Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

8 articles on this Page

BOROUGH MAGISTRATES' COURT.…

News
Cite
Share

BOROUGH MAGISTRATES' COURT. MONDAY, APRIL 13TH, IS78. Before the Mayor, J. C. Owen, Esq., J. Beirne, Esq., ex-Mayor, T. C. Jones, Esq., E. Tench, Esq., A. W. Edwards, Esq., W. Over- ton, Esq., Edward Williams, Esq., and J. Bury, Esq. I THE HOP-POLE LICENSE. MrT. Bury, solicitor, saul he begged to make application in the adjourned case of Mr C. F. Lewis, of the Hop Pole Inn, that the; Bench might be pleased to endorse his wife's license with his own name until the next licensing session. He should only have to ad- dress their worships very briefly in support of the application. It was rather unusual, and he had not been able to find any case, where a married lady held a license, tha.t any applica- tion was necessary. In the present instance, however, Mr Lewis, immediately after his marriage, did apply to the Bench, without any legal assistance or advice beforehand, but his application brought about such a state of mat- ters that rendered it necessary that the ap- plication should be renewed. They were, therefore, now applying as though Mr Lewis was taking a business which someone else was giving up. The facts were well known to the Bench, and he need hardly remind them that Mrs Goodwin was the widow of a person who had kept the Hop Pole for a number of years, and had always managed the business and con- ducted the house in a highly respectable man- ner. Mrs Lewis, however, being the holder of the license, and being a married lady not holding any separate order for carrying on the business, it became necessary that someone should have a license to be in a position legally responsible for the good conduct of the house. He (Mr Bury) would produce the mar- riage certificate of Mrs Goodwin with Mr Lewis, and assuming that everything went on satisfactory and well in the meantime, there would, he thought, be no difficulty in the Bench granting a new license in the name of Mr C. F. Lewis. He was instructed to say that no effort would be wanting to carr y Oil the house in the respectable manner m which it had hitherto been conducted, and he felt sure the confidence of the Bench would not in this instance be misplaced. Were the aplllica- tion refused, Mrs Lewis, by the simple fact of her marriage, would render herself (without her business), without a home. They all knew that men were apt to make slips in this world, and, fortunately, there was amongst all of us a desire to say as little as possible about the past on the principle that the least said was the soonest mended, and that every man should have an opportunity of showing by his conduct in the future that there might have been a mistake in the past, or that he was not so black as he was painted. He would now proceed to read a largely signed memorial in support of Mr Lewis, and would also call gentlemen who had known Mr Lewis for a number of years. One gentleman, Mr Ryiner, of Holt, had known Mr Lewis well, and knew the feeling respecting him that prevailed in Holt and its neighbourhood, notwithstanding what might have appeared to Mr Lewis' detriment in the public press. Other gentle- men who had opportunity of knowing Mr Lewis particularly well, especially during the last six months, since his marriage, would; testify how well he had conducted the house, and that his own conduct had been without ruproach during that period. The memorial he was about to read had been signed by the petitioners and memorialists under a full knowledge of the facts and circumstances con- nected with the application.—MrT. C. Jones | Is it not necessary, Mr Hughes, that this memorial should be supported upon oath by the persons signing it?—Mr Allington Hughes It should be, strictly.—Mr Bury said it was not held necessary by the county magistrates, and the last practice which had prevailed at that court was that the signatures should be read over. Some of the persons were present, a'nd he would read the memorial as having been signed by them or one of them. Mr Bury then read the memorial, which set forth that Mr Lewis was, in the opinion of the memorial- ists, a fit and proper person to be licensed to sell exciseable liquors at the Hop Pole Inn, and that he would conduct the business in as careful and proper a manner as it had been managed heretofore. Mr Bury added that the memorial was signed by Dr Dickenson, Mr Murless, Mr Mr T. C. Jones But these persons are not here.