Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

LONDON CORRESPONDENCE.

[No title]

THE EASTERN QUESTION., 1

News
Cite
Share

THE EASTERN QUESTION., 1 :r PRINCE GORTSCHAKOFFS CIRCULAR. The text of the circular of Prince Gortechakoff of the 9uh inst., to the Russian representatives abroad, accompamying the annex, in which the Prince replied point by point to Lord Salisbury's circular despatch of the 1st inst., is as follows: li Lord A Loftus has communicated to me the Circular addressed by the Marquis of Salisbury to the Great. Powers, under date April 1. It has been subjected to a careful examination, and we duly recognise the franknfsa with which it sets forth the views of the Government of Her Britannic Majesty on the preliminary Treaty of Peace of San Stefano. We therein find presented in great detail the objections of the English Cabinet, but we look ia vain for any proposals it would be disposed to suggest towards a practical solution of tbp present crisis in the East. The Marquis of Salisbury tells us what the English Government does not wish, but says nothing or what it does with. Wo think it would be useful if his lordship would be good enough to make this latter point known in order to promote an understanding of the situation. Aa r^-ards the declaration of the views of the Government of her Britannic Majesty on the subject of the Congress, I can only recall the course which on its side the Imperial Cabinet has followtd on tbi* question. It has socially communicated to the Gr^at Powers the the text of the Prelimi- nary Treaty of San Stefano with an explanatory map. We added that at the Coneress, if it were to meet, each of the Powers there represented would have full liberty of appreciation and action. In claiming the same right for Rutsia^we can only reite- rate the same declaration. Be pleased to communicate the present despatch, with its annex, to the Govern- ment to which you are accredited." GORTSOHAEOFFS REPLY. Prince Gortethakoff has replied to Lord Salisbury's depatch. The nature of the reply may be judged from the fact that Prince Gortschakoff maintains that the San Stefano Treaty without undergoing the hast modification, would still not have the effect of placing the new state of Bulgaria under the control of Russia, notwithstanding its Muscovite administration, and the occupation of its territory by a Russian army for two years. It is argued that the present pro- posal with reference to Bulgaria is nothing more nor less than that which Russia carried into effect in 1830 in the interests of Moldavia and Wallachia. Experience has proved, it is said, that the work then accomplished in those provinces has been attended by the best possible results, and that Russian influence has not preponderated there in a manner prejudicial to the interests of Europe. Moreover, it is pointed out that the virtual independence of the Danubian principalities has been realised, notwithstanding the fact that their frontiers are coterminous with those of Russia, while it is proposed in the treaty that Bulgaria should be divided from Russia by the Dobrudscha in the event of the latter territory being ceded to Rou- mania. As regards the proposed occupation of Bul- garia for two years, that period would willingly be abridged by Russia, provided it could be accomplished without prejudice to the peace and interests of the country. No proposal is made with a view to allowing Austria to occupy the western portion of the Principality, nor do we ob- serve any similar concession regarding the various mixed commissions for the settlement of boundaries, and the inauguration of the new governments in the several provinces of the Balkan peninsula. It is stated that the delimitation of Bul- garia has only been indicated in general terms, as far as possible in accordance with the majority of the population in the various districts, and that the principle thus laid down will be practically applied by a mixed commission. The statement, however, is simply a repetition of the clause of the treaty which provides that the mixed com- mission shall consist of a Russian commissary aided by commissioners appointed by the Porte, Servia, and Bulgaria. In other words, the cemmis- sion would be practically a Russian one, instead of being European in character. The granting of ports to Bulgaria on the coast of the Black Sea is defended on the ground that the same proposal was received with favour by the Constantinople Conference; while asre- gards the ports on the JSgean it is maintained that they would be profitable to England and the other Powers, whose commerce is far greater in the Mediterranean than that of Russia. The cession of territory in Armenia, and more especially of the fortresses ot Kara and Ardahan, is justified on the ground that Russia ought not to be subjected at any future time to the necessity of taking, by force of arms, places which she has captured three times within the last half century. The repiv termi- nates, as it was anticipated, by requesting the Eng- lish Government to show bow the benevolent views expressed in Lord Salisbury's Circular can be realised for the subject Christian races consistently with the rights which Russia has obtained by so many sacrifices, unless, indeed, in accordance with the pro visions of the Treaty of San Stefano. It is therefore urged that practical proposals should be prescribed to indicate bow arrangements for this purpose can be consistently made with the interests of Russia for the establishment of a solid and durable peace.

WILLS AND BEQUESTS.

[No title]

FAILURE OF CITY BANKERS.1

O'DONOVAN ROSSA AGAIN.

[No title]

PARLIAMENTARY INTELLIGENCE.

ARRIVALS OF SPRING BIRDS.

HUMAN FLESH SAUSAGES.I

[No title]

THE ASSASSINATIONS IN IRELAND.…

THE DOG QUESTION IN THE COMMONS.

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES.

[No title]

PROPOSED POST ADVERTISING…

INCITING TO FIGHT A DUEL.

[No title]

THE KAFFIR WAR.

[No title]