Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

11 articles on this Page

GLAMORGANSHIRE SUMMER ASSIZES.

News
Cite
Share

GLAMORGANSHIRE SUMMER ASSIZES. [Continued from Seventh Page.] William John, a county policeman at Taibach, deposed that lie was with the last witness when the arrest took place. Prisoner said, I wanted to see Dr. Pritchard on his way home, and he was riding very fast and did his best to ride over me and it was then I fired at him. Benjamin Morgan, another constable, said prisoner was placed in his charge at Aberavon station on the eveniBg of March 4. After being duly cautioned, he told witness to go to Taibach, to near John Gough's house and under a sack of bran he would find two pistols. Witness went to the spot described and found the pistols now produced. One was loaded and the other appeared to have been recently dis charged. Prisoner afterwards said I had been waiting in the lane for Dr. Pritchard when he came up on horseback, and held a stick over my head as if he was going to strike me. I had then a pistol in my right hand pocket and I drew it out and fired at him." Thomas Riches, another constable, deposed that while .pri- soner was at Aberavon station on the 5th of March, he said he wished he had killed Dr. Pritchard. Prisoner was very excited at tbe time. Mr. David Davies, surgeon, deposed to being an assistant of the prosecutor. On the evening in question the prosecu- tor came to the surgery with a fresh wound on his right temple, from which blood was flowing. It was evidently a bullet wound, and there were some grains of powder in it, showing that the perion who fired it must have been close to the wounded man at the time. Morgan Hall, a Swansea surgeon, who had also at- tended the prosecutor, corroborated the last witness. Superintendent Thomas, of Neath, produced the pistols as P by a former witness. Mr. Giffard, in summing up the case, said he would not have addressed the jury again but for the tenour of the cross- examination of the prosecutor having indicated that the de- fence of insanity was to be set up. He contended that it was for the prisoner's counsel to make out that he was insane, by producing persons from Swansea, who knew him, to state whether they had seen evidences of insanity in his conduct. It was not for the jury to conclude the prisoner to be insane merely from the reckless character of this assault upon Dr. J or defence of insanity would operate to relieve criminals from the consequences of the worst crimes. Mr. Bowen, in addressing the jury for the prisoner, called attention to the letter of February 28, as showing that in it there was no threat of revenge, but an offer to accept the money without interest, and expressing a wish that all might be forgiven between them. This provtd that at that time the prisoner had no malice against Dr. Pritchard. It was not ne- cessary for the present jury to enter into the matters of ac- count between the doctor and this uneducated old man. All eycould take cognisance of was the fact that the pri- soner believed that justice had not been done to him, and that he had not received what was due to him out of his hard earnings. He contended that when the affray took place, the prisoner had no intention to injure Dr. Pritchard He had jus e ore written to him, asking for an amicable settlement, and expressing no feeling of malice or revenge. He expected an answer to this appeal, and it was for the purpose of ob- taining one that he had waited for Dr. Pritchard in the vicinity of the works. The fact of the prisoner having pistols about him did not imply that he had bought them for the hi .I ""? Doctor- The prisoner had for fnrpi<m r ° j on the Syrian coast, witk a fhi hg"h;7e^3n "° -do,ibt he had been for a long while iu lnaH i°n arn,gKP,SU?U al>0,t him, and of carrying them loaded. If he had been intending to use pistols against Dr. Pritchard, he would havehad one ready in his hand when the Doctor came up. If his intention had been to shoot the SnrpTi'J.t fired the second pistol also. It was more likely that the threatened blow from the Doctor's stick tKp itrtor Knel; •w-take ?ut the pistol in order to deter writ,?n1wng hinn *ith the stick. He had QW;n„ tn him f A' "king for the money he thought was owing to him from Dr pri».u j J c answer, he saw the DacioVride l- h h g ?' and having his stick in hi^h* -?3 lf TT A n,s "and as if to strike him with it. nrisoner