Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

10 articles on this Page

ABERYSTWYTH.

News
Cite
Share

ABERYSTWYTH. BOARD OF GUARDIANS.—The only business at the meet- ing of the guardians on Monday last was the usual relief of the poor, which was attended to by the vice-chairman, Mr W. Jones, Bryn-Owen, and other guardians. MARKET.—There was an average attendance at this market on Monday last, when the prices were as: follows: Wheat, 6s. 6cL to 7s. 3d.; barley, 4s. to 5s.; oats, 3s. t-j 4s., wool, 9s. par llIb.; geese, 4s. to 5s. each turkeys, 5s. each fowls, 2s. 6d. to 3s. per coixkle ducks, 3s. 6d. to 4s, per couple. PETTY SESSIONS, WEDNESDAY.—Before the Mayor (J. Matthews, Esq.), and J. Davies, Esq. Refusing to admit a PoUce-Comtdole and Permitting .DrunL,enrness.-Artbur Ashley, of the Unicorn Inn, was charged by Sergeant Evans with permitting drurikenness in his house on the night of the 9th instant.—Sergeant Evans stated that he was passing the defendant's house on Sunday morning, about one o'clock, and heard a noise in the house as if persons were drinking. Witness knocked at the door b«t no one came to open it.; he then went to the kitchen window, but the parties in the house -still re- fused to open the door the sergeant directed a constable to watch the houge.-P.C. D. Thomas stated that'he was ordered'ty Serjeant Evans to watch thedefendant's house on Sunday morning last, if possible to ascertain what time the men who were drinking in the house left. Witness kept a look-out from one o'clock to two o'clock, at which time hreemen and one woman came out of the house; two of he men were dmnk.-Defeucl&iit, whose-,wife appeared for him, was tined 10s., including costs. Drunkenness.—David Jones, Bridge-street, was charged with being drunk on the night of Friday, the 10th instant. -P.C. D. Thomas stated that he saw defendant very drunk in Alfred-place on Friday night; the officer, think- ing to advise defendant for 'the best, requested him to walk close to the footpath, as there was a drain open in the street. Defendant.became ;y¡ery abusive and used bad language to the offioer.—Defendant was finocl 2s. 6d., asd 4s. 6d. costs. Juvenile Tltief.-Thornas Ridhard Davies, a boy who has several times been before their-worships,-was brought up for stealing articles from different shops.—The magis- trates once more let off this young offender with a repri- mand, and a caution that if he agàiL. appeared before them .he would be sent to Cardigan gaol. -COUNTY COURT, TUESDAY .CAST.—Before A. J. Johnes, Esq., Judge. There were a. large number of eases entered for this -court, the majority of which were simple debt, and being "undisputed were disposed of by Mr Jenkins, the Registrar. The only cases ofany interest were the following Claim againet the Shareholders of Dolclettwr Al-ine.- Thomas JOMS v. Chadwick and, otliers.-This was an action brought 'by the plaintiff, who is a miner, to recover from the shas-eholdeis of the Dolclettwr mines 98 due for work ,done at the mine. Mr Hugh Hughes for the plaintiff and Mr Incliffe, Liverpool for the defendant, Chadwick, who denied his responsibility as a shareholder «f the mine.— Robert Janes-said I am a miner, and father of the plaintiff. Plaintiff has been working at Dofelettwr mine.—Captain Williams said,: I am agent of the Dolclettwr mine. Plain- tiff was employed as a miner in DosLclettwr mine. There was about £ 8 due to plaintiff as .wages.—His Honour; Why is the plaintiff not present.—Robert Jones: He is not well.-By His Honour,: I caniiot say what is due to -him.-His Honour said it was -no use going on with the -case until further evidence was forthcoming. Another Claim.—David Williams, Tre'rddol, v. Chad- -wick- and othfi-s.-The plaintiff, a miner, also claimed from the defendants £20 7s. 6d., due to him for work done. Mr .Hugh Hughes for the the plaintiff; and Mr Incliffe for the ■defendant, Chad wick.—David Williams said he was a .miner a fid had been working at Dolclettwr mine, and .220 7s. M. was at present due to him as wages. .Plaintiff put in a paper containing a statement of his account. He was engaged at 2s. 6d. per day, and the account was for 254 day. -Captain Williams was called, and stated that he copied the list of accounts (produced) from the books of the mine.—Mr Incliffe Where are the books. -(,'aptaii William: At the mine. Not being able -to get money to pay the men I went to Liverpool to see -the shareholders, I saw the secretary's books and copied the names of the shareholders, and amongst them I found the name of Mr Chadwick.—Mr Incliffe: It does not follow that Mr Chadwick is a shareholder through his Jiame being on the book.—Captain Williams: Mr Chad- wick is a shareholder in the mine to the amount of one hundred pounds.—Mr Hugh Hughes said he had un- fortunately lost a letter which he had received from Mr Chadwick with reference this matter.—His Honour said lie should adjourn the whole of the cases, which were five in number, in order to give the plaintiffs time to bring evidence as to partnership. ° Claim for Attendance at the Registration Court.—E. W. Jones v. J. J. Atwood-The plaintiff in this case is a builder living at Borth the claim was to recover 7s. ex- penses incurred through attending the Registration Court held in Aberystwyth October 9th.—Mr Hughes, who ap- peared for Mr Atwood, said he did not think it was a case with which his Honour could deal. The plaintiff at- tended the Registration Court in support of his vote, -which was objected to.—His Honour What are the pro- visions with reference to the Revising Barrister's Court? -Mr Hughes The Revising Barrister has the power to enforce.—His Honour: Decidedly so. Was Mr Atwood the objector ?-Mr Hughes Yes.—His Honour thought it would be best to adjourn the case until the next court. Claim against the High Bailifffor Neglect OfDuty. -John Williams v. Robert Edwards.-The plaintiff in this action obtained a distress warrant against a person named Rd. Jones in August, 1868. The warrant was entrusted to one of the sub-bailiffs of the Court .for execution, but the bailiff neglected to carry out the warrant.