Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

11 articles on this Page

-------GLAMORGAN PEDIGREES.

Detailed Lists, Results and Guides
Cite
Share

GLAMORGAN PEDIGREES. DK BBIGHY AND DE BALEIGH 0:1 WBBSTCHESTBR CASTLE. The family of De Reigny is of Devonshire origin and the elder branches remained in that county, in Somerset, and in Wilts, for several generations, and possessed considerable landed property. John de Reigny was of Eggesford and Culm-Reigny, otherwise Culm-Sackville, 27 H. III. They held lands in Bideford of the Honour of Gloucester, and their name was long preserved in Brixton-Reigny, Ansty-Heigny, and Esse-Reigny. They a!so held lands in the Honour of Totnes, in Melcomb, at Rowell co. Wilts, and at Sheerston co. Somerset. Anne Reigny the heiress and tenth recorded possessor of Eggesford, md. Charles Coplestone of Bicklow the co-heiress of Reigny of Briiton, md. about 4 Ed. I., Crubb, Prouy, Luscomb, Horey, and Wanton. The heiress of the Wilts and Somerset branch married before the reign of R. II. Sir John Paulett of Goathnrst, and the family were allied to Dennis, Sally, and De Londres, all connected more or less closely with Glamorgan. The armorial bearings appear to have been—" Gules, a pair of wings conjoined in lure, ermine.' The connection of the de Reigny family with the Honour of Gloucester is sufficient to account for their occasional pre. sence, and to render probable the settlement of some of the name in Glamorgan, but the precise genealogical point of separation has not been preserved. Sir Milo de Reigny ap. pears, probably in the reign of Henry III., as Lord of Wrinston or Wrenchester Castle in Wenvoe, of Michaelston- Ie. Pit, Llantwit, and Llancarvan. Sir Milo left a daughter and heir. Ela, who md. Simon de Raleigh, whose pedigree it will be convenient to trace. The Raleigh* were of Raleigh by Barnstaple, co Devon, and having been retainers of the Earls Mareschal they bore in con. sequence, Gules, a bend fusilly Argent," superseding their earlier coat of six cross crosslets. I.—HUGH de Raleigh of Raleigh, temp H. II. received Net- tlecombe from John Fitz Gilbert, Marshall of England. He bestowed it upon II.—WABINE de Raleigh, his nephew, and father of—1, Ralph, living 17 John, who forfeited his lands. 2, Warine. 3, G-ervaise. 4, Wimond, ancestor of Sir Walter Raleigh. III.—WARINE de Raleigh of Nettlecombe, was father of IV.—WABINE de Raleigh of Nettlecombe, 1242, who md. Margaret a deed signed by whom, is witnessed by her Ion Sir Warine, and by William St. Quintin, and Walter St. Q., Archdeacon of .Taunton. They had—1, Warine. 2, Simon. V.—Sir WABIXE de Raleigh of Nettlecombe, 42 H. III., md. Hawise, and was father of—1, Reginald of Nettlecombe, ob. s.p. 2, Maud, md.SirMattbew de Furneaux, connected with tbe Urn. frevilles of Penmark. 3, Sarah, md. Richard de Londres, no doubt a connexion of the Ogmore family, and of that Sir Thomas de Londres, who with the heirs ot Roger de Reigny held 3 fees in Bideford of the Honour of Gloucester. V. 2.—SIMOJT de Raleigh, to whom, as the male heir, Nettlecombe appears to have descended. He seems to have lived chiefly at Wrenchester Castle. He died before 16 Ed. I., having md. Ela, dau. and heir of Sir Milo de Reigny, of Wrenchester Castle. She remarried Sir Henry de Gamages. Simon and Ela had- VI.—SirSiMOU de Raleigh ofNettlecombe and Wrenchester, where he resided, and who 21 Ed. I., purchased for 120 marks from Henry de Gamages, the cusody of the Cantred of Dinas Powis, formerly belonging to Sir Milo de Reigny. Gamages was of course tenant by the courtesy, during Elas life. Sir Simon, 31 Ed. I., was Custos of Glamorgan, in which office he died. He married Joan, sister and heir of Lawrence de Tort of Owknolle. She wa3 a widow, 9, E. II. They had—1, John. 2, Simon de Raleigh, who had the Welsh estates and lands of his mother in Somerset, all which, however, passed to his nephew, John. He died 21 Ed. II. VII.