—Mr Bury I must really ask that the objection should come in the usual way from the Chairman of the Bench.— The Mayor It is open for any of the magis- trates on the Bench to take exception.—Mr T. C. Jones Certainly.—Mr Bury Then I claim that I should have the opinion of the majority of the Bench upon the point.—Mr Allington Hughes I don't think it is necessary.—Mr Bury I don't wish to be in opposition to the Bench, but what is the reason of the gentleman who objects ?-The Mayor You say some are here who have signed that document and can prove their signatures?! — Mr Bury Yes. — Mr T. C. Jones I raised tire objection because it is a rule of this court that any person signing any memor- ial of this kind should be here to support it.- Mr Bury Then I have a person here. I shall call Mr W. Pierce to prove that he signed the memorial, and I won't proceed to read the rest of the names, but I don't think it would have done any harm.—Mr T. C. Jones: Oh, no, only as question of -Mr Bury Of practice? —Yes, order.—Mr Bury Well, it's a rule which has been so often broken, that I ques- tion whether it should be regarded ?—The Mayor Personally, I don't recognise the sig- natures of any of the persons who are not pre- sent. With regard to the document, from Holt, I know nothing of the signatures except that of Mr Rymer.—Mr Bury then called Mr Thos. Rymer, Holt, who said lie was the re- corder of Holt, and lived in the borough. He j knew Mr Lewis, and considered him a very tit a!] kI proper person to hold a license for the sale of spirits. With regard to his general charac- ter, he (witness) had never heard anything against him, except a quarrel which had taken place on one occasion with a neighbour. Knew Mr Lewis' general conduct to be steady and sober, and had not seen him in any way under the influence of drink. Knew most of the signatures on the Holt memorial.—Mr Pierce, cabinet maker, gave similar evidence, and said lie had every confidence that the house would be as well conducted as it had been for the last twenty years.—Mr U(I, Evans, provision dealer, York-street, had also signed the mem- orial, and could say, as a neighbour, that the house had been very well conducted during the last six months, and lie had never seen Mr Lewis the worse for liquor during that period. —Mr Thomas Richards, tailor, who occupied the shop premises next to the Hop Pole Inn, saidhehad known Mrs Lewis for about 13 years, and Mr Lewis for 6 or 7 years. He had found Mr Lewis of good business habits, and since Mr Lewis' marriage, the house had been well and orderly conducted. As a neighbour, he believed the house would be as well conducted as it had been hitherto in every respect. After consultation, the Mayor announced that the Bench had decided to grant the application for endorsement. ClIAItCE OF STAIiRIXC IX THE STREET. Richard .Jones, a young man who appeared to have been formerly in the employ of the Great Western Railway Company, was brought up on a charge of unlawfully "cutting and wounding a railway porter, named D. Morgan, who said he lived at 13, Market-street, and saw the prisoner at the Talbot Inn, on the previous Friday night, about twenty minutes to eleven. Prosecutor and another person were having a glass of ale, when the defendant interrupted them, saying lie had been a Great Western man, and had been sacked, adding that he didn't care for the Company, or for any one else. After this, all the parties came outside, and had some words together, when the prisoner drew his knife out. On seeing this, prosecutor pushed away the prisoner, as he struck at him with the knife, which caught him in the hand, inflicting a severe wound. The prisoner "tried" for his (prosecutor) breast, but missed. Had no acquaintance with the prisoner be fore the night in question. The prisoner ran away, but was overtaken, and an officer took the knife from him.—By the prisoner I didn't hit you first. I hit you afterwards in self defence.—By the Mayor When the prisoner pulled out the knife, he said, I'll put a stop to you I got the 1'" to WOUIKI in my nana Detore l strucK the prison- er. The wound has been seen by Dr. Erring- ■ ton, but he is not now present in court, Another man named Davies was with me at the time, and promised to come here this morning, but he has not come yet.