Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

7 articles on this Page

THE AFRICAN SCANDALS.I

News
Cite
Share

THE AFRICAN SCANDALS. I WHY MAJOR BARTTELOT WAS MURDERED. Mr. H. M. Stanley, oa his arrival in New York, was received by a number of friends. He gave an inter- View to some Press men. He said that Major Bart- Mot's offence was inhuman treatment of those under his orders, but charged nothing immoraL Major JBartfcelot, he said, beat men to death; killed his little Ustvant boy, a mere lad, by a kick; and beat the de of a chief until her shrieks attracted her hus- band. Major Barttelot was thoroughly bated by the Mtives. He would grin with a fiendish grin in their faces, and beat them with a heavy, iron-pointed cypress staff until the poor wretches shrank from him with fear. Two men were so cruelly beaten that thoir ulcers measured 7in. in diameter by nearly lira. deep. Siau.cj ;.<ga?n described Barttelot's death. He sayfl they were awakened by the beating of drums and singing, it being the fashion among the Manuema tribe to bait the dawn with music. The major then went out with a loaded revolver and a cypress staff and commanded silence. The woman was defiant, and he knocked her down, prodded her with his staff, and also kicked her. Her screams brought her husband, Who was near by cleaning his gun, and the latter, teeing Major Barttelot abusing hiB wife, shot him dead. The act was committed in a fit of anger by the chief, acting in defence of his wife. Mr. Stanley, says a Reuter's telegram, intends to bring an actios against Major Barttelot's brother. A SIGNED STATEMENT. Mr. Stanley was subsequently seen in New York by a correspondent of the Times, to whom be dictated a statement,, which he afterwards signed, repeating his story of Major Barttelot's cruelty, and says the de- ceased actually entertained the belief that he (Mr. Stanley) would poison him. Major Barttelot and Mr. Jameson had picked up a skit from some irrespon- sible newspitp^r to the effect that it was odd Stanley had never returned from Africa except alone" Mr. Stanley next gives an account of Major Batttelct's treatment of the natives, repeating some statements which have been already published. He says: I WAS tola that Major Barotelot's life was saved twice by Mr Bonny, once when Major Bart- telot had suddenly seized a woman and fastened his teeth in her shoulder. I was told that with a steel- pointed cypress staff he Hal ran abint the cam p prodding bis p opte with it, and then flourishing the stick ant1 hitting a.')')ut h'm indiscriminately. And ail this wttaout app irf-as causv A Manyuema chief, a comrade of the man -»r>ga reported to me chtt he had been prodded IT rimes' • <Í't" only a (ixy or nro oeiore tne maiof was (tinea nv The little boy Sotfcsy, wLoie deach h»t e r<f.ortisd in Darkest Africa.' WAS » little ft-How ten y !tre! o'd and of him Mr. Rarttelo'. says in his O'v.fe, In a general way, that be was a clevor little ieliow,' while I have de- Scribed him in my book as a wise-headed little fe!tow.' Major Burttelot, irritated with little Soudy one morning, save him a kick witb his heavy boot, and fiom the effects ot that kick the boy died. John Henry, a mission lai, was Hogged with 300 lathes, and died eo->n alter." Without any idea that it might have been said in jest. JIr- Stanley brings the charge auvnut the ill-fated Majftr that h-ii the <if serters from the advance column reached Yarru>uya, "lid rold Major Barttelot a graphic tale about my having been killed, he ex- claimed, Thauk God! 1 shall be made a colonel aow." MR. STANLEY APPROVES THE MURDER. Mr. Stanley repeats 'he circumstances under which Major Barttelot. was sbot in the same terms that were published previously, and adds that if Sanga, who Shot the major, bad been brought before him, and If the story, as reported in writing and orally had been confirmed, he would have acquitted him. A HORRIBLE STORY OF CANNIBALISM. But the most horrible charge Mr. Staot; y has to make is against Mr Jameson. He believes a man when he swears he was an eye-witness of the foHow- ing Mr. Jameson, returning from Kason. got into a con- versation with Tippoo Tib and another Arab about cannibalism. He informed them that he did not believe th-re was such a th:ng as cannibalism, be- cause, although he had beard much, he had never Seen it, and no white man had ever seen it done. Tippoo Tib replied that it would be easy to prove it if he liked. Jameson