Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

7 articles on this Page

Bishop and His Rector

News
Cite
Share

Bishop and His Rector COMPLAINTS AGAINST A NORTH WALES INCUMBENT. Se Refutes a Charge of Neglect of Clerical Duty, and the Bishop Caves In. Of late the relations between the Bishop of St. Asaph and the Rev. Walter Evans, rector of Castle Caereinion, have been somewhat strained, and resulted in a series of letters, which have been sent us for publication. On April 11 of this year the bishop, through his archdeacon (the Ven. D. R. Thomas, rector of Llaxidrinio), wrote to the Rev. Walter Evans stating that be had received 11 many com- plaints about the state of things in the parish of Castle Caereinion, and that his lordship had observed that l; on the two, if not on the three, last confirmations there had been no can- didates from that parish. His lordship then requested the rector to state whether the ser- vice had been fully and regularly performed on Sundays and week days." The Rev. Walter Evans replied direct to the bishop, stating that he was utterly unconscious of having in any way neglected or failed to per- form his duties as rector of his parish, or having given any just and reasonable cause for com- plaint to any of his parishioners," and demand- ing a full statement of the complaints made against him, and of the sources from which they had emanated." The receipt of the letter was acknowledged on April 17 by a Mr. Williams," writing on behalf of the bishop, and the Rev. Walter Evans was directed to send his answer to the arch- deacon." On April 18 Mr. Evans wrote again to the bishop, informing his lordship that he reserved to himself the right of judging as to the course it would be best for him to adopt," and enclosing a copy of a letter he addressed to the archdeacon on April 16, in which Mr. Evans absolutely declined to dis- cuss with him (the archdeacon) any of the sub- jects referred to in the latter's letter of April 11. In the same letter Mr. Evans again insists on getting a full statement'' of the complaints made to the bishop. On April 22 the rector was written to by the bishop's secretary (Mr. J. P. Lewis), and re- quested to state whether the services had been fully and regularly performed" at Castle Caereinion on Sundays and week days. In his reply, dated April 27, the rector re- ferred the bishop's secretary to his letters t6 lus lordship of April 16 and 18 respectively, sta- ting it was "his intention to address a fur- ther communication" to the bishop. Mr. Lewis (the secretary) wrote again on May 1 reminding Mr. Evans that he had not answered the question put him in his former letter. Mr. Evans replied the next day, stating, inter alia :— As I am most anxious to avoid even the slightest appearance of want of cour- tesy to you, I enclose copies of both my letters to the bishop, which obviously have not been shown to you. You will observe that the first of them contains a distinct and specific answer to the question you have been instructed to put to me, since I say in it that I am utterly unconscious of having in any way neglected or failed to perform my duties as rector of this parish.' I think I might after this have been spared three repetitions of an offensive ques- tion. As to the other allegations contained in Archdeacon Thomas's letter, I intend to deal with them in a separate communication ad- dressed to his lordship." Mr. Lewis wrote another letter to the effect that bis lordship said he had not received" the further communication which Mr. Evans stated it was his intention to send. To this letter Mr. Evans made no reply, but on May 3 he directed a long letter to the bishop, which ran as follows The Rectory, Castle Caereinion, Welshpool, May 3, 1895. My Lord,—In my reply to your lordship's secretary, dated April 27,1 expressed my inten- tion to address a further communication to you. To this intention I now give effect. You are aware that this is not the first time for you to show your distrust of me, since on a former occasion your conduct has been such as to pre- judice me seriously in the eyes of my parishioners and of others who could not fail to be aware of what you did. I now come to the immediate object I have in Tiew in writing this letter. After a lapse of two years, during which I have, as I have always done, faithfully and religiously performed all my duties as rector of this parish, you have thought fit to make another wanton and unjusti- fiable attack on me. You have instructed your archdeacon to write to me a letter containing three distinct and most offensive allegations, or, as I may, perhaps, more properly describe them, charges. Tou say— 1. That you have received "many complaints." With regard to these I have asked you in respectful terms to tell me what they are, and who made them. This you have declined to do, and I am still in utter ignorance of their nature and origin. Whatever may have been the sources from which they have emanated, I may call your lordship's attention to the very unusual and not altogether honourable conduct of those who obtain information of a prejudicial nature without giving ample opportunity for vindicating himself to the person whose character is injuriously assailed. Yau say, through your archdeacon, that you have received many complaints." Your second allegation is that— 2. You have observed that on the two, if not the three, last confirmations there have been no candidates from Castle Caereinion." In making this statement you have committed yourself to something tangible. This statement is simply untrue, and it was in your power, before making it, to have known that it was untrue, since all the candidates presented in 1891 and 1893 were furnished with cards of the usual description, signed by me, and collected by your officials in the church at Welshpool. I personally placed in your own hands a list of those confirmed in 1891, and sent by the hands of the vicar of Welshpool a similar list in 1893, because, though I went with the candidates to Welshpool, I was unable to attend the actual confirmation, owing to the