Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

33 articles on this Page

LLANELLY MURDER

News
Cite
Share

LLANELLY MURDER TRIAL AT CARMARTHEN. JUDGE AND A WITNESS. THI LINE OF DEFENCE. DEFENDANT INSANE: JUDGE'S SINTENCE. At Carmarthen Assizes on Wednesday, be- fc Mr. Justice Bucknill, Thomas John Lewis (30), plasterer, Cambrian-street, Llanelly, was indicted with wilfully mur- dering his daughter, Gertrude, aged three years and seven months. There was a crowded attendance, including a large num- ber of Llanelly people. Mr. Bowen Row- lands and M'r. Kelly (instructed by )lr. D. R. Edmunds) appeared to prosecute, and Mr. Lloyd Morgan, K.C., ^an<^ ^r" David Rhys (instructed by ^r- J- Le^s Phillips) appeared for the defence. On the charge being read over the prisoner broke down completely and wept bi'lerly- OPENING ADDRESS FO^ THE CROWN. Mr. Bowen Rowland said the crime of murder was a mosf serious one, being one of the few offelice-, for which the law in- flicts the penary of death. In conducting the prosecution he was aware of the serious resp-" .aibility which he was undertaking, f l'iu he would endeavour to place the whole ACCUSED, THOMAS JOHN LEWIS. I of the facts before them in as impartial a manner as possible. The crime of murder was at the best a shocking one. In this particular case there were some most revolting features. The crime was com- mitted under the most. terrible circcm- In coming to consider their ver- diet he asked the jury to arrive at a. deci- sion, apcrt from any sentimental (jonsicLer- ations of sympathy. Counsel then pro- ceeded to describe the circumstances under which the crime was committed. STEP-DAUGHTER'S' STORY OF THE CRIME. Christina Maud James, prisoner's step- daughter, said that on August 26th her step- father came home at 7.50 in the evening, and was asked if he wanted supper, when he replied, "I do not want youx —— food." Her mother was sitting down by the side of Gertie, who was near the fire. Her step-father then came near the fire. He took off his top coat and had a white coat underneath. After ti aing up the sleeves he took a knife out of his pocket and sharpened it on the doorstep outside, at the same time telling Gertie that she should have it before the night was out. At this time she stood on the side of the partition next to the street and could see what was being done. After sharpening the knife he laid his finger on the knife to see if it was sharp. He then shut the knife up and came back into the room, sitting next to the fire. Having sat by the fire he picked up the fender in order to strike her mother. Gertie was in the room and CHRISTINA JAMES (Sister of the murdered child). also Otatiie, her little brother. Her uncle I William, who was present ail the time, then intervened, saying, "Don i be so fool- ish, Tom. Her step-father then put the fender down, after which he picked up a fender down, after which he picked up a gtooi and struck Charlie twice in the back. He also pushed witness about. She had not done anything to annoy him. She said, "Don't you push me about if you do push my mother about. He again took the knife oat of his pocket and carried Gertie to the front room near the window-csilL Gertie sat by his side. He then twice said, "Do you like,- dadda?" and she replied, "Yes, dadda, but don't beat me again." He had previously taken hold of her by the throat. After that he stabbed Gertie in the neck with the penknife. She then screamed for mother who carried Gertie a.way. Her atop-father said to her mother, "Oh, Sarah Ann, I have done it." Before that witness -id, "OH, MAMMA, DADDA HAS KILLED GERTIE." After that he ran out of the house, but soon came back again and kissed Gertie. After that he stated that he was going to give himself up to the police. Mr. Lloyd Morgan Gertie was your step- father's pet? Witness: He loved her. William James, 2, Cambrian !street, la- bourer's plasterer, said tha.t he lived with prisoner and his wife, the latter being his sister. He sat. in the lower room on August 26th behind the partition. His sister and her three children were present. Prisoner came in sober, and his sister gave him a basin of broth, and after tjUrfrvT a couple of spoonsful he said "I don't want any more of your broth," picked up a stool, and going by the side of his son Charlie, said, "I will kill you, you litcle His" sister was in the same room, add he then turned to strike her wiih the fender. Up to this time i witness had not interfered. The little girl Christina could hear what was said. Pris- oner turned on the little boy, who ran to- wards the door. He fallowed him up and caught him by the threat. Them the child caught witness by the leg and shouted out, ft-" me, Win bach.y' After that witness left the house. JUDGE'S SEVERE QUESTION TO WITNESS. His Lordtehip: What on earth made you gn orat* The little boy was appealing to yon for mercy. Speak up like a man and say what yon have to say. James I dad not like to interfere between rrusn and wife. The Judge: Yoc. had a. sister and a little hoy appealing to yon for safety. You torn year back on them and leave them to the merey of this man. Shame on you Janwn was about to make an explanation, 1 wilen the Judge said ba did not want to Crop's -examined, witness said the prisoner j Was a.n awful drinker. J Prisoner now asked to be allowed to go J Prisoner now asked to be allowed to go I below, and was removed, returninS m a few minutes. I Elizabeth James, neighbour, said she came into the house after the little girl was wounded, and eaid, "Whatever have you doneand prisomer replied, "Oh, Mrs. James, I have done it." He went out, and on returning kissed the child, and left the house, saying that he intended to give him- self up. He was very fond of the child. Dr. Ward said he saw the little girl frit- ting on a woman's knee bleeding freely from the neck and fn a state of cohapse. blood issuing from two punctured wounds below the left ear. The upper one was half an inch ia length, running horizontally. The lower vound was a quarter of an inch lower, and three-eighths of an inch in length, ftoih wounds were clean cut and could Aave. been caused with the knife pro- duced. The only hope of saving the child was by means of a.n operation. On the ar- rival of a cab he took the child in his arms and set off for the hospital. The child died as the cab entered Tunnel-road. Death "was due to the bleeding from the wound. P.O. Walter Evans said prisoner gave himself up at the police-station and handed over the knife produced. He called thA superintendent, to whom the prisoner made a statement. At that time he was calm and quite sober. PRISONER'S STATEMENT TO THE POLICE. Superintendent Rogers said he saw the prisoner at the police-station, when he made