Welsh Newspapers
Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles
18 articles on this Page
Hide Articles List
18 articles on this Page
THE CAH BIFF RAILINGS 1 DISPUTE.…
News
Cite
Share
THE CAH BIFF RAILINGS DISPUTE. — ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE OORPOHATION. STATEMENT BY THE TOWN-CLEEK "THERE IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT." A special adjourned meeting of the Cardiff Town Council was held on Wednesday morn- ing for the purpose of completing the business left over from Monday. Alderman T. Windsor Jacobs was voted to the chair, in the absence of the mayor (Alderman T. Morel). The Deputy-Mayor moved the adoption of the committee's report, and Alderman Ramsdale seconded the motion. Mr. Lloyd Meyrick said he should like to ask one question, so that they might see how the matter really stood. He asked the town-clerk whether the action was settled, and whether he had heard from his London agents that the settlement had been confirmed by a judge of the Chancery Division. The Town-clerk said he had had an oppor. tunity of looking into the correspondence since the last meeting, and the matter was now in this position. The summons was issued by the plaintiffs on the 24th of January, and was made returnable on the 27th of January, when the order was made. Since that time there had been some small detail to be completed, but the order was made on the 27th of January, Mr. Lewis Morgan: What is the order? The Town-clerk: An order in pursuance of the terms that have been set out in the minutes exactly. Mr. Lloyd Meyrick: Judgment was entered on those terms? The Town-clerk: Yes. Mr. Lewis Morgan: Can anything be done to upset it. supposing there is an adverse vote. The Town-clerk: It cannot be upset. Mr. White said, having regard to the answer just given by the town-clerk, he would remind them of certain proceedings taken in the past upon matters undertaken by the corporation in Mr. Justice Romer's court. He wanted to know whether it would be open to any of the burgesses to take action if they so desired. The Town-clerk: No. Mr. Good said he thought the law would show the Town-clerk that not only this council, but cjiy meeting outside the council, or any single ratepayer, could apply for a mandamus to the High Court of Justice to restrain the Cardiff Railway Company and the Pier-head sub-com- mittee from carrying into effect the agreement lately made between them. He was sorry to be opposed to the town-clerk, but that was the law. and they could proceed immediately to appoint a committee to make application for a mandamus. Mr. Brain: Who would pay expenses? Mr. Good: The corporation would pay ex- penses, a.nd, even if it cost £5,000, it would be money well laid out. Mr. Symonds: But the agreement has already been carried into effect. You cannot restrain them from doing what has already been done. Mr. E. Thomas said that he was going to propose a. resolution upon the matter. He did not know how far they were to be guided by the questions a.nd answers that they had heard that morning, but he remembered that some time ago, when they had a certain answer upon a. question in that council, they afterwards found that Mr. Justice Romer held an entirely different opinion. So far as this question was concerned, he had only one desire, and that was to secure a full and complete discussion at that council of the merits of the case, in spite of the fact that they could not move to set aside what had been done—if that were so. The members of the council had never had an opportunity of knowing all the facts. The news of this trespass came to the council almost at the end of a meeting, and the committee was appointed when there was almost a panic in the council; at any rate, there was a great deal of excitement. Outside that council there was a. very strong feeling that there was something more to be known—something that the rate- payers were entitled to know. That was the reason why he desired to have a full discussion upon the merits of the case. It was not a question of whether they took an inch too little or too much, or whether they struck down a railing too many or not. The point was that they should consider what they should do in the future if the public rights were assailed. In the course of readings from the reports pre- sented by the committee, he said that they hal a right to judge of the intentions of the persona interested, and the proceedings when the railings were erected just after midnight were significant. Then he found that certain interrogatories put to plaintiffs' witnesses were not answered. Applications had been made to the judges, who ruled that they should be answered, but the committee had closed the case before the judges' order had been carried out and before the questions had been answered. As to plenary powers, he felt that the committee was empowered to deal with the matter fully, but, taking all things into con- sideration, he felt that there was sufficient ground for the charge of hurry and secrecy. He was sorry that there had been a certain amount of personalities introduced into the general dis- cussions on the case. He had sat under Lord Bute's mayoralty, and felt convinced that his lordship would be the last person in the world to try to burke any question of the public rights or to take advantage of anything. He moved a resolution" That this council regrets that the pier-head committee should have arrived at a settlement of the dispute before having received the replies to interrogatories that had been ordered by the High Court of Justice to be answered." Mr. S. Robinson, in seconding the resolution. said they must congratulate Mr. E. Thomas on the lucid and carefully-considered speech that he had made. (Hear, hear.) He admitted that the committee had full power to do cer- tain things, to remove the obstruction, and to take whatever steps were necessary to defend their actions. He never understood, however, that the committee had power to make a settle- ment. If the committee had that power why did the minutes come up for confirmation, and why was a special meeting called to consider the matter? The great point was-Why was question No. 4 in the interrogatories not answered? On that seemed to hinge the whole subject. He could not conceive how the com- mittee could have come to a settlement when that question was not answered. That seemed to him to be vital to the whole case. They were told they had got everything they wanted. It seemed to him that all they had got was a record for the first time tha.t the only right- of-way to the sea the town possessed was at this particular' point. In conclusion, he was eorry that the mayor should have been allowed to sit on this committee, and it was a pity that the town-clerk did not advise him earlier in the matter. It had placed him in a. very invidious and unsatisfactory position. Mr. Lloyd Meyrick said this was a question which had produced so many amateur lawyers that a lawyer by profession spoke with some little diffidence. (Laughter.) He hoped all sub- sequent speakers would imitate the very calm and dispassionate way in which Mr. E. Thomas had addressed the council. He denied that he had a spark of personal feeling against the Bute authorities, and he had no ground for such feeling. What they had to consider was whether they had done justice to themselves and the people who sent them there. It was the duty of the council, in the interest of the ratepayers, to resist any unjust claim and defend any improper action brought against them. (Hear: hear.) Why was there such a hurry to settle this action? The committee was appointed when the council was in a fighting mood, and it waa supported by the whole town in a fighting mood. The only one way in which this matter could have been amicably settled was by a judgment of the High Court. (Hear, hear.) No one ever dreamed at the time the sub-committee were appointed that they had plenary powers to settle the action. Their object was that they should be free. unfettered. and untrammelled in working up the case, and it reflected the highest oredit on the corpora- tion that during the weary twelve months this had been going on there was not a question asked by a. member of the council, and no one ever attempted to put a hindrance in the way of the sub-committee. It remained for them to see whether the sub-committee had justified the ample confidence repceed in them by the council. As a professional man, would he select the very moment when the other llide were embarrassed to settle the action ? He felt that he would not have been doing his duty if he had even talked about compromise at such a time. (Hear, hear.) Alderman Rams- dale on Monday, in the simplicity of his heart. let out a very extraordinary thing, and that was that one of the plaintiffs