Welsh Newspapers
Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles
10 articles on this Page
RUTHIN.-4Ai;. 14th. I
RUTHIN.-4Ai;. 14th. Present: Mr W. ricktone, in the chair; Mr John Jq)tleq, vice-chairman; the Rev. Lewis William*, Pi ion Meters R. Q. Johnson, Llaurbydd: John 1 Hu¡,>;hu, Rbos street; E..Powell Jones, Llanrhydd I). 1<Ihert<, LlaHiftir D.C. Thomas, Llauarmon G. F. Byfoid, Llvigynhsfal and the clerk, Mr R. Ii. 1(,,10. t.- Statute* Tbe master reporfel that thtre were 80 inmates in the Itou-s. against 76 in the corresponding week UkV yc»r; 51 vagrants Lai been r>- i-ved, and two Woliitl), r.rld respectively 21 avid 22, bad b-on coofinod of ¡Jle\t.\u,tc children ia Llanarmou. The out-reli»f<dur- ing the fortnight amounted to £66 3a p-r Griffiths, and .£4218.. per Jonea; cheques .re issued f<lr £65 aud zC40 r..ipectinlv. The oalance in treasurer'! hinds amounted to £1719 2s 7d. Call. w,r. due from Kuthiu die'rict of £425, of which £ 333 had been pai i, 'Llanarmon baing in arrnsr A:80, ami Llandegla 4!J2; from Llanrhaiadr district, X453 was ciue, of which ial 'bwa paul Abei wheeler, £30, Derwen, £27, LUndyrsog, £ 50, and LlanKynhafal, £ 30. Sani/anl Committee.—This ciMuiittPe met at half- i.put eleven, under the presidency of Mr W.Pickstone the Iuspeotor fw the Union produced the following letter'whicb he bad received from the owner of au un- inhabited kuuN in Gyffylliog "Llya, Gyffylliog; llr Davies,—J hereby give you notice that the bouse at Cefn 1m, Gyffylliog, ia untenantable, an,1 that if you cUlOtV the said hoise to he retenanted I shall take legal proceeding agiiust you.—John Bumhi, landlord." The Beard thought they had nothing to do with an un- tenanted house, nod decided to take no notice of the connsunioation.—Tb« Committee made calls upon the following parishes at the rate of jd in the pound; Aberwheeler, £$; CI oca? nog, £ S> Derwen, £5; Kfenechtyd, £2; GyiFylli og, £4; Llanarmon, £23; Llanbedr, £5; Llandegls, X2; Llandyrnog, X9; Llaii- elidau, Xs Lhiufwrog, £1; Llang..yran, £3; Llao- gynhafal, £6; Llanychau, £3 Llaoynys, £11 ;Llan. ferras. it!; these pareilkes had II balance in their favour at the clnse of the half-year. A balance of £66 atauda to the cre,lit of four parishes, aud upnn them no order was mane; LWnfair, klo Llanrhaiadr, X17 Llan. rbydd, £ and Naiitglyn, £ 27.—The Medical Officer, Dr. W. D. JonH, made the following report:—" I beg Vt report that I have visited in the pariah of Nantglyn; tbia house is quite unfit for habitation owing to its damp and dilapidated state. I alu visited a bouse in the village of Nautglyn, in which two room*, npe used as sleeping apartments; one of the rooms is in a shooking condition, and the other is not much better. To occupy these rooms must be highly prejudicial to health. I also visited Telfryn, in the pariah of LltufprrQg; the bedrooru here is unfit for habitation owing te damp. I regret t.) inform you that since your list meeting four fresh cases of diphtheria have occurred. The Erst two cases were at a house called Fforddfawr, in the parish of Llaorbaiadr, and both cases euded fttslly. The third case wis at The Common, Gellifor, which also proved fatal. The fourth case was that of a pauper girl in Gellifor, also terminating fatally. The persan and her mother occupied a email room which is quite unlit for habititioa owing to the accumulation of wanare and filth el « to the door." ThcSehod.—The Clerk. read tbe report 'of the Rev. Dr. Clutterbuck as to the condition of the workhouse school at his examicatiom. Qualifieptiong arithmetic, spelling, object lessons, good reading, fair; swbstanoe of reading,.meanings of words, slat. arithmetic, dicta- tion, notes of leesons, very goad penmanship and political geography, excellent; state of school, stationary. The Board above award a second class cer- tificate of competency, end the average number of sohelars having been twenty-seven during the year, a (rant of £33 2s was granted for the parochial yeir end- ing Lady Day, 1878. The Mief Lists.—Ia the revision of the relieving officers' books, seven deaths of paupers during the fort- night were reported. There was also au item of 2a for the use of a hearse for burying a pauper at Llanarmon; the Clerk said the charge was illegal, as each parish was bound to keep a hearse for the llse of the parishioners. —Mr Roberts said they bad one and made ne charge for its use, but they charge this amount f.,r the clean. ing a-ui use of barnw.— Mr Byford said they had not one iu his pjrish (Llangynhaf 1) aud the adjsiaiog parish, and the other day they had to carry a corpse on a cart.—The ChairlDan You had better bring tLe matter before your ftew rector. (Laughter.)—Mr Byford Oil I shall talk to him about it now.—As the question of paying for the cleaning of the hearse was somewhat novel, the Clerk was directed to write to the Lnctl Government B ard on the matter. ,Vr Louit and the In answer to a question as to the progress of the wall Mr Luii was building to divide bis newly-purchased propeity from the Board of Guardians' farm, the master of the house sid the wall was a dry wall, anti was to be poinled with mortar. -The Chairmin thought the guardians ceitiinly had not 8rran¡¡ed for that—Mr Johu Hughes thought it was the stronger mode of building at this time of the Tear.—The Chairman, Mr Roberts, and several others, simultaneously eiclaimed that the idea of building a dry wall stronger than a mortared wall was quite new. -The Chairman asked if that were the case, why not build houses in the same way ?—Mr Hughes said setts were to be planted on each side of the waiL-The Chairman And they will push the wall down who. they grow up.—Mr E. P. Jonea. Of course they will. -The I don't think the pointing does any good.—Mr Hughes They built en Moel Fammau a good many years ago with mertar, but it came down. -The Clnirnaan But that was not because it was built with mortar. The clerk having fetched the agreemeut, it appeared that the agreement was for the erection of a subsJantial ,,II.-Mr Powell Jones thought if Mr Louis went into court with that agree- ment be would be sold.—All the Guardians thought that a dry wall was not a substantial .wall within the meeGHig of the agre&-inent.-The Chairman asked if there was any "iJ to bick it up.—Mr Hughes said there was on Mr Louis' side.—The Chairman: I thought 80, as unless there is some soil like that, it -weuld not stand up till it was finished.—Mr Powell Jones: No; of course not.-The Clerk aid they were certainly not obliged to have a dry wall under that agre.ment.-After some further discussion it was de. cided that a mortared wall should be built, a8 the rubble wall without morta* was not in accordance with the agreement.—The Board then adjourned to the field, and fouod that the man who was building it had contracted to build it three feet without mortar, whereas the agreement was for a f jur-feet wall.—The matter was left iu the bands of the clerk. Diphlhtrui.—Dr Jenkins reported that be bad had several case* of diptithemin Llangynhafol.one of which had been fatal. This makes five fatal ca.,es in a fort- night, besides some cases of fever. The School Attendance Committee did not do any bl1Aives, there was no quorum. J IIIrd Cast.— During the revision of the relief lists a hard case was brought forward, and its discussion ldjourned. It appears that one Gwen Joaes was for some time receiving relief, and her brother was work- ing for a farmer in Llanrhaiadr parish, aud a deacon the man had agreed to leave the whole of his wages in the hands "t the farmer at interest, but did not seem to have kept account of the amouut. He died about twelve months ago, and the woman's relief was discon- tinued, as it was naturally thought the farmer would psy over seine of the brother's money, ai he was uu. married. The woman new cam. anl applied for relief, ta1in "he oould get no money from the farmer, aud wa, in g,Ü"I":a.nt.