a statement as follows: "1 wish to give myself up for putting the blade of the I knife to my child's neck. I cut her neck half an hour ago. I did it with the whole blade. I told my wife and she took the knife away. I kissed the child and went out, telling one of the neighbours to fetch a doctor." The prisoner was quite sober. Cross-examined: He knew Lewis well. The man was addicted to drink ,§nd had been twice convicted for drunkenness— once in 1903 and once in 1907. P.S. Britten said he went to the house and found Mrs. Lewis there a.nd a woman named Nicholas with the child in her arms. Dr. Ward arrived a few minutes later. At 10 p.m. he saw prisoner at the police sta- tion and charged him with murdering his daughter. He commenced to cry and said his wife was the cause of it all through drinking and making rows in the house. Lewis formerly lived in William-street, where his furniture .as sold eleven months ago by the landlord for rent. The house was poorly furnished. In reoent years the prisoner had been a. heavv drinker. EVIDENCE OF WIFE* NOT ADMIS- SIBLE. TlJi" concluded the case for the Crown, the Judge ruling that a question as to the character of the wife was not admissible. Mr. Lloyd Morgan said lie was not going to suggest that the prisoner was not guilty of the crime. The defence he intended to put forward was that at the time of the crime the prisoner was insane and not cap- able of knowing what he was doing. If the jury came to such a conclusion they could bring in a verdict to the ellect that prisoner was guilty of committing the act, but was insane at the time. William Jenkins, labourer, said Ue had known the prisoner all his lifetime. They recently worked on the same job for two months. Lewis was in the habit of talking to himself. One day Mr. Vivian, the owner of the hcuses where they worked, called wit- ness and pointed out to him prisoner's strange conduct. Lewis stood on the plank with a hammer held above his head and his face to the ground, remaining in that posi- tion for ten minutes. On August 26th he worked with the prisoner, wno talked to himself most of trie time. He was very. strange and did not appear to know -what; was going on. Cross-examined He never spoke to Mrs. Lewis or anyone else about the strange oon- duct of the prisoner. Lewis acted in a pe- i culiar manner 011 the first occasion three i weeks before the murder. lis Lordship: He had given away to draik' Witness: Yes. Was he drinking durmg the three weeks? did not drink on the job, and never appeared as if he had been on the booze. Mr. Bowen Rowlands questioned William Vivian, Church-street, Llanelly, as to whe- ther or not he had endeavoured to interview- some of the witnesses for the prosecution, and witness said he did send for Mrs. Lewis on Sunday night, but with the idea of giv- ing her some old clothes suitable for wear- ing in court. He did this merely as an act of kindness. The Judge You continue to do acts of kindness provided they are honest, and you will never regret it. David John Harries, James-street, Llan- elly George Ross, plasterer, Swanfield- place, Llanelly, and John EvaJis. contrac- tor, The Forge, Llanelly, spoke of the strange demeanour of the prisoner whilst at work. Edward Thomas, step-brother of the prisoner, said that a few nights before the crime he noticed that the prisoner was very strange in his manner. He kept fumbling his hands and talking incoherently to him- self. He then Hew to the attic, and lay on the tioor while mumbling to himself. On the following morning he found prisoner again behaving very strangely, and picking ■up a bit of bread, which he said was his breakfast, in a large sheet of newspaper. He' did not attribute his conduct on this occasion to drink, although (in cross-exami- nation) he said he could not speak of that with certainty. PRISONER'S MOTHER GIVES EVIDENCE. Prisoner's mother, a homely-looking wo- man, who was so deaf that the interpreter was obliged to shout in her ear, was then called, and said that about six o'clock on the night of the tragedy prisoner called at her house, sat on the settle, and started crying. He seemed very strange in his manner. Later in the night he called at her house again, and his manner WM very wild and excited. He asked her to go down to his house, as he had put a knife into little Gertie. He said he would go and give him- self. up to the police. He looked wildly behind him, and imagined that the police ~e*v. ^ter him. The prisoner's grand- er on his father's side was a very silly woman, and used to go rambling about ?yJ 1uPeoplet^^to watch hlr. She had heard her mother say that her grand- mother had died in an asylum. Cross-examined, the witness aaid the pri- soner was her son by her first hushand. Mr. Lloyd Morgan said he was very sorry to have to put the question. Counsel asked if she had been addicted to drink at one time.. Witness replied, in the affirmative, and added that she had not tasted it for two years. THE WIFE IN THE WITNESS-BOX. Sarah Ann Lewis, wife of the prisoner, who was dressed in deep mourning, was t.hen called, and stated that a few weeks before the crime was committed she noticed that a change came over her husband. He looked very wild. (Prisoner at this stage uncovered his face, and glanced at his wife, this being the second time he had raised his head during the taking of the depositions). Proceeding, the witness said that her husband of late was very dtwvn- hearted, and used to get up in the middle of the night, walk downstairs aimlessly, and go back again. During this period his ap- petite was very poor. When asked whe- ther the prisoner liked the children, witness replied, "Yes, and he was always kind to them," whereupon she burst into tears. In enfes-examination by Mr. Rowlands, the witness said she could not suggest any reason why her husband should have said that he killed the child to annoy her, as there was no unpleasantness between them on the night in question. Prisoner used to drink, but this was the first occasion on which he had ill-treated the children. The. prisoner was about to strike her with a fen- der before attacking the children, but her brother stopped him. Mr. Bowen Rowlands Why didn't you go and give information with a view to pro- tecting these children when you found your husband was ill-trearting them?—No an- swer. Was it because these scenes had very often occurred that you did not take much notice of it?