heimr wi"068 J' was 9uite conceivable that the J. u J hg ta feeble man, and having, as he should have drawn on'e ^th no^th' PiSt°U ahndnei0vePrhimCtanhira,eif' i"prTo £ rdto st™ thaf ihn nistol an!W"'°"lt letter he had written; and wounJ i i.Tm i tc<iide"ta"y* From the Position of fir if he hadfiri»i °re y ,lle prisoner fired accidentally; >>;»■ *» RB.BI« -H.. J tended te shoot the pr^cutSSlprtoon" had del,bera.tely place close to Margam tTn -ort T "0t a light, nor would hf hTve kft fh *} f U™lnb™*A charged. In regard to lheit ?eeond. ,lo«dtfd undls* said to have made u* of wh^u -'°nS wh,,ch pr,S°ne/ "as prisoner was very edited an]^ CU, °dy' U 'u*1 he, at the same time talked a j P5l,C,emfa" ad™tte* ,haj murder the P'«»eouto!lfe,.J?'ber,Se l!u 10 guilty at the most only of% PrW°T T" the Drisone? hill 5 ;W°Uld ,show by » host of witnesses that most humane and hn aJ°ng life home the character of a radhsr,o*tSe?„b=s,' T p'omco- Mr. Allison, SuperintendentID (;!1aractecr- Davies, clerk to tffif £ Pfol'ce at Swansea; Mr. cp by remarking onTheD\ST°l° • count of the prisoner's advanced of th.e case» raeter. He said the erelt aulf?e preuvloa3 Bood eha" was intentionally fired for the« ijaSJ whe'her the Pisto1 was fired by the priao^r a.Jd th,?-^ be nJ°Jdoubt that tor. To aid the jury "n^ deSriiiSJ.,t,°"ndcd-the FT™' ship went carefully over the evident »S clues',on' hl? L°rd- decide whether the prisoner 0 enable the jury to parpose, or whether it went off accidenuMv H P1^0'.0" the iurv that no iniuriM ciaentally. He reminded soner, would at all excuse °his °umW by ^e. prj" prosecutor by personal violence Tn th«"l8 l° pa" the often took th« VC ln the s,ster country men u T their own hands from a belief, un- nuli^'h^ yet'in<:ere' that they could notob- CCNU=dfrrtt; eountr^h«? \ere not tu„. e, e laT ?nto their own hands, because srd,dc„ ? T*0'? w^'1 the courts of law. Men were arm JU!jC-e l"6 em m put up with whatever in8uTts th ° u,n t0 retaliating at the time knil; they.mi8ht receive, without courts of law they would 06^ on »PP'ying to the the prisoner had, therefore ftn Whatever feeling which he thought he had h.' C0Jnc"nu!» the hardship with this formed BO excuse for hi.6]?- If t'le Prosect>tor, The jury retired for soml ^lS° a pi,to1 at him- of Guilty of shooting with in, Tl and returned with aver- a recommendation of th» t0 murder; but they added as stated by Mr J T R Pnson« to mercy, on the ground, age and prerioui good chl™ foreman' of prisoner's Sentence was deferred. Thomas HarrUB8UhI!!3TING A rAil.way. Gelligaer, June 10th lndlc,ed for htvinR. stop block, at or mul removed the staple of a with the Rhymnev r>;i Junc'ion of the Penallta siding gtructed a locomotive and thereby unlawfully ob- using the said railwav ^ic was then and there cution, and Mr. R T ur-n-r" en aPPeared for the prose- Mr. Bowen said fPr th,e Prisoner, the prosecution w„ to show?hat ?h f °bjeCt in ]nstituting must not be interfered wf»h TJ • P0,nt* and property ▼ice of a collierv con,» u Pruoner was in the ser- and he was sent to th^lKav i f 8'di?g °" H[|e' Instead of leaving them „! h.7!" eha5«e of some trucks- to open the pointf, without he took upon h,mself officers of the comnanv g any permission from the merely a wilful one an/'th WM not a malicious act, but the prisoner would plead ffmie|tCOmPan^ wou'd satisfied if to come up for judsin«,t »i,Ly' a?d int0 recogwiaancea Mr. Williams said the "j04 d on' for a moment, Lnly obstructed the line directly but nnfortunatelv trucks out of the way the main line just at the time company's tra,n came up on The Judge said this case persons placing stones or o7h V^ry d,fferen £ fr°m that of He thought, under the circum«f.r lmPe«iiments on the line, in allowing the t« take th0069' he would be justified Bowen. e course suggested by Mr. The prisoner pleaded Guiltv teTing into his own recognisanoL • d wa9 d,8ch*rged on en- ment when called on. 10 *10 to appear for judg- WOUNDING AT Charles Maloney, 23, was i„!r TL0TITlf- ing Jeremiah Buckley, at R^ill ed for unlawfully wound- liams prosecuted. y^ier, July 9. Mr. W. Wil- The case was very brief >nri ™ Irishmen of the lowest class. The parties were that he was sitting » pawablv^J; Ly-' an old man' £ Woro Maloney carce up and hit him a owr! door' wben the head, without any provocatin*eV8rr b'ow with a stone on be found a severe contused wnnJli surgeon deposed tlist locality of which was marked