Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

- ^ liitliimtitfrn Jntcllipte.…

News
Cite
Share

liitliimtitfrn Jntcllipte. ———<— £ '« th MONDAY. L ^°"se of Lords, the Royal assent was given by • b«si0tl ,0n H large number of bills, after which a dis- Tti ^°Un P,ace <>n the non-supply of rations to the troops '^thrr which was started by Earl de Grey inquiring lha Siis • rePorts circulation respecting the defective nt th Sarl:it, were correct. The Karl of Longford admitted at |.rcl"Ps been kept without rations for an unusual offi ,Ulne' and exPla'ned 'hat it arose from the commis- ? S>at uCr Who bave had instructions for supplying «J eCfin Unsi°w being absent from his post at the time. H ^1 TCt l'le qufst'O" bad led to his re- Carnarvon moved for a return of the -< Ks of'S '^at ^ad *>een ^ew Zealand since 18(55, and the iL "!e|0| 'heir embarkation. The noble earl complained of 3 S £ .d^ which ail occurred in carrying out the in- 'nS SoftienS ^°r l',e retur" t'ie troops, and asked the Go- 'k- 10 dpclare the policy they intended to pursue on r '^e ^uke of Buckingham had no objection to m« Qoy re,Urns asked for, and remarked that the policy of fclf 'er ern7>ent m»st in a great measure depend upon_ the 'eceived from New Zealand to the communications loll ""isfj..0. the Governor Earl de Grey expressed his dis- atk with the answer he had received, and after a few !be h>°m other noble lords the motion was agreed to.— Otitned JS Wefe forwarded a stage, and their lordships ad. o*6 ^°use of Commons, Sir Stafford Northcote, in reply ['Hthi 'est'°n from Colonel Sykes, declared there was no •U "IR1 "'e rePort lllat il military force was to be despatched r Ks < to Abyssinia with a view of releasing the cap- of i e hon' baronet sai(1 tl,e Government was still en- a Sorv*1 ne8°'ia'ions, which they hoped would have a satis- \tth resu't-—The Chancellor of the Exchequer announced tfc th»!e woutd be no morning sitting to-day (Tuesday), >gt for' House would probably adjourn over VVednes- iO S. tjC rtv'tw> On Thursday and Friday he suggested h« Sj House should sit from twelve to six, so that mem- it- J in the festivities in honour of the Saltan.— of 'ff< |ra^'ngton explained that he had been incorrectly ei Savl w^ respect to the failure in the supply ofrationsto it etn trooPs :it Hounslojv, and stated that it arose from ear'y hour in the morning at which the troops ad Hi Was c'ear 'rorn Ihis, said the hon. baronet, that 118 I' department required to be thoroughly reformed. ed onth PASSAGE UF THE REFORM BILL. I^e*1,10'ion "f the third reading of the Bill for the Re- Id Lord !ttlOn of the People, id w fav0l orne' seeing tbe great preponderance of opinion tt IhiZ r °f he Bill, would deprecate a division, but he re "ben "„ot on that account regard the Bill with less hostility. ?» ^'ch h°rst broug'u in 'l bristled with precautions, all of f "'I seh disappeared, and he should like to see the origi- f" ^plj,-eni1? printed side by side with the Bill as it now stood, 19 ? with the demand originally made by Mr. Gladstone, w°uld oe seen that they corresponded with the t' i jniw'c'1 bad been wrought in it. He therefore heard [ s;'v :he astonishment that the Bill was regarded as a t v«tive triumph. There was nothing Conservative in r. f>StertVery one °f the demands of Mr. Gladstone had been and no one could point out a precedent of any ?iv|nment '1aving yielded such vital changes and still credit for the measure. If it was a Conservative Ki°PpM t0 ^ave ad°Ptfd all the views of Mr. Bright, to have >. ^in R" distinctive features of their schejne at the Il^tr °' 'beir adversaries, the Conservative party had 1 :'«lokL?n so s'gnal a victory (laughter). It was rather in b*do t,la! ^e Conservative party had been persuaded r •'tn|ey* the Bill, and the chief argument was that of Mr. >$"(lb| ,'la^ ^e pot should not boil over. This was a must n'e»e ar.Surnent, and he feared would be the policy of the VdVative Party in future. The Bill had never been dis- Ntr„With due consideration for the future interests of the Sdjj. atl,l knowing what they did of the freemen and the Un)°ns, they were sanguine indeed if they could place Ie^'ance on the flesh and blood theory ofMr.Glad- J5'is)?r Relieve that there was some unknown quality in th tllen which would neutralise the experience of history, '"tew1 'heir Conservative instincts would prevail over class Jfyij s> They had handed over the supreme power to the St 8 classes, and they would find that when c'ass|jin- v^llio c'ass passions were aroused, rank, wealth, and Sdf^e were but feathers before the wind. He vehe- "Ser Jounced the Government for having betrayed the J|^»ii^nVat'Ve partv, and the Conseivative party for having ^d" ed its P"iicy and its tiaditions, and concluded by My his solemn protest against the Bill. t0We was °f °P'n'on 'hat it was worth while to con- !je ft.