Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

11 articles on this Page

=-"""'" IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.…

. | SOUTH WALES TURNPIKE TRUSTS…

RELIGIOUS INTELLIGENCE.

[No title]

TO CORRESPONDENTS.

[No title]

[No title]

[No title]

♦— HAVERFORDWEST LUNATIC ASYLUM.

[No title]

9 CARMARTHENSHIRE SUMMER ASSIZES.…

News
Cite
Share

9 CARMARTHENSHIRE SUMMER ASSIZES. On Saturday evening about nine o'clock, THE learned judge, Sir Robert Mousey Rolfe, arrived at Carmarthen, escorted by Rawleigh. Addenbrooke Mansel, Esq., High Sheriff," javelin men, and a highly respectable retinue, the Commission having been opened by the Clerk of the Assize, who preceded his lordship by some hours. On Suntlay forenoon, his lordship and the high-sheriff at- tended Divihe service in St. Peter's Church. The prayers were reaff by the venerable- Archdeacon Bevan, and the assize sermon preached by the Rev. Henry Wyndham Joi5?sj—— the sheriff's chaplain, from the 6'th chapter of Matthew, and the 10th verse:—"Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven." On Monday morning his lords! ip proceeded to the shire- hall, at ten o'clock, and the business 0; the assizes immediately commenced. The following gentlemen answered to their names, and were sworn on the grand jury:— Honorable Geo. Rice Trevor, M.P., Foreman Sir John Mansel, Bart., Lhmste- phan Edward Price Lloyd, Esq., Glansevin D. A. S. Davies, Esq., M.HL Pentre J. 1'. Saunders, Esq., Clan- rlmhv Daniel Prytherch, Esq., Carmarthen D. J. Ed- wardes, ES-q., Rhydy;,orse Lewis Evan, Esq., Pantykendy Henry Lawrence, Esq., M.D., Carmarthen Thomas Jones, Esq., M. D., do J. Walter Phillips, Esq., Aber^lasney John Jones, Esq., Llandovery; EDW. B. \'V ood, Esq., Bryn- hafod Chae. Morgan, Jun-, Esq., Hafo.inethin D. B. Da- vies, Fso., Maesycrigie; J. B. Davics, Esq., Myrtle Hill John Lloyd Davies, Esq., Alltyrodin Rees Goring Thomas. fcsq., Lilysnewydd T. L). Saunders, I-.sq., lymawr. THE BOROUGH GRAND JURY".—George Goode, Esquire, Foreman; John Williams, Esq Ben. Jores, Esq.; George Children, Esq. R. M. Davies, Esq.; J. P. Davies, Esq!; D. Waiter Hughes, Esq. John Jones, Esq. E. B. Jou-ns Esq.; YV. Jones, Esq.; T. O.Lewis, Esq.; W. Moss, Esq.; T. Pritchard, Esq.; W. Thomas, Esq.; R. Thomas,'Esq. J. J. Stacey, Eso. The usual prelimirrries having been duly discharged, the learned judge addressed the Grand Juries to the following effect:- Gentlemen of the Grand Jury,—I am very happy to be able to tell you, that your labours on the present occasion, will not be of very long duration and that the cases which will be submitted to you are not such as are likely to give you any difficulty in disposing of them. There are but five or six cases to come before you, and most of them are casesof the most ordinary nature, and not R-uch as to require any ob- servation on my part necessary. I perceive that there i. one case, which, by the depositions, seems to have arisen out of the unfortunate occurrences which took place in this county last year, and of which you have heard so much. The de- positions seem to shew that the party charged is guilty of having attempted to demolish a house-an offence, I need not tell you, which is of a most serious nature. In order to constitute that crime, you must be satisfied beyond all rea- sonable doubt, that the party cbargcd, not only intended to demolish the house, but that he did, by himself, and by others under his immediate control, or who acted under his instigation and authority, actually commence the work cf demolition. There seems to be no doubt of that, if the facts stateu M the depositions are strictly true, for it is positively alleged, that not only end they begin to demolish the house. but taut they actually accomplished the demolition. You ARE AW S;V thnt MERELY break. ihe windows ofthe house wiii not he suthcieni. to VVAITTTIIL VOU ilr BENDING the PRTRCI-JA charged, to take their trial: it must be strictly proved that a successful or unsuccessful attempt to demolish the house itself did actually occur. Gentlemen, there is also another case of a serious nature upon the calendar-a charge of Arson—that of a young wo- man, who stands