—JOHIT de Raleigh or Ralegh of Nettlecombe. He and his brother Simon rebelled with Thomas of Lancaster, and were fined severally £100 and d640, which fines were re- mitted 1 Ed. III. He md. Margaret, d. and co-heir of Richard Bret. She survived her husband. They had-l, John. 2, Andrew, B.p. 3, Warine, s,p. VIII.—Sir JOHN de Raleigh of Nettlecombe and Wren. chester, having inherited the Welsh estates from his uncle. Knight of the Shire for Somerset 33 Ed. III., 42 Ed. HI. In 1368-9, he granted, as Sir John Raleigh of Nettlecombe, Kt., a charter of all his tenements in Wrenchelston in Wales" to John Hiwys, Rector of Nettlecombe, who was no doubt a feoffee in trust upon one of his marriages. He md. -1, Maud —— who died childless, and 2nd, Ismayn, d. and co- heir of Simon Hanaps of Gloucestershire, who died a widow, 8th Sept., 1420, having md. 2nd, Sir John Borowash or Burghersh of Ewelme, co. Oxon, where he was born 1317. He died 21st Sept., 1391. As the result of this second mar- riage brought much trouble upon the descendants of the first, it will be necessary to add a few lines concerning it. Sir John was the son of Sir John Burghersh, who died 30th June, 1349, by Matilda, elder dau. and co-heir of Sir Wm. de Kerdestan, by Margery, d. and h. of Sir Edmund Bacon, of Bacon, co.:Essex, who died 1327. Sir John Burghersh, husband of Ismayn, was the subject of a fraudulent attempt on the part of Sir William Molyns, husband of Margery, a descendant of Sir Edmund Bacon by a second wife, on which ground he tried to obtain a share of the Burghersh estate, and actually got possession, but justice finally prevailed. By Sir John Burghersh Ismayn had Margaret, get 15 in 1391, who md. John Arundel of Bidetord, and Matilda heiress of Ewelme, set 12 in 1391, who md. Thomas Chaucer, son of the poet, born about 1360, d. 1434. They had Alice Chaucer, born 1404, heiress of Ewelme, who was affianced in early youth to Sir John Phelip, who died when she was 12 years old. She md. 1, Thomas Earl of Salisbury, and 2d, William de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk, by whom she had John, 2d Duke of Suffolk, who md. Elizabeth Plantagenet, and was thus brother-in-law to Edward IV. He inherited Ewelme, and, as will be seen, had tortious possession of the Raleigh Welsh estates. Sir John de Raleigh, the first husband of Ismayn, had by her 1, John, who succeeded, but died s.p. 2, Simon. 3, Joan, and 4, Maud, eventual coheirs. Maud had the Welsh estates, which on her death, 42 H. VI., i.p., passed to her sister Joan. IX-—SlMOX de Raleigh inherited both the Somerset and Welsh estates, which on his death, s.p., seem to have been divided between bis two sisters. He md. 1, Joan ——, died 14, H. VI.; and 2d, another Joan, d. of Oliver Hiwys of Don. niford, who survived her husband 17 years. Simon died 12 March 18 H. VI., 1441-2, and Joan died before 1465. IX. 3. Joan de Raliegli of Nettlecombe and Wrenchester Castle md. Sir John de Whellesborougb, or Walesborow, of Whalesborougb, in Marhnm-Church, co. Cornwall. They were a considerable Cornish family, and possessed Lancarfe, Treisdor, Lamelwyn, and Perran-Uthuoe, and had besides estates in Somerset, Devon, and Surrey. They bore Argent, a fess lozengy Gules,' indicating some early feudal dependence upon the Earls Mareschal. They had— X.—THOMAS Whellesborougb of Whellesborougb, Nettle. combe, and Wrenchester Castle, who was recognised as right heir of Simon de Raleigh. Hewasdeadin 1482. Hemd. Matilda, or Maud, living 1482, she was a dau. of Sir Wm. Bowes. They had—1, Elizabeth. 2, Catherine, who seems to have died s.p. XI.