Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

24 articles on this Page

LLEDROD.

TRE'RDDOL.

TREGARON.

News
Cite
Share

TREGARON. SPECIAL PETTY SESSIONS-TUFSDAY, OCT. 3BD, before Major Phelp and the Rev O. Davies, M.A. ALLEGED SHEEP STEALING. Morgan Lloyd, wine and spirit merchant, Car- narvon, and tenant of Brynhope Farm, Caron-uwch- '^Ilawdd, charged Thomas Lloyd, his brother-in-law, and late of Brynhope, with having feloniously stolen and taken away 80 sheep from Brynhope Jrarm, his alleged property. Mr J. W. Thomas, solicitor, Aberystwyth, and Mr Edgar Atwood, of the firm of Messrs Atwood and Sons, Aberystwyth, appeared for the defence. Morgan Lloyd said he resided at Carnarvon, and n as a wine and spirit merchant, up to September last "c bad occupied Brynhope farm. Previous to June, 1876, the defendant, Thomas Lloyd, was the An execution was put in for rent for three half years. There was a sale under distress, which Realised .£120, with which defendant paid off the reutj after which he sold everything on the place, excepting the household furniture. He. witness, Bought at the sale cattle to the amount of £83. After 'the sale he bought 19 sheep from defendant, for which he paid £ 15 4s. He sent a cheque for that amount to his sister, Mrs Morgan, Pontrhydfen- digaid, to be handed over to the defendant. The Bheep that he bought were the remainder of his stock, He could not say whether defendant had deceived the cheque. He had no receipt. De- ^eadant was his brother-in-law. On Saturday last received a telegram to the effect that 80 sheep **d been taken from the field. They were now in ?field at the back of the Talbot Hotel. They were *i8 sheep. Cross-examined by Mr Atwood: He was not Present at the sale himself, all that he had just Stated was what he had heard. Mr Atwood argued that prosecutor had no case, all that had been stated was merely hearsay Re-examined:: He could not say what number of "heep defendant had in 1876. He would not swear that he bad not 50 or 60. There was none of the '19 sheep among the ones taken. He took the farm for the sake of defendant's children. He was not aware that defendant left any sheep on the farm or the mountain. Perhaps the nineteen sheep were "'GrA the mountain. He had no receipt for the money #aid to defendant. Defendant was paid through sister. He could net say when the cheque was Paid. Perhaps it was sent on the 16th June, and payable to Mrs Morgan, and was drawn at Mr ^illiams'bank at Carnarvon. He was not sure "Whether he paid for the sheep in the cheque. The cheque was for the whole amount which he bought ■5* the sale. He did not bring his sister to court. ^■e did not ihink it was necessary. He once the sheep for sale, and immediately after received a letter from defendant stating that he *d left the sheep on the farm for the benefit of his children. He destroyed the letter. All the sheep marked with M. LI. He would not swear all the sheep taken were marked. He 21 sheep from a Mr Charles Jones Morgan said he lived at Llwyngog, 2fWnws. He was a small farmer. He had heard on j*aturday iastthat sheep had been been taken from I ty'ihope farm. He went and found the sheep, 80 Dumber, at Tregaron, in the keeping of Thomas .°yd, the defendant. He did not see them taken He saw thera early Saturday morning in the and on passing it the next time he found the be»,p Were gone. He knew no more than that. ■ not*n £ to do with Brynhope farm. Prose- ..JW'Or was his uncle. In his estimate they were w°Uh £ 70. Cross-examined by Mr Atwood: He would swear #t all the sheep now at at Tregaron were bought -3 Pr°secutor, most of them from Charles Pencefn. He remembered the sale at Bryn- 9P« in 1876. No sheep were sold by auction that any were it would have been after the "We by auction. That closed the prosecution. s fA^0.0^ addressed the bench at some length, 'a? ? defence was that sheep and other tock were left on the farm for the maintenance of is (defendant s) children. He also contended that is client did not act as a thief. No thief would go ,:an broad open daylight, and after stealing 80 sheep **«« tftem down to a town and lodge them in a field ^ere. Why did not defendant bring his sister to Sj^rt, as all the business had been transacted by her. fraction that day did not look as if he had taken brother-in-law « children out of charity and kept *he«n. There must have been some of defendant's on the farm. He would close his address 'n!?, those remarks.. xhfe bench retired for consultion, and on return- Major Phelp said that they dismissed the case r? a larceny, the sheep to be restored to com- *irDam- Atwood said the case would not end there, but would be entered for the value of the wp- ^4RD OF GUARDIANS, TUESDAY, OCT. 8TH. Present Mr R. J. Davies in the chair; the Rev O ^avieg, M.A.; Messrs John Rowlands, Bettws j1*'} J. D. Williams; W. Jones, Caron Upper; Jones, Doethie Camddwr; — Williams, Ogoyan- E. Williams, Gwnws Lower, R. Jones, r>WJ?Ws Upper; W. Jones, Llanbadarn Odwyn; j* Davies, Llangeithe; Isaac Griffiths, Lledrod « £ *•> A. Jenkins, NantcwnUe; David Williams, and R. Rowlands, medical officer. Out-door relief administered during the to £ 0r»night: per Mr James Roberts, £ 21 ios. 6d. ^40paupers; per Mr Stephen Thomas, j» *!• 7R to 247 paupers. for Provision*.—A- committee was ^aio to B° through the list of tenders for pro- A BOARD.—A meeting of the highway *«re 7as ^eld, Mr R. J. Davies in the chair, there 50 P'esent the Rev O. Davies, M.A., and the <tri, members of the board. The accounts for the %ther LVr6re exami ned and pas»ed. There was no or wisiocM transacted.

LLANGADOCK.

LAMPETER.

LLANBADARN FAWR,

LLANYCHAIARN.

TOWYN.

WRECK OF THE " PROVIDENCE."

HUNTING APPOINTMENTS.

[No title]

[No title]

THE NATIONAL SCHOOLS.

CRICKET.

APPOINTMENT OF INSPECTOR OF…

A SAGACIOUS DBXVES.

LLANILAR.

PONTERWYD.

A QUESTION. «

ON THE RAIL TO ROME.

[No title]

Family Notices

[No title]

- TJIE NATIONAL SHEEP DOG…