Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

27 articles on this Page

SUFFRAGETTES AND WARDRESSES.

News
Cite
Share

SUFFRAGETTES AND WARDRESSES. VIOLENT CONDUCT IN THE CELLS. c, KICKED LIKE A CHILD IN A TANTRUM." Arising out of the conduct of euffragettea in Holloway Gaol. and following upon a Tisit of the Home Secretary (Mr. Gladstone) to the prkon, two members of the Women's Social and Political Union, Mise Theresa Garnett, of Leeds, and Mrs. Dove Willoox, of Bristol, were summoned at North London Police- court on Wednesday (before Mr. E. S. Fordham) to answer charges of assault upon wardresses at Holloway. The defendants were among' a large number who were arrested in connection with the raid at Westminster on the 29th of June, and were ^ent to prison for one month in default of a fine. The court was crowded with many friends Jf the "Votes for WomenH movement. Mr. Sodiin pro-seeuted on behalf of the Home Dllico, but the defendants were not legally •epr-efrented. The case against Theresa Gamett, who was ihe defendant in two summonses for assault, "was first taken. OUTBREAK IN THE CELLS. In outlining the case Mr. Bodkin sa-id the ffiinpia in ant in the first charge was Annie Richards, a wardress, who was assaulted by the defendant during the performance of her duties on the 19th of July. It was perfectly clear, he added, that the women who were committed to prison ae the result of the dis- turbance outside the House of Commons had agreed upon a plan to sot at defiance the discipline and regulations at Holloway Gaol. Defendant began by refusing to give up property or to change into prison clothing or to be medically examined. On July 13, added counsel, fourteen of the prisoners, iTIoluding the defendant, broke a numbor of windows belonging t<J. their cells, and shouted, gang, and signalled through the broken panes to friends iu houses near the prison. Alto- gether they behaved in a violent and in- subordinate manner. The visiting justices attended the next day to deal with the insubordination. Two wardresses were sent to bring the defendant before the justices, but she refused to go. Two wardresses, including the complainant, were sent to the first two. They got hold of defen- dant, who kicked and shouted and made a disturbance. She got hold of the com- plainant's hand and bit her until the blood c-arae. The complainant had to be off duty a couple of dayg, a.nd her hand clearly showed the marks of the defendant's teeth. What silo had done was a nasty and dangerous thing. The matter presented some serious aspects, as nothing was more important than that the authority of those in charge ot prisons should be maintained over those lawfully sentenced. It would seem that the defendant sought ¡.o be dealt with as a first-class misdemeanant, a condition of things which was not lawful. It was absolutely correct procedure that the defendant should be a eecond-olass prisoner when, as in he.r case, she refused to pay a fine and elected to go to gaol. The Magistrate said the case was an extremely simple one. If the assault was committed, and it was not justified, th-? defendant»must be punished. WARDRESS'S ALLEGATION OF BITING. AniiiO Richards, the wardress, then told the court how on the 14th of July she went to assist the two other wardresses. The defendant was ringing a bell and banging at her door with a dustpan. The thro*' wardresses tried 1:<) get the defendant out of her cell, when she struggled violently, and the dustpan had to be wrenched from her. In the course of the struggle the defendant took while- hand up to her mouth, hit it on tho kiinrklc-s. and blood flowed. Dr. Sulli- van sent her off' duty, where she remained for two days. The defendant was eventually taken before the justices. Cross-examined by defendant, witness denied that the defendant threw the dust- pan into the corner. DefendantWhen did you first think I had bitten yonr finder ?