Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Family Notices

" Times" on Football.

Advertising

Some Suggestions for May-Day…

CATERING FOR CARDiFFIANS.

-?--" DYFED'S " ODE.

THE MAY HEAVENS.

[No title]

!" MR. CARR IS RIGHT."

A WELSH INDIAN CHIEF.

UNDERMANNING OF SHIPS.

DEAN VAUGHAN.

Advertising

The Legend of the Tree, >

MITCHELL V. PRiCE.

News
Cite
Share

MITCHELL V. PRiCE. A Letter from the Defendanfl Uncle. TO THE IDfTOR OF THE EVENING EXPRESS. Sir,—From a oopy of a paper re- ceived by me yesterday (Sunday) morning I find that my name lwJ been most unjustifiably and unwarrantably mixed up in a. recent breach of promise caae tried on Friday in the Court, of the Under Sheriff of London, in which I am alleged to have acted in a disgraceful, shameful, and cruel manner by sending a false telegram. As these statements are calculated to do me infinite. ? harm, I must ask you, in justice to me, t<t publish the following statements in as publiou a manner as yo« have printed the report of the proceedings at the trial. t I am an uncle of the defendant^ and I knew thai he had been1 engaged to be married, and that" his engagement had been broken off. That lit all I knew of the matter. I never knew tha* any legal or other proceedings were in progTHS* or "had been commenced against him by tha plaintiff. I never received any letter from tha' i plantiff. I never wrote, assisted to write, sent,' or knew anything about the telegTam which it is alleged was received in answer to a letter writter. to me by the plaintiff, and I nevee received any letter in reply from the plaintiil. My name appears to have been mi sed up, with that of an uncle of the defendant who is no relation of mine, and who lives in Gla- morganshire, where I neither live nor own land, though whether the defendant nas equally taken his name in vain as well as mine 1 di not know. though it would appear from th( following letter that he has. I 'ippend exuracrt from a letter received y&sterdav mn.n- ing Iron the defendant, without any usmmum- 0I1:1 j(Æ from me:- ou have, doubtlessly, either seen 01 iMSArdJ ..f the lamentable ending of my trip to CaiTOh The action has been on for some time, but I had limped it would have never come IMJ co-vilt. so I never mentioned it to you, but as they w mlrl not settle under Li,000 •.h«-re w nothing for it. Unfortunately, ? nad • men- tioned your name in some of my correspondence* with the plaintiff, and she assumed that the telegram which I sent had been sent by you, hence there is some confusion in the newspaper reports. I said it had been sent by Edwin Price, and they have, I much regret, mixed up the two uncles. It is most difficult to explain by letter, but I hope soon to see vov and give you a personal explanation. I trust you will insert this in a, prominent place in your next issue.—I am, &c., ROWEL J. J. PRICE. Greensted Hall, Ongar, 5, Crown Office-row, Temple, E.C. -?--?-? -?_

CARDIFF'S NEW POST-OFFICE*

WELSH SPRING ASSIZES,

Advertising