—No. In reply to Mr. Lloyd Morgan, witness said she- recansad a letter ■itxmt tho prisoner 'I from the gaol on September 2, but the coo- tents were not disclosed by order of the judge. PRISONER'S SANITY: EXPERT EVIDENCE. Dr. Richards, Joint Counties Asylum, Carmarthen, said on the previous day he examined prisoner. The physical examina- tion resulted in his opinion that he had been addicted to chronic alcoholic indulgence. He examined him with a view to discover the state of his mind, and then came to the conclusion that he was sane. (Commo- tion.) Mr. Lloyd Morgan put questions to wit- ness with a view of discovering the condi- tion of the prisoner's mind at the time he committed the act. Witness said there was a form of sanity which was known as alcoholic insanity, the characteristics of which were that there was a gradual change in the mental and physical condition of the person suffering. The change in the per- son's condition was due to the action of the poison, which affected the general nutrition of the body. Dr. Richards said alcoholic insanity meant that a man became morose, sullen, lacked vivacity, forgetful ness, in- capacity for doing work, not taking the same interest in his work, ;and loss of self- respect. A man in such a condition might have defasioiis. He might know where be was, or be might be absolutely lost. The most marked point about all forms of in- dulgence was the loss of self-control. Such depressions as spoken of by the prisoner's witneses were consistent with alcoholic in- sanity. It was quite consistent with alco- holic insanity for a man suffering front it to be perfectly sane three days after it. It was quite consistent with alcoholic insanity for a person to commit an act of violence I of which he would not be able to give an intelligent account a few days afterwards. Mr. Bowen Rowlands, before proceeding to cross-examine Dr. Richards, desired to know how far it was possible for an offence of drunkenness to be a defence of murder. His Lordship explained that drunkenness producing delirium tremens to such an ex- tent as to make a man a raving lunatic was one form of active alcoholic insanity, but there was another form of alcoholic in- sanity when a man did not know the dine-r- ence between right and wrong. Mr. Bowen Rowlands respectfully con- tended there was no judgment on the point. His Lordship I thought I knew all about it I ought to, at any rate. Mr. Bowen Rowlands But according to medical men everybody is insane. His Lordship Have you any authority for that? (Laughter). Mr. Bowen Rowlands The only difficulty is how far his opinion goes. His Lordship Don't attempt to say it. (Laughter). Mr. Bowen Rowlands: Do you think, doctor, that when the prisoner was cutting the child's throat that he knew he was do- ing wrong? His Lordship That is a question for the jury. On the judge's advice, Mr. Bowen Row- lands said he would not call rebutting medi- cal evidence. This closed the case for the defence. COUNSEL'S ADDRESS FOR THE PRISONER.' Mr. Lloyd Morgan suggested that a gradual mental change in prisoner's mind had been taking place for some time, and that all of a sudden a condition of mind came over the prisoner so that he was un- able to control himself, and did not know what he was doing whan he committed the crime. Let them not imagine that he was setting up a defence that drunkenness was an excu.se for crime. It was a disease which was brought on by heavy drunkenness. That was an excuse, and there was no doubt that the poor fellow's mind had become unhinged vthrough the excessive use of alcohol. (5>unsel did not suggest that be- cauw prisoner was now sane that he had recovered sufficiently to go back to society and his old associations. There could be 110 question about it that on the day of the tragedy prisoner was suffering from aloo- holic insanity, which culminated in this, as in most cases, in an excess of violence, i.\1R. BOWEN ROWLANDS RIDICULES DEFENCE. Mr. Bowen Rowlands, in his address to the jury, suggested that the defence set up in this case was of a most startling ch a raster, ajid one which up to a. few years ago would not have been allowed in the criminal courts. If the jury accepted a plea of insanity in this case, there was not a drunken reprobate who, after committing a crime, would not come to them and say, "True, I did it, but at the time I did it I was mad drunk." He characterised the doctors' evidence as not worth one-tenth part of the value of the pencil which he had in his hand. JUDGE REPROVES BROTHER-IN- LAW. The Judge, in summing up, said that the only question the jury had to answer was Was this man, the accused person, insane in the eyes of the law, and. therefore, not responsible for taking the life of the child, if he did take it, or was he sane? And, if so, it was conceded that their verdict must be one of guilty, because there was no doubt whatever that he did with his own hand take the. life of this child, of whom he ap- peared to have been passionately fond up to this time. The judge reviewed the evi- dence, and said it seemed a strange thing for a person to have done what the prisoner appeared to have done on this fateful night. At the same time, a man might have allowed himself to lose his self-control and become nothing else than a perfect beast. The jury had to decide whether the prisoner knew either of the quaJity of the act which he was doing when he cut the little girl's neck, or that 00 did not appreciate that he was doing anything wrong in other words, that he was a madman when he committed that rash act. It could not be suggested that Dr. Richards had come there to save the prisoner's life act tho expense of his reputa- tion. Dr. Riahaards only gave his evidence as an expert witness. The judge said that if Williaim James, the brother-in-law of prisoner, had stuck to his post this tragedy would very likely never have happened. It was clearly James's duty to stay. If his evidence was true, after what he saw pri- soner was not fit to be left alone on that night, and if he was in drink, he ought to have been looked after. To leave the pri- soner in the house with a defenoeieaB wo- man, a little boy, the little girl, and his stepdaughter, after what James had seen, seemed to him (the judge) to have been most callous. He considered this case in a sense the most difficult case he had ever had to try. Two verdicts were open to the jury (1) If they found he had not made out the defence of insanity, of course, the verdict was wilful murder; (2) but if they found that be was irresponsible of mind, then the verdict would be guilty of the act charged against him, but that he was in- sane at the time when he did the act. "GUILTY, BV7 INSANE." The jury retired at 5.20. After all ab- sence of twenty minutes they returned a verdict, amid a hushed silence, that "the accused is guilty of the act charged against him, but was insane at the time he did the act." The Judge thereupon ordered accused to be detained until his Majesty's pleasure be further known, and Lewis was literally car- ried down below, still crying.

