Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

15 articles on this Page

DOLGELLEY GRAMMAR SCHOOL.

News
Cite
Share

DELTA writes to say that Aberystwyth" pebbles can be obtained at Ocks Brothers, Birmingham, and not Dicks," as printed in a letter last week. DOLGELLEY GRAMMAR SCHOOL. "uu,—It is a good sign when the worth of good menis rt" yu;zed..Many have been, of late, theexemplifications we hive had of this some on a more extensive and general scale, otberf on a more private and select one. Various too, have been the lields of labour in which these men have been working. Some we tind at the head of public institu- t.ou.-i. others masters of private institutions, some have been in repute for their literary contributions, others for general usefulness to the public. o Of all who uught to be recognized in this manner, we believe none to be more deserving than gentlemen who devote their time and energies to the advancement of education in our country. Deserving indeed, are those who think it not too much to make a great self-sacrifice for the sake of this. When we find gentlemen—scholars of the first order, men who might apply for, and obtain the best positions anywhere they please almost, settling down as head masters and under-masters of public and private grammar schools in Wales, and that from a genuine desire to contribute something to the advance- ment of higher education in their native country when we find, I say, gentlemen of this stamp staying in this capacity for eight or ten yea.s, more or less, for this purpose, we think that they ought to be deeply admired aud substantially recognized. Dolgelley, I am glad te see, once more evincing proof of its capability to appreciate education, has resolved not to allow Mr. Morris, headmaster of the Grammar School, to depart from nere, without having tirst tliovvn to him by way of a testimonial, a substantial one I trust, how much it valued his untiring exertions with the school, and how deeply they regret his departure. The L'o.gelley boys, and those of the neighbourhood, have received the most advantage and, we believe, the iesult of his labours here will be felt in years to come to the great benefit of all those who have been under Mr. Morris s tuition, the town, aud the vicinity are deepest iu this debt, and on that account their contributions ought to be the most liberal. But it should not be said by any one" none of my children have been in the Grammar School." The question is, how much good the town at large has received? The rule of contribution, we think, should, by no means, be '"to follow suit," but rather an independent sense of interest. JNext to the town in the advantages received, are those young gentlemen who have come to the school and into a profitable contact with Mr. Morris, from different parts of the principality. And I am glad to learn that an opportunity has been given to them to show their appre- ciation also of Mr. Morris's labours. A subscription list has been opened among the pupils themselves. A general feeling of regret prevails in all at the thought S of -lir. Monis from amongst us. His labours have Leen most unwearied, and, at the same time, crowned with consummate success. Several of his pupils from this school have gained Scholarships, and honours in the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. I would especially mention his zeal in the conduct of the evening classes, which were held, during the winter, w^h the South Kensington Science and Art Department. These classes were for the advantage TVi °l sc'100^> 'Dut a'so ,t'le in general. V y, successful candidates in this department, which appeared in your columns last week, speaks volumes of pralse for the master, who, in less than a month, means to bid adieu to his many true friends at Dolgelley. AVe heartily wish him happiness and success wherever HM destiny œa.y ieaJ him.-I am, &e. AMICUS. <, WATER SUPPLY. th SIR,-It may interest your numerous readers to know at the Government have granted an important motion, made by the Marquis of Stafford, relative to the water supply of all urban towns in England and Wales. lhe following are the queries to be answered by each Local Authority of 1871^le name ani* P°Pu^ati°n according to the Census of 1871. •^nf" source from which water is supplied. 