h n Buckley's head, the plaster. The prisoner's stor* great Patch of sticking fiom work, he found Bucklev V that when he came home law, all bating his (Maloniv'V°n' daQ«hter, and son-in- stone and went to the rescue hi •fe; and he took up the by way of making a diversion'in itlng Buckley on the head denied the prisoner's story abom uWlfe's f,lV0Ur- Buckley but his manner of giving evidenc e assau^c ?n his wife; on the prisoner being found n so unsa<'sfactory that him only to a fortnight's hard lak •' sentenced was probably more Provocation in the affair than Bucklev admitted. n ln the affair than Buckley ROBBING A ROB Ann Donahay was indicted for Bf-R' nc r S"ee"ey' The prosecutrix was in the servi^ r «r c j gattock, Monmouthshire. She ? Stallard, at Llan- money, and absconded. On li»r 'ie![ she met the prisoner, and thev Way through Wnitchurcch Whitchurch, and subsequently t0 a Public-house in ^vhere she went to sleep, and awat' 6 ^°y.a' Roath, a sovereign, a half-crown,'and a ni S^e m'ssed a n°te, the prisoner into custody to Ser* Uret°^ 'lerse'^ She gave the picture, a sovereign, and silvp *anst°ne> wbo found mination that had beeti lost, upon <k°ln8-°f exactly the deno" Tbe j ury Acquitted the prisoner Vi,ri80?ej diet being given, intimated his dis Judge> on ver- soner was not discharged until thn 3™1 ^rom and the Pr'- THURS^ The Court opened at nine o'clock THE DOWLAIS IU Thomas Watkins (40), labourer »RD-E^ murder of Saunders Henderson [\ £ 3 lndlcted the wilful He pleaded Not Guilty. As tl,e 1'"erthyr Tydvil, July 7. the Judge assigned Mr. Henry A. £ was undefended, and the ttlal of the case waspostponej act 38 his counsel, Subsequently his Lordship fixed th case for ten o'clock on Friday morning murder THE MARGAM SHOOTIRQ CASE Thomas Jones, convicted yesterday of u 1 • Llewellyn Prichard with intent to mML*i?°Ung at "°Pk,n to receive sentence. The Judge ADTE.«D T "P ■ .1 U J .E»»EA luin at very great length, stating that he had not GIVEN sentence yestefday, from no doubt of the propriety of the VPRHJM U wished it to be understood that he MWTK concurred £ adverted to the patience and care with which RHP HFRV H 'i,e abR"i,y *» P"5"?h in-ent to J Mr' B°Wen- The offence of shoot- r of^ £ thZ*el wasu°re which—long after the f'* r 'Tpne-i was still .eet\ ai)0'lshed for a great variety r ,r'dindeed tW-d on U,e slalute book for this yffen e jaiitv K ?S not a 8reat de< of ditVerence ,n point of deliberate attempt to destroy itfe and tiie actual commission of a murder. He must say that there were many cases of murder which in- volved less deliberation and less apparent intention to take life, than the prisoner had shown during the four or five days preceding this attack on Dr. Prichard, and in the attack it- self. Had the prisoner been convicted of this offence as re- cently as six or seven years ago even, in the then state of the law he would have been sentenced to death and indeed, that be was not a murderer now, and not now standing up to be sentenced to an ignominious death on the scaffold was from no merit of his, but owing solely to the interposition of God's providence, saving Dr. Prichard from the consequences of a deadly aim at his head with a pistol. Had the shot taken the effect intended by the prisoner he would have been now suffering those pangs of remorse which he (the Judge) believed were inseparable from the commission of a murder. He would inflict a sentence which was light considering the gravity of the crime. In doing so he was taking into consi- deration the prisoner's age-which would in all probability render even a comparative short sentence equivalent in his case to penal servitude for life. He was also giving full allowance to the jury's recommendation to mercy, in which the prosecutor had kindly joined and he hoped that, small as the sentence was in comparison with that which a younger man would have received, it would be sufficient to deter others from the commission of such an offence. The sentence was, twelve years' penal servitude. CONCEALMENT OF BIRTH AT CARDIFF. Maiy Ann Evans (19), was indicted for having, at Cardiff, April 13, concealed the birth of a child of which she. had been delivered. Mr. B. T. Williams prosecuted and Mr. Bowen defended. The prisoner was in the service of Dr. Krapf, the Austrian Consul. Her fellow-servant had noticed that she was with child, but had not spoken to her on the subject. On the day in