BANGOR AND BEAUMARIS.—Wednksdat.…
BANGOR AND BEAUMARIS.—Wednksdat. I:?reient Mr 'Thomas Jones (vice-chnirman) in the chair Mr G. Davies (vice-chairmsn). Captain Verney, R.N. (ex-offcio), Captain Mitchell (Peomon), Messrs Thomis Lewis, George James (Baignr), R. Hughe* (Llanfaii'feobsii), W. Reberts tAbei), M. Williams (LlandeRfan), Richard Evans (Llanuristiolus), W. Edwards (Pentir), W. E. Thomas (Ll-ndegai), R. Robeits (Llinfihaugel), Owen Owen, William Owen, Thomas Williams, and Hugh Thomas. Financial and Sidlisticit.-Otit-reliet for the ensuing fortnight, per Mr H. 1'. Jones, A:106 15s 91; Mr G. H. Ogden, £ ltS 15s Id Mr W. Hu«hea, £ 74: Mr T. J. Hughes, aCSii 2j 5d; to non-resident povr, X20 138; balauce in tra.\1r.r'e hands, £892 2s 51. Number of inmates in the house, 117; corresponding week last year, 81 vagrants reliovki, 42. Oap>*<* Verney's Cotton.—Captain Verney introduced a motion, nutice of which he had given at the last "III..t¡D. to rescind a resolution come to at the last meeting respecting the granting of an additional shilling a week to Evan Jones, a pauper at Llanddeiniolen, in ihe Carnarvon U.ion, and to reconsider the matter. Two questions arose, vit the question as cjuceraed the action "f the Board, and that of the action 01 the pauper. He maiutainell that the former's action should be re- oonsid'-i d, a'1d he knew of no reason why the pauper should not receive the relief. At the last meeting of the ld year, a reJ.)mmAndation that the relief given to the pauper should fee increased Is per week was made by the Carnarvon Board, The Board refused the ap- pliellttoo, and, apparently, by some oversight, the 5s allowance was also rtopped. The matter came up for consideration at the last meeting, and Dot only was ths 5s ordered to be continued, but the extra shilling was granted. No roasoc whatever was given for proceed- ing thus after deliberately refusing it at the previous meeting. Their action was not courteous to those who pi-wedod thern, and he did not thick the BoartI did their duty to the ratepayers io acting as they t had done. The Board bad acted in an undignified man- ner. There wito nothing of were importance than the dignity of the Board. It affteted the paupers and the poor people of the country the pauper olass would have no confidence in a Board who distributed money in euch a liap-hazard and reckless manner, and that from go-d nature. Another thing, the pauper did not live in tbia Union, but in the Carnarvon UnioD, and he instanced a case which came before the Meaai Bridge magistratoo at their last monthly sitting (the oireum- stances of whioh were fully reported in our columns at. the time) t, show how carelessly the Caraarvoa Board dispensed their relief. He reminded the Board that they had no definite rutss for tbe granting of relief, and until they bad definite rules relief would be given is undeserving c&iea. After qhotimg from H.M. Inspec- tor's report as to relief iadiBmentUuionsin the country, given acccrdii g to fixed rules he moved that the reso- lution be rssciu led, and the matter be reconsidered.— Captain Mitahellsecoeded the motion.-Mr Rich. Evans ".s sorry Up'aitl Verney blamed th, action of the Carnarvuci Gu\\rùia.,a with re>p-ct to the wonao from Newborougb. The wofumu was in diatrep, and her sous were not in a position to help her. She had to beg the money with whicth to pay the fine imposed upon her, aud he (the speaker) bad giveu her a shill- ing. (LaugKter).—Captain Mitchell thought they had no baeiue's tJ enter into tho affairs of tbe Carnarvon Union, win a a guardian replied that Captain Verney had cimmeuced. (Laughter, and hear. hear).—Mr Lewis scarcely thought that the Boaid deserved the charge. bro i^lit against them by Captaiu Verney, who, in reterring io ths mutter, the speaker alleged, lini made use sf the word "deliberately" eight timet. He could not sse that the case was so very importast, and the Board certainly did not deserve the epithets showered upon them that mornisg.—Mr James was of opinion that they should be very wary before rescinding any resolution, and it really leokod something like child's play in BoaTdofGllardiane to a 1&10. IlItion aud taen sesciud it. (Hear, hear, from Captoin V.tney).-Mr M. Williams aid the Cb.irmau and the board fully ceuiHerad tbe hardehips of the "e at th: time the increase was applied for.-Mr Edwards thought tbat it woul 1 be a bad policy te make a practice of reo scinding motions, but. seme cases justified their doing eel. He moved that the reaulution be allowed to stand, and Mr M. Williams seconded it-Mr Lewis again as. serted that they did not deserve the charge of acting in an undignified manner. It was very often thecisethata pauper after being refused oace applied again, and the matter would be re-considered that was not undig- nified."—Captain Verney admitted that tbat often hap- pened, and it was exactly what be objected to.—The Chairmar4 said that the case was fully gone into at the previous meeting, and he wondered why Captain Verney did nut object to it then.—The amendment, in favour of letting the matter stand, was then put up, and eleven guardians voted for it. Fur Captain Verney's motion only three votes were returned, and he gave ootico that he would re-iutroduee the subject at the next meeting. More Persoyialities.-the"Cl,rk asked the chairman to attend t l a return of divided parishes; Capt. Mitchell could give valuable information on the Llaogoed one, and that gentleman wanted to go.-The Chairman re- plied tbat he could Bee no reason for deviating from the agenda. He hope 1 Capt. Mitchell would stay till that came on. They were very glad to see him, he came so seldom.—Capt. Mitchell objected to the chairi ian com- menting on a members atteadance. It was not fair.— Capt. Veruoy endorsed that opinion, and the matter then droppe t.—The lists were subsequently attended to, but they presented no feature of public interest. The North Wales Lunatic Asylum. Capt. Verney called attention to the fact that the above institution needed enlarging, and the Chairman replied that that was generally known among the guardians. School Attendance Committee.—A. return of the ex- penses of this committee, which amounted to £48 1611 lid for the last quarter, and aa estimate of £38 for the current quarter, were presented. Inquiry O'Kcirt.—The Clerk, replying to Captain Verney, said that he had not received a reply from the Local Government Board with respect to the appoint- ment of relieving offic-rs as itiqu ry officers. Cementing the Workhouse.—It was resolved, on t}ie motion of Captain Verney, seconded by Mr W. Roberts, that tenders be invited, through the medium of the looal newspipars, for the ceuuutiug of the outside por- tion of the house. The remaining business was of a routine nature.
CONWAY.—JiNnaBi 14TH.
CONWAY.—JiNnaBi 14TH. Before the Revs. V. W. Williams (in the chair), J. D. Jones, and Mr C. W. Bulkeley. "That Glautoo Many."—Hugh Hughes w". ebarged with being drunk on tne 2Ut aod 23rd of November last. Mr W. Jones, of Con way, appeared for the defen- don', aud admitted that his client had had a glass on the former <late. P.O. Stephens swore that be saw the defendant drunk, in Chapel-street, C6uway, on the latter fiate. In cross-examination the P.C. said that the de. fendant had not ."Id him, with respect to .lie charge for the 21st that he (the defendant, bad been engaged to remove nixir. awil from a midden, and that two or tSree glasses of whiskey had been givstn to him tuty in the morning as a kind of disinfectant. Stephens swore further that the defendant wat drunk on the 23rd. Mr Jones stated that his client would swear, if he were admitted to the oaib, that he had had only one glass -on the 23,d., and that be bad since been a total ab- .t&i..r. F,d 10s and costs. JiejUeting to send their Children te Sclog. -D.mi,1 and Ellen Jones, of gri. B I word Evans, of Llysrsen; John Jones, ef Penmaesmawr; Wm. Thomas, of Mer- llyn; George Robert4, Ty Ucha; Hugh Williams, Llyefaen; John Roberta, Ruffus; Peter Williams, Pen. ygamdda Jesse Jones, Cae-eithin David Williams, Brusymerfyw; and S. Jones, PenmaenBaeh; were sum- moned for neglecting to send their children to school, in accordance with the provision of the Elementary Education Act. Elias Davies, the attendance officer, proved the offence in each of the cases. After hearing the evidence, which in some instances disclosed great hardship, tbe beach fined J.Jones, Thomas, H. Williams, J. Roberts, P. Williams, D. Williams and Evan Jones, Is without eosts; Ellen Joues, Edward Eun., and Jesse J ones were summoned to appear at the next Llandudno meeting and the ease of George Roberts wasadjournsd for a month. Helplessly Drunk.—Hugh Thomas, labourer, Llan- fairfeohan, was charged with baing helplessly drunk in Boot Lane on the 29th Dscember,-P.C. StepheDs proved the case, and the Bench fined thk defendant 2s 6d and costs. John Parry, labourer, of Roewen, was charged with being drunk aud disorderly in Castle- street, Conway, on the 28th Dob,r.-P.S. Hughes, of Tjlanduduo, proved the dcnQkenness and riotous con- duct of the defendant, and the Bench fined Parry 5s and costs. The.Deipeg,ate Potter,—Thomas Jones, potter, of Con- way, was cherged with being drunk on licensed premises. —The defendant failed to appear, and as Superintend- ent. Evans proved him to be a desperate character, the Bench issued a warrant for his immediate apprehension. Drunk and Helplen.-Henry 'Griffiths, of Gyffin, was charged with being drunk and helpless in Upper Gate- street, at eleven o'clock on the night of December 10th. -Superintendent Evans established the charge, and as it was fourteen years and a half since the defendant had been summoned on a similar charge, he sea fined 2s 6d and costs. Drunk and Smearing.