themselves was the first to suggest a settlement. Unfortunately. it happened that he was Mayor of Cardiff as well, but that did not alter the fact. It was an extraordinary thing that a gentleman, however worthy, should have been appointed a member of the committee when he was one of the very men who were bringing the action against the corporation. He had heard rumours that Sir W. T. Lewis had declined to deal with the com- mittee unless they had plenary powers. He hoped there was sufficient backbone in that committee to have said that they had certain instructions from the council to fight the case out, and that if there was any talk of settle- ment they must go back to the council for in- formation as to how they should act. (Hear, hear.) He considered this was a very unsatis- factory settlement, and it was not a reasonable one. After they knew that the railway com- pany were embarrassed, they suggested terms for a. settlement. They had had to go to the expense of working up this case for upwards of a year, the Bute people granted them a small portion of their demands, and each side were to pay their own costs. This little friendly coterie settling the matter, with the Mayor of Cardiff and a director of the Cardiff Railway Company opening negotiations, was a pretty and peaceful picture. (Hear. hear.) He felt that he had been neglecting his duty somewhat, inasmuch as he had been kept in complete ignorance, from the time the writ was issued until the settlement, and that was why he sup- ported the resolution that had been proposed. Why was the matter settled in a hurry and ip secrecy? He felt there was too much power given into the hands of two or three, and there was a son of aldermanic contempt going on in many of the proceedings for the general body of councillors. (Hear, hear.) He protested against the contemptible treatment of the I council by an unimportant and subordinate I committee. (Hear, hear.) Mr. A. Good asked if he would be allowed to move another resolution if the one before the meeting were not carried. The Chairman: I suppose you know the meaning of Mr. Thomas's resolution? It is a vote of censure upon the committee. Mr. Thomas: Oh, no. I take exception to the chairman's remarks. I meant the resolution to be merely an expression of opinion. Alderman Jacobs said that no doubt Mr. Good would be able to move another motion. Mr. J. Jenkins said that the question was whether the corporation and the ratepayers had a right-of-way or not. He found no fault per- sonally with Lord Bute or Sir W. T. Lewis, for if he were in the latter's position he would not give the corporation any more than they had a right to. He could not understand why the agreement had been made. The mayor one day told him that the settlement was to be made, and that the corporation was to pay £100. but he found that that was agreed to at a meeting at which Alderman David Jones was not present, and after he did attend the com- mittee they found that the question of the £100 was dropped. The Bute people knew that they had a weak case, and so were willing to drop a part of their stipulations. Mr. W. S. Crossman held that the motion could not be regarded as a strong vote of censure. He had no desire to support a strong vote of censure nor to give a silent vote. If the question were put to the vote amongst the rate- payers, it would be found that the large majority would be in favour of Mr. E. Thomas's motion. It had been said that the first sugges- tion of terms of settlement came from the corporation, and he should like to hear :f that would be contradicted. Counsel was consulted when the case was prepared, but was a. similar course taken when the agreement was drawn up? Mr. Fox objected to any section of the corporation usurping any powers that should be dealt with by the whole corporation. They had a duty, and that was to safeguard the town against the rapacity of the land gluttons. Why had there been all the Lurry and backstairs business of the mayor going to the uncrowned king of South Wales seeking a settlement? Was it dignified or dis- creet? If they had gone to the courts and lost the people of the town would have been ready to go further into the question. Sir William Thomas Lewis was the man that slapped the Government in the face when they I sent Sir Edward Fry down, and was not the man to agree to any terms unless they were to his own advantage. He objected to the ten- dency of the business of the town being rele- gated to the hands of small sub-committees. In this matter the committee had acted indis- creet}-. Mr. Lewis Morgan said that he might have been inclined to support the resolution if .t had not appeared so much as a vote of censure. There was a feeling in the town, no doubt, but that was because some of the members of the corporation had not put the facts beiorp the ratepayers fully. He could not understand what importance there was to be attached to the fact that the interrogatoneu were not answered. The answer to the cor- poration was given in the agreement. It seemed to him that the Bute people found themselves in a difficulty, and caved in. The council might congratulate themselves that their legal advisers had drawn up such a strong case that their interrogatories practi- cally settled the case at once. They had been asked, Why settle the case in this manner when you can go to the courts and get a judgment? Mr. Lloyd Meyrick could not say that the agreement was not as binding as a judgment of the High Court could be. It was equivalent to a judgment of the High Court, and in the future there could be no dispute as to the right of the corporation to the eaa. They ought to be fair in considering the matter. The Bute people were of opinion that they had the right to wall in the land by their Act of Parliament. The committee con- sidered that they had a strong case upon different grounds, and, looking at it as pre- sented, he felt that the corporation did have a strong case, but they should remember that in all cases, however strong they might appear when regarded from one side, there was still an element of doubt. If he were in the position of the committee in such a case he would have accepted without hesitation the terms of agree- ment offered. If they had gone on they might have been asked why they had not accepted the terras offered, and been blamed for not saving further expense. They would not have got more than they had now even if they had gone to the court. Mr. Veall asked if Mr. Thomas would not, after the speeches that had been. delivered, withdraw the motion. He believed that the mayor had throughout the whole business done his utmost for the town's interests. Alderman E. Beavan said it appeared to him that for the last half an hour they had been whipping, with a. tremendous labour, a dead horse. Mr. E. Thomas: Who killed the horse? (Laughter.) Alderman Beavan said he felt bound to say he could not support the resolution, because it implied a vote of censure on" the committee. Alderman Ramsdale said he had nothing to complain of in the way the debate had been conducted, but he felt that Mr. Lloyd Meyrick had made a slight attack on the Mayor of Cardiff. Mr. Meyrick: Not as Mayor of Cardiff, but as a director of the Cardiff Railway Company. Alderman Ramsdale said he never knew a man put on a bol1er front or mamtaill a more deter" mined attitude than the Mayor of Cardiff. (Hear, hear.) If it had not been for the Mayor of Cardiff Sir W. T. Lewis would not have given way as he did. The committee did not regret the course things had taken, because they would act in the same spirit again, believing, as they did, that they had done what was best in the interests of the corporation and the town. It had been suggested that the com- mittee were lacking in backbone, but he con- tended that they had as much backbone as any other members of the council. They had never known Alderman Jones yield one inch to the Bute, and he himself had never deferred to the Bute authorities. The same could be said of the other two members who were present. The committee had several meetings, and he did not think it would have been wise for all the details to have been presented to the corpora- tion. They would have been showing their hands to the other side. He repudiated the idea of aldermanic contempt, and he thought they would find that the aldermen were as regular in their attendance, and took as active and intelligent a part in the work of the cor- poration as any member of the corporation, and, 80 far as he was concerned, he would never do a wrong to Cardiff wi.lingly and knowingly. (Hear, hear.) The committee acted on direct evidence, and they were informed that they had power to settle the matter. The town-clerk and his deputy guided them in this matter, and they were justified in acting on the advice