Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

14 articles on this Page

-.----------COUNTY COURT;

News
Cite
Share

COUNTY COURT; FRIDAY. Before His Honour Judge Bishop. CONGBATTJLATOKY. On Mr Griffith Jones, barrister, appearing in oour: i the Judge said th"t was the first time he ha appeared before him since he had gained higher tiononrs, and he had therefore much pleasure in co 'ffratnlatinsr him upon gaining anrtbe? step in the ladder, and he hoped that some day he would be able to coEgra'date him on attaining a still hightr step. Mr Jones said he was very to him for -his congratulations, and he could assure him tint it gave him veiy much, pleasure to appear before him. PROPERTY DISPUTE. Jane Edwards, Cnwch Coch. sued John Jones and John Lewis Jones, both of Coeh, for the recovery of « £ 5, damages for eac'-oaohing on certain property alleged to be the property, of the plaintiff, Mr Griffith Jones (instructed by Mr W. V. Owen) appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr F. R. Roberts for the defesdants. Mr Jones, in briefly stating his rase, raid that the flispnte between the parties arose as to the boundary dividing1 the defendants' property from the plaintiff's. At one time the boundary was a water course, but it had been piped and covered in some years ago. 'i he plaintiff's land was two or three yards, higher than that of the defendant. It was not IL slope, but it fell ■d«,"Tn perpendicularly. The plaintiff said her husband bought the property in October, 1807. He re-fenced the whole of the property, there being previously only fencing at some places. Thero was a thatched Cottage on their land at that time, and the house that they then lived in ha.d not been, built. There was a Stream running through the field. There was not much of a hedge at that time. Their land was much high er than the defendents'. Her land carno down to the verge of the ditch. Her hu^barv! put all their iledg-e riffht in about two years after ho ha.d bought it. Her husband planted fresh quick there. almost nil about it. He banted up the face of '.he stream with Stones about 20 years ago. The defendant covered in the ditch. The fence was in a straight line, from the top to the road. There was Only a space of a foot and a half between the cable end of the house and the hedge when she first knew it. She could not say how wide it was at present. About two years ago they took the hedge away, to which she objected. The defendants after- wards planted a hedge on her land, which she took down. They carried away the quicks and everything tout of the old hedge. "Part of the hedge was taken away before the other part. There was no dispute about it when her husband was alive Dnring the years that they lived there her husband had repaired it, and they considered it their own hedge. Had not seen the defendants at any time repair the hedge. She only saw them pull it down. The present hedge was not sufficient to keep the cattle out, and they went into her garden. Witness, cross-examined: The field was bought from the parish. It was formerly owned by John Pugh, who also owned the defendants' piece. When they first had the ground there was a hedge between it and the field, and all ronnd, but it was a very bad bne. Everyone walked over the field, in order a snort cut instead of going round the road The village children used to play in it. It was not true that David Lewis, the great grandfather of the defendants, made the hedge. There are some stumps where the hedge was. There were three big trees in the hedge, which were there before David Lewis bought it. Could not say:how long the pipes had been down. The Rev William Evans said he was the vicar of Llangybi and Xlanifhangel Ch dogau, and brother of Mrs Edwards, He had been brought up within a stone thiow of the place, and remembered it from Childhood. The land was bought from John Pugh. The plaintiff's land was much higher than the defendants'. There used to be a growing hedge -between the two. John Pugh owned all the fences round the plaintiff's field. To the best of his -recollection the passage between the hedge and the gable end of the house was about two feet, but it was much wider at present. He had been requested by his sister to visit the place, as there was a dispute. When he went there he went to see the defendants, and they pressed him to draw up an agreement, and the terms were that they should replace the earth taken away, and carry out other improvements. Witness, cross-examined They did not sign the agreement because a solicitor advised them not to do so. The water came into the defendants' field near the hedge, and the water ran down all the way by the side of the hedge into the road. Mr Rees Jones having bet n called to give .evidence as to the extent of the encroachment, the Judge decided to adjourn the case, with the intention of visiting the spot. BANKRUPTCY Mr Griffith Jones, instructed by Mr W. P. Owen, made an application to his honour to vary or quash an order made by him a few courts before in the matter of EvaR Heese, Machynlleth, a bankrupt. Mr Jones pointed cut that a few courts ago a Mr Bryant, who had acted as traveller for Eeese, appealed to his honour a»aii'St the ruling of the trustee in bank- ruptcy in objecting to a proof of his. and his honour admitted the 'proof. Mr Jones showed that Bryant claimed £24iJ. and that the proof was put in by him ton behalf and for the benefit of a. person named William Roberts, a partner with the bankrupt, and that Bryant was to receive J510 for doing Mich an act for Roberta, He also added that several facts were not before the court when his honour made the order. Mr J. L. Pritchett, instructed by Mr Carr, Bir- mingham, who opposed the application, having replied to Mr Jones, his honour said he would reserve ilis judgment.

AN INFIRMARY MEETING.

[No title]

------ITHE SAD CASE OF ACCIDENTAL…

CILCENIN.

CEMMAES.

LAMPETER.

I GOOD REASONS WHY I

ADDRESS ON TITHES.'

THE BI-LINGU AL DIFFICULTY.

[No title]

------------HOW A MOTHER SAVED…

MACHYNLLETH.

Advertising