question the prisoner was ill, and went down into the garden. One of the other servants found the body of a child in the ash-box, and on speaking to prisoner, she admitted it to be hers. Dr. Paine was called in, and found that the child was dead before its delivery. In reply to Mr. Bowen, Dr. Paine stated that, the child having died before delivery, it would have been born before its time, and probably without any immediate warning to the prisoner of her being about to be delivered. Under these circumstances Mr. Bowen urged that there had been no unlawful concealment of the birth, the prisoner having freely admitted, both to her fellow-servant and to Detective Price, that the child was hers. He called Dr. Krapf, who gave the prisoner an excellent character, stating that while under bail for this offence, he had retained her in his service, and after the result of this trial he purposed to take her into his service again. The Judge said that cases of this kind varied greatly in character-some were very serious offences, others compara- tively trivial. In this instance there had been no injury done to the child. The object of the law making concealment of birth an offence was, that there should be no attempt to stifle inquiry by surreptitiously disposing of the body; be- cause, if this were permitted, it would lead to neglect of new-born children, if not to their being murdered. The pro- vince of the jury would be merely to determine whether there had been concealment of birth; if there had, it was for the jury to find the prisoner guilty, and the Court would appor- tion the punishment, having regard to the degree of crimina- lity which the circumstances disclosed. The jury Acquitted the prisoner. ROBBERY AT SWANSEA. Rachael Ingle, 21, was indicted for stealing, from the per- son of Jan Von der Heide, money and a handkerchief, at Swansea, July 13. Mr. Bowen prosecuted. The prosecutor, a Dutch sailor, was in a public-house, at midnight on the date specified, with some of his shipmates. The prisoner came in, and requested the sailors to treat her to beer. Prosecutor did so, taking a shilling out of some money-about two pounds—which he had wrapped up in a handkerchief, They then left the house together, and went to a second public-house, called the Troubadour, in the Strand, where the prisoner sat by the prosecutor's side for awhile, and then ran away, on which prosecutor put his hand to his pocket and found his money gone. He pursued her, but could not overtake her. About ten minutes afterwards he saw her standing at the door of the public-house, and charged her with robbing him. She admitted to him, in the presence of a policeman, that it was she who had taken the handker- chief and money, but said that she had given it to another girl. The prisoner now vehemently denied the truth of this evi- dence of the prosecutor and the constable, Sergeant Wilson, alleging that what she had said was, that the other girl had taken the money from the sailor. The jury found the prisoner Guilty, and she was sentenced ta twelve months' imprisonment, a former conviction having been proved. HORSE STEALING AT CADOXTONJUXTA NEATH. William Birchill, 18, was indicted for having, at Cadoxton. juxta-Neath, on the 14th April, stolen a horse and bridle, the property of John Bowen. Mr. H. Allen prosecuted, and Mr. Bowen defended. The prosecutor, a farmer, deposed that he last saw his mare safe on his farm on the day in question. He did not see her again until the 5th of May, when a constable brought the pri- soner and the missing animal to him. He had recently bought the bridle at Neath; the mare he had had for two years. A labourer, named Davies, in the prosecutor's em- ployment, had left the mare in a stable, the door of which was closed, but not locked apd the next morning at seven o'clock he found the mare gone and the stable door open. The mare had only two shoes on. The next seen of it was on the 29th April, when the prisoner introduced himself to a blacksmith named Evans, at Ystalyfera, as the owner of the mare, which he said he had bought from a jockey, on the road, and offered to sell it for thirty shillings, saying th4t that was all he had given for it. The defence was that the prisoner had only taken the horse in a drunken freak, without any intention of stealing; and that the offer to sell the animal to Evans was not made in earnest. j- ft/und the prisoner not guilty. Isaac