asked how that was possible, and it was answered, -1 If you will pay for a slave, and give it to those men there, they will show you." Iwelve cotton handkerchiefs were then given in ex- change for a little girl aged 10 or 12 years. She was given to the cannibals, and Jameson is said to have then exclaimed, Now let us see what yon can do The girl was tied up, and Jameson took his sketch- book in his hand. The witness to this stood a few feet behind him. When all was ready a knife was plunged into the girl's heart, and Jameson stood still sketching while her life-blood spurted over her body. Be made six sketches during the different stages of the affair, from the murder to the eating of the body. Mr. Stanley is careful to add: I expressed my doubt of this story; but a European came forward and told me that he had seen Jameson's sketches. Another person whom I asked also said that Jameson had shown him the sketches. It was reported to the authorities of the Free State, and they took evidence, which was shown to me. I wrote to Mr. Jameson a letter, which I sent by a courier, saying," Before you can join our expedition again I hope you will be able to disprove this." MR. STANLEY'S APOLOGY. In making such charges Mr. Stanley himself recog- nises that he occupies a no very enviable position, for he excuses himself as follows: No one can regret more than I do the disclosure of the revelations made to me confirming the sad story of the rear column. I Tiave told these facts as they were told to me. Whether every one of them is true or not, I have no meanB of knowing from personal knowledge. Some are attested by affidavits, others are stated in official reports which 1. being bent upon saving the expedi- tion from scandal, tried to suppress. Under the cir- cumstances, I should have been only too glad to have pone into court, where the facts could be ventilated. THE TERRIBLE CHARGES AGAINST MR. JAMESON. "Concerning the story of cannibalism connected with the name of Mr. Jameson, I first heard (Mr. Stanley says in a supplementary statement, published by the Times on the 10th fast.) of it, of course, from Mr. Bonny. I was quite Incredulous and inclined to suspect that there was some animus but Mr. Bonny said to me, 'But I have seen the sketches myself,' and a Zanzibar!, who had been at Stanley Falls, cor- roborated Mr. Bonny's statement. I was also, in- formed that the Congo State authorities at Stanley Palls intended arresting Mr. Jameson for his action, and the story, as Mr. Bonny told it to me, was not only current in the camp, but it was current all along the Congo from Stanley Pool to Nyangine. Even this was not sufficient to entirely satisfy me; but at the same time I wrote a letter to Mr. Jameson, laying that I hoped he would be able to disprove such a tearful story. "1 heard no more about the story until I came to Cairo, when Assad Faran, a Syrian Christian, and formerly an interpreter of aur expedition, delivered a written document to me, on reading which I saw that the details were so circumstantial, and related with such wonderful clearness, that I asked him if the facti were true which the documents contained. I asked him if be bad written them himself, and he answered in the affirmative. Two witnesses were called, and in their presence I asked him again if the facts in that document were truthfully related, and be answered, Yes.' f As a Christian,' I said, remember that these men are dead, and whatever harm they may have done you in Africa, they can never do you any more. Therefore think well before you speak. Are the facts contained in this paper true?" Yes,' he said, f I swear it.' I said to him, 'Write your name down in the presence of these gentlemen if the paper is true,' and he signed his name, rand the two witnesses signed theirs, attesting the fact that Assad Faran had solemnly sworn to the truth of the document, and bad attached his signature with his own hand to It. On reaching England I asked Mr. John Rose Troop if the story were true, and be said, I have seen the Sketches mvself, and Captan Vangele b s ..111< i-e-u them.' A few days later & gentleman toid me tbAC do elerpvman had Sfeentbe head and neck of a negro whicu bad been sent home to London to Mr. Jameson lo be stuffed. The clergyman was reported to have odd- that, if Jameson bad such a morbid Jove for such monstrous curiosities, there might be considerable IsOb in the other story. I was told at Banalya that