—Joseph Davies, porter at the Great Western Railway 1 Station, corroborated the prosecutor's evidence, and said he heard Morgan shouting out that lie; had been cut with a knife, and he (Morgan) then struck the prisoner. Had seen a knife in the prisoner's hand when he was in the house. Prosecutor's hand was bleeding very much, and when witness asked prisoner why lie used a knife, the latter replied that lie wanted to cut some" baeca," Did not see any tobacco, and could not swear to the knife produced. The prisoner, whom he had never seen before that; evening, was drunk.—P. C. Carden said he was in Hope-street, when he heard the distur- bance, and saw the prisoner running away, with his face covered with blood from the pro- secutor's hand, which was bleeding profusely, so much so that he (witness) could not see where it had been cut. The prisoner had the knife (closed) in his hand, and witness took it off him, the prisoner stating, in answers to questions put to him by the officer, that he had been put upon before by about a dozen persons, and thinking they were the same set that night, he had "brought the knife with him to cut their throats. "—The Bench considered the case a very bad one, and sentenced the prisoner to two months' imprisonment with hard labour. DRUNKEN"NESS, I'lCIITIXC, &(. John Allington, Croeshowell, tor being i drunk and disorderly in Ruabon-road on Sun- day week, 5s and costs.-Thomas Brierton, charged by Police-constable Williams with being drunk and fighting in the Dunks on the previous Saturday, was sent to Ruthin for- a month. Anthony Sweeney", charged by Police-constable Davies with being drunk and disorderly on Saturday evening, was sentenced to one month's hard labour, and another month for assault upon a worraan named Ellen Gregory. lane Wilson charged by Police-constable Diekens with being 0 drunk in Abbot-street, I was discharged. ARREARS OF RATES. Committant orders for five weeks' imprison- ment were granted, on the application of Mr E. H. Williams, collector, against Richard Woosnam, jun., and Thomas Henry Sykes, respectively, for non-compliance with the Justices' order for payment of arrears of rates. —Two other persons were also summoned by the same complainant for arrears of borough poor rates.-Rohert Redman, clothier, was summoned by the Wrexham Gas Light Com- pany, for f2 12s 9d arrears of gas rent, an order being made for the amount claimed. DRUNK WHILST IX CHARGE OF HIS HORSES. Robert Hughes, waggoner to Mr Lloyd, of Plassey, was charged by Police-constable Pugh with being drunk and incapable whilst in charge of a waggon and two horses on the King's Mill road on the 30th March.—Fined 15s including costs. DESERTING HIS EMPLOYMENT. Thomas Phillips, a youth in the employ of Mr Peter Walker of the Willow Brewery, was charged with leaving his employment without giving due notice on the 4th March. Mr T. H. Bancroft proved the case and said the de- fendant (who lived with his uncle), was en- gaged in November last and received 17s per week, on the understanding that a week's notice was to determine the engagement on either sitle. On the 4th March, however, the defendant left as complained of without giving any notice whatever, and Mr Walker had in- stituted these proceedings as several other men had threatened to behave in a similar manner. —The defendant was ordered to pay a week's wages, 17s, in lieu of a week's notice, and the costs, the Mayor observing that Mr Walker was by far too good a master to be treated in this manner. THE BUCK INN*. Mr Spencer applied for the endorsement of the licence of the Buck Inn, Hope-street, in his favour, which was granted. TUESDAY, ApriIWth.-Before T. C. Jones, Esq. ALLEGED ROBBERY OF A CASH BOX FROM AN EATING HOUSE. John Riley and James Flood, two respect- ably dressed men, who gave their addresses, respectively, as Clock Alley, Corporation- street, and Angel-street, Rochdale-street, Manchester, were brought up in custody charged with stealing a cash box and its con- tents, the property of Mr Thomas Savage, provision dealer, ke., 20, Charles-street, on the previous evening. Supt. Wilde said the prisoners were given in charge by the prose- cutor on the previous night. It appeared that Mrs Savage had to leave the shuptu paya bill, and left the cash box on a table in the parlour at back of the shop, in the care of the prosecutor. Shortly afterwards Mr Savage had to go down into the cellar, and on coming up again he heard a slight noise, and saw the prisoner in the act of leaving the room with something in his hand. The other prisoner asked for some refreshment, which was sup- plied to him, and soon after their departure the cash box was missed from the parlour. Information was