Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

37 articles on this Page

A SEASIDE LOVE STORY. *I

News
Cite
Share

A SEASIDE LOVE STORY. A CASHIER'S EXCUSE FOR ALLEGED BREACH. An action for damages for breach of pro- mis-s of marriage waG brought at the Leeds Assizes recently by Miss Beatrice Conyers. of Sheffield, against Mr. Frank Stratford, cashier. also of Sheffield. Mr. Fleming (for the plaintiff) said she was 24 years of age. The defendant said the agreement to marry had been verbally dis- charged bv mutual agreement on September 22 last. The parties. said counsel, became acquainted in 1905, when the plaintiff's father was the licensee of the George Hotel. Bridlington. He made frequent week-end visits, and correspondence was started. In February, 1906, the plaintiff visited the defen- dant's people, and eventually, on September 7. 1906. the defendant proposed marriage to the plaintiff, and was accepted. At Christ- mas Stratford gave Miss Conyers an engage- ment ring. AN ALLEGED LOAN. Towards the end of 1907. counsel proceeded, the plaintiff's father became ill, got into financial difficulties, and borrowed f,40 from the defendant. Notwithstanding the loan, however, the father ultimately failed, and early in 1908, the girl's parents left Bridling- ton for Leeds, where the courtship continued in just the same way Mr. Fleming went on to quote from a number of letters written by I the plaintiff by the defendant in most affec- tionate terms. On October 11, 1908, he wrote: No, Kiddie, you need e,"er have any doubt about me forsaking you. If I don t see you so often it will make 1110 difference in my regard towards you. I don't care how soon the time arrives before I can take you away from it all. HOPELESS PROSPECTS BEFORE US." In September of this year the defendant and plaintiff met at Huddersfield, and on I September 10 there came a, jjreter from the defendant, signed "Yours, &c." Miss Conyers, fell ill, and the defendant was informed by her in a letter written from her bed. On September 16 came the reply :— Dear Bee,-I received your letter, and am sorry to hear you are unwell; but I was hardly surprised to hear you were again at home. I am terribly sorry that what I am going to say must, I fear, give you I pain. But as I have always tried to be honourable in all things with you. I think 1 am only doing right in telling you my thoughts now. For a very long time I have I been much worried by the hopeless pros- pect before us, and after long meditation and careful consideration into all things, I have come to the conclusion that our engagement has been a great mistake, and will be a greater one if continued. When your father did me out of my money I then considered the advisability of asking for my freedom, but in face of the affection you then showed me I brushed such thoughts from my mind. Miss Conyers, the plaintiff, a prepossessing young lady, who wore a black dress and a large dark blue hat, went into the witness- box. She said she was 24 years of age, and lived with her parents at Sheffield. She became acquainted with the defendant five years ago, when she was living at the George Hotel, Bridlington. with her father, who was the licensee of the hotel. She was introduced by a friend to the defendant, who was a visitor. After defendant had left she stayed in Leeds, and he came over for half a. day. In February, 1906, she went to Hull, and met him by appointment for half a day. She went after vards to Sheffield for half a day to the defendant's house. In 1906 she was liv- ing at Bridlington; and the defendant came over several times, and in August of that year they went to a wedding together. In September. 1906, defendant was again spend- ing his annual holiday at Bridlington. and on the 7th of September they were engaged to be married. I MUST SEE YOU AGAIN." Towards the end of 1907 her father became ill and embarrassed in his affairs. She wrote a letter asking him to lend her father £40. which he sent her. Jfotwithstanding that her father failed, and after the failure she went to live in Leeds, and afterwards at Ash- ford. Up to that point various things had been bought by the defendant. In 1910 there was a conversation between them with respect to her leaving her home, and he advised her to take a situation. She went to Huddersfield, and the defendant went to see her. Mr. Fleming: Was he just the same as he had been ?—Just the same. Plaintiff added that while she was at Hud- dersfield she became seriously ill and she was taken home, and her mother wrote to the defendant, but she did not read the letter. Mr. Fleming: You remember getting a letter of the 16th of September, asking for his release? Plaintiff: Yes, I was in bed at the time. I wrote a letter in reply, saying. "I must see you again." Then we come to the interview of the 22nd of September?-The interview took place at the defendant's house, and defendant a father, mother, and aunt, and my mother were present. Defendant said, ''what you have to say, say it. before my father and mother." I said, "It is what you have to say." I also said, "Why did you write me such letters after being so nice a fortnight ago?" He said, "I have not meant what I have said. My affection has changed, and under no consideration can I carry things forward." I replied, "How can I go on with it. if you won't?" WANTED THE RING BACK. We got up to go. The defendant followed me into the passage, and said. "-Are you not going to let me have my ring?" But I opened the door, and walked olit. Is it true, as is suggested, that at that interview there was any agreement between you and defendant to rescind the engage- ment?—Certainly not. Subsequently did you get from the defen- dant a type-written letter saying that unless he received the ring by return of post he would place the matter in the hands of a solicitor?—Yes. es. And after that the writ was issued?—Yes. Mr. Waddy: This was a perfectly happy engagement up to September 3, 1910?—Yes. In further cross-examination plaintiff said that the defendant was a clerk when they became engaged, but she never asked what. his salary was. He was now earning £2 a week, and had private work. The only trouble in the engagement between you and this young man was this unfortunate habit of your father and mother?—I think it was. He pressed You, as you were to be his wife, to rid yourself of the influence of your own home?-He asked me to go away. Did this young man tell both you and your parents that if you persisted in going back to their house he would ask for hie release?— o, he did not. MEANT TO HOLD HIM. Witness added that she did not return the ring at the interview because she had not got it with her. Why did you not send it back.—I did not intend to release him. Did you part with him on perfectly friendly terms?-He put out his hand to shake hands with me. but I drew my hand back. I did not feel like shaking hands. I felt too much upset. Were there tears?—Yes. Plaintiff's mother said thst during the conversation at the interview she said if there was no real love between them there would not be the happiness there should be. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case, Mr. Waddy stated that he withdrew the allegation that the engagement was res- cinded by mutual consent. On behalf of the defendant he said that he invited the jury to come down from the high level of exalted sentiment to the lower level of pounds, shil- lings, and pence. There were no aggravat- ing circumstances in the case, and the jury might deal with it so far as damages were concerned in a most humble way. It was not suggested that the defendant had trans- ferred his affections to any other young lady. The jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff, and awarded the damages at £10.