—I did not think at all about it; I felt it. TIRE A CHILD IN A TANTRUM. Mr. rordliam: She kicked about like a child in a temper, what yon call a. tantrum? —Yes. Mr. Bodkin said defendant refused to sur- render her property. Mr. Fordham: I thought people in gaol were not allowed to have their property with thflnn. I always thought that if I were sent to gaol I rhould be stripped, washed, and placed in a cell, but I did not think I should be allowed to take, say, a cigar- case. (Laughter.) The other wardresses admitted they did not see the defendant bite the complainant. TIT. Soott, prison doctor, said the revolt amounted to mutiny, and force was neoes- eary. DEFENDANT'S STORY OF A STRUGGLE. Defendant, addressing the court, denied the allegation of biting. She refused to wear prison garb because she protested against being treated as a second-class offender. The coll window was broken to get fresh air. Wher, she stooped to pick up her hag she was thrown on her back, and in the struggle her dress wa" torn. No charge of biting was made against her to the visiting justices, and the wound to the wardress's hand was probably ca-used by a brooch torn from her blouse. Mr. Fordham said what occurred was to his mind more consistent with an accidental blow with the teeth during the struggle than with an intentional bite, and he should, therefore, dismiss the first summons. The second summons was for assaulting another wardress, named Hilda Marion Sim- monds, on July 15. Complainant went to defendant's cell for her bedding, when. defendant clenched her fist and struck her in the chest, knocking her against the wall. Her nose bled. her head ached, and she was sick for several days. Defendant said the wardress knocked her off the bed, hurt her knee, and called her uncivilised. She ordered the wardress out of the cell. As she refused to go she pushed her out. but did not strike her. The Magistrate sent defendant to gaol for one month. KICKING BY A BRISTOL WOMAN. The case against Lilian Dove Willcox, of Bristol, on a charge of assaulting Wardress Slyfield was next taken. The allegation was that she scratched, kicked, and behaved in a violent way. and inflicted bruises and scratches on the wardress. The complainant deposed that she went with two other wardresses to the defendant's cell to take her before the visiting justices. She refused to go. and was told that she would be taken by force. The other officers took a bag from the defendant in which she kept her clothes. Defendant threw herself on the bed, and commenced kicking in all directions. She deliberately kicked out and struck com- plainant on the right leg. With the assist- ance of other wardresses defendant was taken out of the cell. She then said she would go alone, and did so. Witness was much affected by the conduct of the suffra- gettes, and the defendant was particularly violent. Complainant added that defendant kicked out deliberately, but she could not say whether she personally had been deliberately kicked by defendant Defendant was reading a protest against Mr. Gladstone's statement in the House of Commons when the Magistrate stopped her, and said, I don't want to know anything about Mr. Gladstone in the House of Com- mons." Defendant: I protest that this has been a case of judgment first and trial afterwards. NOT ASHAMED OF WHAT SHE HAD DONE. Mr. Fordham: The (juestion is. did you kick the wardress? Defendant: Yes. I did. Mr. Fordham: Then give me eome justifica- tion, if possible. Defendant said she was not ashamed of what she had done in Holloway. She went to Holloway for a political offence, and had been refused the treatment allotted to such Prisoners in all civilised countries. She refused to express regret for what She had done. The Magistrate said defendant would be fined 40s.. or ten days' imprisonment. Defendant was further summoned for having assaulted Wardress Baxter. After being before the visiting magistrates defen- dant was violent, and kicked the wardress on her hand. Defendant was also fined for this assault 4{)8., or ten days' imprisonment. I The Magistrate said the period of imprisonment would run concurrently, which meant ten days in all. The magis- trate added that he would not say in which division the two defendants would be put. He did not see any reason to treat theee two defendants different to other people. Defendants decided to go to gaoL

MR GLADSTONE IN A CELL

UGANDA A WHITE MAN'S .LAND.…

SEARCH FOR OVERDUE SHIP

STRUCK SUBMERGED ROCK

A CAREER OF PLAY.

FLUNG THROUGH A GLASS SCREEN.…

CURIOUS ELECTION POINT AT…

NEARLY THREE HUNDRED KILLED…

MOORISH AMAZONS. -

MOORS REPULSED.

STARTLING REPORT FROM VIENNA.

A DREAM OF BLISS. I

MR. WILLIAMSON'S FATE.

TWO SALMON FISHERMEN DROWNED.

« CZAR WELCOMED BY KING EDWARD.

PROTEST FROM NEWPORT.

GLAMORGAN BILL IFAILS. +j

THREW HEHSELF INTO THE CANAL.I

Advertising

[No title]

HOURS OF RAILWAY SERVANTS.…

NOTED ATHLETE AND WIFE.

SHOP ASSISTANTS' HOURS.

MINISTERS' STIPENDS.

MH. AUSTIN CHAMBERLAIN

yaUK PAGEANT SUCCESS.