Lyons, 26, glazier, and Emily l!yons, 18, wife of the male prisoner, were indicted for having at Neath, on the Ist July, stolen a blanket, the property of William Crocembe. Mr. Hughes prosecuted. The prosecutor kept a lodging-house at 14, Union-street, Neath. The prisoners had lodged there for three weeks. On the Monday previous to the date in the indictment, the male prisoner left. On the Wednesday, Mrs. Crocombe missed a blanket from the bed on which the psisoners slept. She told the ftmale prisoner of the loss, and she said she had folded it up and put it under the bed, because it was not wanted to cover them during the hot weather. Mrs. Crocombe told her to search for it, and on it not being found, Mrs. Lyons said her husband must have put it somewhere, and that it should be found on his return. Mrs. Crocornbe suspected it was pawned, and asked Mrs. Lyons if she had pledged it, which she denied. The husband returned next day, and on Mrs. Crocombe asking him about the blanket, he replied that he had pledged it. It was found on inquiry that the blanket had been pawned by the female prisoner, at the shop of Lazarus Samuel, Neath, for Is. 6d., by the female prisoner, who gave the name of Mary Williams. The pawn-tieket was found in the pocket of a waistcoat belonging to the male prisoner. On being arrested, the male prisoner admitted that the blanket had been taken by him and pledged by his wife. The Judge directed the female prisoner to be discharged, upon the ground that the law presumed her to have acted under the coercion of her husband. Upon this Mr. Hughes called another witness, Sarah Wood, who stated that the female prisoner had told her she would pawn Mrs. Crocombe's blanket, and that she knew if it was found out, that the law could not punish her, but only her husband. The Judge held that even this did not make the wife respon- sible, as it appeared that the male prisoner admitted that he had taken the blanket and told his wife to pawn it, and as it appeared she gave the ticket to him, from its being found in his pocket. The male prisoner was found Guilty, and sentenced to three weeks' imprisonment. STEALING AT SWANSEA. Mary Edward*. 32, was indicted for having, at Swansea, May 28, stolen a quilt, a frock, and other articles, the pro. perty of Ann Jenkins. Mr. Hughes appeared for the prose. cution. The prosecutrix resided in Crab's-eourt, High street Swansea. On the day in question she missed various article from the wash-tub. Emily Heard, residing in the Strand Swansea, deposed that the prisoner and three men came to a cookshop kept by her, and sold her the things for one shil. ling. Several weeks after Mrs. Heard had the quilt hung out to dry, and it was seen and recognised by the prosecutrix, who sent the police to Heard's. They, from her information, arrested the prisoner, who denied having sold the things, or knowing anything respecting them. A police-officer, however, stated that he had seen the prisoner carrying a parcel wrapped in a bedquilt, within a hundred yards of the prose. cutrix's residence, and, as near as he could remember, on the same date as that on which the articles were missed by the prosecutrix. The prisoner, in defence, undertook to throw the suspicion of the theft upon the witness Heard, who she said had just come out of Bristol jail. The witness Heard denied this, and said she had never been in jail in her life. During the questioning of this witness by the prisoner, the Judge re- marked that the dock where the prisoners stood was so far from his seat, that he did not hear half that passed. The prisoner was found Guilty, and a previous convic- tion was proved. The sentence was, nine menths' hard labour. STEALING AT MERTHYR. John Probert, 39, shoemaker, and Ann Long, 30, widow, were indicted for stealing, at Merthyr, June 24, a bed-quilt, the property of Ann Harris. Mr. F. Williams prosecuted. The male prisoner pleaded Guilty. The female prisoner was placed on her trial. The prosecutrix was an aged woman, with whom the prisoners lodged. The quilt was missed by the old woman, and on the same day the two prisoners went to the shop of Mr. Levy, a pawnbroker, the woman carrying the quilt, and offered it in pledge. The money was received by Probert. In the lodging-house, Probert slept in one room, and the female prisoner cohabited with another man in an- other room. The stolen quilt did n ,t belong to either of the