1 he arrangements made for the supply, by reser- voirs, Wells (Artesian or otherwise), rivers (if filtered or nor/' or any other arrangements. i^-ttwunt of daily supply and whether or not the SUPP> £ sufficient. ath., whether the supply is constant or not, and the used daily. oth. The ratable value of the district. SH!" T<]le cost ^ie Perpanent supply, if any. th. ILe annual payment of principal and interest on ma*fy borrowed for the works. Tfitv, avei'aSe annual cost of maintaining the works. 7i Jv!" r £ .ke annual amount of water rates and rents, if any. V u L e Parliament or other Authority under 19fV. Tworks have been executed. 12th. What improvements, if any, are considered neces- sary. The return will be an important one, and many towns will appear in an unfavourable light. It is supposed that the object in view is to make the subject of ample supply of pure water to all towns more compulsory upon the Local utkorities. am, &c., Aberystwyth, July 1,5, 18íS. JOHN E. THOMAS. <> BORTH WATER SUPPLY. In times like the present, when the most insigni- ficant member of a Hoard of Guardians or of a committee, hardly dare venture to relieve himself by a cough, or in- an iniloceut and harmless sneeze, without the in e atigable reporter of the Cambrian News, with a pin 0 irouureyrjCably recording the interesting fact, far the f Dev,t an'^ instruction of posterity, it struck me very when reading the report of the proceedings of yscwyth Rural Sanitary Authority in the last 1 ,News, that members should be very caittions i f express an opinion upon any matter broacght e thetn, without having also sufficient data so as to ena e them to understand the said matter clearly. This Was not practised by the members of the i01",1,/ at their last meeting when discussing the • **ater Question. Almost the whole of the dis- cussion was based upon mistaken and erroneous views «>f the case, and since I was not present at the meeting, and therefore eould not defend my view of the nJa ,fr' vJrill make a few observations upon some ?i vr p P°ints and arguments that were used. ,i* I- ryer said that what Mr..Jones now wanted was „n C;tttie should have a priority 0f claim for water ° i e people of Borth, and again he savs, but: \f Tf 6 Watlted his cattle supplied before the people." t '„,„r?TUr ^nas to imply that it was very unreasonable want rr'y cattle to be supplied with water before tne people, as people are of more value than cattle. Very S° ^t doctrine is right I should like to apply it say that it is unreasonable for Mr. Fryer °f pvp_f r 0rse8 a single,feed of oats until he ascertains ttiat every houg0 in Taiiesin and Irertidol are well sup- P 1 YiT V°°d store of oatmeal, as people are of more value than horses. By this way of putting it the ab- surdity ot the "doctrine" becomes apparent, but the ab- surdity_i., precisely the same in both the eases. j have no i the people of Borth and the people of Taliesin a.nd, ?? would greatly rejoice if they could be car- "/porth wioK the matter is this that if the people ? •„ take any water used by my cattle, the law compel them to provide another efficient supply, or to leave the water alone. At the foot of my letter f Sive fch« clause of the act of Parliament which bears upon the matter. UPUU I fr. Fryer is also of opinion that the law would not a help nie. i hope Mr. Fryer's opinion is wrong, and I niost hrmiy believe myself that the law will help me and give me every necessary protection, at least such is my faith in this that I shall have no hesitation whatever in appealing at once to a court of law, which will decide ac- cording to the evidence brought before it, and not upon the random statements of persons interested themselves in the water by hook or by crook. Mr. Fryer also sal< £ 'he stream near Mr. Jones's house was made up of three or four contributory streams, and the one Borth was gOlIlg to cut off was not by any means the most important. But two of my fields depend entirely for every drop of water upon the stream that Borth is going to cut on. In justice to Mr. Fryer I must say, that I have such confidence in his clear-headedness and fair- ness, that 1 beheve, if he had looked carefully into the matter, and made himself master of the true facts of the case, he would certainly have spoken very differently. Captain Jones is reported to have said that the stream near my house dried up in summer, and that I had no Water at all-a very good reason one would have thought for not depriving