—Thoi. Jones was charged with being drunk and eweariog on Novembtr 17th h.t,- P.C. Stepheas proved the charge, and said the defend. ant bad behaved well since that date.—He was fined 5s and eosts. Lieensmg Application.—Yr Wm. Jones, solicitor, ef Conway, made an application on the psrt of Mrs Grace Davies, ef the Tudno Castle, Mostyo-street, Llandudno, in which tbat lady asked that the licence to those pre. mises, which was at present a seven days' one, might be substituted by aix days' licenao.-The Bench said they bad no power then to'grant the application, bnt would consider the matter at the next meeting. Violence and Alleged T/uft.—Darius Roberts, of Llandudno, was charged with threatening the life ef George Smith Gags, also of Llandudno, the latter applying te the BeDch to bind over the defendant to keep the peace. The plaintiff said that on the fith inst,, defendant went into th" market and took uf a knife from a stall, and said he was going to sharpen it. He came back and gave' plaiitifl a black eye, because he (plaintiff) had ordered him out of the market. After some irrevalent erose-examination by the defendant, the Benob bound Roberts in two sureties, himself in £5 and Owen Jones in the same amount, to keep the peaee for six months.-Robert, was further eharged with stealing the knife alluded te in the former case. John Smith Gage said that he had the stall, No. 5, in St. John's Market, and was in business a. a butcher. He missed a knife, which was the ene produced. At this point Superintendant Evans appli,-d for a remand of the case, aud asked the Bench to bind the prosecu- tion over to continue the prosecution of the ease. Gage was bound over in the sum ..£.£5 to appear on the 28th inst., and Roberts was bound over in the sum of 20s to eooie up ou the s.me day An Indecent. Female.—K i-zibeth Pirry, Bethesda, was charged under the Vagrancy Act, with prostitution in Llandudne, on the night of Sunday last, the 13th init. P.C. 41 prjved the ofieuce, aad the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one month, with hard labour. Nonpayment of the Poor Hate.—W, N. Brailey, of Llandudno, was summoned for nonpayment ef the poor rate, which amounted to 1:3 6s. Mr Erana, the cull.. tor proved the rate, and the dema,id for payment of it. Mr Wm. Jooes said be would oppose any application for costs, ainee be cauld obtain payment I.v applying to tbe receiver of the defendant, who had filed a peti- tion in bankruptcy. Afttif some further di9>;us«iou of a legal point with respect to production of a copy of the demand note, the Bench ordered ialln.dil\te pay- -at of the ..I)I amount.
DENBIGH.—Jau. 11th.I
DENBIGH.—Jau. 11th. ¡. Before the Mayor (Alderman Gee), the ex-Mayor (Alderm.n Williama), Dr. A. E. THrno?r, C?ptua R. Doyd WiUiam't *B? Mr ThomM Svans. Disobei/al of an Order.—Mr Grimsley, clerk to the St. Asaph Guardians, appeared to support a sum- mons against Robert Heury Hookea, ttilor, Harrow, Mid.Hlvs-x, for neglecting to obey an ouder made by the magis'rates f»r th« payment -f a contribution towards the support of his father. He had been in arresr fr m July last, and appeared to have made no effort to pay, the amount in arrtar beiug £3 l!fa.—TUtre was a loug discussion as to whether the amount should not be remitted, eq the expend" of obtaining the order were .€3 I iI, and would now be nearly M much.-Ulti- mately the case was adjourned that the guardians might decide whether they would reduce the pavments and remit the arraira.-The olerk was also requested to make a representation to the Local Government Board as to the beavinrss of the costs in these cases. Permitting Xiotom Oonduct at the Three B:){J,rs' Heads.—Terrible Swearing.—'Thomas Jonea, landlord of this house, was summoned for this offence. He ad- mitted the offence at first, but afterwards said h. tried to stop it.—Mr Edwards, the Hand Brawery, Ruthin, the owner of the house, was also present.—P.S. Lewis said that about eight .n'clook on December 29tb, he received information of a row at defendant's house. Went over and saw Joseph Janes go through the bar and the cellar into the street. Found defendant m the kitchen with the front of a waistcoat aad a sold chain in it, in his band, hiving appareatly been torn off a man. Asked him what kind of conduct that was went into the parlour, where he found severs! people. Mr Foulkes was there hiving his h ai bathed, as it was bl.eliin&" and with the portion of his waistcoat gone, which defendant seemed to have in his hend. Told him h. should report the matter, defendant said he could not help it. Mr Foulkes was there saying that there Was not a man in the hOllo. csuld bend him, all they were all cbildrm defendant did not send for the police nor aak them to torn them out. Joseph Jones was drunk and very riotous all the others were very riotous also.—Cross- You did Dot ask ma to tnra Mr Foulkes cut I expected you would do so.—P.C. WyoBe said that with P.C. Simpson he went to the defendant's housii Faw Mr Fou'kes there. He waa bleeding froin a cut in the head asked defendant what was the m3tttr, and he said he could not help it. De- fendant bad Mr F?u?k'a' w?ieto?tt torn in two, and had his gold watch. W&a not asked to turn anyone out. Corroborated the previous witness in some other details.—The defendant said he did ssud for the police, only they came before his messenger started. He called Edward Jones, who deposed to going to the defendant's houee; Mr Foulkes cam. there full of drink and asked for some drink. Defendant told him he was too full and refused him. Aftertbat Mr I'julkes took his jacket off aud began putting his fiet, io a yaung man's face. Mr Foulkes wanted the young fellow ts fight, and struck him three times, and he was struck back. Mr Foulkes would not got out, s* defendant sent his son to look for the police; saw him go ou. That was at nearly nine o'clock before the messenger had gone a hundred yards he met P.S. Lewis; saw this as he was outside the house. Boy went back and told him P.S. Lewia was coming; defendant asked lewis to ttlrn Mr Foulkes out, and he replied, "No, you are the landlord, and it it your duty to do 80," Lewis went in a few minuies. Saw the waisteoat torn could not/ewear exactly how it was done. There ..ere several pulling My Foulkes Did not see any other police there, before Lewis went there Winne and Simpson were not in front of P.S. Lewis in going there. Whatever he had said was true and he Would stand to it.-In eensequence of this evidence P.S. Simpson was called, and said that he went with Wynne to the defendant's house about eight o'clock went befure Lewis: Lewis came in about five minutes. Saw defendant with a waistcoat in his band saw the man that struck Mr Foulkes go into the cellar which led into the Back-row that man was very drunk and riotous.—John Jones, son of the defendant, said that his father sent him for the police between eight and nine on the night in question. As he saw Lewis coming be turned back. No police had been in the house wheu he started did not go out of the house.—Dr. Turnour (to witneas E. Jones) How can you swear that the boy w int a hun- dred yards, when he swears he did not go out of the door?—The witness I suppose he mnst have gone twice.—Jehn Jones denied going out twice, did not see auy fighting that night, heard someone shouting Mr Foulkes."—After the ceurt had been cleared, the Bench considered their decision, and after the readmit- tance of the public, the Mayor addressed the defendant and aoid: We have considered this case and we find that you were fined £1 aad costa in May, 1875, and the figure you cut then was anything but creditable; it was hoped that would have been a warning to you; it would be well for you and all publicans to remember that far permitting drunkenness, or violent or quarrelsome con- duct, or serving a drunken man with drink you are liable on the first offence to a penalty not exceeding £10, and on the second offence of £20. This is your second offence, and the magistrates have the option ef recording your conviction on the license. We have taken your present circumstances into consideration (defendant's wife was sent to gaol a tew weeks ago for receiving stolen goods), and we shall fine you £5 only, and costs, 12', or in default two montbs' imprisonment. We are sorry fjr Mr Edwards, the landlbr.1, but we must deal with the case as it stands, and must order the license to be endorsed. The money waa paid,—The witneis Edward Jonea wsi then called forward and the Mayor addressing him uid We aTe of opinion that your atteution should be called to your own evidence, but all we say is do not commit yoursslf agiin we might have ordered procedtnijs to be taken against you for giving testimony that was not true, but we will not do it now, only warn you in the future ,to confine your- self to what is Iru". Dranh.—Thomas Roberts was fined 58 and costs for being drunk and behaving indecently in Bridge-street, on December 26th. P.C. Simpson proved the c;ve.— A warrant was issued against Walter Wynne, Castle: for a similar offence. Justices' Clerk's Salary.—The Clerk produced the resolution of the council recommending a salary of X116 per annum to be paid to the magistrate, clerk, io accordance with certain papers he now produced.— Capt. Llojd Williams reMmmendad fiat the salary be adopted, and this being seconded by Dr. Turvoiir, was tarried unanimously. January 14TH.-Beiore the Mayor, ex- Mayor, and Dr- A. P. Turnour. .Drllnk.- F.dward Hughes, labourer, was brought up in custody by Police-Constable Wynup. charged with being druok and riotous on Saturday night, for which he had been locked up.—He was finsd 5s and costs; and as be could not pay, went to gaol for fourteeu days' hard 1aoour.