* ether any credit was due to any one in respect to Ptotde^ure. Many, although they did not like the bill, (j, that stage with satisfaction, in the hope that at "th6* Wou'd be at peace, but he wished rather to point ofthes 'his night would be the period when they took leave tr the tabltlty and permenance which had marked tie history IItllte CoVn'ry> and when they were entering upon an era of bi||tr'fe and turbulence. Rather than claim credit for ought all to disclaim it with horror 3s a dis- ,)ad a Pr'nc'P,e forsooth; but what was that ficl was Pqua'ity, by which the day labourer and f'es? commoner who paid the'r rates were placed on the f0ot'ng They were told that they were to have no Collllt ast hne, but with this basts of equalIty would the IOdg Y franchise be tolerated much longer, or would the !cLralways submit to pay his £ 10? Again, would their 'dhak-e for the redistribution of seats be Una) ? Would the "ants of the largo to wns consent to have a sixty- V84ndth share of the representation ? Instead of settling "taction they had opened the door to numbers of other ?Wl°ns equally important and serious. It was absurd to uSth at they could, with a household suffrage, maintain boroughs. When they had once taught the people (j'^V^'ons of equality, they would find out that equajity no rival near its throne, and that it was an idle oft ^f0 fanry 'hat things would go on as they were, that edlir s1'" he able to discuss their little pithy details .ation, and so forth. They would find that all things .'tltert Ve t0 he re-modelled to the new order of things. e'se jt 0 'he basis of tbe franchise had been fitness to exer- In future it was to be the dangerous doctrine of ■M irV' There was no blinking the matter, and they would Iloj )at the experiment would not answer here, as it did ^swer anywhere. Other countries had tried tbe demo- Ng C and too late had repented in vain, and it r.d t0 suppose that if democracy failed in other tioj. *!Ies> it could succeed in England. Democracy was a set?rSpotic tyant. It suffered no opposition, and instead of g affairs they were really only now inaugurating an ex enc"ess chance, turmoil, and confusion. In conclusion, tb{)lIse/eSs.ed his infinite astonishment that the leaders of the 'hey Vative partv should have, after the opinions which »ti|f av°wed only last year, so changed their policy, and Bla ^re their followers, the country gentlemen of should have followed them. And for what? To For though they had established a union be- ^kle highest and lowest against the great middle classes, s,, *• Of what they destroyed, and ot what would be the pOyjjGovernment was handed over to the masses. He >*1 „ w'sh for a poet, an historian, or orator who could paint 'hat would nevtr die, the shame, the scorn, the in- VWil0r,> and the despair with which the measure was V hy every cultivated Englishman, who was not tbe Nar of Party trammels, or dazzled with the glow of a tern- jffSrS XTiL, 11)e ginning .f bis P»l»ic.l 48i» |lad regarded household suffrage as the on y p ssi clllde } the borough franchise; but feeling that it woutd .m. aLU lar8e class at present not fit for it, he was ynAng ^°v»B"Ve at that result by gradual stages. He did no., th?t erj regret at all the passing of this bill but fee ing Pfjj. ef°re long great concessions must be made, he was {>oSpjred, irrespective of the party by wliich th°y were pro- ^'ei- t° accept any proposals which would have gradually ^'le people for the concessions which were mevita- e had always acted on this principle. He made al- for the difficulties of the question, and did not reject did n8si0ns, if they were in the right direction, because they *4, go