Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

20 articles on this Page

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

News
Cite
Share

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. In the House of Lords on March 13, the Earl of Devon laid upon the table a bill to further amend the law relating to the relief of the poor. The Duke of Argyll, having directed attention to the incon- veniences arising out of the ratepaying clauses of the Reform Act of last year, turned aSide to refer to the terms 11l which Iiord Russell had lately spoken of the Government as un- Worthy of confidence, and which, he remarked, were fnay deserved. The only reply to this noble friend was a letter signed by the Premier, and published in the newspapers two days subsequently, and he thought the Conservative party were entitled to the cred it of being exceedingly good natured in enduring the process of education to which they had been subjected, and especially in forgiving the speech of Mr. Disraeli at Edinburgh. The Lord Coancellor, having explained the nature and effect of the ratepaying clauses of the Reform Act, ad- ministered a rebuke to the noble duke for occupying the time of the house with criticisms upon what after all was oniy a postprandial speech. He then animadverted with considerable force upon the charges which had been brought by Lord Russell en the occasion referred to against the con- duct of Lord Derhy's Government, and denied that these charges had either point or accuracy, and indignantly repu- diated the conclusion which had been drawn by Lord -"•Ussell from his own unfounded and unsupported premises. Earl Russell characterised the speech of the Lord Chan- cellor as emillelltly ingenious, though it had altogether onutted to answer the charges of the Duke of Argyll- Ihe ltoble earl justified his charges against the Government, ana "eclared that their conduct with respect to Reform had Been unworthy of high-miuded statesmen. „,«+«>*(• The Earl of Malmesbury complained that, under the p^ a question with resnent. t.() ronmnnnnrtn. J.wl" me encouragement, oi a »»» — proprietary, which he explained at length. If it were right to lend money to tenants for improvements, as Lord Majo's Bill proposed, WAY not lend money to tenants to buy land? Protesting that he had no desire to interfere with the rights of property-for he would not apply his plan except where landowners were willing to Bell—iie showed that, without paying more annually than hIS present rent, a tenant in a little over 30 years might become the oymer of his farm. His object was to create in Ireland some few score thousands (If a steady dass be ween the large landowners and the landless—a class which would be thoroughly loyal and would be the zealous eIHllllY of Fenianism. lie admitted that the time would never come when Mr. Mill's remedy would be necessary for Ireland, but heheldthaf-in every country where there was no cla-s but landlord and tenant, with no manufactures to absorb the population, the condition of the cultivator of the swn must infevitably be degraded. On the Church question, Mr Bright described the Ministerial proposal to add another buter&ss in the shape of a bribe as grotesque and imbecile. The establishment of a Catholic University could have IlO effect on Jb'euianism it had been received with general disfavour; and, like the dual vote of last year, when itimd served its object would probably disappear, But Protestant ascendancy in Ireland, as represented by a State Church, was doomed, and perfect religious equality on the voluntary principle must be estahlished in its place. There might be difficulties in carrying out this change, but they must be faced; and, condemning Lord Russell's pamphlet as 40 years too late, Mr. Bright developed a plan of his own for the pur- P<)Be- ■He would, of course, disestablish and disendow all Churches alike the liegium Donum must go as well as the Maynooth grant. But as the lite interests of the Protestant bishops and priests must be preserved, 1i0 must the hfe interests of the Presbyterian ministers and of Maynoo h Cul- lege he provided for. Where the congregations of existing Protestant churches would undertake to repair them and the parsonage-houses they might be left in possession of them. Of course, no more bishops, except on the footing of Scotch Bishops, would be created; and if the State granted any provision at the out-et to either of the three religious bodies, it must become its absolute property entirely free from the control of the State. The whole of the Church property being Irish p.operty, it must be disposed of in entire accordance with the desires of the Irish people. Though not sanguine that Mr Disraeti would be able to deal radically with it Mr. Bright protested that he should be delighted to co-operate with him in settling this question and in one of his finest and most enthu- siastically applauded perorations, he appealed tc the mode- ration, the justice, and the upright and Christian feeling of