Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

12 articles on this Page

. MR. BALFOUR'S GUILLOTINE…

News
Cite
Share

MR. BALFOUR'S GUILLOTINE PROPOSAL. ANIMATED DEBATE AND PERSONAL ATTACKS, In anticipation of a very animated if not angry debate on the closure by compartment motion respecting the Licensing Bill, there was an unusually full attendance of members of the House of Commons on both sides when the Speaker took the Ohair at noon on Friday. Mr. Balfour's motion for procedure on the Licensing Bill allots for Clause 1, one more day; for Clauses 2 and 3, one day; Clause 4, one day; the rest of the Bill and new Clauses, one day; report stage, one day; and third reading, one day. At eleven p.m. on the allotted days the Chairman or Speaker "shall forthwith put the question or questions on any amendment or motion already pro- posed from the Chair, and shall next proceed with any amendments moved by the Govern-1 ment, of which notice has been given, but no other amendments." Mr. BALFOUR, rising to propose this motion, was received with loud and prolonged Ministerial cheers, and Opposition cries of "Oh!" and shouts of "Gag! gag! gag!" and Shame," and Ministerial cries of Order!" The SPEAKER (interposing) expressed the hope that members would refrain from other than purely Parliamentary expressions. (Ministerial cheers.) Mr. BALFOUR (proceeding) said he hoped to convince the House that the motion he was making was a necessary and reasonable one. The notice which had been given with regard to this motion far exceeded that given in the case of the precedents. As to the Parliamentary business, there must be a reasonable limit to criticism. (Minis- terial cheers.) Parliament must do some- thing besides criticise the Administration. For criticism they had had the debate on the King's Speech, debates in Committee of Supply, debates on motions for adjournment I of the House moved at question times, debates on motions for holidays, and debates on votes of censure. (Hear, hear.) There had been all these occasions for criticism of the Government. If the House insisted on spend- ing night after night upon criticism, the time for legislation must go. Before Easter the Government were only able to get one afternoon sitting for legislation. The rest of the time was entirely taken up with criticism. Between Easter and Whitsuntide they got seven afternoons, a.nd since Whit- suntide twelve afternoons. That was too little. (Cheers.) The Government were not asking members to pass much legislation- only two British Bills could divide the House on strict party lines, viz., the Licensing Bill and the Defaulting Authorities Bill. (Oppo- sition laughter.) Liberal administrators had never been content with so modest a demand. (Ministerial cheers.) The Government had a right to claim that these two measures should be passed, and a Government which allowed itself to be beaten merely by time on measures of that character would be un- worthy of the responsibility of government. (Great and prolonged cheering.) A friend had calculated that if the Government allowed the debates on amendments to the Licensing Bill to proceed at the present rate of pro- gress the Bill would take a year and a quarter. (Cheers and laughter.) It was in the interest of the Assembly itself that some such step should be taken as be now pro- posed to prevent the evils which otherwise would ensue. (Loud Ministerial cheers.) MR. ASQUITHTS ATTACK. Mr. ASQUITH, amid prolonged Opposition cheers, rose to move the following amend- ment:— That this House declines to consider the proposal to deprive the House of Commons, without any justification in the previous course of the debate, of all power of reason- able and adequate discussion in respect of a measure which seeks, in the absence of any authority from the country, to make fundamental and much controverted changes in laws materially affecting the well-being of the people. He would tell the Prime Minister that his proposition was an outrage—(Opposition cheers)—on the dignity and the liberties of the House. (Renewed cheers.) The Govern- ment had provided in unexampled profusion material for criticism—in every quarter of the globe, a.nd in every branch of adminis- tration. The House would surely be failing in its duty if it did not attempt, with no slow and laggard step, to keep pace with the abnormal activities of the Government. It was that mismanagement of Parliamentary time. that tardy and dallying treatment of subjects which the Government put forward as of paramount importance, which had brought the Government into the muddle from which they now asked the House I to extricate them by arbitrary