Mr. Jameson, ascertaining that the public feeling and the Arab sentiment at Stanley Falls bad been roused by Ms action, had said, • Well, if ever I am charged with it, I will deny it.' The document in my possession Is a very circum- stantial story, and presented la such a vivid manner, without any affectation or pretence, and is such a plain and simple story that one does not know what to say. You are swayed with a feeling of incredulity, but, if false, Assad is the most consummate and ac- complished liar in existence, because, as far as I know, Mr. Jameson had never done anything to inspire such devilish malignity in anyone as to incite them to invent such details. Personally my opinion will be just like that of most men but these facts and detaits were quite enough to cause me-to draw up that censure upon the officers of the rear column because it seemed to be the general belief that some terrible act like that related had occurred. If Mr. Jameson had not shown the sketches and bad not appeared to take a pride in the fact that be was the only living European who had ever sef-n this atrocious act of cannibalism, Assad Faran's story, however I might baVt; been struck by ttao manner of his relating the details, of itself would never have been deemed pufficient evidence to cause me to believe that any liviag white m'ln could be c»nab!e cf such an act. Had Mr. Jameson lived to reach us I would certainly have inquired into the rruth of every article of the accusation against him. but unfortunately Mr. Jameson died at Banea'a station on the same day that the advanced column reachi-d Banalya. The clergyman who is reported to have seen the ghastly trophy of the negro's head in London is a gen- tleman very well known, but for the present I have no right to mention his name." WHAT MR. HERBERT WARD SAYS. It is impossible for me to remain silent (Mr. Herbert Ward writes) after perusing Mr. Stanley's extra- ordinary communication to the Timet. I have already stated in public, and am prppared to* maintain, that, although I lived in the rear-guard camp with Major Barttelot for eight months in intimacy necessarily far closer than the ordinary companionship of civ .;isation, I saw nothing in Major Barttelot's behaviour during the whole of that time derogatory to his reputation as an officer. I do not tuink that any person who has deait with native troops would condemn the shooting of the Soudanese soldiet who deserted. Mr. Stanley himself has shown no hesitation in hanging Zahzibari porters for similar offences. My position as regards the allegel atrocities was, geographically, somewhat similar to tbtt "f Mr. Stanley. I bad left the camp and was hundreds cf miles away at the time. But, unlike Mr. Stanley, I should prefer not to attempt 50 injure the reputa- tion of the dead by the use, or misuse, of allegations based on report only. For it should never be for- gotten that Mr Stanley can at any time cast the whole responsibility of this degrading controversy, as it affects the dead, upon his informants. When Mr. Stanley cornea to deal with the living it is not difficult to answer him. The statement that I abstracted br&Rs rods (the currency of the country) is a ti" 1^22 till fCI CCCv urass roaa referred to the rods paid by the Congo State to the Bangala natives who assisted me in my canoe journey down the Congo with despatches. LIEUTENANT TROUP AND MR. STANLEY'S STATEMENTS. Lieutenant Troup, referring to Mr. Stanley's state- ments, declares that he challenges the latter to prove that he was present at the sombre scenss depicted by Mr. Stanley, or that he failed to protest. Lieu- tenant Troup says: It was impossible for the rear- guard to advance, as they were the scum ot the ex- pedition. We protested against Major Barttelot's conduct Mr. Stanley thinks we ought t;o have bound him with ropes we, however, preferred death to such a breach of militarv discipline." MR. JAMESON'S WIDOW SPEAKS. I should feel greatly obliged (Mrs. Kthet JamAson writes) if you would kindly state that the accusa- tions brought against the late Mr. J. S. Jameson are founded entirely on the misrepresentations of a dis- charged Syrian interpreter (Assad Faran), who denied his grossly exaggerated assertions to the Emin Pasha Relief Committee, and Mr. Jameson himself wrote a full account of the facts to Sir William MacKinnon. These I trust to be able to publish with the com- mittee's permission. MR. BOVNY'S STORY. Mr. William Bonny, who ia