thus given. Sir W. T. Lewis never asked them whether they had plenary powers. He asked them whether they had power to discuss and decide the question, and. the minutes were produced to prove what powers they had. They had gained everything they wanted, and a little more than they probably would hava got if they had gone to court. Legal matters were left in the hands of the town-clerk and counsel, and he thought Mr. Riddell had distinctly stated that the committee had done wisely and well in the interests of the town in making that agreement. He asked them to believe that there had been no backstair influence, and there had been no hurry. They acted according to the best of their ability, and he hoped the cor- poration would not pass a stigma upon men who were as honourable as any other mem- bers of the council. Mr. Mildon asked if it was usual for people who caved in to pay their own costs. He con- tended that the corporation had not got in they wanted, because, according to the evi- dence of one of the members of the committee, there was free and uninterrupted access to the pier head, landing stages, and slipway. Mr. Symonds said his question referred to the pontoon, where the Bristol boats landed their cattle. There had been a gate erected there for twenty years. Mr. Mildon said it was apparent that some members of the committee did not believe they had plenary powers until they were told so by the town-clerk. He did not wish to give a vote of censure on the committee, but he wished to state that he was not satisfied with the way in which this business had been done, or with the agreement. (Hear, hear.) Mr. Munn said he did not wish to censure the committee, because he believed they were sincere, and acted in accordance with their best judgment. Mr. C. Bird said he felt that a word or two was necessary from him on this matter. He had carefully considered the papers on the subject, and it seemed to him that the settlement arrived at was a reasonable one. There, how- ever. seemed to be such a divergence of opinion as to the powers of the committee that he did not propose to vote at all. Alderman Lewis said that the corporation had taken the law into their own hands and smashed down the railings. Then matters went on until they saw the flag cf peace. He was a man of peace, unless he saw some prospect of gaining anything material by taking another course. He had every sympathy with the com- mittee. but hoped that the corporation would earn the lesson. He for one was not an advo- cate for leaving the town affairs in the hands of small sub-committees. Mr. H. White thought that if the. committee had takpn the usual course—had presented their report/and left the chairman to make an ex- planatory speech—the criticism that had been uttered that morning would have been dis- armed. Those who had proposed and sup- ported the motion were in a dilemma, for, whilst they had given the committee plenary powers, they found that the committee had not taken the course that they wanted it to, and now brought forward the motion for the purpose of putting themselves right with the section of the public that supported them. In the course of some remarks treating with the history of the caee, he said that the case might have been settled years ago if the corporation had followed up correspondence commenced then between itself and Mr. Corbett. He was in favour of upholding a committee appointed by the council, but in this case they had not carried out the duties that were expected of them. He could not find that they had sufficiently en- forced the public rights over the land in ques- tion. tion. In consequence of remarks made by several members, Mr. E. Thomas said that he did not care a rap whether the motion were regarded as a vote of censure or not. But he had framed it as carefully as he could with the object of avoiding such a vote. The Deputy-Mayor, as a member of the com- mittee, complained that members of the corpo- ration had treated the members of the com-; mittee very unkindly. They had been told that there were sinister rumours in the town, but a man who would give rise to such rumours, and would not come forward and prove them, was a coward of the deepest dye. The Chairman then put the question to the vote, and the following voted:—Against: Alder- man D. Lewis, Alderman Jacobs, Alderman Trounce, Alderman Ramsdale, and Alderman Beavan, Councillors Evans, Veall, Hallett, L. Morgan, Courtis, and Symonds; total, eleven. For: Councillors E. Thomas, W. S. Crossman, H. White, A. Good, Munn, S. Robinson, Lloyd Meyrick, Fox, and J. Chappell; total, nine. Mr. Good commenced to move a motion (as an amendment) to the effect that the corpora- tion should make application for a mandamus to set aside the agreement. Before he had read more than half of -he proposal the chair- man ruled him out of order, saying that if Mr. Good wanted to take separate action he must give notice of motion. Mr. Good proceeded with his reading, but the chairman ruled him out of order. Mr. Fox rose to ask a question, but there was so much interruption that his words could not be heard. Mr. Good: You may rule me out of order if you please. It is a. piece of despicable trickery. Mr. Fox asked the chairman if Mr. Good could not move an amendment under standing order No. 8. and contended that, as Mr. Good's proposal referred to the pier head, his amend- ment was in order. The Chairman: No. I want to go on with the other business. Mr. Good: The town-clerk will tell you that I am in order. I challenge him to say that I am not. Mr. Chappell: Mr. Thomas was allowed to propose an amendment. Mr. Good has another amendment, and cannot he propose it? The Chairman: It is a separate action that he wants us to adopt. Mr. Good: I say that I am in order, and the town-clerk knows it. A1 dermar. Ramsdale: This that Mr. Good wants to propose is a resolution involving a large outlay of money, and to bring it before the fag-end of a meeting is unwise. I think that the chairman is perfectly right in ruling it out of order. Mr. Good: I say that I have a right to bring it forward. The Chairman: You cannot. You are cut of order. I aslc the corporation to support me. The Chairman then put the committee's report for adoption, and declared that the Ayes" had it. Mr. Chappell, amid interruption, proceeded to ask a question, and, when he could gain a hearing, said: Am I out of order, seeing that the resolution has not been put as a substantive motion ? The Chairman: The proceedings of the com- mittee have been put and carried. Mr. Fox: But what about the standing orders, which say that when an amendment is lost the resolution must be put- Mr. Good also tried to speak, but there were cries of Order," and Chair." The Chairman: Yours is not an amendment. I have put the business to the meeting and it has been carried. Mr. Good: Then you were not in order. Upon this there were loud calls of "Order," and Chair, chair." Mr. Good resumed his seat, and the chairman proceeded to put the remaining formal business to the meeting. MR. A. GOOD'S RESOLUTION. It is understood that Mr. A. Good intends to bring forward at the next council meeting the resolution that he tried to force on the council as an amendment at Wednesday's special meet- ing. He was allowed to read only a part of it before he was ruled out of order by the chairman. The resolution, as he drafted it, and as he intends to propose it on a future occasion, runs as follows:- "That this council make immediate applica- tion to the High" Court of Justice for a mandamus to restrain the Cardiff Railway Company and the pierhead sub-committee of the Cardiff Corporation from carrying into effect the agreement lately made between the aforesaid parties severally and jointly, on the ground-first, that the said sub-committee, on their part, made the said agreement without the knowledge by the corporation of its details and provisions; secondly, that this actiou and agreement of the sa.id sub-committee were contrary to the purpose and intention for which they, the said sub-committee, were appointed; thirdly, because the terms of the agreement aforesaid allow an invasion of public rights of way, and thus seriously affect, and are inimical to, the public interests, and act to the prejudice of this corporation. And, further, that a committee of eight members be herewith appointed to carry the above reso- lution into effect; that they take legal advice outside the legal advisers of the corporation, and that they report progress at each monthly meeting of this council, and in any question of emergency requiring settlement that they call a special meeting of the council to consider the same. That the said committee be formed of Aldermen Sanders and Jacobs and Coun- cillors Robinson, Meyrick, Fox, Evans, White, and Jenkins."
CARDIFF GUARDIANS.