all c'asses to remove the dark cloud now resifJg on Ireland. Sir S. Northcote, summing up, or taking stock, as he said, of the debate, was of opinion that It would put the House in a better position to deal with the Irish question. For in- stance, the real character of Fenianism could be more v,Ut ,RPPreciated, and the delusion that Ireland had not ner lair share in the councils of the Empire was dispelled, ■ine problem before Parliament was, no doubt, a difficult one but the first thing to do with a disease which might be said to be on the nerves was to give hope and comfort, and not to disturb any healing process which was going on. He claImed for the Irish Government, not limItmg It to the present Administration, that it had administered Ireland with impartial justice, and the conviction of this must in time come home to all classes. He defended the Land Bill which Lord Mayo would introduce, expres- SÎl1g a strong conviction that the landlords of Ireland would net object to a restriction of their rights if it could be shown that the public interest required it. But it was not intended that this Bill should necessarily be the be-all and end-all of the Government policy, and for that reason, and not for delay, the Government had appointed a Commission of Inquiry. As to the Church, Sir Stafford said that if he believed its maintenance to be unjust he would consent to sweep it away immediately, but he was unable to see that it was except oil a principle which would be destructive of all establishments. The property of the Church was not national property, but the £ °Perty °f the Church; and though the State ™igM hare a:right to inquire how the Church was using _vp, ?p^lvs her ot it without a violent necessa healiritr nonrv* breach of statesmanship. Ireland req\_rit«.tine and confiscation would be unjust and lr »■ M r hl(, Mr. Mouse 11 adjourned th# debate until Monday, March 16. In the House of Lords, on March l^, the caU borough gave notice that next Tuesday week elementary the attention of their Lord-hips to the state yn that education in England and Wales, and bring in a ui "Vart Rusiell had given notice that he should call attention to the Commission on the Neutrality Laws, and ask t. the repoit of the Commission will be laid before Parliament,, but the noble earl did not bring forward his motion. Their Lordships adjourned at an early hour. In the House of Commons, Captain Vivian asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether the estimate of the probable expenditure on account of the Abyssinian expedi- tion, which was presented to the House in November last is likely to be exceeded and if so, whether he is prepared to say to what extent, and what are the circumstances which account for the same. The Chancellor of the Exchequer deprecated the course ol putting these questions in such a manner. But he could ill- form the House that at present he had every reason to believe that the expenditure would bll covered by the lowest estimate viz three millions aud a half. Air Monpell rose to continue the adjourned debate on the Irish question. He thanked the right hon. baronet (Sir Stafford Northcote) for the way in which he had treated the matter in his speech on Friday night. There had been, m lndew"med at thetotal perversion of was a great amount of discontent, vergig0>d^cUon indeed, there was much more of the latter U of Feniauism. He acknowledged the sj mpat jeit the Irish in the House of Parliament, and stated that th^y they were governed more by English and Scotch than by iris opinions. He reminded them that, although the people were quiet from 1S48 to 1865, nothing was done to do avvay the wrongs from which they were suffering. He thanked the Government for their proposition with respect to tne Roman Catholic University, but he awaited the decision of the people on the subject, for he should not be satisfied until the University of Ireland was a National University. He doubted the statements of the noble lord that education in the United States and Germany had progressed consider- ably affirming that in the former country education had me„t with regard to the tants monopolised the whole ofth lerated m England and Whether such a grievance would ere ever alienated Scotland. He btlteved that no Wfairly th^ by justice, and if they only treated tne f He com would not have to complain of their u j uje(1 agaj,)3t batted the various arguments which hart aIl(j assured the dis-establishmeut of the ProUstant Chur th(;re wag the House that there never could be conten granted perfect religious equality. When that wad as ready they would find the Irish people as loyal and ljsh iZ MUpport tho Constitution as their Scotch or bret iren. He entreated them nflt t0 let th.s sense ol m £ haVn;<Lconvu,se the nation, as it was the last link in tne chain of conquest which now remained. there Joh»stone, after a short introduction said greatest of 0 e ^reat subjects for legislation, and the tSs of°the HoeU8:awS theJa',d "»e3ti0n- Jle'h';fv minster for