so far as he thought they might have done. He Htv refore disposed to congratulate the CoHSeri'a1tl*f 'ft! J having discarded their fears of the people, and he Clfed that next year they would still be further advanced lhe f ,ady to complete their work by a practical scheme for thai ^ls'i'ibution of seats. At present he could only rejoice Peo^fliament had made this great concession to the **0u]e' and the people, he trusted, would never send to that M„e 5 Parliament less worthy of the nation. tile rf Seymour, as a member of the tea-par y> thot„ e °f the success of the bill in its present shape for wh° refused to adopt the insidious tacticsi p haj ,8^ Conservatiue Government in :S52 and 1850. y fetrclir>ed to obey the behests of their leaders, and pre- I 'heir duty to their country to party ties. Klcho said that last year, when the late Governmerr c°rn ^rtled out, he had anticipated that Lord Derby wou lr,i and that Reform would be settled by independent Suit V3'3- a moderate Liberal, he did not regret this re- it ly' ri with all respect to Lord Cranbourne and Mr. Lowe. Qov0u,d have been absurd for the present or any other to have tried to arrest all Reform j and, as Cou lcal men, the moderate Liberals had taken the patriotic lt»eaSe °f supporting the Government, which offered tbe baSij?s °f settling the question on a satisfactory and stablp which was infinitely safer and sounder than a £ 5 line he .'he temporary expedients of Mr. Gladstone, who, though «ec ,*aded household suffrage, was really responsible for the r,ties proposed by the Government having been swept Vj1' thP • Osborne said the Chancellor of the Exchequer was not 5j.jr«al father of the bill. He had stolen the bill of Mr. the8ht, and, only to conceal it, had only disfigured it. At tL Same time he had proved his genius in having converted be<- ^ost aristocratic and Conservative Cabinet even to a hajef'n household suffrage, having, as everyone knows who pf. read his words, led his party little by little up to this ft, "l- He doubted, however, if the country would believe conversion which was made for the sake of retaining ofr Sandford denounced the Government for its changes Vp,n'on. ttlp r- Doulton defended the course pursued by the Govern- b||t «ho after the tactics of the Liberal party had no option the -° Seltle the question. In this they had been assisted by ij1j1.,ndependent Liberals, who had been most unjustly 'gned for having deserted tluir party. Cecil ^f S0Ine remarks trom Mr. Newdegate and Lord E. ha^- Laing protested against the terms in which Mr. Lows Hi SUP( ken of those who had done tluir best to pats a BUI fi^ ?h was so popular that no one ventured to oppose it; thj ,age. The occasion was worthy of something better 'hp0 Personal recriminations and invectives. Referring to hav^r°8ress °f the Bill, be gave the Government credit tor under very difficult circumstances, dealt with the rjft'on in a common sense and practical manner. sPep i Chancellor of the Exchequer said that after the •Viof es abusive of the measure and the Government, he was fot arixious to vindicate the former than the latter. Re- de&| had long '^een a quest'on with which a cabinet must 01\ t,and that opinion he had expressed so long ago as 13^2, e resolution of Mr. Hume, affirming the necessity of be ?rrtl, when, as the organ of the Government of Lord had declared, whilst deprecating the raising of the Of |vct at that time, it was necessary to remedy the great blot $ha Act of 18:!2, and restore to the working classes the °f the franchise of which they had been deprived hy tj,- Act. This view the Government of Lord Derby had Ch)" to carry out in 18^9, although fully aware of the dlffi- W les which they would have to encounter, but the country Oft "ot ripe for it, and although they were thrown out of th -"e hy a resolution calling for a reduction of the franchise, it eir successors, the authors of the resolution, failed to carry In°Ut. and in spite of that failure remained in office for years, of i859 it was the unanimous opinion of the Government thp. d Derby that if they reduced the borough franchise IY1ust go to household suffrage, and the force of th at Qov"noru vvas sliown by the failure last year of a powerful u,u'er mos* favoutuble circumstances, lit; eit