News
Cite
Share
CARDIFF GUARDIANS. At a meeting of the visiting committee of the Cardiff Guardians on Tuesday, Mr. F. J. Beavan in the chair, it was reported that the children under four years of age now in the workhouse had been removed from the isolated block to the new infants' quarters, and the question of supervision cropped up and was discussed at great length.—Dr. Sheen attended and reported on the question from a medical point of view, and eventually the following motion, proposed by the Chairman and seconded by Miss Jones, was carried: -"That this committee recommend the board to employ two assistant women, whose duty it shall be to assist in the new infants' block, including the probationary rooms, and in the red and white blocks, as the master, matron, and medi- cal officer might direct."—An amendment, moved by Mr. Cross, that only one additional attendant should be employed, was lost. The salary of the assistant was proposed at E12 and uniform. Day-attendants Radneigh and Price sent in their resignations, and it was decided to take the necessary steps to secure successors. A meeting of the workhouse bui'ding com- mittee was held on Tuesday afternoon. Coun- cillors. Mildon being in the chair.—The question of electric-lighting for the workhoase was on. more discussed. A letter was r*ad from an independent expert, who stated that it would be more economical for the guardians to obtain their electricity from the corporation than to erect a private plant. The question was deferred for six months.-A convalescent home for from twelve to twenty children was next considered, and a report was read from the valuers on some property facing Whitmore Bay at Barry. It was decided that a sub- committee of the building committee should visit the premises and report on them.
LLANGUICKE SCHOOL BOARD.
Detailed Lists, Results and Guides
Cite
Share
LLANGUICKE SCHOOL BOARD. The following is the result of the election of the above board:— ELECTED. 'Darnel Meredith, colliery manager.N. 2.825 John .Jenkins, Gwauncaegurwen .N. 1,815 Rev. J. Rees, Cwmllynfeli N. 1,733 James Williams, Ystalyfera N. 1,592 Thomas Howells, Pontardawe N. 1,580 T. Wade Evans, Ystalyfera c. 1,546 J. M. Price, Brynamman .N. 1.527 W. Morgan. Ystalyfera x. L467 John Williams, Ystalyfera N. 1,409 Lewis H. Lewis. Pontardawe .C. 1,379 Rev. E. Thomas (curate), Gwaun- caegurwen C. 1,273 NON-ELECTED. John Griffiths Ystalyfera .N. 1.224 J. R. Jones,'Brynamman C. 1,167 John Davies, Pontardawe .N. 1.004 C. B. Davics, Ystalyfera .C. 633 William Davies jr. 241
SUCCESS OF A BARRY STUDENT.
News
Cite
Share
SUCCESS OF A BARRY STUDENT. At a meeting of the Barry Science and Art and Evening Continuation Classes Committea held on Tuesday evening, at Holton-road Schools. Barry Dock, Mr. D. W. Roberts pre- siding. it was-reported that Mr. A. Harrison, a pupil of Mr. A. Cryer in the machine construc- tion class, had succeeded in securing a Queen's prize in connection with the Science and Art Department, South Kensington.
MENAI BRIDGE ON SALE.
News
Cite
Share
MENAI BRIDGE ON SALE. The Board of Works have offered to sell the Menai Suspension Bridge, which connects Angle- sey and Carnarvonshire, for about £ 15,000. The gross rent of the structure is stated to be LI,700, there being an annual profit of something like JB400, after paying all expenses. The proposal was made to the Menai Bridge District Council, and was referred to the Anglesey and Carnar-
DELLXAH UP-TO-DATE.
News
Cite
Share
DELLXAH UP-TO-DATE. A fortnight ago (says a Berlin correspondent), when the War Minister informed the Budget Committee of the Reichstag that foreign women were in the habit of coming to Germany with the object of enticing officers in the Army to engage in high play, it was believed that these women were the agents of financial gentlemen, who took this roundabout method of increasing their illicit gains. Now, however, it is stated that the women were French, and that they had been visiting Hanover, Berlin, and other garrison towns with the deliberate intention of leading German Arrpy officers astray. In this way the moral ruin of the officer is completed, he becomes a ready instru- ment in the hands of the French Delilah, and is ready to tell her the secrets of the German War Office. The story reads very absurd, but it is widely believed in Berlin.
CARDIFF IMPORT TRADE.
News
Cite
Share
CARDIFF IMPORT TRADE. DISCUSSION BY THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE- At the meeting of the Cardiff Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday morning, the presi- dent (Mr. W. Lester Jones) in the chair, a lengthy and important discussion took place in reference to the import trade of Cardiff and the facilities granted by the Great Western Railway Company. The Chairman explained that for a long time past the matter had occupied the serious atten- tion of the import section of the chamber, and. after many discussions and interviews, a long reply had now been received from the general manager of the Great Western Railway Com- pany. They had been urging the company to give to Cardiff the same privileges and advan- tages as were given to Bristol, but the company had only granted a few concessions, and the import section had requested Mr. Jennings to move a resolution in reference to the matter. The letter from Mr. Wi-kinson, the general manager to the company, was then read by Mr. Willoughby Hawkins, the secretary. It was dated December 22, 1898, and was as follows:- December 22, 1898. Dear Sir,—With reference to the discussion that took place at the meeting on the 22nd of February last at the offices of the Cardifl Chamber of Commerce, between the repres<lnta. tives of the different trades of that port and Mr. Bot-cher, the district goods manager of the com- priiy. The various matters then brought under- notice have been carefully considered, and tha results arrived at are given below under tha several heads noted by Mr. Boucher at tho ir tcrview: — 1 Timber. Disputed Rates.—In regard to the questions referred to by Mr. Jennings aa being Tii der negotiation between the timber mer- chants and the railway companies, I am pleased to be able to say that an amicable arrangement has been arrived at and carried into effect. 2. Railway connection between Great Western (Riverside Branch) and the timber float.—As you are aware, this matter is not one entirely within the control of the Great Western Company, but we are favourably disposed towards the scheme, and are in communication respecting it with the Cardiff Railway Company, with whom the q -e^uon at present stands. 3. Timber and other traffic, Penarth and Barry Docks to certain Midland stations.—Under the usual arrangements between railway companies higher rates would be required from Penarth and Barry than from Cardiff for traffic which is conveyed over the Great Western Railway, cving to profits having to be provided for two or three companies instead of one only. With a view to help the port of Cardiff, however, tho rates have been assimilated to a very large number of stations, and this principle will be further extended whenever and wherever it is practicable to make arrangements with tha other railway companies without unduly sacri. ficing the interests of the Great Western. 4. Glass Trade.—It will ba remembered that the reference to glass was made by a representative of the timber trade, and was not supported by any specific cases. A general examination of the iatea tends to show that they are reason- able. 5. Petroleum Trade.—The rates specified on the list handed in at the meeting have been considered, and, although some of them are too kw to permit of any modification, a consider. able number of reduced figures have now been r dcpted. With regard to rates to Blaina, Briton Ferry, Brynmawr, Ebbw Vale. and Nantyglo, communications are in progress with the other interested companies. Traffic between Cardiff and Ynysybwl is local to the Taff Vale Com- P?ny. 6. Potato Trade.—The very low special rates vhich were granted for old potatoes from the Shropshire. &c., districts to the Cardiff and Newport districts in the season of 1896 were adefted upon urgent representations that the circumstances of that year were exceptional. They would not have been put in force to meet the temporary emergency if it had been known that the special assistance given would be used as an argument for permanent reduction, and such low figures could not be kept in operation without a. prejudicial effect upon rates in oth?r districts. However, communications are pass- ing with the other railway companies concerned with the view of meeting the wishes of the potato trade as far as possible. 