COUNTY COURTS.
COUNTY COURTS. BANGOk.-MoIiDA Y. Before Mr Horatio Lloyd, judge. Motion in Danhruptcy, —Mr Hammonds, of LTan- rwst, appeared on beh-df of Mr Samuel Roberts, the trustee in the liquidation of the affairs of Archibald Soott, a coal merchant, carrying on business at Llan. rwst, to make a motion to declare that the delivery of a certain cart belonging to the debter to Mr Thomas Joues. » creditor, as fraudulent and void, under section 92 of the Bankruptcy Act. On Sunday, Ootobsr 28tb, the debtor called upon Jones and asked him to take a cart as part payment of his debt. This was accepted by the creditor; the cart was handed over, and on the Tsesday foil >wing (October 30th) the debtor filed his petition. No pressure was made upon the debtor te pay the debt,—Archibald Scott was called, and said that he filed his petition 011 the 30th Oct,ber. Thomas Joaee was a crediter of hi.. Witeets bought the cart from Jones some feur or five months before for £ 15, and had not paid for it. During his absence from borne a few days before filing his petitiea, his horse was taken away by see of his creditors,and on his return on Sunday he asked Joies to take the cart back aa part payment. Jones agreed to this, and the cart was handed ever to him. Jonas bad never pressed him for pavment. Witaess handed tbe cart over ..f his own free will he feared lest the cart should go inte the hands of the creditor who had takeu the horse. He had no intention of liquidating then. Afterwards Mr Samuel Roberts, the creditor who had taken the horse, asked him to liquidat", and be said b. would— Mr James, who ap- pe..ed for the credits, said there was no fraudulent intention under the Act.-Samuel Rob.rla, the tru.tee, was next examined, andthe said he was tbe representa- tive of the Wigan Coal and Iron Company at Lian- dudno. He having hurd that Seott was in a "bad way," went up to Llanrwet, aud found tbat the debtor was away on his spree. He found that he had a horse, of which be took possession in the interest of the eredi- tora. On the Monday witnell again went to Llan"nt, and saw Jones, to whom he said that hs had taken the horse, and would hand it over to the credi. tors if Jones would do the same with the cart.-ID cr3Iauamiftl.'ion, be said that if he had known of the cart on Saturday night, he would have taken possession of it also. His Hon said that be could not see from the evidence, that when the debtor presented J onus with the cart be had an intention of liquidating, and therefore the applioation would be refused, but without costs. In re Tharmxt Brooiet.—Mr J. W. Hughes, Bangor, made an application on behalf of Thomas Brookes, of Llandudno, to sell some leasehold property of which he had a fourth share. He said Brookes bad filed his petition in 187S, and at the first meeting of the credi- tors it was arranged that he should pay 6, 8d in the pound. Mr T. H. Lloyd was appointed trnstee, and he paid the composition to all the creditors who had proved their debts, and the bankruptcy was closed. A difficulty now arose from two or three creditors having sent in claims which bad not been proved. Brookes was anxieus to sell, hut the question was whether there was anything to ..II.-Mr J. Glynne Jones, the regis- trar, said the bankruptcy had been c'oted some time, but the property had not been re-assigned to the debtnr. The trui>te», unfortunately, was insane, and he (the registrar) did not kuow what cla;xai might have been sent to bim.-Hi. Honour directed the sale, the debtor'. share to be lodged in court until the re- gistrar certified tbat he ..? satisfied ai to tbe claims sent to the trustees. The IJtinl'echid Riqht of Way Crue-At the last Court the Judge d-ia. in the saae of Robert W. Roberts t'. John Williams, to give the plaintilf a verdict for £20 damages, but would not order judgment urtil to-day, when he would see what arrangement bad been come to by the parties, and if satisfactory to reduce the damages to a nominal sum.— Mr M. Lnlli. (defendant's soiioitor). now appeared, and informed his Honour that his client bad b >u»bt tbe lan4 in dispute so ss to met his (the judge's) wishes.—Mr John Roberts, who ap- peared for plaintiff, expressed himself quite willing to have the ,hmagel reduoed to a no.in?l sum, but he apprehended he would get costs. Mr Louis objeet-ad to this, saving that they had gone to the expanse of £20 to buy the land to meet his Honour's wishes, and it seamed hard to be mulct in co.ts.-Hia Honour gave judgment for Is damages, and court fees on £20, and coats on the nominal d.m.¡¡ee. Admiralty Cnse.—John Thomas f Rdward Roberto.- This was a case in wbich the plaintiff, a ship-carpenter, carrying business on at Ba'igor, sought to recover X.54 from the defendant, a shyi-eworr, residing at Holyhead, for repairs done to a schooner, the It Jane, the propertv of defendant.—Mr J. Roberts ippeared for the plaintiff, and Messrs M. Louis and J. B. AINnson defended,.—Mr Roberts having opened the case, Captain John Thomas was examined, whe said that he was a sbip-ca-penter, living at Bangor. John Williana, master of the "Jane," OIUerlllpon bim on Feb. 23rd, 1876, and aqked f.)r three a, four TIItn to caulk his ship.—Mr Louis her. obj-cted, asthty disputed the main's authority.—John William*, the captain, was therefore called. He stated that the vessel w.n bave'beeo repaired when h. broaght ber to Holyhead, in the diiuraer of 1875. When be reached thft^port, boweter, there were II. carpenters to be had. WitneKft complained 8eVtr.1 times, and tbe owner said he would get it repaired, but did not say where. When witness got to Bangor he could not proceed anv further. He went to John Thomas for three men, for two or three days, to caulk her. It was found that she could not be caulked, and new planks had to be put in, tbe others were so bad. He made tbe owner aware of tbi; by letter, but he got no reply. The owner came over in about a week he went on board fhe veeeel, and saw the men werking. He did not at all object to the repairs, but merely asked if she was very bad V' Mr Francis, inspector under the Merchaot Shipping Act, liaited the ship the aame day and said, Repair her sea-werthily, er let her rot here." Witness Again saw the owner tbat day, who aid that II he would trarel home with Mr Fraueis "he would make it all right with him." Witne»» saw the bill for the repair. aom. time afterwards at Helybrad, when the owner said it must be paid."—Cross-examined The owner sHid the bill was ratb", big, but it must he pid," Defendant never told bra (witnesf) to get his repairs done at Parry's ) ard. Tbe plaintiff's examination was then proceeded with. H. said that he found the plank- ing of the vessel in a very bad conditiol. Skje was not fit to go out. Mr Fraacis, of Holyhead condemned two plauke, juid ordered ibeaa to be replaced. Witness went te Holyhead te consult the defendant reapectinc the repair, utid- the Utter eaid tú hi. I I D. the s»me with it ss you would with your OWD." H., said nothing about the cost. W??it,io.s, after rep.iring the Ship went to Holybead with the bill, when .1ef.u'!M.t .id be ?o.ld not pay it then. He subsequently promised to pay in a fortnight. Th. third time witness called defendant eemplaiued that the bill was "too big." Saw the owner again at Bangor, when" he told witneis that he it was sure to got his uwney."—Croe8-ex*mioed Oefeadant never declared that he would not pay the bill, he only lomplaineoi that it wm high.—Robert Thomas, who at the time wallo plaintiffs employ as c'erkjSftid be went to Holybe&d en October litb, on behalf of the plaintiff, for moaey. Defendant aid that he bad no money at the time he, however, promised to come to Bangor id a fortnight, and would arrange then to p"y the bill either out of the money he would rceiu by sellig the n..el, or out of her ?ruitige.- W*. Williams plaintiff's fore. man spoke to .ic, the defendant and telling hi. tbe ship would not caulk h. wanted new pUoks. D.- feudaut ordered him to repair the vessel, and give her all she wanted,¡,(r All. in his addresa for the defaaoe maintained that the repairs were not absolutely necessary He contended that the master took it upon himself to order the repiir of the vessel without re- ceiving proper Authority. At Bangor station defendant told the plaintiff that he would have to go to the captain for money.