CHINA MISSIONARY AT SWANSEA.

[No title]

CARMARTHEN ASSIZES.{

COCKETT COUNCIL.

LLANELLY SHIPOWNER'S PURCHASE.…

PONTARDULAIS MURDER CHARGE.

ASPHYXIATED BY GAS.

=--= REV. OSCAR SNELLING.…

-.........:::::::=.::.---—----LATE…

SWANSEA OOUNOIl EMPLOYE'S…

I ! KINGSBRIDGE LADTS FUNERAL.

A COLD ON THE CHEIT.

DID PAUL VISIT WALES?

FIRE AT PORT TALBOT.

SKETTY DRAINAGE.

! SKEWEN LAD S BRILLIANT CAREER.

SWANSEA WHARF EXTENSIONS.

[No title]

i SWANSEA POLICE FORCE QONGEKT.

NEATH COUNTY SCHOOLS. [

|SWANSEA PROPERTY SALE.

I—.= , MORRISTON INSURANCE…

MUMBLES LIFEBOAT'S "CALL."

[No title]

LLANELLY MAN STABBED

SWANSEA HOSPIT. -

I. " !DIE. ON THE SOFA.

I !BRITON FERRY PUBLIC HliI.

ZLGAR'S "THE KINGDOM."

DECEASED WELSH KNIGHTS FAILURE.

[No title]

COST OF SWANSEA STREETS.r