Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

10 articles on this Page

RUTHIN.-4Ai;. 14th. I

BANGOR AND BEAUMARIS.—Wednksdat.…

CONWAY.—JiNnaBi 14TH.

DENBIGH.—Jau. 11th.I

COUNTY COURTS.

1 BANGOR. -Saturday.

VALLEY. -Jt';UARY 14th.

Advertising

THE PENMON QUARRY COMPANY…

News
Cite
Share

THE PENMON QUARRY COMPANY AND THEIR WORKMEN. —— REFUSING TO PAY WAGES. STHANGE DISCLOSURES. At the Menai Bridge Police Court on Tuesday iant9 before Cantaiu Verney, R.N., and Captiia Morgan, the Penmon Quarry Company (Limited), were summoned under the Master and Servants Act for refusing to pay twenty-f Mr of their men their wages. The men wet* net represented by a solicit r, but Mr G. D. Dow, of Llangefni, appeared the d-fendants. The following are the names of the workmen who claimed wages, and the amount tile, claimed. They all reside in Anglesey.—John Willi ms, 15 4s 10d; William Williams, f6 4s Id John Junes, £7 17a 3d; John Williams, £ 5 12» lOd John Thomas, 15 18a 10d; William Roberts, ;CIO John Ro-erts, £10; 0. Edwards, £ 5 19. 8d; Owen Thomas, £3 19. 4d Evan Parry, £7 git 4.1; John Jones, ilO Owen Jones, £ 1 16. lOd Owen Jones, X2 18. 5,f; Rubard Jonea, SS Is 4d William Thomas, X5 8. 4d; Owen Thomas, fS 10e lld; John Roberts, tlO William Thomas, £1 16. 81d John Roberts, £ 10 Thomas Brian, flO Job. Roberts, 45 13s 7d Hugh Rowlands, £ S O. 4d John Thomas, 15 5s lid Owen Roberts, £ 5 4s Id. As ail the cases were the same in principle, differing only in the amounts, it was decided to take one ft. text case, and the decision in that to be binding im the remainder. The case ef John Roberts, Tan y 0My whose claim was for ten pounds was then taken. The facts were as follows:—The men had worked from the 15th October to the 22nd December of laa year and had received no wages, and they now sought to recover the wages earned, and a certain amount tot compensation dating from the 22nd of December to I the 5th of January. Is Joh" Roberts', the text case, the claim wasaa follows For wagi-s from 15th Octo. ber to Decombtr 22nd., £ 81 2s 101 for compensation from 22nd December to 5th January, £ 1 7a 2d. total olaim XIO. The mea cl.h..d cowpen..ti"n for buial been prevented from obtaining work elsewhere, as tbey 4 had not been formally di<cbarged from the Penmoa quarries, and their wages having been detained. Johu Robert., whose c:aim was £ 10, was then eatied, and in his evidence be stated that the balance of wages doe was SS 12s lOd (which the company ad- mited), and the balance he claims up to the 22nd December, and frorn the 220.1 Dectimber to 5th Jan- uary he was kept without w iges and without being discharged, aud he was consequently unable to look for work elsewhere, and the difference he claimed for ?m??.?"-???..x?Min? by Mr Dw: The 22nd December was S?.inhy, &ad he asked the secretary for his wages, and Mr Young said there was no money then, but it would be there on Monday. He did De work en the Monday nor on the Tuesday, and he bad not done any work since. He had not worked since the 22nd. Mr Young said he wuuid pay the money w soon a-i it came. He was a poor man, and he could. not wait for the money. He worked two days for another party. Practically, be left the quarry on the 220d. He had no money to enable tiim to look for In answer to Ctptttin Verney, Mr Young said the mell wete day labourers, and were paid by the day. At this point one of the men put in several letters which he had received frum Mr Wingate, the managing director of the quarry. The letters were to the ertect that he was very 80rry that the men bad not received their WJges, but that he hoped the money would soon be forthcoming, and the men would the.be paid. He hoped they would tfot leave their employment, as in a short time, if all went well, they would be paid, aud there would be regular employment aud regular pay. The men, however, thouguc it waS very bad they should continue to work without wages, and they refused to work until they were paid what was due to the.. ?r Dew, for the d-?a.?u.t'.t?d he a?ittedthe claims of hut denied fie c'aim for compensa- tion. The men might have contiuued to work if they would.  