methods. (Opposition cheers.) The first hour of the sitting had been deliberately frittered away by a few docile followers of the Government in order that other Ministerialists might follow other avoca- tions than their Parliamentary duties. In the present case it was impossible that any such plea, as that of organised obstruction could be made out, because during the 34 hours that the Bill had been under discussion, there had been 115 speeches by supporters of the Govern- ment and 135 by members of the Opposition. The motion of the Prime Minister was a flagrant violation of constitutional practice and principle. It would be an evil day for democracy when the House of Commons came I to be regarded as a mere automatic machine fy>j- registering the decrees of a transient and, perhaps, crumbling majority. The Prime Minister had exhausted all his resources to reduce the House to a dumb show. (Opposi- tion cheers.) The Prime Minister now wished them to deba.r themselves for the rest of the session from effective criticism of the most complex of all the proposals of the Govern- ment. Was the Houfe prepared, at the invi- tation of the Prime Minister, to ta.ke that last step on tho road to humiliation and impo- tence? Let them :ave themselves from an ignominous surrender of their privileges and save those who came after from a disastrous precedent. (Loud and prolonged Opposition c ANIMATED DEBATE. Mr. PIKE PEASE CU., Darlington) said that anyone listening to the last few days' debates would agree that most of the speeches were made purely in order to waste time. (Oppo- sition cries of "Oh," and "Whose speeches?") Mr. GEORGE LAMBERT (R., Devon. South Molton) said that Yr. Balfour was at his wits' end for means to keep his party together, and this was the last despairing throw of a political gambler. (Delighted chers from the Radicals.) Sir CHARLES DILKE (R.. Dean Forest) asserted that the discussion in Committee had not as yet touched those parts of the Bill which were the most difficult and delicate of all. Mr. HENRY HOBHOUSE (U., Somerset, E.), amidst Opposition cheers, stated that he would not vote for the Government resolu- tion. He did not think that on this Bill there had been unfair discussion or obstruc- tion. Mr. BALFOUR: I never mentioned obstruction." Mr. LOUGH (R„ Islington, W.): Then why this resolution ? (Radical cheers.) Mr. BALFOUR: If the hon. member had listened to my speech he would have known that I carefully abstained from using the word obstruction." Mr. JOHN ELlJIS (R., Nottingham, Bush- el iffe) Then there was no obstruction. (Loud Opposition cheems.) Mr. BALFOUR: It was absolutely unneces- sary for my argument to say whether I thought there was obstruction or not. (Ministerial cheers.) Mr. EMMOTT (R., Old/ham) said that if the Government's motion were carried the Libe- ral party would be compelled to pledge themselves to reverse the Bill at the earliest possible moment. (Opposition cheers.) Mr. LAWSON WALTON (R., Leeds, S.) described the methods of the Prime Minis- ter as hugger-mugger. Sir JOHN GORST (U., Cambridge Univer- sity) protested in the strongest a.nd most earnest language against the application of the principle of closure by compartments to social legislation. (Opposition cheers.) Mr. WHITTAKER (R., Spen Valley) said that the truth was that the Government were in the hands of the "trade." (Prolonged Oppo- sition cheers.) They were between the devil and the deep sea, and he appealed to the Prime Minister to play the man. (Renewed cheers.) He was surrounded by influences which had led to unworthy results. (Opposi- tion cheers, and Ministerial cries of "Order," and "How?" and "What?") What was the influence which had induced him to knight Sir J. Mark and confer a decoration on the chief-constable of Manchester? (Opposition cheers, a.nd Ministerial cries of "Order" and "Withdraw.") Mr. GUST (U., Bermondsey) asked whether the hon. member was in order in making a. personal attack. The SPEAKER replied that he did not understand there was a personal attack, but he thought the hon. member was travelling a little beyond the point in the matter of Mr. T. W. RUSSELL (U., Tyrone, S.) com- plained that the liberties of the House were to be docked, curbed, and restrained because the supporters of the Government would not. come back from their clubs and dinners at nine o'clock. On the motion of Mr. JOHN MORLEY the debate was adjourned.

EXTRAORDINARY SCENE IN THE…

THE GOVERNMENT MAJORITY.

Advertising

MINOR MATTERS.

LAUGH & GROW FAl .-

THE WISDOM OF GLAD#*0*** .

WORKMEN'S NOTES.

Advertising

PERSONAL PARS. !

FURTHER ONSLAUGHT ON THE GOVERNMENT.

THE "GUILLOTINE" VOTE PASSED.