the only wh'to officer of the rear column of th" Emin Pasha Relief Expedition personally acquainted with all the terrible events connected with the misfortunes at Yambuya Camp, has made a signed statement for publication, corroborating in all but a few trifling particiilars Mr. Stanley's terrible alii gations concerning his rear column. Of this, and Mr. Stanley's supplementary statement, the Times says: Whatever the value ultimately set upon these amplifications of the fright- ful story—and few, indeed, will accept the evidence. even yet, as conclusive—the effect must be to deepen and darken the extremely painful impression left by this controversy upon the public mind. As regards the almost incredible brutality and inhumanity with which Major Barttelot is charged, one thing is clear. If we are to accept Mr. Bonny's narrative as correct, it is absolutely incompatible with Major Barttelot's sanity. This conclusion, which Mr. Bonny himself accepts as irresistible, would modify the amaz-ftent with which the world has heard such in- sensate acts of ferocity as the fixing of his teeth in a woman's flesh imputed to an English officer. As for Mr. Stanley's additional evidence against Mr. Jameson in respect of the most revolting of the whole batch of accusations, we must decline to regard it as carry- ing the case much further. Beyond repeating the testimony of Assad Faran, the dismissed interpreter —evidence upon which it is impossible to rely- he can say little except that the sketches depicting the alleged cannibalism in its various stages have been seen. It is obvious, however, that these sketches prove nothing. They cannot be supposed to be sketches, finished upon the spot, of what must have been a scene of great excitement, precluding the artist from effective work. They must, at all events, have been elaborated afterwards, when many amplifications of what he saw must have sug- gested themselves. It must be admitted, at the same time, that it is rather staggering to find Mr. Bonny declaring that Mr. Jameson had related the whole incident to him-the only discrepancy between Mr. Bonny's version and Mr. Stanley's being that in Mr. Bonny's notes Mr. Jameson is made to pay six cotton handkerchiefs for the girl who was to be eaten instead of 12." "We must insist" (tbe Times goes on to say), for the sake of the good fame, not only of the parties themselves, but of the British nation, to which they belong, and whose reputation the atrocities. charged to their account will cloud, that the whole mystery of this dreadful business should be cleared up. It becomes the duty of Mr. Walter Barttelot to print the expunged portions of his brother's diary, and the forthcoming diary of Mr. Jameson, which his widow is about to publish, ought to be free from any lacuna whatever." THE ATTITUDE OF THE BlIIIN BELIEF COMMITTEE, The responsible officials of the Emin Pasba Relief Committee absolutely deny that in their endeavours to rescue Emin Pasha any one of those associated with them was in the slightest degree actuated by any thought of personal advantages, whether of fame, riches, or ivory. The members of the com- mittee and their connection (Sir William Mackinnon and two of his colleagues explain in a letter which has been published) subscribed JE8650, exclusive of the sum contributed by the Egyptian Government, and those contributed by the late Mr. Jameson, the Countess de Noailles, and the Royal Geographical Society, and when these subscriptions proved in- adequate they added further donations amounting to JB5700. Th3 only stipulation they wished to make was that in the event of ivory being found at Wadelai by the expedition it should not be wholly retained by the Egyptian Government, but that a just proportion should be made over to the sub. scribers in payment of their outlay. The history of this stipulation is recorded in the Foreign O>nce Blue-book, Africa No. 8 of 188S. No ivory has tTn received by or for account of the committee. It is due to Mr. Stanley to add that be not only gave his services gratuitously for the expedition, but that he also threw up engagements worth more than £ 10,000 to him, and generoos'y placed at the dispoeal of the committee such sums as tpey m'gbt receive from the Press for his letters in connec tion with the expe- dition. These sums have amounted to considerably over £2000,

[No title]

. NEW DEAN OF WINDSOR.

[No title]

Advertising

A LADY'S LETTER.

THE COMIC PAPERS.