FRENCH FLOODS ABATING.,

j A SOLDIER'S CRIME.

,AXE.

WOMANS ALLEGED ADMISSIONS.…

FAMILY TRAGEDY. -

FELL INTO A TRAP.

REDUCED TO POVERTY.

Ixii,ooo MISSING.

ISTEAMER'S CREW FIGHT.

THE FORTUNE OF KINGI LEOPOLD.…

STOWAWAY'S STORY.

MORTGAGEE IN POSSESSION

HEARD FROM HIS WIFE. 1

Advertising

PASSENGER tTRAINS INI COLLISION.

SKATING DISASTER. -4

"MARY MAGDALENE."j

DEATH SENTENCE UPHELD

UNHAPPY SECOND MARRIAGE. —

[THE TRUNK MYSTERY.

GIltLS PATHETICI APPEAL.I…

Advertising

LIST OF KILLED AND INJURED.

GUILTY, BUT INSANE.

EUROPEANS KILLED.

Advertising

CARDIFF MAN AND DOCTOR'S WIFE.…

COUNTRY GIRL DECOYED.

JOURNALIST S DAMAGES.'

JEW'S HOME CRIME.

TERRIBLE MOTOR-CAR ¡.."'..1…

LOSS OF A LEG.

MARRIAGE NOTICE CASE.I

,"MILLIONS OF KISSES." I

IT IS SWANK.

SUICIDE IN COURT.