rp™! re due to the hon. member for rcspect to ffifeHntin? th° gravity of the crisis with to compare that argued that it was absurd had been mentioned With niai,y othe?'s wllR'h i h r MaiesU's Cnvli thought the propositions made that they had thrown awa'^a^reat^on UI,*alis'act0[,y' eked the speech of the Ear*! ofCyotTd policy then in expressed might be^ a -Trulv liberal'' but was not a state-manlike one. If they wotetrvi.iJbv their proposals to conciliate, the Roman Cathol.es they would not succeed; if they wanted to conciliate Ireland thev must bold 1 j face the problem they had to solve. Mr Gregory, admitting the geneial accuracy of Lord Majo's picture of the progressive condition of Ireland, and allowing that Fenianism was confined to one i.art ot the country, aud was utterly impracticable in its aims main- tained that there WHS much discontent afloat which o'usrht to he dealt with immediately and it ought to be dealt with as nearly as possible in the same spirit as an Irish Parliament would handle it in. On the land question, stability of wnuro wm th# first thing to b« obtained, and if Mr. Bright'* plan could be accompanied by some proTision against suth division it might confer great benefits on Ireland. On tne question of education, replying to Mr Horsman s ^mark he denied that the Roman Catholic la^y required pr t<ectio againsD their h critchy, and showed that in8 l]ire(j minational education, primary and university, Jrst^,bjec- no more than was claimed by Protestants l tions to the mixed system of education camefromth testant clergy, and though the Roman C^ Colleges were | condemned tne principle on which the Q greater! has ;d, they had not cariried/hew opposrtlon to g thp length. But at the bottom of all Irish d^^?erecommended State Church, and, speaking as a Protes protestauts. Mr. Bright's scheme to the consnierauc. the three Personally he was in favour of '^e en- that pUi,jic denominations in Ireland hut he <t■ {0 sweep away the opinion was against endowments. P and must Church would be an Looking to leave much bitterness and a u{,cstion, its settlement the great difficulties which beset the item of that must be attaine £ fcto be the conveyance to each denomina- 1 compromise ou0ht t^a b condition in the case of Roman tion of a lump sum> .f gv,0uld be applied to the purchase Catholics that a par jje exhorted the enemies of the of glebe lands an^ lth jig-establishment, and avowed Church to be c stion should be deferred until the new his wish that ttie ques^^ wUh u ((U ]arger ba5ig. Amnn^other remedies he suggested direct diplomatic rela- ^vith the Pope, moderate loans of public money for improvements, and an improved administration of ^Mrf^Conolly augured much good from the practical turn of the debate, and while maintaining that Irish Protestants were not indisposed to a calm and just settlement of the Church question, intimated that he should oppose Lord Mayo's Land Bill if it was like that of last year. As Mr. Conolly sat down more than a score members sprang up to continue the debate in all parts of the House, but chiefly on the Liberal benches, and the Speaker called on Mr. W. H. Gladstone, who, in a very successful maiden speech, argued that the circumstances of Ireland required a bolder treatment than the Ministerial programme. Fenianism, he held, was not so dangerous as he subdued and smothered^ feelmgs of .iiscontent, which prevailed extensively, and on niiberal policy of this discontent he defined to he the ill °era^ P°llcy we had Dursued towards the Irish people, notn as cultivators of the soil and as Roman Catholics He cultivators ° f erta;n an,i liberal compensation forV°hnprovements, and this he would substitute for the tenant-right Custom, which he did not altogether approve. Deeply regretting that the Government had no policy m regard to the Church, he insisted that no time should be lost by Parliament in pronouncing for the principle of religious equality, and he combatted the plea that to disestablish the Irish Church would strike a blow at the English Church showing in how many circumstances the two differed. Ihe one was an insult to the vast majority of the population while the other was in entire accordance with the feelings of the people among whom it was established. On the question of education, though he should have preferred a fusing of all educational establishments into one University, he did not disapprove the plan of the Government to charter a Catholic Lord Castlerosse complained of the timidity of the Govern- ment in not dealing with the Chui ch. He expressed a strong opinion in favour of a measure for compensation to tenants, and predicted that Parliament would not consent to the plan of a Catholic University. The discussion was continued on the same side by Mr. De la Poer and Mr. Synan by Colonel Bruen, who argued against the establishment of fixity of tenure bylaw, and ap- proved the endowment of a Catholic University and by Mr. Kendall, who justified the course of the Government on the three