Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

IHK FLEET RUNNING THE GAUNTLET…

[No title]

THE VICTORIA CROSB AND ALBERT…

THE TOWNELEY FAMILY.

[No title]

COLLIERY DISASTER IN SCOTLAND.

THE VALUE OF THE CLEOPATRA.

[No title]

THE CAT TAX.

BOAT RACE ON THE TYNE.

[No title]

SCENE AT THE SIGNATURE OF…

[No title]

EXTRAORDINARY DIYORCE CASE.

THE VOLUNTEERS AND THE NEW…

A PRESTON WILL CASE.

[No title]

THE^QUEEN AT THE ROYAL TAPESTRY…

REMARKABLE BREACH OF PROMISE…

News
Cite
Share

REMARKABLE BREACH OF PROMISE CASE. The case of Heap v. Morris came before Mr. Baron Huddleston and a special jury in the Court of Bx chequer. This was an action brought by a gentleman to recover damages from a lady for a breach of promise to marry. The plaintiff set up a written agreement to the effect that they arranged to be married, and that if the marriage did not take place by 1875 the defendant was to give him a third of what she received under the wills of her parents, or pay him an annuity of XW, which was to be doubled every year until the marriage took place. Mr. Digby Seymour, Q.O., Mr. M'OoU, and Mr. John Carr, jun., represented the plaintiff; and Mr. Benjamin, Q.O., Mr. Waddy, Q.O., and Mr. Tennant appeared for the defendant. The plaintiff was formerly the second master at the Oaistor Grammar School, in Lincolnshire, and the de- fendant was the daughter of a solicitor at the same place. In 1857 or 1858 the plaintiff formed the ac- quaintance of the defendant, she being then about 26 years of age. About the year 1862 the head master of the school died, and the plaintiff then sought to obtain the appointment, but without success, owing, it was alleged, to the opposition of the defendant's father. Since that time a considerable amount of correspondence had passed between the parties. The plaintiff's case now was that on December 17,1872, an agreement was signed by the parties, whereby the defendant agreed to be- come the lawful wife of the plaintiff on or about Jan. 1,1875, or in default the defendant promised to pay a third share of the property or money which might be left to her under her parents' will. The defendant also agreed to pay X20 per annum from Jan 1, 1875, which sum was to be doubled annually until the defen- dant should become the lawful wife of the plaintiff. The defendant had not fulfilled her promise to marry, and although the plaintiff had always been ready and willing to become the husband of the defendant, yet the defendant refused to become his wife. The state- ment of defence admitted the signing of the memo- randum, but did not admit the date or contents of the document, and alleged that the memorandum was to have become void under certain circumstanses. Mr. Benjamin, before the opening speech concluded, suggested that it might be possible for an arrangement to be come to between the parties if his lordship would allow the adjournment of the Court to take place at that time, although rather before the usual hour. Baron Huddleston granted the application. Mr. Digby Seymour, after the Court had re-assem- bled, said on behalf of the plaintiff he had consented to a verdict for .£1000 upon certain terms. Mr. Benjamin, on behalf of the defendant, said his cl:ent was willing to pay £ 1000 rather than to allow the letters she had written to be brought before the public. Certain arrangements had also been made in reference to the disposal of the documents in the case. A verdict for the plaintiff, with £1000 damages, and judgment were then entered.

CHARGING AT FOOTBALL.

[No title]