7. Fruit Trade.—Appendix B shows the rates for apples mentioned by Mr. Biermann, together with the figures which I am able' to announce as now in operation. With regard to the rates to Swansea. Brynmawr, Abergavenny, and Aber- dare, I am in communication with the other companies concerned. The rates for oranges ara already very low, and the following are the only reductions that can be given:—Pembroke and Pembroke Dock, 14s. per ton, including col- lection and delivery within limits. At the meet- ing comparison was made between the Cardiff and Bristol rates for oranges to Worcester and Biimingham, but this comparison does not favour the view expressed that Cardiff is treated unfavourably, because in the case of Worcester, Cardiff, J"th a distance of seventeen miles greater, has a slightly lower mileage rate, and in that of Birmingham, with a distance 24 miles meater. Cardiff has the same figure, and, there- fore, a considerably lower late per mile. 8. Provision Trade.—Nearly the whole of the sU tions named by Mr. Collett in connection with the cheese and butter rates are competitive with other railways, and the rates are under con- sideration between the companies concerned. As to the few stations with which the rates are controlled by the Great Western Company, the reduced figures shown in Appendix C have been adopted. You are, of course, aware that re- ductions have been recently made in the rates for certain provisions from Cardiff to Bristol, as referred to by Mr. Jennings, and reported in the Western Mail" of the 17th ultimo. 9. Frozen Meat.—As pointed out by Mr. Neale, the competition of Cardiff in regard to imported meat is with Liverpool and the East Ooast, and to the stations specified at the meeting the advantage in regard to railway charges is clearly with the first-named port. If. there- fore, those stations are drawing any portion of their supplies from Liverpool or any East Coast port in preference to Cardiff, it must be owing to some other cause than railway rates. At the two pln,-es referred to by Mr.'Neale. where the competition with Liverpool would be sen- sibly felt, viz., Birmingham and Shrewsbury, comparison shows that at Birmingham. Cardiff has the Same rate as Liverpool for three-ton lots, although the distance is about 25 per cent. greater, and that at Shrewsbury, whilst the dis- tance from Cardiff is close upon double that from Liverpool, the rate is considerably below a proportionate figure. In the list, submitted, allusion is mr.de to the rates for three-ton lots from Cardiff to Newport and Bristol, but these are so low for the services included that there is no margin for reduction. It is, cf course, natural that differential charges for imported frozen meat. as compared with English fresh meat, would be desired by the -mporters. but. after the most careful consideration of the arguments it is felt that t1.ø company oi ght not to disturb the present balance in opposition to the interests of the English farmers, and it is believed that such a step would not be considered justified father by the friends of agriculture or by the public generally. It is not possible to adont rectal rates for small consignments of meat. looking at the natnre of the traffic, nnd that such a course would give rise to complaints at other ports at which full ordirarv rates are charged, but Appendix D shows the rates that have been adopted for larger lots to Great Western non-competitive Nation*. As to Aberdare..Abergavenny, Briton Ferry. Ehbw Vale. Hereford. Neath, Shrewsbury. Swansea, and Birmingham. I am in communica- tion with the other railway companies con- cerned. General Remarks.—With rpyard to tbo general onestiou of rates from Cardiff I would venture to assure you that, while differences in the charges in proportion to mileage can always be voirtpd out. so loner as other circumstances than distances are talfn into account, the rail- way rates from Cardiff are, upon the whole, ort an excf*>dinelv favourable footing, and much lower than could b" adopted if a mileage ba,<s were acted upon.I am, dear sir. vonrs faith1 ful1v, J. L. WTT KINSON. W. R. Hawkins, Esq., Chamber of Commerce, Cardiff. After the reading of the letter, Mr. J. M. Jeuning?. the chairman of the import Bection, said that about, eighteen months ago the question of the railway rates for imported goods was taken up by the import section of the chamber, and upon investigation they found that for goods sent into Bristol they had very low railway rates to South Wales. They would think by that that Cardiff would have low rates to the other side of the Channel. But, whilst, goods could be sent from Bristol to the stations west and north of Cardiff for very little more than the rate from Cardiff, they found that if the goods were sent from South Wales to Wiltshire. Somersetshire, or Devonshire, the full rate from Cardiff to Bristol was charged, in addition to the rate on from Bristol to the destination. That was a very unfair handicap to Cardiff. They had been trying to encourage the import of goods from America, but to encourage that they had to show the consumers some benefit in having the goods from Cardiff instead of from Bristol. They had discussed the matter fully with the Great Western Railway people. With regard to the timber trade they were unable to discuss the general matter of railway rates, as they had been for some five years under discussion with the Great Western Railway Company, who acted on behalf of the other companies. The company now said that the question was amicably settled. It was settled in this way: They had notice five years before of an increase in timber rates to almost all Great Western stations, and the amicable settlement" con- sisted of the Great Western Railway Com- pany saying:—"We will not insist upon that rise where the Severn Water com- petition comes in to the Midlands, but to practically all other towns we in- sist that Cardiff shall pay the 5 per cent. rise." In the letter which they now received from the Great Western Railway Company practically no concessions were made; nomi- nally. it seemed to give a great deal, but actually nothing was given, and the fact remained that unless they had water compe- tition developed in the future Cardiff would not get any concessions. Bristol had splendid water communication right down the Channel, and the Great Western Railway had this to face. Turning again to the timber trade. Mr. Jenning3 said that a truck of timber could be sent from Bristol to Cardiff, or Bristol to Pen- arth, for under half the price that they could send that truck across the Channel to Weston or Clevedon. They had 4s. 4d. charged from Bristol to Penarth; they had 8s. 9d. charged if it went from Cardiff to Weston or Clevedon. But that 8s. 9d. was more than if they sent the truck first to Bristol and then re-consigned it on to Weston or Clevedon. By this means the rate would come to 8s. 4<1., or 5d. less. This was most unfair. (Hear. hear.) If they sent the timber from the water side at Avonmouth' the same rates ruled as from Bristol, but if they sent from the water side at Cardiff—the Bute Docks, for instance—they had to pay an extra charge of from 4d. to 6d. per ton. The railway rates to Ilfracombe, although by water nearcr to Cardiff than Bristol, were 14s. per ton, viz., 4s. from Cardiff to Bristol and 10s. from Bristol to Ilfracombe. The same thing applied to all
Advertising
Advertising
Cite
Share
THE USEFULNESS AND THE CURATIVE VIRTUES OF Dr. Williams' Pink Pills for Pale People can be proved in one day by making a few enquiries in your own neighbourhood. There is probably no place in th" country which does not contain strong, healthy, active men and women who have been reset* from acute illness or chronic ill-health by Dr. Williams9 Pink Pills for Pale People. You tvill never hear of any good being effected by a Substitute: but the great cures known to have bee" effected by the genuine pills—Dr. Williamsf Pink Pills for Pale Ptopl*— I the talk of nearly every ts-ivn. I CASES IN WALES.
