Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

7 articles on this Page

OF AN YSTALYFERA ^OMAN'S LOANS.

^°0LGIKL'S KNOWLEDGE OF LAW.

News
Cite
Share

^°0LGIKL'S KNOWLEDGE OF LAW. A in «lrt was PS3Ilmed on Tuesday, when Sfo-^rly woman, named Ann Farran, ^ligT^Xamination, admitted ehe was now 0^^lth one of the defendants, attending the family, and had been for three *i ^vSh« ka<* been in receipt of parish "Jft. kich had been stopped on one ocoa- Thomas: Was that on the ground kept a brothel?—Oh, dear no, sir. Y'as the ground ?-That I kept ¡¡'II °t W ° got drunk. v lodgers who got drunk?—Yes, .• Th Celling. th^aS' ^8taJyfera, was called, and V1 when, in May last, he attended Hjrt^nd d WaB su^ei'inS from hysteria. 9. he son of the defendant Rees, t^5 a brother and his present wife blai C were working at the Ynys- W^tijf °*l»ery on January 10, 1896, when V>hi there, told them the colliery be ^ly he sold up for rent, and they 0a^ thrown out, and she asked them tjfu a^ti0riUt a fraudulent document to defeat at Llandilo County-court. The <iij <ii()which was a bill of sale, was VN jf'r drawn up by Edgar Rees, who ft In the defendant Rees's absence. W!! "'0 Of £100. and it was understood that d have it back for £10. ^oiflas: You have forgotten that ther Edgar forged your father's have not forgotten it; I may uted to say so. He did it under Jou « direction. grcwn man at the time?—Yes; being so much older than oar- aaying it was all right, we did as th^" answer to further questions had often difficulty to maintain °nt of the colliery. He had been I and had saved money, being a u y man, as his papers would prove. y°ur discharge yon have been a years, so you knew what forgery bill of sale included plant iVn^ry at the colliery and three Ystalyfera. 'jffl ^-Itp- ther said that the £ 100 had since Vjwt^ red into £ 1,000. Edgar Sees wrote <w0risinal, and his (witness's) wife V*? V wpy.. V to evin^nce of the crime?—No; to i e bailiff. Plaintiff took the origi- the following day to be stamped. a. olage Was given for £1,000 in conside- Oa Does not it seem to you to be thjj.' Nonsensical thing on the face of t|j% J she a haby would not believe?—No. ^Cujw^^med she said, "I have altered Jk'?1 by adding another nought, so fr ten the court by the larger 0la interfering with the property." t^« BECOMING SERIOUS. a. <* interposed with the remark Was unquestionably assuming tJn ^6 j^aracter. Did he think a court v1* ,» Hh ^midated by any such thing? cross-examination witness said J|v aftd -wag witnessed by himself, his *hom Ura Swash. So the whole four of yon JV °f fo^ery. X see by your discharge you g- otlal assistant to your regiment. It) J you don't know what forgery ti^e ^}lr!ation) witness said a few days > ^aintiff told him she was off to c°urt to withdraw her claim. » riflatb ^S' wife °f a tinman named Ssiyj • ?ave evidence as to plaintiff's v0,,tinn? s':ie borrowed from her email A It jj ^ally to buy leather to repair i'* tk'' o^r more than a sovereign in all. her 7s. 6d. Plaintiff had told hM fop^a forged document which she >*>t ?0,1e tvT b.y her nephew. She said she lft» c»Q,,Sed trick and had had the docu- Tj. 'n the county-conrt at Llandilo. hv » ^ination, she said this was in -rv tK ^Qh-^ ^hat ^hen she was able to ^2^ knn w°uld happen a year after? »ll{ e't-" W' ^ut she said she had "do_»e Wern, Ystalyfera, bar- Vi*5 Verv l,n May last nlaintiff told him to as glad she had withdrawn from lL* ha?' Sha it had very nearly worried her r not have taken it on but 1*1 Jfors, one of whom was her 5 H^S81?- *d^rehi>?lil}ation' witness aaid he was th ltted ii*1 Edgar Rees in a colliery. def.r> v'at the first proposal was 10 lanrfi ant Beee in the partnership. did or^ tell you he would not have v1*! t«U n°t tell me that straight. y0»°? that crookedly ?—Yefc. n^a,QP o took in his son?—Yes. ♦ ^^sh ash» the wife of Charles K tlj% a c' a son of the defeudant Bees, nf v« 4;n'Uw) iersation with Plaintiff (her ehc'which she was alleged to !°*»ed ^ould to have possesion » tv:Qocument, so that she oould to thie document, so that she could P-a.rt of the country, She 1 heard it was burnt the next day. Her mother- in-law told her afterwards she was very glad to have it to burn, so that she could return to that part. Mr. Abel Thomas: Did you know that all your interesting relatives-in-law had taken part in this forged document—that Edgar Rees had forged it, and your husband and eister-in-law had assisted?—I did not know, only she wanted it back. Richard Morgan, leather merchant, of Ystalyfera, gave evidence as to plaintiff's trade, which amounted to £6 a month in leather. Mr. Vaughan Williams then read the evidence of Charles Henry Swash, a son of plaintiff, taken on commission because he had broken his leg. He spoke to a conversation with his mother, who told him of the forging of the document, her deeire to get it back, of his application to Rees for it, his telling her Rees was willing to give it her, of Rees's subsequent delivery of it to her, and plaintiff taking up the document, putting it on the fire, burning it, and saying, "Now I can come back to Ystalyfera." She then said she had dropped the present action, which she had been harassed into taking by her husband's cousin, who was a solicitor. Hannah Hooper, wife of John Hooper, of Ystalyfera, and Maria Rees, wife of Roland Rees, gave evidence. In the oourse of her examination-in-chief Maria Bees said she worked at the colliery, and Mr. Abel Thomas asked her what she did there. She