charged with having set fire to a house. It appears, by the depositions, that circumstances which render the guilt of the party charged probable, have been sworn to. You will hear the statements made by the wit- ness; and if it appears to you that the evidence "is such as would necessarily lead to the conviction of the party, if pla- ced upon her trial, you will, of course, find a true bill but unless the evidence adduced is such as will probably lead to the conviction of the prisoner—if it am aunts to nothing more than mere suspicion, it will not be desirable to send the party to take her trial, as in the event of her acquittal, she cannot be at any future period tried again for the same of- fence, even should further circumstances appear which would render her guilt no longer doubtful. 11mt, however, is a matter entirely for your considcration-a matter in which you will exercise your own discretion and if the facts proved are such as amount to evidence sufficiently conclusive to warrant you in arriving at the conclusion, that the party charged, will be convicted of the offence, you will return a true bill against her. His lordship then reiterated some of his former statements, and alluded to a case of burglary, in which the party charged with the commission of the offence, is bath deaf and dumb. That circumstance, however, the grand jury n"pd not take into their consideration. If the witnesses should swear distinctly and clearly to the facts as stated in the depositions, they (the grand jury) would send him to take his trial;- the fact of the prisoner being deaf and dumb, had nothing to do with the duty they had to dischage, namely, to decide whether the evidence adduced in support of the "prosecution was sufficiently conclusive to warrant them in s-ndins the ttrisonertotake his trial. If they (the grand jury) should be satisfied that rhe prisoner was guilty of the crime imputed to nun, they would return a true bill. His lordship concluded by stating that these were the only observations which he conceived it necessary to make awl it they (the grand jury), would have the goodness to with- draw and SEND a bill into court, as soon as they had disposed of a case, the business of the court would immediately be proceeded with. In addressing the gentlemen of the irrand jury for the borough of Carmarthen, his lordship merely thanked them for their attendance, and informed them he was happy to find their services would not he required. If, however, any cases should occur, they would hold themselves in readiness to be summoned, in order that no delay might take place in pro- ceerling with the public business. The grand juries then retired. In a short time a true bill was returned against Richard Mathews, charged with having stolen a pair of trowsers'TI waistcoat, and a handkerchief, the property of one Nathaniel Jones, o' Forest, in the parish of Llanboidy. Mr. W ilson stated thee ase for the prosecution, and called the following witnesses: — Nathaniel Jones deposed that he is a farm servant with John Thomas, of Forest Lhmboidy, in the county of Carmar- then. On the 6th instant he lost a pair of trowsers,, a w aist- coat and a handkerchief, from the loft above the cow-house where he usually slept. He had seen the prisoner about the premises in the course of the mo. ning, and told his master who went for one of the Rural Police, and directed him to go in search of the prisouer. George Morgan deposed that he belonged to the Rural Police force for the county of Carmarthen, and was directed oy ivir. inomas, ot forest, on the nth instant, to go in search of the prisoner, who was suspected of having stolen the clothes in question. HE found the prisoner at a ulace called. Gilfach, and after searching him, found the clothes in his possession. The clothes were then produced, and identified by Natha- niel Jones, the prosecutor, as being his property, and those which he had lost. The prisoner was called on for his defence, when he clap- ped his hands together, saying, he was not guilty. The learned Judge having briefly summed up, the jury. after a short consultation returned a verdict of Guilty. I He was sentenced to two months' hard labour in the House