IMERTHYR GIRL'S SUFFERINGS.…
News
Cite
Share
I MERTHYR GIRL'S SUFFERINGS. ¡ ANAEMIA AND INDIGESTION CURED. Recently a "Merthyr Express" reporter called on Miss Rees. We refer to Miss Jane Rees. the adopted daughter of Mrs. Phcebe Rees, proprietress of the Colliers' Arms Inn, Aberdare-road, Merthyr Tydfil. Mii-s Rees is about 22 years of age, and has been a great sufferer for a long time. She looked exceed- ingly well and healthy, but she told him how much she had suffered. "I may say," said Mrs. Phoebe Rees, "that Miss Rees has been a great sufferer, but she is better now than I have ever known her to be; but, there, she will tell you all about her illness." "Ye3," rejoiived Miss Rees, "I was very sickly for many years. I took bottle after bottle of medicine, but could not get perma- nent relief. At times I suffered terribly, and Mrs. Rees will bear me out in what I say. I suffered from want of blood, there was none in my body: palpitation of the heart, great weakness, indigestion. I couldn't cat anything, the smell of food was distasteful to me; in fact, I cannot tell you the extent of my pains and suffering. When I went upstairs I had to sit down on the top stair and wait for my breath to return before I could go on into the bed- room, and I began to be frightened. Medicine seemed no good to me. I even hated the sight of food. My legs would swell and caueo me a great deal of pain. But I feel all right now; I don't feel the same girl. I can eat anything now, and any amount. I could not bear the smell or look of any food, meat Included, but now I enjoy my meals thoroughly. Everyone is surprised to s'ee the change in me, and all my friends congratulate me." "But how were you cured?" asked the reporter, who readily admitted that this was a marvellous cure. "Of course! I omitted to say," replied Miss Rees, "I am entirely cured, thanks to Dr. Williams's Pink Pills for Pale People. How did I come to know about them? Well, I will tell you with pleasure, because I owe every- thing to Dr. Williams's Pink Pills. Some time ago a friend of mine came down from Scot- land, and told me all about Dr. Williams's
Advertising
Advertising
Cite
Share
s$> AK0NG THOUSANDS. « The interesting cases here men- « tioned aro a few among thousands in which the usefulness of Dr. 4ø « Williams' Pink Pills has Leen made « known to iho public. They are <#> famous among the highest and the 4a a lowest in the land for the cure of m 0is Rheumatism, Sci&tica, Indiges- Jl., tion, Anaemia, Palpitation, and a General Muscular Weakness. O?,¡G They are a splendid nerve and *¥• de spinal tonic, and have cured many cases of Paralysis, Loco- motor Ataxy, Neuralgia, St. «¥• Jfo Vitus' Danes, and Nervous Head- JU ache. Sold by all chemists, or sent post free by Dr. Williams' JfB jqu Medicine Company, 46, Holbom- jL viaduct, London, at 2s. 9d. a box. or six for 13s. 9d.; but are genuine Jfe ere only with full name (seven words), cafe M £ >» WILLIAMS'al If ITIIiijls fel 1 M m ILeopi-E. W Pills sold loose or from glass Jars cannot be Dr. Williams', and won't «j!o JIL cure you; substitutes never cured anyone!
WELSH MINER'S LTT^-A-GO ^
News
Cite
Share
WELSH MINER'S LTT^-A-GO IN CONTINUAL SUFFERING- ■net** The strike among the Welsh coal recently assumed so serious a charac^^ an incalculable amount of suffering haS f ,0 borne by these workers, and the notice 0 whole nation has been drawn to the coJldJ of their work. But even at the best of times minetØ ■ <■ much to bear. As an instance, there is > miner named James Thomas, twenty-sil of age, living at 6, Baxter-terrace, GIYIIG South Wales. When questioned by a. "BtJUP Chronicle" reporter, he stated: at work underground, about ten year9 was seized with violent pains in the after that was subject to terrible spells Of J at intervals. I was incapacitated froo for a fortnight at a time, but about e *0 r months ago I became so bad that I had up work altogether. I consulted a doctor, attended Cardiff Infirmary, where I WO my complaint was the collier's bane— For many hours we have to labour up, with water dripping from the roof, "< all times on damp earth. At that could neither sit, stand, nor lie down £ suffering horrible pain, and when my *rJi accompanied me to the Infirmary she I would die in the train. One day wS across an advertisement of Dr. Pink Pills for Pale People, and we then to try them." "With what result?" queried the preSS f "After the first box of the Pills I td some relief, which encouraged me to U second one, when there was a marked nient; my limbs became easier, my returned, and soon, after taking six Or ¡¡f f boxes, I felt healthier than I had do ø many months. I feel convinced that hadn't taken Dr. Williams's Pink Pills never be where I am now. I am strong healthier than ever I was." Not only by miners, but amongst all Dr. Williams's Pink Pills are praised jji way in which they have cured pa.ralYSiSo < motor ataxy, rheumatism, and sciatica; all diseases arising from impoverished J scrofula, r 'Vts, chronic erysipelas, f tion of thv> i^«Wels and lungs, anaeffli^J and sallow complexion, loss of appetite- £ tations, pains in the back, early decay, j weakness, and hysteria. Genuine only full name, Dr. Williams's Pink Pills for j People, and sold by chemists and bl Williams's Medicine Company, 46, 3C'f I viaduct, London, E.C., at 2s. 9d. a bot, Of boxes for 13s. 9d. These Pills are not P tive, nor can they harm the most delic»" inland towns; no reduction was made by
AMATEUR BURGLARS.
News
Cite
Share
AMATEUR BURGLARS. CONFESSION OF A MANAGER. Charles Morgan Maud and Frank Boon were charged at Bow-street, London, on Tuesday with conspiring to steal- boots and money of the value of about JB26 15s.. from Messrs. Crick and Gunn. of Chancery-lane. Maud had been employed by the prosecutors for over six years, and had been manager of the Chancery-lane shop for two years. Of late Mr. Crick had told him that he was giving too much credit, and had a list of the outstanding accounts made up. However, when the cus- tomers were written to. several letters were returned. On Saturday last Maud -reported at Bow street that the shop had been broken into. and. on Detective-sergeant Haines calling to investigate he was sbown two sacks of boots lying in the shop, as if the burglars had been disturbed, while downstairs in the basement boots were lying about on the floor, and the window was partially open, with a mark on one pane as if a diamond had been used on it. The prisoner told him that he thought fifteen pairs of boots were missing, besides a cardboard box contain- ing £21, the week's takings, and later in the day informed him that he found that the ledger, daybook, and stock-book were also missing. After further investigation, however, Maud made a full confession. He said that he and Boon, a customer to whom he owed money, had arranged the burglary between them. They had dinner in the shop, and Maud sent the errand boy to Boon's house to get rid of him. The sacks they filled with boots, and left in the shop, and before closing the premises they unfastened the basement window. Boon took two parcels of boots with him, which he gave to a Gower-street tradesman, saying they were a job lot he had purchased. Maud had secured the books. 921 in cash, and two cheques. Later in the evening they returned to Chancery-lane, and Boon, having made certain that the coast was clear, they tried to cut a pane out of the basement window with a diamond, but they only succeeded in scratching the glass, so Boon opened the window a little, and they left. The prisoners were remanded.