beds occupied by the prisoners. The statement made by the prisoner when taken into custody was, that Probert met her on the tips, he having the quilt, which she did not know to be stolen, and he asked her to carry the qnilt to the pawn- broker's for him, and sht did so. On this the Judge said that he could not see that any case had been made out against the female prisoner, and di. rected her acquittal. Sentence on Probert was deferred. WOUNDING AT MERTHYR. Ellen George (38), married, was indicted for having, at Merthyr, July 8, feloniously wounded Watkin George. Mr. F. Williams appeared for the prosecution. The prosecutor was a smith, at Merthyr, and he stated that on the day in question the prisoner's husband was throwing stones at him. and he (prosecutor) asked him what he meant, and caught him by the arm; on which prisoner's husband gave him a smack on the side of the head, and then prosecutor retaliated by knocking him down. Prosecutor fell on his knees with the force of the blow, and as he was rising up the prisoner struck a knife into his forehead. This was just outside the door of the prisoner's house. She tried to stab him again, in the bowels, but did not succeed in doing so. The prosecutor's statement was corroborated by another smith, named Evans, who resided close by. The surgeon, Mr. Miles, by whom the prosecutor's wound had been examined, stated that it was a cut five inches long, and might have been inflicted by the pocket-knife produced, and which was sworn to by the prosecutor and Evans as tiie one by which the wound had been inflicted. The prisoner on being arrested and charged with the offence, said that if the prosecutor came to her house again she would rip him open. The prisoner now defended herself by saying that her bus- band was an old man of sixty, and crippled, and that on the evening in question the prosecutor came to her house, abusing the old man, and on her ordering him out he dragged the old man out with him, threw him down in the gutter, and beat him until he was nearly killed that she had a knife in her hand at the time, with whicil she was cutting bread and butter, and she went out solely to rescue her husband, and did mean to strike the prosecutor with knife, until she found she could deliver her husband from him in no other way. The jury found the prisoner gnilty of unlwful wounding, and she was sentenced to six weeks' hard labour. ROBBERY AT SWANSEA. The Grand jury threw out the bill against Ellen Temple (31), charged with stealing X13 from the person of Joseph Ferguson, at Swansea, July 8. BROTHEL ROBBERY AT MERTHYR. Mary E,yan (22), was indicted for stealing lis. 4d. from the person of William Thomas Williams, at Merthyr, July 8. Mr. H Allen prosecuted. The prosecutor bad met the prisoner in a public-house, and treated her to a pint of beer after which she took him to a hfuse of ill-fame, when she put her hand in his pocket, and taking out his handkerchief, in which his money was wrapped up, she made off. She was apprehended two days afterwards by Sergeant Rees, when the prosecutor identified her from among other girls as the person who had robbed him. No money was found upon her. She stated that the prosecutor had given her the handkerchief, which was found in her possession. The prisoner was found guilty and a former conviction proved she was sentenced to six months' hard labour. BROTHEL ROBBERY AT CANTON. Robert Dawkins, 26, shipwright, Sarah Strange, 48, mar- ried, and Catherine Wheeler, 29, single, were indicted for having feloniously assaulted and robbed Thomas Rees, at Canton, April 22. Mr. T. Allen prosecuted. The prosecutor, a respectable looking old man, said he lived at Ely. On the day in question he went to a house in Canton and went up stairs with a young woman. The young woman went down stairs, and soon after the prisoner Wheeler came up and put her hand in his pocket, in which be had a purse containing £ H. Witness took hold of her hand to prevent her robbing him, and she halloed mur- der," on which the other two prisoners came into the room, and all three set upon him. They covered his mouth with their hands to prevent his crying out for assistance, and with the aid of a fourth woman not in custody, they all, especially the male prisoner, beat and kicked him. He grasped the prisoner Wheeler by the hair of her head and held with such tenacity that she only got away by leaving two handsful of her hair