—Captain Roberts, the defendant was put in the box, and said that the master knew where to take the vessel to, atl Bangor, for triflng repairs. He did not receive a letter from Wil, liams stating that she needed repair, but he (witness) had written three letters to hit wife. He bad no idea where the "Jane" was. He went to loek for thecaptiio at Bangor, and waited an hour for him. When he made his appearance told him io get her clear. He saw plaintiff at Bangor station, who asked for X20, but be (wituess) said he would not pay him twenty farthings. Mr Francis, the inspector, who was on the platform at the'time, said to defendant, "don't believe him; he only wants a job." Plaintiff c»me te Holyhead, but witness, told him te go to the captain. He had always, point blankr refuB»d to pay him. Witness denied that he ever tpld the clerk, Thomas, he intoned selling the vessel, and then pay him. The captain left the 11 Jane" in July last, but prior to that he said, referring to plaintiff, "If I were you I'd never py he's a bii$rogue." He told Wil- liams he had no authority.—Here the Judge severely catechised the witness, and asked if all the respective witnesses bad said was false, to which defendant coolly answered fi Certainly."—His Honour then said he should let the case stand as it was, and suggested that Mr Francis should call upon him at the Royal Hotel, Holyhead, on Wednesday morning, when he would like to ask him a few questions. He would reserve his judgment until the next Bangor court.-Mr Allanson informed his Hoaour that Mr Francis should be acquainted with his wish.—"Mr Roberts subsequently asked the Judge to leave his judgment in the hands of the registrar a few days after seeing Mr Francis, so as to facilitate matters, aud his Honour agreed to do so. [We understand that his Honour delivered bi judgment at the Holyhead Court on Wednesday, and wa% fur plaiutiff with fvill cost>] In re. W. N. Bradley.—In this case Mr Louis ap- plied, on behalf of Mr J. W. ROlI;er8, the receiver of the estate of W. N. Bradley, a liquidating debtor residing at Llandudno, f"r an interim or3er to restrain the holder of a bill of sale, Mr Herbert Careless, from reo moving certain goods, the property ef the debtor. Mr S. R. Dew, app-a-ing for Mr Herbert Care. Ivap, auctioneer, Liandudoo, opposed the application. M, Lnu;s stated that it Ippeand from debtor ii he debtor's affidavit that on July 2nd t b :pp,ar.d fr..n gave a bill of sale on his stock of fancy goods and fur- niture to Mr J. W. Rogers to secure; on the face of it, a um of £500. In reality the bill was only for £100. That amount was advanced, and a reeeipt given for £500. Shortly after, it was arranged thot Mr Herbert Careless should pay the amount of the bill, and to be- came security for £50, owisfc to Mr Chamberlain for law costs. That money (Nir Chamberlain's) was secured by a bill of exchange for six months, which became due on Saturday last. The bill of Bale was the. endorsed with a certificate of transfer from Rogers to Careless, and there was a consideration from the debtor to Care less for the goodwill and fixtures of ono of his ahops, situated at and being 95, Mostyn-sireet. In addition to thia Careless got a horse ani cart, valued at £50. Careless therefore got the £ 100 he had paid. On January Sth the debtor filed his petition, and on the 9th (dur- ing the debtor's absence from home) Mr Carless entered into possession and nmoved £100 worth of SOOÙI. A restraining order was then obtained against Careless, and he (Mr Louis) now asked his Honour to make that order perpetual, so as to prevent Mr Carel089 from realisin g on a debt which was nnt him. He snggested that the goods hi tnnded over to the receiver.-Mr Dew said his client had protection under the 12tb seetion of th* Bankruptcy Act. HH had obhined the goads under the bill of sale for £G3 still due-to his client. Haifthe speaker) wotili aree to the receiver holding possession of what he now had, but none of that already recovered under the bill ef sale. That, his client w.a entitled to retain. He (Mr Dew) was instructed that the goods did not "lue more than £ 35. J. W. Rogers, the receiver, was examined, and stated that he took a bill of sale from Mr Bradley for £100. He was pid off in the shop and horse and cart, £50 owiag from Mr Careless by Mr Bradley. The bill, although drawn for 1500, WM in reality only for £100. Mr Careless hid removed goods to the value of about £iO. Those goods wpre at Warrington House, belonging to Mr Felton.—By Mr Dow Witness instructed the preparation of the bill of sale, but not for X500, Nevertheless signed it, because Mr Bradley asked hira to take a bill for £500, and ad- vance £ lùO, so as to accommodate the debtor. Did not consriderthe proceeding a fraudulent one. Did not seek for the appointment of receiver, but did not feel sorry be waa appointed.—His Honour directed the restrain- ing order to be made perpetual, and gave the receiver to un leritand that be was not to dispose of the money until after the next court. An Account for Ladqiwjt.—In an adjourned case in which Alln Jones, a ledging heuse keeper, residing At Mill-street, Bethesda, ened Mra Davies, who keeps a number of horses and cars, for payment for the board and lodeing of two drivers in the latter'a employ.- Mr Louis defeaded.—The plaintiff aid tbe defendant brought the men there, and agreed to pay for their board aod lodging.—T. Williams and Rdward JeMa two other drivers, give corroborative evidence. Mr Louis contended that his client never agreed to pay the board of her drivers.- Krs Davie. wa. examined and said she never promised to pay for any of her drivers' boo-d, and never paid plaintiff any moaey.—Mr Louis submitted that his client was not liable for the amount claimed (which did not transpire).—His Honour, however, gave judgment for ,1.i..tiff. In re R. 0. Thomas, a BI/nkrupt, living in IAan- ddt1niolen.Yr J. Roberts applied for the eontinllattnn of the injunctions restraining the 8her:ff from Ae11in2.- Mr Louis appeared for the execution creditor, Mr S. J. Bibby, watchmaker, Carnarvon.—Mr Roberts eaid the question, in a great measure, would turn on tbe question whether the del,t"r was a trader or not. The bankrupt's petition described him as a commission tWnt vt broker, which was proved by the affidavit of ge,iire Klli* and Owen, morble mercbaet., Abery«twitb, who appointed him as their agent. The debtor was also a farmer and a quarryman—a skilful workman.— Mr Roberts showed, thit in his opinion, bis client might be considered a trader, as described in schedule 1 of the Bankruptcy Act.—Mr Louis contended that not one of these would make the bankrupt a trader within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Laws. He was only a char- terer, and traded under restraint. The fact of his being a quarryraan clearly exempted him from the Bankruptcy Laws. He a^ked his Honour to let the sherriff sell, ss the debtor was not a trader.—Mr Roberts showed that his client was a cowkeeper, and that certainly made him a trader.—Hia Honour reserved his decision until next court. A.tl,e, Application in Bankruptcy. —Mr George Thomaa, Carnarvon, made an ex parte application in the matter of Wro. Davies, R bankrupt, residing at Eb*n- ezer, near Carnarvon, on behalf of the trustee to order the pr".eol1\ion of tbs ".btnr, unler section 11 of the Act, 1869, for the fraudulent removal of a cart. — His Honour grmte<1 the oHev. A Bt'others* Dispute.—Hugh Rohtrt.,Iourer. Mostyn, v Robert Roberts, car owner, Bethesda.—This was a claim for £31 9s. arrears of an account otmoney lent.— Mr Woo. Evans, Holywell, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr J. Roberts defended.—The plaintiff said his brother owed him, originally, a debt. of £40 paid his- by instalmeute of ahout £2, from time to time. Had asked several t;m"a for the money; defendant never denied bis liab. ility, and paid £8 odd. He now owed him the amount claimed.—Mr Roberts eontended that his client only br)rrowed X8, which he had paid. He aekddplaintitr to produce hi. account, but he could not. Neither eould he name the dates ou which the amounts were paid, nor the exact amoHote,—Mrs Roberti corroborated her husband.—Robert Roberts, the defendant was next ex. amined and acknowledged that he had borrowed £ from his brother, He wa, no6 aware of having borrowed any more, but had promised to help the plaiatifr, who was iu ill health,—^The plaintiff informed the judge that he thought he had letters ip his possession (at home) asking for the loans, and his Honour ordered the case to jund over for the production of those letters.