points-Laud, Church, and Education. Mr Gladstone, who rose just before ten o'clock, and was loudly cheered by the Opposition, pointed out that, numerous as had been the blots hit in the Ministerial programme, their greatest error of all was that they bad failed to realise the grave fact that we had reached a crisis in the Irish question. Ireland had an account with this country which had endured for centuries, and in the opinion of every enlightened nation in the world, much as we had done, we had not done enough to place ourselves in the right. The most recent proof of this failure of the Governmenb to grasp the gravity of the occasion was Sir Stafford Northcote's speech, for the impar- tiality of the Executive Government, to which he trusted, was not sufficient to counterbalance the injurious effect of unjust laws. Time, his second palliative, had been tried some centuries, and of the third palliative—justice—he re- marked that Sir Stafford's idea of it included the main- tenance of the Irish Church. Admitting that Lord Mayo's account of the state of Ireland was, on the whole, accurate, he argued that the co-existence of material progress with widespread discontent was a proof that some unsatisfied necessity still existed, and in enforcing the gravity of the political crisis he pointed to the depletion of Ireland by emigration, the repeated suspension of the Habeas Corpus, and the invasion of England by Fenianism. Mr. Gladstone next discussed at length the adequacy of the Government policy to the exigencies of the case under six heads, viz :—Parliamentary Reform, the Repeal of the Ecclesiastical Titles Act, Railways, Education, Land, and the Church. The first three he dismissed very briefly, and on the question of University education he remarked that the Roman Catholics had a real grievance. He defended the action of Lord Russell's Government in 1866 on this subject, and in discussing Lord Mayo's suggestion he insisted, with much emphasis, that Parliament had never voluntarily undertaken the support of denominational Universities and school* but, on the contrary, of late years it had been sedulously endea- vouring to get rid of all votes of a purely denominational charactpr. Mr. D'srae i must know as well a» anyone that such a scheme as this could not be carried into effect; it was a mere idea la fact, which in reality was dead before it had lived and in the absence of any information as to the views of the Roman Catholic bishops it might be described as another leap in the dark." But it was impossible to give a final opinion on the University question until the view of Parliament on the Irish Church was ascertained, for if a sweeping policy were adopted it would be necessary to con- sider how far Trinity College could be made available. On the land question Mr. Gladstone asserted that the fed grievance of the Irish people had been acknowledged by the Devon Com- mission which had recommended a measure of compensation for imnrovementP. A just land law he laid down to be one under which?in the absence of any contract between land- lord and tpnant the improvements effected by the tenant should be his propCTty, arid he preferred to tru,t rather to the operation of Such a security than to any measure for fixity of tenure, /rhe suited 'thatif th! pointed out some difficulties to n,, i» ° Government took possession of the Irish Church pr ptr y^ the experiment could be tried there 1^8,8'n« question! Mr. Gladstone congratulated the House on the rapid advance of public opinion, as shown, perhaps, more forcibly in the defence of the Church than in the attack. After condemning strenuously Lord Mayo s hint at an jncrea«e in the R><gium Donum and a subsidy to the Roman Catholics from the Consolidated land, and ridiculing the Government pleas for delay, he an- nounced, amid loud cheers from the Opposition, his opinion that the Church, as a State Church, must cease to exist. Religious equality must be established, dif- ficult though theoP-tjonm,ght be^ toeth"e level of the Church by grants from the Consolidated j",nd! and the plan for redivid.ng her revenues among the flersv of different denominations Those plans had long passed the point of practical possibility. On the whole, he agreed very much with Mr. Bright's mode of effecting this great operation. He recommended Mr. Magmre to with- draw hb motion, hut he intimated that unless Mr. Disrae speech differed altogether from the speeches of his col- leagues, it would be th« duty of the Opposition to as cided opinion from the House on this question an not be a mere empty declaration, butTt id by some practical step which would show the Irish people Parliament was no w in earnest. cheered, commenced Mr. D'^aeli, who was also y fate which made by ironically bewailing the Millfgterial career coinct- the commencement or nis eggjty cf immediately dent with the imPerI°^Li.nrjea old. Examining the settling an account seven c gtatei by Mr. Glad^- elements of the Irish <c .'hem },a t existed while he stone, he showed that all