replied, "Screen the ooal and wind up the engine along with Laura Swash, and weigh the coal and keep accounts." She had often seen Edgar Rees imitate his father's signature. He was good at imita- ting other people's signatures. She denied that anyone wrote on the document but Edgar Roes. Neither she nor anyone else signed as witnesses. Florence Margaret Rees, daughter of the two defendants, also spoke as to an inter- view with plaintiff, in which she expressed a desire to withdraw from the present action. At plaintiff's request she fetched her father, and on his arrival plaintiff asked him to forgive her, and he said he would, and a document to that effect was executed stating she had no claim, and "all it was was on that fraudulent deed of 1896." A GIBL'S STUDY OF THE LAW. In cross-examination she said she knew Mr. Trueman well. Mr. Abel Thomas: Is he a man who has a great number of cases in different courts?— Not that I am aware of. Do you mean to say you have not acted as his clerk or come down to the courts with him over and over again?—I have not come with him, but for the pleasure of hearing the cases. The Judge: In a criminal court? Mr. Abel Thomas: Police-courts and county- courts. (To witness): You have come when his cases have been on?—Yes. Did you take notes on these occasions?—No. In answer to further questions she said she might have carried books for Mr. Trueman and travelled down to Swansea with him. The Judge: And you a girl of sixteen?—Not quite sixteen, sir. And do I understand rightly that you go into police-courts for the pleasure of hearing cases?—Yes, sir. Does your father know of these excursions? 1 Yes sir. Mr. Abel Thomas: Have you been paid for it?—No. sir. Not even your carriage fare?—He might have "raised" the ticket. What is there besides? Little presents?—No, sir (indignantly). At this stage the witness began to weep. Has your father a good many law books? —Yes, sir. And have you been looking up references for him?—They are not his law books; they are mine. Do you study law, then ?—Sometimes, sir. And there happens to be a big library there, does there not?—I don't know, I'm sure. Will you tell me what kind of books you have got? Have you got law reports?—That's not an issue of this case. Mr. Abel Thomas: I think it has a. great deal to do with it. Further examined, she said there were law reports in the house. Law reports! Well done! Any book about the Statute of Elizabeth?—Yes, sir. Let's see; what is the other name for it? —I don't know. Oh, ye3, you do. Don't you know the statute of Elizabeth?—There are a good many statutes of Elizabeth. Are there, really! But what is the name of this special one?—You ought to know that without asking me. (Laughter.) I quite agree. I ought to know, but I want to get at your knowledge. The witness aga.in wept. Come and tell me the statute of Elizabeth that we are continually talking about in our law business—yours and mine?—You ought to know better than I. Is it a statute of frauds?—It might be. Or fraudulent conveyancing? The Judge (interposing): Are you studying law?—In my spare time, sir Mr. Abel Tho'nas- You did not remember that it was fraudulent conveyancing?—There are many other statutes besides fraudulent conveyancing. Mr. Abel Thomas: Very well; that will do for me. I stand corrected. In further cross-examination the witness admitted sending a telegram to plaintiff's solicitors, which read: "Notice. Case of Saunders v. Rees has been settled. Plaintiff has withdrawn." This was done at plaintiff's request, and the terms of the telegram were plaintiff's. At the close of the witness's examination the Judge asked her if she was studying law, and she said Yes, in my spare time." What do you do at other times?—In school, sir. Where ?—County School, Ystalyfera. That is all right. I am very glad to hear it; but what on earth do you go to the police-court for? I mean, have you any reason?—Only my delight. By Mr. Vaughan-Williams: She studied law as a hobby, and hoped to turn her know- ledge to account and become a. lawyer. Lilther Davies, collier, also gave evidence as to plaintiff askipg for the forged bill of sale from Rees. Laura Swaeh, one of the defendants, was next called. She said she had four children. In June, 1895, she quarrelled with Rees because he would not make over anything to bring up the two little children, and went to live at Brynamman with her son Edgar. Sub- sequently she was induced to go back to Rees, and he then handed her in 1895 three leases for the education of the children. In November last the colliery lease was also given her, as reparation for loss of charac- ter, as Rees. she said, had ruined her. She bore out the evidence already given as to the alleged fraudulent bill of sale, and also as to the withdrawal of the present action. A CHALLENGE. The Judge interposed during the examina- tion, and said the defence had been allowed to go on without a single original document having been produced. The witness said the documents were at home. Mr. Abel Thomas: You had them in court this morning. They were seen.