—The present action was brought against the high bailiff for neglecting to carry out the warrant. -Mr Crealock for the plaintiff; Mr Hugh Hughes for defendant, who denied the negli- gence.—John Williams said I am the plaintiff in this action. I was also plaintiff in an action against Richard Jones in August, 1868, and obtained a warrant against Jones, which I delivered to the bailiff, William Davies, for execution. The day I delivered the warrant to the 'bailiff he was going to an auction he said he would exe- cute the warrant as soon as the auction was over. The place where the levy was to be made was about a mile from the place of the auction. I begged of Davies to execute the warrant that evening, or else I should not get the money. I saw Davies the Saturday night after the auction; he said everything was perfectly right, as he had levied on Jones's cow. I also saw Davies on the follow- ing Monday, when he again said all was right, and that he was going to Richard Jones's again on the Tuesday. Davies afterwards went to Jones's, but the cow was gone. Davies came to me and said he could not find the cow. The cow was worth about 29. -Cross-examined by Mr Hughes I went to see Mr Edwards, the defendant, and he said Davies must pay the money.John Williams, Tregaron, said he remembered a conversation taking place between the plaintiff and William Davies, either on the 4th or 5th of August. Davies was enquiring after a cow belonging to Richard Jones, which Davies said he had levied upon. Davies asked plaintiff to assist him in look- ing for the cow at Tregaron fair. Witness made the re- mark that the cow might have been sold. Davies replied he did not care, as he had levied on the cow many times before, and the cow was his.—Thomas Edwards said he met the bailiff, William Davies, in the beginning of August. Davies said he had levied on Richard Jones's cow for John Williams, the plaintiff, but the cow had escaped, and he should like to know where the cow was gone.—Cross-examined Davies asked witness where he should meet with the cow.—Elizabeth Jones said she re- membered the plaintiff delivering a warrant to the bailiff, William Davies, who said he would execute the warrant directly the auction was Over. -Cross-examined: Witness was a sister to the plaintiff; she saw the warrant delivered into the hands of the bailiff; she was within a very few yards of them at the time.—Mr Hughes said he should call the bailiff, who had quite a different story. He did say that he had executed the war- rant, but he had never done so.—William Davies, the bailiff, said he met the plaintiff, who stated that he wanted a warrant executed on Richard Jones and Thomas Jones. Witness told plaintiff to go and get the warrants at the office, and stated that he or another officer would execute the warrants. Witness went with Wm. Evans, another officer, to the house of the plaintiff on the dav appointed and found that plaintiff had obtained the two warrants' Plaintiif was not in, and witness told plaintiff's mother that they had other business, and it would be too late to execute the warrants that day. Witness and Evans after- wards saw plaintiff, and asked him why he had taken the warrants away, as if he had not done so they could have executed them. Plaintiff replied that he had waited a very long time for them. Witness stated to plaintiff that they had intended to execute the warrants that night if they had received them, but they could do no good in seizing cattle after night. He believed the first time he went to plaintiff's was on a Wednesday. On the following Saturday witness went to Richard Jones's to look for the CajY J plaintiff what colour the cow was, and he replied he did not know. Witness went to Richard Jones's to look for a cow. Saw several cows in a field, but did not know which was Richard Jones's, and it was of no use asking them which it was. In consequence of not being able to find which was Richard Jones's cow he re- turned. No cow was taken that day. The Wednesday following witness and William Williams went to Richard J ones s in order again to search for the cow. They first went to the house °f the plaintiff; plaintiff's mother said they had waitt.l too long, and the cow had gone to the fair that morning Kiev then went aftef the cow, if possible to lay hold of her; searched through the fair many times, but failed to find her anvwW, then saw the plaintiff, J^hnWiUiams, wh^aid the cow Tlr s r 1 oi .Liiachod. Witness 1 ?!Ver miA J iwelevi^ her on Saturday • we will find her and take her agai,.» The reason witness said he had levied upon her was Ucause Richard Jones had himself gone away to the iron w -rks, that the cow's going to Mrs Jones's, of Llachod, vassome scheme of Richard Jones's mother, who knew that warrant was out. The reason he said he had levied upon the cow was in order to alarm the people, thinking they woild give the cow up. A few days after the fair witness ana three other officers went to Pontrhydfendigaid, some ne having stated that the cow was there. They went an took a cow, but afterwards found that it was not Richard Jones's cow. Witness went up to plaintiff's the first day he was disengaged.—Cross-examined by Mr Crealock: It was seven o clock when I left Mrs Jones's house on the day of the sale. Plaintiff never told me that he would come and point the cow out to me. I made a return to the warrant, no effects. I levied upon some cow on the warrant but that cow was not the proper cow. The place where I levied was out of this district -Mr Crealock called a witness named Mrs Jones, who stated that the sale at her farm took place between three and four o'clock. She could not say how long the witness, William Davies, remained there after the sale was over.- Mr Crealock thought the point was, which evidence was to be believed.—Mr Hughes thought it was very hard JJpon Mr Edwards to suffer on account of his subordi- BY ■ .¡. nates.—His Honour was of opinions %h at the bailiffs had f done their best, and the judgment would be for de- fendant.

Correspondence.I

WORKMEN'S INTERNATIONAL EXHIBITION,…

MISSIONS IN FOREIGN PARTS.

Advertising

Tipyn o Bob Peth.

[No title]

A ,-TH® WELSH FASTING GIRL.

1--Agricultural.

[No title]