fact that I bad to leave by train to attend the funeral of my brother. I explained this by letter to the vicar of Welshpool, and asked him to state the causq of my absence to the proper authori- ties, which I have no doubt he did. On the 14th of April, 1891, I presented six candidates of the respective ages of 29, 18, 14, 13, 19, and 14, and with regard to this confirmation I venture to re-call to your lordship's memory a conversa- tion which took place between us in the church- yard of Castle Caereinon, on the occasion of your brief and only visit to this parish, shortly after I came into residence. I told yon-you were then in the middle of your confirmation tour-tbat I feared I should not be able to pre- sent many candidates. Your reply was, "Oh, never mind." or some such hasty expression- don't trouble yourself," or one or two will do." On the 18th of April, 1893, 1 presented seven candidates of the respective ages of 16, 14, 13, 16, 15, 14, and 13, and, with regard to the current year, the fact that I have not yet presented any is due to your own defective arrangements. You in the first instance fixed upon a Sunday for the confirmation at Welsh- pool, and as it would, of course, be impossible for me to take any candidates there, I made up my mind to take them to Llanfair, which, by the way, is nearer and more convenient for us than Welshpool. My lord, you must forgive me for saying that your reputation as an accurate statistician, already somewhat tarnished, is not likely to be re-burnished by all this. I have, my lord, dealt at some length with, and disposed of, the three charges contained or implied in the archdeacon's letter, and it now becomes my turn to complain. My charges shall be a little more specific than yours have been. I complain in the first place— 1. Of your action in respect of the trust money belonging to the trustees of Castle Caereinion School, which, at your own suggestion, you undertook to recover, and both verbally and in writing, promised to hand over to the proper custodians of it, which promise you deliberately broke by placing it in other hands, without as much as communicating to me your intention to do so, thereby implying a want either of capacity or integrity on my part, and subjecting me to a direct insult, to which I called your attention at the time it was made. You took this course in defiance of the most distinct warnings that your conduct would tend to prejudice me seriously in the eyes of my parishioners, and to destroy my influence among- them, even before I could gain their confidence, being, as I was at the time, a complete stranger amongst them. I complain in the second place— 2. Of what you have recently done. You have instructed your archdeacon and other offici alii to make charges against me, reflecting on my position as a clergyman, all of which YOll ought to have knowR, and some of which you must have known, to be entirely devoid of foundation. If, as regards your charge as to the absence of candidates you plead ignorance of the facts, it must be ignorance of that nature which lawyers describe as crassa ignorantia. I complain in the third place— 3. Of your having recklessly told the arch- deacon that you have received many complaints of my conduct, and of your refusal to comply with my proper and legitimate request that you should indicate the nature of these complaints, which could only have been of such a nature as to reflect upon my character as a clergyman, otherwise your allusion to them would be only a piece of sheer impertinence in both the etymological and the ordinary sense of the word. I need hardly say that to speak of com- plaints without either giving the name of your informant or specifying their nature is utterly nnworthy of a public official. Fortunately for the credit of public life such conduct is rare, if not unknown, in this country. I must lay the case fully before the public, and obtain from it that justice which I shall have unsuccessfully tried to obtain from your lordship. I may add that were I disposed to view your lordship's conduct to me and others of my brother clergy since your arrival in this diocese as fairly representing episcopal rule, and your methods of controversy as a model of Church defence, I should look upon the present adminis- tration of the Church as wholly indefensible, and the cause of Church Defence in Wales as absolutely hopeless. You are credited by many, not only of the assailants of the Church, but also of her defenders, with having done more to promote and accelerate Disestablishment in six years than forty years of Liberationist work could have done. I freely share in that opinion, and am fully prepared, if challenged, to produce facts in justification of it. My lord, your conduet is inexplicable to me. During forty years of ministerial life I have, according to my light and ability, done my best in the parish, in the pulpit, and in the press to serve the best interests of the Church. I have invariably enjoyed the respect and confidence of my ecclesiastical superiors, and of my brother clergy, and have never found it difficult to deal or co-operate with them. I have done my best, consistently with self-respect, to obey you as my bishop during the last five years, and in my declining days I had every right to look to you for sympathy and encouragement. You have, however, thought differently, and have chosen to wrong and harass me, and to treat me not only with discourtesy, but with suspicion and distrust, for which I challenge you to produce the slightest cause or justification. Such con- duct as this, my lord, is calculated not only to bring the Episcopate and the Church, but religion itself, into disiepute.—I am, my lord, your obedient servant, WALTER EVANS. The Lord Bishop of St. Asaph. After some further correspondence the bishop's secretary wrote to the rector stating that the bishop accepted his assurance that the services at Castle Caereinion Church had been regularly and fully performed."

FOR SAILORS' FRIENDS.

[No title]

ICardiff Representation.

Advertising

Advertising

ICardiff Representation.