that lhe only course was to take tWe House into Ir.ink JUst^i°n. That course was at first derided, but bein^ J I had been acted onl and it was only by the cordial assistance of the House that the Government had brought the Bill to this stsge. He denied the charge that the Go- vernment had obsequiously yielded to the imperious dictation of Mr. Gladstone, and humourously showed that it was rather in deference to the general fueling of th? House and the opinion of the Conservative pa'ty that they had aban- doned the restrictions, and not to that of Mr. Gladstone, who would have emasculated the Bill with his hard and fast £5 franchise. Out of 26 considerable divisions in which Mr. Gladstone had opposed the Government, 18 of them did not result successfully through his imperious dictation. With respect to the redistribution of seats, the Government was perfectly satisfied with the results which the House had sanctioned, and with one slight excepticn was in accordance with the views which he had for twenty years advocated on the part of the Conservative party. In conclusion he warmly thanked the House for the cordial assistance which it had rendered to the Government. The Bill was then read a third time and passed amidst considerable cheering. TUESDAY. In the House of Lords the Reform Bill was laid on the table and read a first time. The Earl of Derby stated that he proposed to take the second reading on Monday next, and if the debate terminated that night to fix the committee for the following Friday. Should the debate, however, be pro- longed, he suggested that the best course would be to take the committee the following Monday. Earl Grey was not aware of any opposition to the Bill, but he did not think the debate would be so short as the noble earl anticipated. So important a question ought to be fully discussed, and he therefore considered it would be better to fix the committee important a question ought to be fully discussed, and he therefore considered it would be better to fix the committee for Monday week. The Earl of Derby expressed his readi- c, e ness to meet the convenience of the House The Tran- substantiation Declaration Bill, after a complaint from the Marquis of Westmeath of the meagre and partial report of his speech which recently appeared in the Times and other newspapers, was read a third time and passed. The Viceroy of Egypt, accompanied by several members of the lower branch of the Legislature, paid a brief visit to the House, and evinced great interest in the proceedings. In the House of Commons new writs were ordered for West Gloucestershire, Andover, the University of Cam- bridge Coventry, and Birmingham. Mr. Fawcett inquired whether the expenses of the ball about to be given to the Sultan at the India-house were to be defrayed out of the revenues of India. Sir Stafford Northcote answered in the affirmative and explained that the invitation to the Sultan did not proceed from the Imperial Government, but from the Government of India. Mr. O'Beirn moved that the House should resolve itself into a committee to take into considera- tion the expediency of granting a loan not exceeding one million for the purchase of estates which might be offered for sale in the Landed Estates' Court in Ireland, so that such estates might be subdivided into small farms and sold to the tenants. The O'Donoghue seconded the motion, which was opposed by Lord Nass, and after some observa- tions from Mr. Urquhart it was withdrawn Sir. R. Pal- mer then moved the second reading of the Increase of the Episcopate Bill, which was opposed by Mr. Gilpin, who moved its rejection. After a short debate a division took p'ace, when there was a majority of eleven in favour of the second reading. The Tests Abolition (Oxford and Cam- bridge) Bill was read a third time and passed, and Sir C. O'Loghlen then moved the third reading of the Libel Bill. Mr. Ayrton opposed the bill, and in the course of his speech the House was counted out.

LLANDAFF.

NEWPORT.

- |PENTYRCH.

LLANTRISSANT.

CWMAMAN.

CHEPSTOW.

HEREFORD.

PONTYPRIDD.

COWBRIDGE.

,PENARTH.

BRIDGEND.

CAERPHILLY.

- ST. MELLONS.

BRECON.

MERTHYR.

RHYMNEY.

-. TREHERBERT.

- LLANTRISSENT. (MON.)

-----FAIRS IN JULY.

GLAMORGANSHIRE SUMMER ASSIZES.