1 BANGOR. -Saturday.
BANGOR. -Saturday. Before Col. Williams. Tramps.—John R.lIy, Thorn.. Taylor, and George M-y wre commited; the first two to 21 days', and the latter to 14 days' hard lib nit for begging.—P.C. J. Humphreys was the informant Tuesday.—Before Colonel Vincent Williams, and the Revs. T. N. Williams, and D. Evans. Threatening to Kill. — Mary Hughes, Tyddyn Cottage, Iylanllecliid, charged Grace Willi»mK, a neighbour, with threatening to kill her on the ThurJ<hy wight after Christmas. Defendant ran after IlUd persisted in per- sisted in threatening her. Complainant ran into a neighbour's h"u.e, into which defendant followed, say- ing, "I'll kill you." She wai afraid of her.-The defend- ant was bt)und over in £10; and two sureties of £5 each te keep the peace for six months. A Drunken Quarryman.— Wm. Griffith, quarrymsn, Penybonc, Llandegai Mountain, was charged by P. C. Job. Thomas, with being drunk and disorderly in High- street, Bethesda, on the let inst. Tbe defendaat did not appear. The officer proved the service of the sum- mons, and said he was called to the Waterloo Inn, where he saw the defendant creating a disturbance out- side the door. He wai,taken away by Thomas, but soon afterwards be went tu another public house, where, however, he wai refused drink. The officer subsequently prevailed upoa defendant to go home.—He was fined 20s and eosts. Quarrelsome Neighbours.—Eliztbeth Davies. Ann Roberts.—In this case the litigant, were from Hendre- wen-street, Glanadda, Bangor.—Davies slid that de- fendant came to her house and commenced quarrelling. On her asking her to go out and not raise a disturbance in her house, she dealt her a savage blow on tbe side of the head with her clenched fist.—Defendant replied that oomplainant Ret hold of her by the shoiilder, push- ed her out, at the same time dealing her a kick, and finishing the attack with throwing a brass candle- stick after her. She denied touching tb4 complainant. — Marfi;atet. Davies, complainaot's daughter, said defend- ant bit, her mother in the face, and ehe (the witness) turned her out, and further corroborated.—C. Johes, sister to the defendant, corr >bor ited Mra Roberta' statement. Sije acted as "mediator" for her .ister, and Mm Davies' daughter acted in the same capacity for her mother. On the same day a son of struck witness down with his firt. The case was dis- missed upon payment of 2., costs, the complainant to pay her own costs also.——'The same complainant sought for sureties of the peace against Catherine Jones, who times out of number had threatened to kill her.- She was bound over ip her own reoognieanees of £10 and two sureties of LS to keep the peace for six months. Keeping Christmas at Capel Ourig.—E. Roberts, of the Royal Hotel, Capel Cilrijr, charged J, Jones, smith, PeDyroeffordn, and fftilh Hughes, quarryman, Bryn. llys, in the same parish, with faulting him. As be was going home on Christmas night there was a raw in the sheep pens, close to Capel Curig Hotel. He aud his brother, tbe landlord of the hotel, went there when somebody gave John Jones a slap in the face. Upon this Jones charged eompl-inantwith thegftenceaad attacked him. Jones struck him onc. and Hughes t*ice. Both followed him off the road home and attacked him.—J. Owens corrob irated. There was a row between tbe two defendints and another man. Some other man inter. f, red. He helped the one that was attacke l. This row blew over when the brothers Roberti appeared on the scene. A John Jones struck the defendant Jones, and the latter charged Edward Roberts with doing this. The Roberta. went towarils home, when they were followed by defendants, Jonea Idealing Roberts a blow, and Hughes preparing to fellow suit. He was sure Roberts did not strike Jonea, for he knew the mas who did so well. They were sober at the time.—Defendant Jonerdenied touching the complsiaant, but alleged that the latter threatened tabeat him.— Hughes spoke in the same strain.— A man named Hugh Hughes sail be met I Eti "srd Rooerta in LUnrwat on Tuesday week when Robert" referring Kb the row on Christmas night, said that he expected a thrashing," but he fortunately was not beaten.—The defendants were each fined 53 And 5a costs. A Kyffin-sqmre Squabble.—E. Jones, hawker, Kyffia- e quare, v. Henry Humphreys, labourer, Penychwintan, Bangor.-Tbe complainant charged defendant with u. saulting him a montb sgo. He said be was in his house abjut ten o'clock on the uigbt in question, when he was informed that five boys-from Glanadda were bating his son at the top of Kyffia-square. He wwnt there aud released his sec. While pr "<ce*ding to take him home, H. Humphreys struck him aid kicked him in his tack which caused witness to tall. He was in all uncon- scious state ft r upwards of five minutes. Did n.,t see who struck him, but he ?M told by bia «itoM<ei tbat it WM the defendant who did it. Ou Sunday mnrcin? defendant sent three men to ask him to go into a field "and fight it c)ut.Etnma Roberts, also from the Square, corroborated. Jones asked Humphreys why he beat his boy, when defendant struck the complain- ant a blow on the id,, of the head, and kick.d him in the "small" of his back. After kicking Jones, Hum- phreys ran away. — Robert Roberts eaid he saw the row (It was opposite the Red Lion Inn). He saw Hum- phrey. strike Jones. He did not see Mrs Roberts, the f -rmer witness at all there there were eever.1 women there, but not one of them struck defendant; no one struck him while he was there.—HeLry Jones, com- plainant's brother also corroborated. He said tbat Humphreys struck ài. brother on the side of the head until he fell he did not see complainant's son there at all. Emma Roberts was th(re, but she neil her struck, nor was struck by, auybody. Complainaut had his back towards Humphreys.-The defendant said he had a dispute with a woman (Emma Roberts), who struck him twce in the face, when Jones interfered aad made a run at him, and he (defendant) only struck complainant in self defence. He was sorroborated by Ellerv Jones, who said tbat after receiving the blow complainant went straight away, and Hugh Jone-, a lad, who spoke only to the fact that Humphreys did not kick Jones.—Defendant was fined 16., and 10s cests. A Brutal Fdlovi.—William Robinson charged Hugh Hughes, another resident of Kyffin square, a labourer, with assaulting him on Saturday lut. Robinson Aid he was with a commercial traveller at Upper Bangor, and was coming down towards the station with a haad- oart to meet the five o'clock train. Hughes came up with a herse and cart, and when near him (complainant) left his horse and cart and sprang upon him, takisg hold of him by the neck, and kicking him in the legs, to the bone. He (camplainant) tried to run away, when defendant followed him, pushed him against the wall, and tried to threttU him, and finally threw him under the handoart. Defendant be said was like a 1I1&mad. On the previous Friday defendant threat- ened to make for him."—Robert Prytherch, why had been subpoenaed by complainant, said he only saw lIe- fendant running after complainant and failing to catch him. He did not see any blows exehauged the com- plainant toek a stone from the wall aud tbrew it at defendant. Defendant said that a row arose out of Robinioii's poaching OB the George Hotel premises," and that on the day in question complainant provoked him by throwing stones at him.—Mr Thomas Evans, watchmaker, High-straet, said Robinson was Cuming down with a handcart towards the etation, and the defendant going up the road with the George Hotel cart, laden with coal. They met, and a scuffle ensued complainant ran and got stones which he threw at defendant In the ecume defendant seemed as if he tried to choke his adversary.—Tbe Beach sonsidered the sssault proved, but only fined defendant Is and 10s 6d, costs. A Swindling Sailor.—WilliaM Jones, a sailer, from Holyhead, who was brought up in custody by P.C. J. Humphreys, was charged with obtaining board and lodging at the Black Lion Idn, Llanfairfechau, under false pretences.—Mrs Mary Hughes, the landlady of that house, said that prisoner same to htr on Thursday night aekiag for lodgings. She gave him lodgings on his saying he bad plenty of money to pay for it. He was sober. He had supper that night and breakfast next morning. He also called for six shilliags'-worth of drink. She gave him a bill for'9s on the following day. On her presenting the account, he said his brother (living at Holyhead) would pay it, and with that left. He did not tell her who his brother witm. He ordered drink for others as well as himself. —The defendant said the bill presented to him was only 78, he asked to be let off so as to b3 able to join his ship, when the Bench remarked that the sooner he went the better. Upon paying the prosecutrix 7e he was discharged, Alleged larceny by a Sea.c(lptain.