HOME-MADE POISON.
News
Cite
Share
HOME-MADE POISON. A curious case of poisoning was investigated by the Croydon coroner on Tuesday evening. The deceased was William Henry Smith, 35, of 204, Oval-road. Up to a year ago he was a clerk in the Post Office, but left of his own accord, and had since been out of work. On Saturday night he went to bed at eleven o'clock, but did not gcrt up on Sunday morning, and when his room was entered at mid-day he was found unconscious. Smith died at mid- night. Dr. Hobson deposed that death was due to hemlock. It was suggested that the deceased gathered the plant and distilled the poison him- self. Smith left a letter for a Miss Bishop, in which he said he chose as his confidante to receive his dying speech and confession.-The jury returned a verdict of "Suicide during tem- porary inear
MINISTERS AS COMPANY DIRECTORS,
News
Cite
Share
MINISTERS AS COMPANY DIRECTORS, DISCUSSION IN PARLIAMENT. In the House of Commons on Wednesday, Mr. FIELD (P., Dublin) resumed the debate upon Mr. M'Call's amendment representing that the position of a director of a public company was inconsistent with the dignity of a Minister of the Crown. He submitted that Ministers of the Crown should not be directors of railway companies. The railway companies at present controlled the House of Commons. Mr. JEFFREYS (U.. North Hants) supported the motion. He did not desire to make any personal suggestions, but officers on active duty were not allowed to accept a directorate, and they never heard of a judge upon the Bench becoming a director of a public com- pany. Sir J. LEESE (R., Accrington) supported the motion, although he was not in favour of a hard and fast line being drawn. Mr. GIBSON BOWLES (U., Lynn Regis), on the other hand, declared that a hard and fast rule was absolutely essential. It was improper for gentlemen in the Cabinet to be active directors of public companies. The double capacity was impossible. There was a very great and constant danger of th3 two duties clashing. Mr. BECKETT (U., Whitby) was certain that no ono would cast a doubt upon the integrity of Ministers. It was impossible to lay down a hard and fast rule, but it was better, unless under very exceptional circumstances, that the Ministers should not accept directorates. Sir JOHN BRUNNER (R.. Northwich) took exception to the Junior Ministers of the Crown being exempt from this wholesome rule. This was not a vote of censure, but only a vote of warning. The honour of the House should be the national pride. Colonel LOCKWOOD (U., Epping) opposed the motion entirely. He could see no incon- venience or danger in Ministers accepting directorates in large and almost national industries. Mr SYDNEY BUXTON (B., Tower Hamlets, Poplar) wa3 of opinion that every Minister should be. like Caesar's wife, above suspicion. Mr. GEDGE (U., Walsall) opposed the motion, while Captain NORTON (R., Newington, W.), supported. Mr. ARTHUR ELLIOT (U., Durham) said that the Opposition had clearly identified itself with the principle of not allowing Ministers of the Crown to act as company directors in future. Sir H. CAMPBELL-BANNERMAN (R.. Stirling Burghs): We have done it in the past. ( Mr. ARTHUR ELLIOT said he believed there I were several cases in the last Liberal Adminis- tration. (Mr. A. J. Balfour: Hear, hear.") He was, however, concerned for the future rather than the past, and he appealed to the leader of the House to concede whether in the days to come he could not adopt the late policy, and he also hoped that some of the present Ministers might see their way to resign their directorship. Mr. LABOUCHERE (R., Northampton), said the last speaker evidently wanted the House to indulge in virtue, but not until his friends left office. (Laughter.) Hon. members oppo- site were in favour of the amendment, but were not going to vote for it. He would sug- gest, seeing that they did not want to make this a party question, that the Government should agree to lay down the principle that members of the Government should not act as directors of public companies. Mr. A. J. BALFOUR (First Lord of the Trea- sury) said he had been struck by the care of all the speakers to make no attack on the per- sonal honour of any single member of the Government, and there had been on all bides a most an-ous desire to maintain at its pre- sent high standard the purity of English public life. While he recognised that with pleasure, he did not think that in certain respects the speakers, or many of them. had got on to the wrong rein, and were not advocating the best method of securing the object which was the aim of all. The mover of the amendment had made an indiscriminate attack on directors, but. surely, they must all recognise that the vast enterprises of this country were being carried on by joint stock enterprises, and it would be the greatest possible mistake to brand the office of the director with discredit, as that would drive out the best and most fitted to undertake the direction of these undertakings. He could speak freely, because it so happened that he had never held such a position himself. (Hear, hear.) The House must discriminate between the man who sold his name-a shock- ing and scandalous operation—and the genuine director of an industrial concern. He did not believe that a single Minister of the Crown, of whatever party, had given his name to bolster up a company. He took the case of the Duke of Devonshire, which had been men- tioned, and asked-Was it right to lay down the rule that such a director, to the great detriment of his personal property, and the great detriment of the other shareholders, should deprive himself of his directorship? He could not consent to I a rule which would either drive the Duke of Devonshire from public life or would compel him to separate himself from such concerns which were necessary for the welfare of many parts of the kingdom. (Cheers.) It was folly to ask that directorships should be given up and shares retained. There was a time when it was held that no one was fitted to take part in the government who had not a stake in the country. That stake was overdone—{loud laughter)—but he would not like to see the government of this country monopolised by those who had no property and no business in the country. In the best interests of this House, it was not desirous that Ministers should depend upon the barest means tence, or else upon the precarious their official salaries. He hoped the 'jji would not commit itself to a hard an" rule. Each case must be judged merits. No Minister had the right to his public time in managing the affair company or his own affairs, but it had found not incompatible with public li^e statesmen should be concerned affairs of their own, or, if they took the precautions, to do a eertaia nmoUIlt of in connection with public f.nmpa thought that, by properly applying ptlbW maxims, they would do more for t]1e 1 good and the high standard of polite than by laying down an and fast rule. Mr. ASQUITH (R., Fife, E.) agreed sciously or unconsciously, directly or every member had an interest in all le^f which might conceivably be money. But he contended that to tain that that interest was aiJa/\|V with that of a director was to upon the intelligence of the House, man wlio entered the public service mflS f his whole time to the service of the St no Minister should place himself in any P° £ jjf where his public duty and private interest clash. J. Mr. WEIR (R„ Rosa and Cromarty), L J speech was made all through amid "Divide" and general interruption, ir that if Ministers were not satisfied wi^jjr salaries they received from the jf should form a union and go on strike, of seeking other methods of increasing incomes. (Laughter.) On a division the figures were:— ,it For the amendment Lf Against Government majority —