—No, they were not, sir. Defendants' solicitor, in response to a chal- lenge from Mr. Thomas, denied he had ever seen them. The Judge asked witness what she did at the colliery, and she replied that she went underground, helped fill the trams with coal, put fire in the engine, filled the boilers, and drove the engine. She worked very hard, and did not have much time for pleasure. She was anxious to save the colliery when the plaintiff took the fraudulent document to the pit, and was afraid her sister would get into gaol, and her son and she offered to raise a loan on the securities that had been given her. Plaintiff had never lent Rees £1.000. She never lent him a penny. Indeed, she never had any money, but had always been in poverty. In cross-examination, witness was pressed as to whether she had ever had the deeds she alleged Rees had given her, but she would only reply, They are in the house," "I decline to answer," and "I am prepared to bring them here." The Judge: I am afraid I shall have to draw my own conclusions. T can only draw one conclusion, and that is that you are not telling the truth. Witness: I am prepared to bring them. Witness: I am prepared to bring them. Mr. Abel Thomas: You think you have done everybody now?—No, sir; I do not think I have done anybody. Then why do you not tell us where they are?—I am prepared to bring them here, The Judge: One of the issues is whether there was any transfer. If you decline to say where the de-ads are I can only conclude they are not in your possession. It may be that you have euch influence over Rees that you can get them. But that does not satisfy. nor is there any reason in the wide world why you should hesitate if what you say is true?—I have them. Where?—I decline to say. They are not in the house at Ystalyfera. The Judge: What house?—I decline to answer. I am prepared to bring them here I to-morrow. That is no answer, because you may get 1 them from anywhere? In further examination, she said she was now living in the same house as Rees. Edgar Rees, a son of the defendant Rees, was called by Mr. 0. T. Evans, who intimated to the judge that in order that the witness might not incriminate himself, he would ask him in examination-in-chief no question as to his alleged forgery of his father's signa- ture. Mr. Abel Thomas was about to cross- examine him, when his lordship warned the witness that he need not answer any ques- tion if the answer were likely to cause him to incriminate himself. Mr. Abel Thomas put the question as to the putting of the defendant Rees's signature to the bill of sale, and asked: Did you sign itP The witness did not uuwer. Mr. Thomas: Sid you aign it?—I imitated W. B. Rees's signature at her (the plaintiff's) instructions. The last witness called was William Burchell Rees, the defendant, who described the pit, which was a slant rented at £10 a year, and only sufficiently large to give employment to his own family. He also described the plaintiff's going to live with him in 1875, on the death of her father, saying she asked him to take her in, and he did so, and gave her employment at the shoemaking. He denied that she ever had any money, and was certainly unable to lend him .El.OOO. He remembered her well leaving him in 1896, after being with him 21 years. A MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE. He remembered it too well, as ehe went away without saying a word, and the police accused him of murdering her, and his house was searched. She made no claim on him for money, and from 18% to 1900 he heard not a word from her. In Deoember, 1900, her son, Oharles Henry Swash, told him to come to his house at Brynamman, and he saw plaintiff there. She requested that the treacherous document, as she called it, be returned to her. She went back to South Shields, and never made any demand for money. The first demand was on the 8th of March through her solicitors. He denied ever having given her a mortgage to secure £1,000. Refer- ring to the forged document, he said that in 1895 he was in such low water that he was in arrear with rent, and was sued at Llandilo County-court. He noticed on the engine- door the remains of a paper, and asked what it was. When he heard he was about to strike his son, when plaintiff came forward and asked him not to do so, as she had acted for the best to gain time to find the money. He told her the document was a bad one. At that time Laura Swash had left him, and the reconciliation took place, on his handing the deeds in question to her. Then the action came on, and at his request Laura Swash accompanied him with the deeds to Messrs. Jenkins's office at Swansea, and the result was a loan of £5D on them. With this money they were able to settle the action, and plaintiff signed a with- drawal of the interpleader action she had entered. Subsequently he redeemed the deeds. The defendant, coming to the alleged with- drawal of the action, said the plaintiff sent for him, and said, "Oh, William, do forgive me. Remember the years we have lived together. I should never have commenced this action if it had not been for my husband's cousin, who is a solicitor. Can they do any- thing to me if I withdraw?" He said "No." She said, "I am afraid of them solicitors." He said, "Let the matter drop." He denied that she was delirious at the time, and did not know. He denied that he ever owed her a. single sixpence. In cross-examination, he said he had had a good many cases in the course of his life. He had studied law, and had got together a decent law library, adding one was bound to have Woodf all's Landlord and Tenant if one had houses. Mr. Evans: If you study law books you deserva to have cases. (Laughter.) The cross-examination was not concluded when the court adjourned.

JUDGE AND IMMORALITY OF THE…

DISASTER AT YNYSDDU. ..

BURYING BODIES IN ORDER TO…

♦ FELL OFF A BRIDGE AT LLANBRADACH.

DANGERS OF THE MINE.