at once given to the police, and the prisoners were apprehended at the rail- way station just as theyweretakingtheirtickets I to leave by the train. They were heard by a certain person, who would be called, to say they had got no money, and it would be proved that shortly afterwards they changed a sovereign, and a cash box was oubsequently discovered within twenty yards from the place where the prisoners were seen. —Mrs Savage, wife of the prosecutor, said she left her husband having his tea with the cash box by him on the table. She went out to pay a bill, and when she returned in about a-1 quarter of an hour she missed the cashbox, which had contained a bank book, a Pruden- tial Insurance book, several bills, a sovereign in gold, and a half-crown in silver, together with a silver thimble. She identified the box pro- duced and the contents as her property, and had not seen them since the previous day.— Thomas Savage, prosecutor, said his wife left him to go out, and asked him to keep an eye on the shop. He left the parlour for a short time, and on his return he saw the prisoner Riley walking out of the parlour, the other prisoner standing by the counter. On coming up into the shop, the prisoner Flood said, You're a nice fellow to look after a shop. Anyone could steal anything they liked while you are away. He then asked for some beef, and the other man walked past him. Riley tendered a shilling for the beef, &c., and pro- secutor gave him 2d back. Mrs Savage came in and asked for the cashbox, which he hadn't missed until then.—By the prisoner Riley Didn't remember hearing you say that you were going to the Blossoms for a glass of ale. I saw something bulky under your coat as you left the parlour, but didn't notice what it was. —In reply to the Bench, prisoner Riley said he and his companion were dealers in marking ink and type letters. They were not strangers to the town, having stood in the market off and on for about ten years. Had received money from Sergeant Malone at the Barracks on the previous day.—The prisoner Flood subsequently made a statement to the effect that they were lodging at the Commercial Hotel, and had gone without their breakfast (having had a little beer on the previous night) to the Barracks to serve an order to Mr Barnett, color-sergeant. They went between twelve and one o'clock, and the goods didn't suit their customer, who, however, paid Is 8d for articles sold to him. He and his com- panion Riley had about 16s between them, Riley having effected sales to the amount of about 10s. During the day they received a sovereign from a gentleman who went to Manchester the same evening. His name was Thomas Smith and he dealt in jewellery and cutlery, and he (prisoner) had changed a sovereign for him. They went to the prose- cutor's shop for something to eat, but not being able to make anyone hear at the counter, they rapped at the parlor door, and he would swear that he did not go any further than the top step into the room. Had bought off the prosecutor a quarter of a pound of cheese, half a pound of beef, and one pound of bread, and they had then gone to the Blossoms Inn where they stayed about five minutes. They after- wards called at Mr Roberts' and had two 2d worth of brandy, tendering a sovereign in pay- ment. They next proceeded to their lodgings at the Commercial and paid their bill, afterwards making their way to the railway station where they met the prosecutor and a police-officer, with whom they returned to the police station. He (Flood) was just going to get their tickets when lie was accosted by the prosecutor.— James Cross, in the employ of Mr Walter Jones, currier, whose premises adjoin those of of the Blossoms Inn, said he went to the closet down the yard about half-past six that (Tuesday) morning and found that the service was very full. He tried to force a passage for the water when he felt some obstruction which turned out to be the cash box produced, in which were some papers addressed to Mr Savage, Abbot-street. Witness gave the box up to the police, not having heard anything of the box having been missed.—By the Bench Mr Walter Jones had a right of road through the Blossoms yard; but no one but Mr Jones' workmen had access to the closet although witness had seen other people go there.—The prisoners were ultimately remanded till Tues- day next.

I i COUNTY MAGISTRATES' COURT.

I HIGHWAY AND SANITARY COM-…

Advertising

I WYNNSTAY, RUA-BON.

1.A.... ■j THE REPRESENTATION…

[No title]

[No title]