Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

13 articles on this Page

[No title]

TAFF VALE KAILWAY rnOSE-CCTIOX…

News
Cite
Share

TAFF VALE KAILWAY rnOSE- CCTIOX AT PEXARTH. UXFOUXDED CHARGE AGAIXsT A Ei \~X CASHIER. MR. KAXBCOCK AXD MR. JAMES HUHMAX. At the Penarth Police-court on Monday, before Colonel Guthrie (chairman).Mr. J. Pyke Thorni>-on. and Mr. T. Morel. Robert Thomas, a bank cannier, was charged with attempting to defraud the Tatf Vale Railway Company by travelling from Care.itf to Penarth without a proper ticket.—Mr. J. Handcock defended. On the case being cabled on, Mr. James Hurman. manager of the Taff Vale Company, rose from the solicitors' table, and addressing the Bench asked to be allowed to st.^te the circumstances of the case in the absence tthe Company's solicitor. Mr. J. J. Hancock strongly objected ina<nrueh as Mr. Hurman was not a solicitor. Mr. Hurman again proceeded to add>re>s their worships. Mr. Handcock again objected, and said it was a most irregular proceeding. The Tatf Vale •' o:n- pany should be treated the same as anv other company. The Bench decided against Mr. Hurman. and called upon the first witness to give evidence, Charles George Hanvell said he wa-s a ulster in the employ of the Taif Vale Railway Co.and was on duty at the Penarth Station on the arrival of the 4.32 p.m. train from Cardiff on the 11th of June. The defendant, who was the second or third passenger who got out of the train, gave witness a ticket which was only available from CardiJ' to Penarth Dock. Wimi-ss told him there was a penny to pay. as it was a Penarth Dock ticket. Witness refused to pay the extra charge, and said he would see the man from whom lie had the ticket the following day. and after leaving his name and address went away. The following day at the same time he arrived by train with a proper ticket, and said. How about the penny for Yesterday • did you get it Mr. Handcock. after briefly cross-examining the witness, proceeded to address the Bench, and"raid the defendant occupied a responsible position :n 1 one of the leading banks. Their worship- had been asked by the prosecution to believe the de- fendant. for the sake of one penny, was going to defraud the company. That was the gist, oi the case. Unfortunately he (Mr. HandcocK) was not allowed to call the defendant, but his instructions were that he took f! ticket in a nurrv at < diff for Penarth. for which he paid 3d., and which wa- the proper fare. On arriving at Penarth he naturally refused to pay the additional charge, as he had paid the proper fare already, and told the porter he would see the man who had issued the ticket about the matter. He iMr. Handcock) complained very strongly that the company had not asked for an explanation. He begged to draw the attention of the bench to a clause in the company's Act in reference to such a case. Mr. Hurman Read the clause. Mr. Handcock (to Mr. Hurman) If yru have anything to say. bring your solicitor here. I" is i, most irregular proceeding for you to inter; up-, me with a running conversation, as you have been the wh«.;Ie of the time I have been addressing the bench. It's only done with an object. The Bench, interrupting Mr. Handcock. said thev were of opinion that there had been no int'-ntioii to defraud, and dismissed the case. Mr. Hurman rose, and asked for an adVmi- meut. in order that the company's solicitor miirht prosecute. Mr. Handcock Weil, it's a most novel proceed- ing. It's on a par with the whole prosecution. The Magistrates' Clerk informed Mr. Hurman that the Bench had dismissed the case. so that, there was an end of the matter.

PKXAKTH POLICE COURT.

[No title]

'X AXD ABOUND BARRY.

LETTERS TO WELSH NADERS OF…

BARRY DISTRICT NEWS

EXCITING BOATING INCIDENT…

BARRY DOCK AND RAIL-! WAYS…

BARRY AND CADOXTON! LOCAL…

INTERVIEW WITH DR.! O'DONNELL.;

BARRY AND CADOXTON1 BURIAL…

SEKIOUS CHARGE AGAIXsT A j…