Captain Verney Yee; but the p,ur men wanted their wa'@, n -I. Mr Dew there was no money no pav umm. Captain Verney: Then how could the men be ex- pected to work ? Mr Dow The men werken up to the 22nd December, and then they wellt t,) Mr Youuc, who was acting as manager in the place of Mr Liversi tge, whe had died. Mr Yoiiuk told them there was uo m ney, but he wag writing for some, aud as "°0:\ as it tame they should have it. He requested tbem e.i tbe Mouday to resume work, but they refused The men applied for their money on Tuesday aud also ou Wuiuesday, but Mr Young was not able to pay them. Mr Dew also con- tended that the meu were u..Iy labourers, their encase- ment wasobly from day to day, and ceased when they refused to work. Captaiu Verney They on]y refused to work because they did riot get their wg, Mr Y»uon Exactly so. Captaiu Verney a-k-d if the men had been formally' discharged, and what was the usual custom at the quarries, as the question would be ruled by the custom, where there was no special c intrant or agreement, John Walters, the f reman, was theu oalied t> give evidence as to the custom at the quarries. He said he had been the foreman for two yens. The men could leave at any time. They were never discharged, aod nons of tue men had evt-r I < fo:e taken proceedings, neither bad the company takeu proceedings against the men. Captain Verney Thn ae are to uu,1er8tand that in efiect the men said that ur less you give us our money we will not woi k, duli they had leceivel uo uotice to leave. Mr Y"ung Yes. Mr Dew here several times referred t) Mr Young and statements ue kept making. I Capt tin Verney: If y. to want Mr Yo mg tuf give evidence let him ba sworn He was tueu sworn. Mr Young said he was manager at the qoaniea since the death of the late manager (his toother iu-lft*) Mr Liveraidge. He bad nev-r theobai^ed the melt. When tbe men came to I.illl 0., Saturday besaid the meney had not arrived. Some in ney cime and he divided it among them, which came to Is 8d each, but they refused to work any longer. A(,erÖ\'ard, tllOt WII. on the Wednesday, tie tol I the meu thi-y had better not work Riaio uaiil he heard from the directors. The magistrates the i re'ired for c niult..tioo; and after a few ininut-e absence returned and Captaia Verney addressing thecour: said:—Weareof opiniontlist these men had Dot b.-en discharged, and they are eo- titled to comp -nsatiou. Mr Dew We iiik for a fortnight in which to pay. The magistra'es' C:81 k (Mr Rice Thomas) said the men wanted their wouey. Tney bad brought the caM there instead of going to the County Court, wh-re they might have claimed a little more, because of the summ<ry powers. Mr Dew We expect the money in a very few IayL Oae of the men here said tbey were badly eff, they could liardiy ob:a.n food, aod Mime of them would have to applv to the parish fr i,f. Captaiu Veru -y WHitisrn.- t» tal claim. Mr Young F, r wages £ 13-5 2.; lod, for compensa- tion nearly £ 50, aud witii eo-.ts, .t w li amount to u. arly £OO. Capt .iu Vern.y thought the men ought to be paid their money. Tbe Be-.ch ooutd not grant the fortnight and would make an order for payment ofrthwith." Mr Dew said tbe nione,' was ce't.i i, A" repect. able cuiup my like the Peomon Company would cer- taic.lv pay the aifii. Cap-a-n Verney thought if the Company was anch a very respei- able company it coulu raise money to pay te nieti in two days. Mr Dew far.I that it iha bfilills were put in, execution could but take p *ce until after livl* days. After some further conversation Captain Verney &idt the decision of the Herich was that the men should be paid their -nagea, also compeusition, and also their wages for that .lay'? attendance at the cour', a decision which was receive 1 with great pleasure by the men.

Advertising