in his hands. As soon as Wheeler had got safe off with the money, the other prisoners let the prosecutor go, and he obtained the aid of a policeman, still holding to the prisoner Strange, of whom he had not let go since the scuffle. P.C. Price deposed that aoout nine o'clock on the evening of April 22nd, he was fetched to a bouse, 24, Halket-street, Canton, and he foand the prisoner Strange held there by the prosecutor, who charged her with robbing him. In about half-an-hour witness saw the prisoner Dawkins running from the back premises of the Halket-street houses. Sergt. King deposed that he went to the house in Halket- street at a later period of the evening and arrested Dawkins, who was in the act of coming down the stairs of the house. Subsequently he saw Wheeler running from Halket street, in the direction of Cardiff, but she was not arrested until the next day, at Llandaff station, by another policeman. The statement of the prisoners Strange and Dawkins was that they heard the cry of "murder" upstairs, and on going up found the prosecutor ill-using a woman, and pulling her hair, and they interfered to free the woman from him, but had nothing to do with any robbery, nor did they know that he had been robbed; and that the woman in question was not Wheeler, but a strange woman. Wheeler herself also denied having been in the house at the time. She further referred to the fact of her going to Llandaff police court next day to hear Strange and Dawkins tried-at which place she was arrested. If she had been guilty, she would not have gone to Llandaff station the next day, when the case was to be tried. P.C. Williams deposed that while the prisoners were at Llandaff, he overheard a conversation between Dawkins and Strange. The former said to the latter, Have they caught Mary yet? Did they find any of it about her?" He un- derstood this to be a reference to the prisoner Wheeler, who also went by the name of Mary Baker. Sergeant Thornton deposed that after Wheeler's arrest, and while she was being conveyed before the magistrates, he saw her pass something to a little girl who was walking close to them. He took fiom the child's hand what had been placed in it, and found it to be a sovereign. Strange said that the little girl was her child. Wheeler now undertook to explain this by saying that the sovereign had been sent by another woman to pay the expense of hiring a lawyer for Strange's defence. The jury found the prisoners guilty. A previous convic- tiou was proved against Wheeler. Sentence was deferred. STEALING AT CARDIFF. Mary Johnson, alias Sheppard, 33, widow, wss indicted for having, at Cardiff, July 11, stoleu a shirt, the property of John Jones. Mr. Bowen prosecuted. The facts of this case appeared last week in our police re- ports. The prisoner went to the shop of the prosecutor, in Bute-street, corner of Herbert-street, and on pretence of making a purchase, ooncealed a shirt about her, and was de- tected in the act by the shop assistant, and given into custody. The prisoner was found guilty, and a previous conviction was proved against her, in the name of Mary Brown. De- tective Price identified her as the same person, though she > protested that she was not. The sentence was, nine months hard labour. The Court then rose. The Judge stated that civil business would not be taken before Monday. There are thirteen causes on the list. THE CAUSE LIST. Pltff'a. Attrny. Plaintiff. Defendant. Dfdt's A.u.uy. Linton Nixon& others v. Mills rtosser Linton Jones. ■». Jones C.H.andF.James B. W. Williams Heap v. Penarth H., D.,) B. Matthews & Railway Co. ) (withdrawn). Kempthorne.Tones. v. Carmarthen and ) H r_:m„T Cardigan Rlwy. J y Field. Bulgin v. Turner & others. Waldron Jones & Morris Richards v. Jenkins & others W. Brown ecrick Moxham v. Lloyd & another. C. Bishop Ingledew&Ince Williams & ) „ R.nv,™. f Paul,Lovesy,and others J -tsusDnage t Fearon Smith & Linton Davies v. The Aberdare 1 C. H. and F. Gas Company 1 James J. Stockwood Guest, Bart. v. Jenkins. C. R. Thomas B W JonpH (United Merthyr a. w. Jones | Comery Co. v. Thomas Spickett. Lloyd v. Davies & another J. Stockwood Jones & Curtis-Thomas- v. Gilfach Coal Co. A. C. Hope

MARITIME INTELLIGENCE.

FROM THE BILL OF ENTRY OFFICE.

THE NAVAL REVIEW.

[No title]

---u-GENERAL NEWS.

--::---------LOCAL NEWS.

MERTHYR.

PARLIAMENTARY INTELLIGENCE.…

CARDIFF POLICE INTELLIGENCE.J

CARDIFF FREIGHT LIST. M