me of a supply amounting, on the 20th June, to 40,000 gallons daily: but this statement °f Captain J ones is incorrect; the truth of the matter is, that the stream near my house dried up about three times during the last 45 years, or about once in every fifteen years upon an average. All this is very unimportant, but the true facts of the case ought to be got at. A great deal appears to have been made of the fact that the source "i the water is not on my land. Does that in any way affect; my rights to the water? I very innocently thought ™*t the fact of the water running through my land gave nght3> but am no.t,a lawyer, and probably am wlwken- A-ain lt: Yu3 Said t-hat 1 only got the surplus "Whp»n^W" What is the meaning of that I do not know. the !fe ,oes the body. W g0 now that I only get Sou,,?1;13' AU this appears to pe0ple who know the ev«tv j 0 be velT fo".llsl? talk' aa is well-known that throuo-h^ of water xt 1S I)roposed to take flows now T AIY land. SaniCv f be very ?lad, an,7 mepher of the Rural the ur.t-p^ ity w'u' K1I1diy point out in what does open to p ^bleuess of my requirements consist, as I am what is ction and do not wish to do anything but of my reasonable, consistent with the protection in me to cn^ 8' which I consider it would be very wrong people to ^promi3e. I am quite willing for the Borth satisfied mv^v? ^e whole of the water, and to be t/listt provea th.0 ovtiruo^v'^irom their rGS6rv*oir, if life of me I !y all say it will-sufficient. For the but as so rrianv m-See anything more reasonable than that, able, won't gom186 PEOPLE 3aY that 18 highly unreason- lighten me? Tvef0tte have pity on me and try to en- J. E. Thomas (.frcas agreed upon between me and Mr. stated by him, in etiR ineer of the undertakers, and mittee, to be very reP«rt to the Borth Parochial Com- tical terms are also almost the iden- the.-e people must W y Co1- P°ns°nby Cox. Surely May I ask, if "layla riletilin', about the matter. submit to be guided bv Proprietor in the county would represented the Borth o °Pinion of the gentlemen who meeting, on any questio OIllrnittee at the Aberystwyth one of their farms, if no^ "^uching the rights of water on This letter is a great dealt y 41111 expected to do so ? as much as possible, and bv *°na. but I have condensed have not done justice to the° doinS I am afraid that I will agree with me, sir, that tC^1-' but I am sure you quite enough to make people hav ^h water question is itjhas not done so already in a f Water on the brain, if Bryn Owen, Jidy 16th, 1873. Ca8es.— lamj &c., Provided always that in the WILLIAM JONES. powers the undertakers shall do a we,rcise of the said be, and in aL cases where it can k2 'iam ige as can other watering places, drains, and cha^0?6 8hall provide adjoining lands, m P^^ce of any aU(Ji for the use of away or interrupted by them, and shall 8hall be taken pensation to all parties interested for all d lUake full com- 11 (1 byfthem through the exercise of such Nvatnage sustained em THE )lERI?\t;:JÕ:Y)}6fl sessions A-I;D SIR,—Adverting to the report of the MenV.^V, V Quarter Sessions which appeared in the on the 5th July, and m consequence of a statement made by Mr. Charles Edwards and others, respecting the cases of "Pleuro-Pneumonia," winch broke out at Hendwr farm, in the parish of Llandrnlo, as it }va, stated that ■fjrp hid died previous to notice being given by the SJSer M' rea red to the local authority, will_you Smy £ e™?he following statement m your next issue Srth- "formation of the justices who were mis-informed lu reference to the couuuct of tiie owner of the said cuttle. On the 12th day of January, 1^78, I was callt d to Hendwr farm to a cow which was ill. I treated her for chest affection, which I thought at the time was produced by bad ventilation, in consequence of the cow which will contain upwards of twenty head of cattle being' situated on a very low and damp ground, surrounded by large trees, the height of the said cowhouse being scarcely seven feet. The cow recovered, and was sold last April to Mr. Vaughan, Penissa'rllan, Bala. On the 17th of March last I was again called to see another milch cow suffering from similar disorder, and she recovered, and is still at Hendwr. On the morning of the 1st of April last I was requested to examine a dead cow at the same farm. The cow was found dead that morning. From a post mortem examina- tion then made, I