of Correction. The prisoner begged his lordship would give him'seven years' transportation. His lordship directed him to be taken away. David .Tones, aged 31, labourer was charged with having on the night of the 21st of March last, or early the following morning, feloniously stolen, taken, and conveyed away a certain black mare, the property of Mrs. Mar}- Thomas from a stable at Pantyeerrig, in the parish of Lianfihancel- rhos-y-corn, in the county of Carmarthen. The prisoner pleaded guilty. His lordship, (;11 passing sentence, addressed the prisoner- as toliows — This is an otience for which yon are liable to be transported far fifteen years but I have looked at the depo- sitions, air) have seen under what circumstances yon commit- ted this offence. The sentence of the court is, that you bo imprisoned and kept to hard labour tor one year. Counsel for the prosecution, Mr. Vaughan WUIiams.— Attorney, Mr Morgan, of Llandovery. David Davies, aged 54, labourer, was charged with having stolen a spade, the property of Mr. John Davies, Cefngwyu, in the parish of Llanegwad, Carmarthenshire. Mr. John Davies examined.—I am a farmer. In the month of August last, I lent a spade to John Jones, my neighbour. I did not M" it since till I saw it in the begin- ing of last March with Thomas Evans. I am sure it is the- same spade. The prisoner said, I do not wish to ask any questions, but I found the spade on the public high way. \erdtct,—p,)i!ty of skiing." His Lordship oil passing sentence said to the prisoner, I am very sorry to see such a hale, hearty, strong looking man as you are, convicted, of such an offenc •. The sentence of the court IS, that you be imprisoned and kept w hai'D labour FER* the term of one caleddar month. Counsel for the prosecution, Mr. Giovc.—Attorney, Mr.- Richard Rees. Mary Evans, AGED HO, servant, was charged with having unlawfully and maliciously set fire to a certain house, on the 14 th of June last, situate in the village of Mydriin, -which house, in the first count of the indictment, ifhs. described av the property of Mr. George Bo-.ven, and in theTsccond count as the property of Mr. Joseph Harris. The prisoner who appeared to be a persan.of considerable-, shrewdness, pleaded "not guilty," in a firm tone of voice, and dec lined challenging either of the jurors. The witnesses on both S'd -s were ordered out of court. Mr. i!nn. in opening th: case, said the prisoner was the daughter of Margaret Evans, who a as the-occupier ofthe house, in as tenant to Geo. Brawn, Esq., of Llwyn- ygwair, who in consequence of her ina' ility to amount she owed for rent, caused a distress to be made on her goods, and she was by PROCESS of law ta be put out of the house, and to have "her goods sold. This took place on the 19TH of June last, and the prisoner being present, claimed to be entitled to certain property 11'1 the house, and desired tie bailiffs to deliver to her a wooden partition nnd likewise a hearth-stone, expressing at the same time an earnest des: e to have theni. The bailiffs, not feeling justified in giving IP the property referred to T y her, refused to accede to her n qnest, u;;on which 8'1'" was said to hap made use of words lo the fo 1 hwing effect —If I have them not, do not be su prised if the house be burnt down before the mcrnirg. These words were addressed to the I aililfs to the prisoner^ on tiie iii H tif June, nnd that night the house was destroyo d BY IIRR. Th prison'-r-had BI-en seen in the immediate neiVi • bouraoood of. the B.ON'sft at the hour ofthe fire the jiily would, h •refore^bavo to consider whether that taken M connection with the words addresser! to tie L«IUAP?R* «= UY.the JJRI^OIKR, did not PROOF SNFTI* IRAM.WNIL-N they MIGHT -hrfbr WAS NNNN^ST'OR.ABLY- tae person who had set fire to the hotw,-anti thereby criiled its destruction. David Ghnrles examined.— I am a bailifT, a sheriff's officer ^ND was Mr. Jeffries'# bailiff on the TF>th ofduntH.-IST when' 1 was employed to make A DISTRESS ON the gooifs cf MARGARET Evans,, in consequAice ofher refusal.IP pay rent tj> the PRO- Beci.itor,. I received the 18th. It was ,ON DJSFOW. F TTI^ATORAISEMENT was 'MADE OR T^E 18th and 1 HE RENK>||A& doe TDRMS, GEORGE ¥