Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

.-THE TERCENTENARY OF HARVEY.

[No title]

ERUPTION OF MOUNT HECLA.

A REMARKABLE CASE.

[No title]

THE AUSTRIAN ARMY.

[No title]

RUSSIAN VIEWS OF WAR WITHj…

THE CALLING OUT OF THE RESERVES.

[No title]

HOW THE GREEh. INSURRECTION…

5 BREACH OF PROMISE CASES.

News
Cite
Share

5 BREACH OF PROMISE CASES. WDM BUSH V. COLLINGS. TT ci!e ^imbush v. Collings came before Mr. Urider-Sheriff Burchell and a jury at the Sheriff's Court, Westminster. This action had been brought in the Exchequer, and judgment being allowed by default, was sent to this court to assess the amcuntinan action for breach of promise of marriage. The claim was for £200, and Mr. Erskine Pollock, as counsel for the plaintiff, Jemima Wimbush, asked for substantial damages from Edward Collings, who was coach- man to Lady Charles Burt Percy, at Guy's Cliff, Warwick, where the plaintiff had been in ser- Tfl7ft Ji y.,Wer6 .acquainted in 1869, and in lo7o, when the plaintiff mmn to London, he Dro- misedher marriage. The wedding was arranged for Sept. 2 last, and a few days before he told her he liked some one else better. He, however, made it up, and saw her on the day before the appointed marriage. He was to see her again in the evening, but she had not seen him since, and in November be was married to another. In December she wrote him a letter, and he returned it with his own remarks. Mr. Pollock said judges were divided as to actions on breaches of pro- mise, but for the heartless conduct displayed by the defendant be asked for ample damages to punish him. Mr. Under-Sheriff Burchell said the jury were not to A 0 defendant, but to compensate the plain- loss she had sustained. The jury ultimately awarded £ 75 as damages. mij, MAT V. ROTTON. fj" C??J6 before Sir James Fitzjames Stephen at tbe Assize Court at Devizes. The plaintiff waa the n „Ufhter of the Eev. Edmund May, rector of J near Devizes, and the defendant was an undergraduate at Cambridge, where he became ac- quainted with ths plaintiffs brother. A visit to the rectory oil owed, which resulted in defendant becom- ing a acned to the plaintiff, and in an engagement ^e^'en He had, however, failed to pass his i. j f0', Bn^ «ome months after the engagement he wished to break it off, on the ground that he had no prospects before him at present. The plaintiff, however, refused to exonerate him, but eventually he broke it off, though still against her wish. Being prestea by plaintiff's father as to his reasons, he said, in a letter he then wrote, that his only fea*L?5 that the plaintiff was untruthful, and that u* k there could be that confidence that ought to exist between man and wife. The charge of untruthfulness was indignantly denied, and as the de- fendant declined an interview in which to come to an arrangement, the present action was brought. During the correspondence his father—a bank manager in Birmingbam-had died, and he was said to have re- ceived AoUUO as his fortune. The learned counsel read a number of letters that had passed between them, and after the plaintiff, her father, mother, and brotner nad been examined, the learned counsel for the de ence addressed the jury, and his lords-tip eummed up, somewhat unfavourably to the plaintiff. The jury, however, found a verdict for the plaintiff- damages, £1000.

[No title]

THE MILITARY SITUATION IN…

THE CHANGES IN THE CABINET.

TURKISH REFUGEES.

[No title]

THE BURNING OF THE SPHINX.

DEPUTATIONS TO LORD GRANVILLE…

ON BOARD HOBART PASHA'S FLAG-…

[No title]