found that the cow died from the burst- ing of an abscess in the side (the chest adhered to the ribs), which was produced by external injury. On the 11th of April last I was again called to a cow which suffered from tympomitis in consequence of inflam- mation of the Uterus, after a difficult case of parturition. She had been tapped by the owner three times and eventually died. On the 2nd of May last I was again called to a cow which was suffering from chest affection. I treated her accordingly, and she got comparatively well. On the 21st of May I was again called to examine two calves which were supposed to suffer from a similar com- plaint. I treated them successfully, and they are still at Hendwr. On the 26th of May I was again called to see another calf which was suffering from a similar disorder. In con- sequence of so many cases of the kind having occurred at the same farm, I suggested to the owuer that a professional veterinary surgeon be asked to examine the calf and the cow which was under treatment since the 2nd of May. Mr. Roberts, V.S., Wrexham, came on the 29th day of May, and was not satisfied with the nature of the disease. He declined to state whether they were suffering from any contagious or infectious disease. Being not satisfied myself I advised the owner to report the cattle to Mr. John Roberts, the Inspector for that district, with the view of having the opinion of another veterinary surgeon, aud ascertain the nature of the complaint. According to my advice Mr. Evans, the owner, reported the cattle to the Inspector on the evening of the 21lth of May. and the Local Authority met at Corwen on the 31st of May. The meeting was adjourned until the 4th of June. In the meantime the Local Authority ordered Mr. Simpson, veterinary surgeon, from Ruthin, to inspect the said calf and cow and report. On the let of June, Mr. Simpson, veterinary surgeon, at- tended at Hendwr and examined the said cattle, but on his arrival the calf had just died. We made a post- mortem examination, and Mr. Simpson was of opinion that it had died from pleuro-pneumonia. He was also of opinion that the cow, which was under treatment since the 2nd of May, was suffering from the same disease. On the 4th of June the Local Authority assembled, and acting on the report of Mr. Simpson, ordered that the cow should be destroyed, &c. On the 5th of June I was directed by the Local Authority to examine two milch cows supposed to be suf- fering from the pleuro-pneumonia at the same farm. I examined the cattle and certified that they were suffering from pleuro-pneumonia. On the .7th of June I was again requested by the Local Authority to examine another cow at the same farm, which I pronounced to be suffering from pleuro- pneumonia. On the 12th of June last Mr. Simpson appeared and ex- amined one calf according to the request of the Local Authority, .and certitied that the said calf was suffering from the same disease. From the above statement I hope that the misinformed justices will be convinced that the "Act of Parliament," has been strictly carried out by the owner of the said cattle, and that it was incorrect that five cattle had died previous to notice being given by Mr. Evans. I beg to state in reference to a suggestion made by Mr. Breese in reference to the value put on the cattle, that the Corwen Local Authority have appointed Mr. John Davies, butcher and cattle dealer, Corwen (who has extensive practice), to value the cattle, and I am of opinion that the value put on the same was a; fair market value, and in reference to Mr. Breese's remarks made about Brynmelyn cattle, I beg to state that I condemned all the cattle slaughtered there with one excep- tion, and I think it is absurd to compare the Hendwr cattle with the Brynmelyn, as there was no comparison in the value of the different cattle.—I am, &c., T. W., M.R.C.V.S., L. and E.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. -----........-.....""-""--....

----------CARMARTHENSHIRE…

CARDIGANSHIRE SU.VLMBR ASSIZES.

[No title]

HARLECH FESTIVAL.

-BABMOUTH.I

.FFESTINIOG-

DAROWEN.

FARMERS' COLUMN.

THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SHOW.

MESSRS. WEBBS' STAND AT THE…

MARKET REPORTS. -"'.I"'.'\'''''''''''''''-'''"\...'"'\..-'''-""V'\..''\,...'''''''''''''-",-.......r\.../-\..'''\.."""-""---,,,-,/,,",-,",-''''''''''''"''-

__Trade Intelligence.

CORRESPONDENCE.