrn, declared, amidst the cheers of the House Simons, that it wa3 disgusting and obscene Archbishop of CANTERBURY, in his place in the pper House, said that any clergyman who had 'Used it was not fit to be admitted into the bosom any man's family. Yet, notwithstanding all the gentlemen who circulate and use the book :U-e not prosecuted. It will appear to many who •^puder these things that the priest's cassock, like ^ty, covers a multitude'of sins. W 0 perceive that the Archbishop of CANTEII- *U*Ys, notwithstanding the fervour with which he ^sed the book, and, impliedly, the people who *sedit,, has not scrupled to hold a private and friendly conference with two of those people, ^th a view to get the objectionable volume with- in from circulation and destroyed. The re- ?^t of that conference, we are given to understand. '«fa every member of Society the Holy Cross should burn his copy oithe book. SUch an auto da fe would form a spectacle only ^^lled in sublimity by that presented at Ephe- :t> a. when many of those who used curious arts, rOllght their books together and burned them be- ^le all men. Whether the Society of the Holy 1'08S are likely to bring about an historical ^^faliel like this is, we think, exceedingly doubtful, gentleman who suggests that the books shall burnt is, however, sangune. He believes that many members of the Society of the Holy os.s <10, like himself, disapprove of the book, and i readily consent to destroy it. At any rate, he s as a member of the Society, make his propo- at the first opportunity. The sensible refiec- n> and one which will readily occur to the mind, ''Ifi fl-> 'a' if there are many members who disapprove book they should at once burn their copies Hot only burn them, but cease to inculcate the :practices contained in them. There is no need to "ait for an order from the Superior of the Society, "Or any other official, to do that which they honestly e £ ,u to be just and right. Tile statements-of the gentleman above referred r aie singular. He tells the Archbishop of CAN- that his copy of l'he Priest in Absolution .ad. hiin locked up since it came into his posses- ion, and he was not aware, until he heard the de- bate in the House of Lords, that it was so vile as it Really is. Further, he believes that many other «Ievgymen who possess it, will be able to make a statement. In charity, the public will il>erhapd be disposed to accept that explanation some will think that while it is possible that v<me or two gentlemen might send for a book sold ^dor the most solemn restrictions and pledges, then lock it up without reading, it is exceed- ^S'y improbable that many men would do so. The secrecy surrounding the transaction would act an incentive to read and the desire to purchase md argue the desire to reap the benefit of tlie T^chase. If they have read the book, and have rkorne to repudiate it until forced to do so by an ^tburst of public indignation, we shall know how 10 assess their present professions of virtue. If, '>()n the other hand, they have never read the book they took the trouble to purchase, they have miered themselves to be made the tools of adesign- S and insidious party. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY, while speaking PoM the subject in Convocation, on Tuesday, ^"Ued animated by a certain sense of pleasure at Ile probability of these confessors themselves con- ning their misdeeds, and promising amendment life. There is, however, little comfort to be Sailed from such scanty probabilities. The ARCH- 81ISHop could not hide the fact that one of the two who had so frankly repudiated the ob- tcctiouable book, still held to confession. He ap- JH"oved of the practice of confession, though he dis- proved of the particular rules laid down for it in driest in Absolution. Tiie Bishop of LONDON ^as not, therefore, inopportune in submitting to 0fl'vocation, on Tuesday, a motion calling the attention of the Lower House to the declaration on le subject of confession adopted by a committee of e Upper House, in 1873, and inviting their imme- T^te consideration of the same. This" declara- tion," which is a somewhat long document, is to e effect that the Church of England in the tn Article affirms that penance is not to be ^°^nted^for a sacrament of the Gospel, and, as iutlged by her formularies, knows no such words as confession,' that she distinctly de- .*area the full and entire forgiveness of sins through blood of JESUS CHRIST, to all who confess to ALMIGHTY GOD with full purpose of '*Irie,»dnient of life. Yet for the relief of troubled *Oftsciences S'he has made special provision for con- T^'on in two exceptional cases, which special pro- *U1», however, does not authorise the ministers of the Church to require from any who may resort to them to open their grief, a particular or detailed Numeration of all their sins, or to enjoin or even ^Ucourage any practice of habitual confession to a What good his Lordship of London expects to Accrue from this motion we cannot conceive. That and admonition are thrown away ':t1pon the advocates of Confession is abundantly 'dear the only alternative, then, is prosecution. nut the Bishop of LONDON looks with disfavour legal repression or "periJeclltion," because tvouid not tend to repress confession, but to ^k^ke it secret instead of public, and secret con- 'fssion is more dangerous than public confession. Uch reasoning and such policy as this, coming trotn the heads of the Church, are enough to shake ?0e ii faith in sense and honesty. We submit that if confession i* bad, and contrary to law, it ought to be put down, so far as the Church of England is Concerned. It is no business of the Bishop's to Connive at it because it is public, or because it will ■^come more dangerous should its advocates be forced by prosecution to follow the practice secretly. tt is no business of the Bishop's to parley with blen who break laws and circulate filthy books, for ^'bich, if they were not protected by the stupid Prejudices attaching in the public mind to the Mostly offico, they would be fined or imprisoned. ?'lat the practice of confession is bad in itself, that It opens the door to all kinds of pruriency and p^clean thoughts, is notorious-. The Bishop of himself, in his speech to Convocation, on ^uesday, said, The extracts which were brought 0rward in the House of Lords contained the strongest exhortation to the priest engaged in this -flice to be most careful, whether in confession or eut of confession, not even to touch the hand of the person confessed. He asked whether the neces- sity of such a caution did not of itself show the danger of the system, and whether a system which might produce such pruriency in confessor and confessed as to require that they should not even venture to shake hands, did not carry with it its own condemnation. It was obvious that the rela- tions between the confessor and the person who confessed must be different from what they were before. The woman who had gone through such a process must be in that man's power—he did not mean in a wrong sense, but she knew she had a secret which she had not entrusted to GOD, but which she had entrusted to a human being, and her relations to that man must be different from what they were before." Yet his Lordship exhorts his right reverend brethren not to persecute the men who follow practices and put questions to women of so delicate a nature as to entirely destroy those relations which ought to subsist between honest men and modest women. The Society of the Holy Cross have escaped a summons before a jury of their fellow countrymen but they are called upon by Convocation to produce a list, of their members, and any statement in explanation or defence which they think fit to make. We shall be very much surprised if they show a re- pentant spirit.

---THE INCREASE OF MATERIAL…

MADNESS, AND ITS INCREASE…

FIIOM 0(111 LONllOJUJOltfTliSFONDiiNT.…

----*-.--.--. FATAL RAILWAY…

; -------------------------1:.----;…

[No title]

-..---.----J"'-'-- --.__.---------------I…

THUNDERSTORM AT NORTH SHIELDS.

[No title]

HOUSE OF COMMONS—MONDAV. "

------'-'.-,,-HOUSE OF LORDS.—TLTISDAT.

-.---HOUSE OF COMMONS. -TCSSDAY.

—m1 HOUSE OF COMMON'S.— WEDNESDAY.j

..--'---+--,----HOUSE OF LORDS.—THURSDAY.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.—THURSDAY.

THE PROGRESS OF THE Y An.