-Ricbar.i Dennie, master of the ship Chester," aud a native of Bagillt, was charged by Miss Mary EHen Halliweil, of the Crown Inn, Bangor, with stealiog a gold Albert chain, a pair of ear-rings, a head necklace, and a bruoch.- The prose- cutrix said prisoner came to the Crswn Inn on Thursday, at about half-past ten in the morning. He was sober. He remained there some two hours. He weat upstairs and lie on a bed. The thiags produced were here, with the exception of the chain tbev were in the house that day. She was not in while he was. She went into the house about half-past five. When she came in she suspected the prisoner, who showed her the beads and the brooch. He showed hr the brooch, and aaked if it belonged to auybody he hid the beads in his hind, too. She did not recogaise the articles at the time. He left the house, with the things in his posses- eion, ard aha went through all the bedrooms Bhe first missed the ear-rings, then the neck-tie, brooch, and the beads from her own bedroom. She also missed the gold Albert chain left under her charge. The prisoner was mob-r when she spoke to him down sta:rs. There were two other men with bim from the same ship, the" Cheater;" and one of them, Friilerick Na. thaniel Bennett, slept at tlie Crown on Saturday awl Suu- day nights last. She was quite sure the chain was ■siissioetbe day he let t—P.S. Morris eaid he receive! in- formation f, Mr HaUiwe!t on Thursday, at ?U..t ten o'clock at nhebt. He made icq.iri?.d found that Dennia b,!I..g?d to a ship -ad Chester." He went on boad on the morrow and found D.n.i. deck. He c"lled him, but DeDDi. went down to the cabin. The sergeant followed, and thought he 8-W the prisoner putting something in a looker. The officer told him he came there respecting the robbsry at the Crown Inn, when the prisoner volunteered a st atcsaent that lie did not know what he bad taken, and handed the wituess a coin. From the locker be brought the ear-rings. He eaid that if he bad taken aoything else the captain of the G. H. Bnan" would have them. He took h'm on board that vesssl, and when alongside a boy brought the neck-tie and beada. The witness went on deck, and the captain informed him that if there were anything else they woeld be ia hie pockot he had them given him by Dennis. He then took him into custody. The broooh was left in the parlour of the Crown the ch'i i was not found upon him.—Frederick Nathaniel Bennett, mate of the G. H. Bevan," aid he was at the Crown Inn with Dennis o. the day in question. Prisoner showed him the "neck tie, beads, brooch, and one eat- ring he said he bad bad them from upstiirs. Pri- soner was at the time in the parlour, and wai not iober. Witnass left the house at 7.35 did not leave with prisoner. Saw nint next on the following morn- ing. He fetched the officer the things from his cap. .By the Bench Prisoner told the witness there were more things upstairs, but wituess did not go with him. Prisoner did not tell him what he was going ti do with the things.—Thomas Finch, master of the G. H. BenD," aaid that on the day in ques- tion he saw the prisoner at the Crown Inn, at about half past four. He did not leave that house with witness. The prisoner was in drink, and sat, in the front room on the left hand side. He showed wit- ness the aeckerehief aud the beads. Witnsos saw nothing else, with the exception ef what appeared to be a) ear-ring. He wanted witnes. to take the neckerchief and the beads, and he (the latter) put them in his pockets, and thought no more of them unt I the fol- lowing morning. Prisoner waa not in his proper senses witness did not believe that the prisoner knew what he waa talking bo.t.-A. the chain and bro- ch were fouad in the house, no charge 19M made.—Pri- soner said he was tipsy, and did not remember taking the things. When he found the ear-ring on the fol- lowing morning he intended returning it, as the Crown was the only house he had visited. -Captain Finch said he had known prisoner for seven or eight years, and be bad always borne a good character. A big, burly Bailor, who aaid he came from Hoylake, uad known prisoner for '■ 20 year." He bad been master for five or six years. Ho had never known hint to do anything »' this sort before. —The Beach told prisoner he bad had a very narrow escape, and they warned him not to get drunk again, as this spree nearly caused him to be sent to gaol. -H.. was then dismissed. Transfer of LicenH.-The license of the Barney Is'aod, High-street, Banger, waa transferred from Woo. Thomas to David Roberts.
VALLEY. -Jt';UARY 14th.
VALLEY. -Jt';UARY 14th. Before Major-General Hughes, Rev, J. H. Ricba,di, Captain Hampton Lewis, and Mr H. Edwards. Alleged Malicious Damage.—Owen Hughes, Bodedern, charged by Mary William", Garden-lane, with having on December 4 th, maliciously damaged her window, was diicharged. Refusing to Quit licensed Premises.—P.C. Owen Jones, stationed at Badedern, preferred a charge against Griffith Jones, Llanfihangel, that he refased to quit the premiiea of the Horse Shoe Inn, Borledern, when requested to de so ou December 11th. He was fioed 5, 6d and Drunkenness.—Owen Griffith, labourer, Lleohgyn- farwydd, summoned by P.C. Owen Jonrs, Bodedern, with being drunk aDd disorderly at Bededern on Christmas Day, was fined 2s Oil and costs. Donkey Straying.Ed ward Pritchard, potter, aLl Job Williams, labourer, both of Boiedern, werocharged by P.C. Owen Jones with allowing their donkeys to stray on the highway on December 27tb. Both '-barges were considered proved and defendants ordered to pay costs, 2 respass in Pursuit of Gtmc. The above charge was preferred by Major-General Hughes asjainst John Jones (rabbit catcher), Garden-lane. Bodedern, the offence having been committed on January 2nd. De- fendant was fined 10« and costs. Assault.-Kn assault casein which John Hughes, butcher, and Job "Williams, itfbouier, (both of Bodedern) were cone-rned was adjourned for a month, Nc/eetful Overseers of tlx Iligh wny. -Sergeant Ed ward Hughes, of Holyhead, summoned the following over- seeis of the highway for negUc'. of duty, which is to keep the highway in the respective parishes over which they are overoeers in proper repair. Richard Thomas and Johu Parry, for the parish of IJanyngheaedi, John J,,n,-a and T. H. Williams for tbe pansu of LV.faohrrtb, William Jones and John Owen, for the parish of' Llanfigael, and Rowland Jones and John Jones, for the parish of I.J ,oddeus,.t..Th. B<ncb granted them one month's time to put the reals in proper repair. Deserting Service.—Owen Lloyd, Tvny Han Llan- fair y-Neubwll, farmer, summoned Thomas Hughes, Ynys, Llantihangel, for desirti' g his service ou Nov. 17th. — Defendaat was fiued X2 aid costs. Auanlt.-Evlln Jonea, roo,1Iiler at the Valley Foundry, and reading at Valley, was summoned by Thomas Pierce, coal merchant, Valley, for having assaulted him on Docomier 24th.—He was fined .£2 and costs. MiMvprepriation of Club Funds. — H^orv McAlister, boiler maker, Peorhos Arms, Holyhead, was charged with wilfully withholding £27 Is 4.1, th- ii-mevsof the trustees of the Holyhead Branch of the United Society of Boiler Makers and Iron Shipbuilders of Great Britaiu and Ireland.—from the evidence it appeared that the branch above referred to waa established in October 1376, and the defendant, who was a member, was elec- ted treasurer. He continued to act in that capacity until November 16th, 1877, when he suddenly left Holyhead for a fortnight. When his accounts came to he examined thev were. found to be t27 1. 4d sh-rt. Upon his return to Holyhead he was req.ted to make up his defici-ncy,when he stated that during his absence he must have lost the money in the train or some other place, when under the influence of rlriok.-The charge was preferred under section 12 of Trades Union Act, 1871, which empowered the Court to make an order for repayment of tb-' mnn-y, with costs, a id a peualty not excepdin¡¡ Ji.20.Def.ud,t adm.tteil ttiechaigi,and offered to pav the amount by we-k'y inntalrocnt. of ten shillings.—Mr JA. Hughes, of Carnarvon, whn prose- cntfd on behalf of the .-ioty'. truatfe<, euhmitted that the ()hare was a very neriom one, the ,fen(l,ut b?ing in a position of trust, and he having embezz'ed the funds of the society.—The bench ordered the money to be paid forthwith with £1 eosts. or in default three months' with hard labour.Defendant was detained in euaùdy. I
Advertising
Ewland's Scobbok—Mr Geo. Thos. Congreve a work on Consumption 11M recently reanhed the Two Hundhbth Edition I It treat* on the Causes, Sump- toms and Progress of this fell disease, with the Successful Treatment, giving Casks of CURB with Qukstions for Patients consulting the Author by letter. Post free for five stiinps. Coomba Lodge! Peckham, London. I Kay's Compound F.ssKNoe or Lissekd for Colds and (Coughs (Asthmatin, Consumptive, or Bronchial), cures nine cases out fte.. •
THE PENMON QUARRY COMPANY…