--PITCAIRN ISLAN D.f
News
Cite
Share
PITCAIRN ISLAN D. f WHAT FORTY YEARS OF if^ MARRIAGE HAS DONE. # Official correspondence issued relating to condition of the Pitcairn Islanders:— Ii. "In bodily appearance the t tj healthy and vigorous, but the same can&t# claimed for them mentally. In the respect they show a distinct deficicncy< was noted by everyone on board, and not be mistaken for the simplicity d&ur to want of communication with the 00 world. The moral sense of the to be weak, and some- of the things would tend to show that a very serioO* of affairs existed in that respect. There aPTjjif to be a distinct reason for their coD J when it is remembered that the present f tion of 141 is derived, with one exception; the 42 people—i e., 14 adults and 28 that returned from Norfolk Island Qf' 1859 and 1864, consisting of four ff and they already closely related. It opinion of all on board, and of the mo&$ ligent of the islanders themselves. tbafc J state of affairs should not be allowed tinue if means can be found to From all that I have gathered on the 8° I consider that if regular communicatio11 established it would be a boon to the and would go a long way towards co**f^ j the unsatisfactory state of affairs <ipubtedly exists at present." to0 The Constitution of the Pitcairn Isl!&Odfao very peculiar. One of the provisions IJJJ tP P" a fine for profanity, one half of the fine pr, given to the informant. Another cla scribes "that any person in a quarrel S otIJ 1 his opponent with his fist or any if 0 weapon must submit himself to t ever fine the authorities think impose, and should the blow turned (save in tha case of self-"6 qq* they are to be submitted to the "Save in the case of self-defence" is ni^.ott? Among other provisions of the Constito one to the effect that "No person or are to kill any cat unless doing him "anjs&j. If anyone be found so doing, shall be Pa^il<* by having his dog taken from him and and should the person have no dog he 60 punished by the magistrate."
POPE AND THE
News
Cite
Share
POPE AND THE The Rome correspondent of the graph" has a good story of the Pope » } Queen- In 1846 Gioacchino Pecci, then simple to Leopold I., father of the present > ^5.1 the Belgians, had given him on his jVfy a very warm letter for Gregory XVI., Vt the king highly praised tne young Pre1*, P/ expressed the desire to see him Cardin^j he did not return at once to Rome, K it a good opportunity to satisfy one yjjj great desires—that is, to see and spe» £ Queen Victoria. He crossed the Cha succeeded in obtaining the longed-for Qtty He describes the conversation with the nine years younger than himself, wi'-Vjyo enthusiasm—her grace and amiability. f,4 sation and senti'SHMita. When he cacr* < Pontifical Throne as 3HI. there change of warm compliments and a »v\ of the conversation of 32 years befo*^ r. even now every New Year the aged Jl&fl Queen personally write each other a fc This visit to London delayed Monsigno^ fO*t return to Rome till Gregory XVL ha4 ^0t f so ill that King Leopold's letter could presented. Pope Gregory died, and wj-wVU had to given to Pius IX.. already J influence of Cardinal Antonelli, who *5, disliked the future Pope. Pecci had { till 1853 for his cardinal's hat, so that.P > to see the Queen delayed his prefer10 seven years.
CARDIFF IMPORT TRADE.
News
Cite
Share
booking through. Judging by that they would think that railway rates from Bristol to the Welsh towns would be plus the rate from Bristol to Cardiff and Cardiff down line. But they found that in very many cases the rates from Bristol were little more than the rates from Cardiff, and in some cases were the same. For instance, the rate for two-ton lots either from Cardiff or Bristol to Cardigan wa.s 13s. Id. per ton, a,nd from Cardiff to Carmarthen 9s. 7d. per ton, as against 103. 6d. from Bristol. In the glass trade the importers found their trade seriously handicapped by the unfair preference shown to Bristol. The Cardiff-Swansea rate was 15s. per ton, and the Bristol-Swansea rate 16s. 2d. per ton, the extra 40 miles from Bristol to Cardiff being charged only Is. 2d. per ton. or one-third of a penny per ton per mile, whilst from Cardiff to Swansea the rate was 4d. per ton per mile. The importers of fruit had tried to get their wares imported into Cardiff, but the rates from Bristol to Swansea, Milford. Haverfordwest, Cardigan, Pembroke, Llandyssil, and Llandilo were exactly similar to those from Cardiff. In the frozsn meat trade some con- cession had apparently been made. but the concession really consisted in goods being carried from station to station, instead of collection and delivery as heretofore, so that there was actually no reduction whatever. Mr. Jennings concluded by moving:—"That this chamber desires to express its great disappoint- ment and dissatisfaction at the fact that, not- withstanding the alleged concessions set forth to the Great Western Railway Company's letter, dated December 22. 1898, the disadvantages under which Cardiff has laboured, compared with Bristol, are left practically untouched." Mr. H. Aumonier Seconded, and said that the company's alleged concessions with regard to petroleum were absolutely useless. Mr. C. Collett supported. The question for them to consider was how they could remedy the grievance. The only way was to bring about a similar state of tilings to what they had at Bristol. They should cultivate an import trade, and when they had that they could bring about water communication with all the towns that Bristol was in communica- tion with. 1, Mr. J. B. Ferrier said the whole question had ,h L, been talked about ad nauseum, and they should now do something to put Cardiff in an inde- pendent position. Then they would get con- cessions from tha company. Further discussion ensued, after which the motion was put to the meeting and carried unanimously.
IMERTHYR GIRL'S SUFFERINGS.…
News
Cite
Share
Pink Pills for Pale People; how she once suffered like myself, and how Dr. Williams's Pink Pills cured her. I there and then deter- mined to try them. I took two boxes in a fortnight, and the second box brought me grand relief. I don't remember ever being so well before. Everybody noticed the improve- ment, and I told all freinds I had to thank Dr. Williams's Pink Pills for my restoration to health. My blood improved, my strength returned, I can go about all right, and I am thankful to say, as I have already told you, that I have such a good appetite that I can eat any time of the day. My breath is better than ever it was, and you can tell how well I am when I say that yesterday I went to the Rhondda. Valley, and returned without feeling the least tired. Before I took Dr. Williams's Pink Pills I could scarcely go about, so you can quite understand how much I owe to Dr. Williams. In all I took five box- and the cure is complete. I consider I look better than ever I did, and I certainly feel better." "And you really believe that this wonderful return of good health is the result of taking Dr. Williams's Pink Pills for Pale People?" asked the reporter. "Yes, I am perfectly certain of it. and I make it no secret. Why. before I took Dr. Williams's Pink Pills I could not sleep for an hour together, but now I can sleep till fur- ther orders."