—ELIZABETH Whellesborough, heiress of the Cornish, Somerset, and Welsh estates. She md. John Trevelyan of Trevelyan and Basil in St. Cleather, co. Cornwall, who bore Gules a horse Argent, armed or, rising out of the sea, party per fess, wavy, Azure and Or.' In consequence of this marriage the Trevelyans settled at Nettlecombe, and became also Glamorganshire landowners, de jure, though not, as will appear, for some time dc facto. The marriage settlement is dated London, 19 July, 1452. It does not include the Welsh property, which possibly was then vested in Catherine. It appears from the Trevelyan papers, recently printed by the Camden Society, that the Duke of Suffolk, who, by descent from Ismayn Hanaps, was of kin to the Whellesboroughs, had got possession of their Welsh property. In 1463, John Tre. velyan addressed the Duke, pointing out that his wife Eliza- beth was the true owner of the manors of Mighelstone and its advowson, of Lancarvan, Lantewyte, and Wrygstone, with their appurtenances," which bad always been in their blood, until lately, when Alice Chaucer, the Duke's mother, by the management of William, late Lord Herbert, entered upon the lands contrary to right, and he prayed the Duke to consider his own estate and the poverty of Thomas Whelles- borough and his heirs, though of the Dukes blood, and to appoint a day to have the truth examined into and the land* restored. At the same time Trevelyan moved the King, who also in 1463 wrote to the Duke, stating that he understood that Tre velyan lxad long made suit to him no longer to withhold his wife's inheritance in Wales, entailed upon her and her heirs by fine, as the heir of Sir John and Simon Raleigh, which entail resteth to our Exchequer at Cardiff." The King adds that the Duke's mother entered on the lands on the plea that her father, Thomas Chaucer, was enfeoffed of them, whereas Trevelyan can show that he was enfeoffed only as Trustee. The letter from Edward IV. seems to have produced no effect. Trevelyan, then Sir John, 25 years later, in 1488, ad- dressed himself to Henry VII., relating how he had been de- spoiled of his lands in the time of Jasper Duke of Bedford, the King's uncle, by Sir Walter Herbert, now deceased, who, because the manors lay near his own lands, and he could not obtain them by fair means, used bis great power, and feigning a title, entered upon them wrongfully, aud left them to his widov, Lady Anne, now living, and a sister of Edward Stafford Duke of Bucks. Sir John adds that he cannot prevail against such power, and prays the King's interference. The effect of this further application was to produce a release from John Duke of Suffolk, in the same year, in which he quits all claim to the "Manors of Michestow, Wrynchester, Lancarvan, and Lantwit, with the advowson of Michelstow," and yields them up to John Trevelyan. Among the witnesses are John Butler, Matthew Cradock, and Maurice Butler. From the above statements it may perhaps be inferred that S,lr Walter Herbert, who was second son of William the great of Pembroke, availed himself of Duchess Alice's shadow lc a^mfhrough the enfeoffment of her father, to enter on the lands, intending, since Trevelyan would not sell, to secure tnem to the Duchess, who was not likely to care for them, and !^™ce m them for himself. Herbert died childless before John Trevelyan, who so perseveringly fought for, and suc- cessfully established his right, died in 1493, leaving Xi ,ir ^en aged 30 years and up- wards, and who died 21 Sept., 1622, leaving XIII* John Trevelyan, then aged 30 years and upwards, and who, or his father, seem to have disposed of the estate, which, a few years later, appears in the possession of the Earl of Worcester. The Trevelyan muniments have evidently been so carefully preserved that it is not improbable that the date aud particu- Ian of the sale may be found among them.

[No title]

-----------------PONTYPRIDD.

[No title]

E. L. RICHARDS, ESQ.I

THE GREAT CADEE IDRIS LEAD…

GUARDIAN OFFICE, SATURDAY…

CORN EXCHANGE.—FKIDAY.

SINGULAR CASE OF SUDDEN DEATH…

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

[No title]