THE PENMON QUARRY COMPANY AND THEIR WORKMEN. —— REFUSING TO PAY WAGES. STHANGE DISCLOSURES. At the Menai Bridge Police Court on Tuesday iant9 before Cantaiu Verney, R.N., and Captiia Morgan, the Penmon Quarry Company (Limited), were summoned under the Master and Servants Act for refusing to pay twenty-f Mr of their men their wages. The men wet* net represented by a solicit r, but Mr G. D. Dow, of Llangefni, appeared the d-fendants. The following are the names of the workmen who claimed wages, and the amount tile, claimed. They all reside in Anglesey.—John Willi ms, 15 4s 10d; William Williams, f6 4s Id John Junes, £7 17a 3d; John Williams, £ 5 12» lOd John Thomas, 15 18a 10d; William Roberts, ;CIO John Ro-erts, £10; 0. Edwards, £ 5 19. 8d; Owen Thomas, £3 19. 4d Evan Parry, £7 git 4.1; John Jones, ilO Owen Jones, £ 1 16. lOd Owen Jones, X2 18. 5,f; Rubard Jonea, SS Is 4d William Thomas, X5 8. 4d; Owen Thomas, fS 10e lld; John Roberts, tlO William Thomas, £1 16. 81d John Roberts, £ 10 Thomas Brian, flO Job. Roberts, 45 13s 7d Hugh Rowlands, £ S O. 4d John Thomas, 15 5s lid Owen Roberts, £ 5 4s Id. As ail the cases were the same in principle, differing only in the amounts, it was decided to take one ft. text case, and the decision in that to be binding im the remainder. The case ef John Roberts, Tan y 0My whose claim was for ten pounds was then taken. The facts were as follows:—The men had worked from the 15th October to the 22nd December of laa year and had received no wages, and they now sought to recover the wages earned, and a certain amount tot compensation dating from the 22nd of December to I the 5th of January. Is Joh" Roberts', the text case, the claim wasaa follows For wagi-s from 15th Octo. ber to Decombtr 22nd., £ 81 2s 101 for compensation from 22nd December to 5th January, £ 1 7a 2d. total olaim XIO. The mea cl.h..d cowpen..ti"n for buial been prevented from obtaining work elsewhere, as tbey 4 had not been formally di<cbarged from the Penmoa quarries, and their wages having been detained. Johu Robert., whose c:aim was £ 10, was then eatied, and in his evidence be stated that the balance of wages doe was SS 12s lOd (which the company ad- mited), and the balance he claims up to the 22nd December, and frorn the 220.1 Dectimber to 5th Jan- uary he was kept without w iges and without being discharged, aud he was consequently unable to look for work elsewhere, and the difference he claimed for ?m??.?"-???..x?Min? by Mr Dw: The 22nd December was S?.inhy, &ad he asked the secretary for his wages, and Mr Young said there was no money then, but it would be there on Monday. He did De work en the Monday nor on the Tuesday, and he bad not done any work since. He had not worked since the 22nd. Mr Young said he wuuid pay the money w soon a-i it came. He was a poor man, and he could. not wait for the money. He worked two days for another party. Practically, be left the quarry on the 220d. He had no money to enable tiim to look for In answer to Ctptttin Verney, Mr Young said the mell wete day labourers, and were paid by the day. At this point one of the men put in several letters which he had received frum Mr Wingate, the managing director of the quarry. The letters were to the ertect that he was very 80rry that the men bad not received their WJges, but that he hoped the money would soon be forthcoming, and the men would the.be paid. He hoped they would tfot leave their employment, as in a short time, if all went well, they would be paid, aud there would be regular employment aud regular pay. The men, however, thouguc it waS very bad they should continue to work without wages, and they refused to work until they were paid what was due to the.. ?r Dew, for the d-?a.?u.t'.t?d he a?ittedthe claims of hut denied fie c'aim for compensa- tion. The men might have contiuued to work if they would.  Captain Verney Yee; but the p,ur men wanted their wa'@, n -I. Mr Dew there was no money no pav umm. Captain Verney: Then how could the men be ex- pected to work ? Mr Dow The men werken up to the 22nd December, and then they wellt t,) Mr Youuc, who was acting as manager in the place of Mr Liversi tge, whe had died. Mr Yoiiuk told them there was uo m ney, but he wag writing for some, aud as "°0:\ as it tame they should have it. He requested tbem e.i tbe Mouday to resume work, but they refused The men applied for their money on Tuesday aud also ou Wuiuesday, but Mr Young was not able to pay them. Mr Dew also con- tended that the meu were u..Iy labourers, their encase- ment wasobly from day to day, and ceased when they refused to work. Captaiu Verney They on]y refused to work because they did riot get their wg, Mr Y»uon Exactly so. Captaiu Verney a-k-d if the men had been formally' discharged, and what was the usual custom at the quarries, as the question would be ruled by the custom, where there was no special c intrant or agreement, John Walters, the f reman, was theu oalied t> give evidence as to the custom at the quarries. He said he had been the foreman for two yens. The men could leave at any time. They were never discharged, aod nons of tue men had evt-r I < fo:e taken proceedings, neither bad the company takeu proceedings against the men. Captain Verney Thn ae are to uu,1er8tand that in efiect the men said that ur less you give us our money we will not woi k, duli they had leceivel uo uotice to leave. Mr Y"ung Yes. Mr Dew here several times referred t) Mr Young and statements ue kept making. I Capt tin Verney: If y. to want Mr Yo mg tuf give evidence let him ba sworn He was tueu sworn. Mr Young said he was manager at the qoaniea since the death of the late manager (his toother iu-lft*) Mr Liveraidge. He bad nev-r theobai^ed the melt. When tbe men came to I.illl 0., Saturday besaid the meney had not arrived. Some in ney cime and he divided it among them, which came to Is 8d each, but they refused to work any longer. A(,erÖ\'ard, tllOt WII. on the Wednesday, tie tol I the meu thi-y had better not work Riaio uaiil he heard from the directors. The magistrates the i re'ired for c niult..tioo; and after a few ininut-e absence returned and Captaia Verney addressing thecour: said:—Weareof opiniontlist these men had Dot b.-en discharged, and they are eo- titled to comp -nsatiou. Mr Dew We iiik for a fortnight in which to pay. The magistra'es' C:81 k (Mr Rice Thomas) said the men wanted their wouey. Tney bad brought the caM there instead of going to the County Court, wh-re they might have claimed a little more, because of the summ<ry powers. Mr Dew We expect the money in a very few IayL Oae of the men here said tbey were badly eff, they could liardiy ob:a.n food, aod Mime of them would have to applv to the parish fr i,f. Captaiu Veru -y WHitisrn.- t» tal claim. Mr Young F, r wages £ 13-5 2.; lod, for compensa- tion nearly £ 50, aud witii eo-.ts, .t w li amount to u. arly £OO. Capt .iu Vern.y thought the men ought to be paid their money. Tbe Be-.ch ooutd not grant the fortnight and would make an order for payment ofrthwith." Mr Dew said tbe nione,' was ce't.i i, A" repect. able cuiup my like the Peomon Company would cer- taic.lv pay the aifii. Cap-a-n Verney thought if the Company was anch a very respei- able company it coulu raise money to pay te nieti in two days. Mr Dew far.I that it iha bfilills were put in, execution could but take p *ce until after livl* days. After some further conversation Captain Verney &idt the decision of the Herich was that the men should be paid their -nagea, also compeusition, and also their wages for that .lay'? attendance at the cour', a decision which was receive 1 with great pleasure by the men.
Advertising
I* CONSI-MITIOV AND STtrfMOUS AKfgCTIONS TSB Ekfioacv OF Dit. m: Jo>'uii'a LIGHT. BROWN COD Ltv. R 011. is UNKQUAbi.KD.—Dr. Sinclair Coghil), Physician to the Royal Nationa. Hospital for Consumption ai d Diseases of the Chest, Ventuor, write-:—"For ma.y ye,ars I h»ve io private pra-,fioe, exclusively prescri' til the Cod Liver Oil o[ Or. de Jongh, fro a a large and i", timate expo ¡e..r." of i'p..i..rit) as a remedial agent iu approi-riare cfses to other Cod Liver Oil., ignorautly lauded on aocoiv t 'if their coinpara ive ti»t*!e«ne«s a d liihtnes- of coi or. Morereci.tly I have ha t, iu the H ryal N-tiooal Hospital for (>ns-im|tion here, an opportunity ot instituting a taore extensive and syste- matic c »iripari-'ori, and I bave convinced.myself that tn Tnb-rcnlai a i t t' e vari -us forms of Strumous D seait Dr. de Jouuh's Light Brown Corl Liver Oil great r tho Nf\e4c etlieacy than any other Cod Livtr Oil with Whijn lam acquiinted. I. wasespecial'y noted, fin alar/* no ulierot cases io which the patients pro- tested the, had rrt-ver iieeo aHe to r«taiu or digest other Cod LIV. r Oil that IV. de Jongb's Oil was not only tolerated, but taken reaji'y, and with ma.ked benefit. Dr. d. JonnH> Qil it now the only Cod Liver Oil u-ed in the Koval National Hospital for Consumption and Dise.ses of the Dr. de Jough's Light-Brown Cod Liver imperial ha f pints, 2,. C)d,; pints, ii. 5;1, qu.rt4..9& ba -11 chemists. Sole consignees, Xhs&r, Harford, and Co., 77,_§t £ M^ 4a«adoti. « • t