oL. t hali been made to deal was in office, and that noa thoPuniversity project, he de- withthem. Commencing with > v The ohject o{ the fended the Ministerial pro^amme [rjfh Boman Catholics proposed Charter was to d ire(j 0f giving their children the opportunity they haddlu0ng.on the ir,fluence o{ thelr the benefits of a hign garca,m of Mr. Horsman that it was own priesthood, iw"r,t montani>m was absurd, as he showed meant to concd'ate lactsrelating to the Queen's College, by a recapitulation d totally misrepresented, which Mr. Horsman he wua^ o/tb(( Goveriimenti He vindicated 1 d all other points the Government premising that in thisi» wag theoretically perfect, but had proposed, not that Y„TH(,ticable. They had picked out which was practical and P a „eI1eral agreement that all those points on which t referred to a C»m- legiilation was possible, wgre not rjpe jor decision, mission those points only w tjiat the object of the and he characterized the jegg al)d re,Use of factious Commission was delay as rhnrcii question, and admitting insinuation." Passing to tn position he should wish that the Irish Church was n mmunt0n the majority of to see her, having in h and defellded the princi- the people, Mr. Disraeli discuss ]Ie deni#d that the pie of ecclesiastical endo el,do»ments, as had been spirit of the age was oppoted to with the aid of laid down by Mr. c01lverted Mr. Glad- the philosophers, had app&'e" ^j.ned the House that it stone to the same opinion. issue of the Irish Church was not the comparatively endowments, an entire rebuff e pn''cllde of eccles.aftic^ character) which wag at stake n" ln the natioiial h-.j^ benches loud and con- bmmna f^rawin^ irom ths ^al c.mp.tence of the tinuous cheering, he denied the mow F t House to decide that Issue without a". o,lld decide ftr It was a question which the country alone 'could^decWa For JO years the Liberal partv had been in power, but wMt Had Ihey done to prepare the public mind for a This Parliament, he held ought not to decide it, it ought to he reserved f#r the new and enlarged constituenciesg personally in favour of ecclesiastical endowments, he strongly objected to the destruction of the Irish Church. ine violence and confiscation with which it must De accom- panied would be a great detriment to Ireland, wl?ere tnere had already been violence and confiscation enough; but ne reserved to him«elf the right of considering the labours of thP commission now sitting, and at the same time he ex- r.rp«sed a decided opinion that the moment had arrived w, there mnst be a considerable change in the condition unendowed clergy of Ireland whi«h would e eva e of the une u a,i3 he dld llot mean what wa, vulgarly their iuflue»ce- he iests," making them the stipendiaries called p»>i' » ..strongly disapproved. Referring of the State, of ^{ lg44^ ile maintained that, to his oft-quoted »P th{J heedies, rhetoric which though expressed, per p g who Bat below the gang_ appeared to be the sPP' bwag ri^ht, and he concluded by way, the sentiment ol l Mi i t8riai programme was the avowing his belief that ithe MiIre|an(i commencement of a new p y withdrawn, and the The motion and amendment debate came to a close. c,1T,„lemental votes in the Civil In Committee several supplement Service Estimates were agreed to. d the jjouse ad. Some other business was disposed ol, an journed. A1arch 17, the Marquis | >f In the House of Lords, on Ma mjttee to inquire Clanricarde rose to move for a select procedure of the into the constitution, jurisdiction, and pr^eaur their Quarter Sessions Courts in Ireland, wit improvement and to the further as»l" nd and Wales. Bill Courts to the County Courts of England ana^ The noble marquis explained that. his o J j Ireland hild was that part of the administration of the la nronosed been neglected, and he believed that the alteration proposed might be made without any increase of expense. the Civil B d a bill embodying the views that he had expressed the Government would ofter no opposition to t. hr -vrth>t h..h.«M ax'i'ts tss1vis's if his attention had Deeii lagt for the purpose of Lion Inu, Cambridge, «n Sl)Ciety, at which the forming a Conservative iieg ]lt tor Cambridgeshire, &arl of Hardwicke, the LordI be ghouid inquire if and a peer of the realm preside 0j a representative such conduct was permitted on the p °'J?.er Thursday next he Ihe karl of Mayo gave notice that o Peoole should introduce the new ltepresentation of the p (Ireland) Bill.

.... DEATH OF LADY TICHBORNE.

AN EXTRAORDINARY SWINDLING…

---THE SUNDAY LIQUOR TRAFFIC.…

THE RETIREMENT OF MR. ADAMS.

THE WAGES OF AGRICULTURAL…

PRINCE NAPOLEON'S VISIT TO…

THE RECENT IRISH PRESS PROSECUTIONS.

SENSATIONS IN ABYSSINIA.

EXTRAORDINARY CASE OF POISONING…

MURDER OF A SCOTCH LADY IN…

THE PRINCE OF WALES'S VISIT…

HORRIBLE MURDER.

[No title]

DAMAGES AGAINST A FRENCH RAILWAY…

UNWILLING EMIGRANTS!

THE FAMINE IN ALGERIA.

SINGULAR FREAKS OF A LUNATIC.

PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS SIMPLIFIED..

THE MARKETS.