Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

12 articles on this Page

SPIRIT OF THE PRESS.I

News
Cite
Share

SPIRIT OF THE PRESS. (In selecting the Spirit of the Press," we are guided solely by a with to place before our readers the opinion of oil parties, without any regard to the relation such opinion may sustain in this Journal.) THE LITERARY FUND COMMITTEE DEFENDED. (From the Critic.) The correspondence between Messrs Elwin and Dickens and the Committee of the Literary Fund, pub- lished in the last number of the Athenaum, entirely confirms us in our suspicion that the munificent offer" about which so much has been said, is little better than an attempt to force the suggestions of the reforming body of the members upon the committee in a different shape from what has hitherto been attempted. The offer was in substance this: a certain person unnamed, but who is generally understood to be Mr John Forster, was willing to leave his magnificent library" to the fund, and to invest £ 10,000 for its maintenance. Accor- ding to the text of Mr Dickens's firstletter, this gift was made conditional on the Literary Fund's obtaining an amended charter, and rendering other services to litera- ture than those in which it is, in its practice, at present limited." Now, let it he remembered that this gift of a library was only prospective; because the donor re- served to himself the right of dealing with it up to the dav of his death. Describing the library, he says him- self, "In number the books average at present from 15,000 to 17,000 volumes, but every year they receive large additions; and the ultimate extent of this portion of the bequest depends on the number of years I may live. The same is to be said of the collection 01 manu- scripts, which, though not at present very numerous, have all a marked and distinct literary interest." Of course, under these circumstances, the security that the bequs: would be carried out was entirely sentimental, for so Jong as the donor kept possession of the books, so long would they be liable to his debts or to any other accident; and although he offered to deposit his will in the custody of the corporation, it was impossible for him to divest himself of the power of revoking it. The title to the XIO,000 offered was, perhaps, a little more tangible, because it was suggested that that should be at once invested in the names of trustees and after the satisfaction of two life estates (one in the donor and the other in any other person), the income was to be applied in support and maintenance of the library. Still, however, the money was intimately bound up with the library; no library, no dividends. The offer, pur et simple, was a library of indefinite extent, indefinite value, and to accrue at an indefinite time; and the money spoken of was merely for the purpose of supporting the library. But the Literary Fund did not want a library; at least the majority of its members did not. Suppose that Messrs Dickens and Elwin had offered a white elephant to the fund, and a sum of money to keep the beast in fodder, would they have thought it right to upbraid the com- mittee for rejecting it. But the library is, to all intents and purposes, so far as the fund is concerned, a white elephant. There are persons and institutions to whom it might be very valuable; but to the Literary Fund it would be Dot only not valuable, but actually harmful. One word as to the value of the library for any practical purpose. If it be Mr Forster's, we have every reason to believe that it is not a magnificent library," in any other sense than as that word 80nveys an idea of size. It is just such a miscellaneous collection of books as might be expected to form the library of a very active literary man who has done a great deal of reviewing in his time, and who has added, by purchase, to the "review copies" which he has preserved. Some indi- vidual books of value, such as a first folio of Shakspere, or the like, there may possibly be; but we have the au- thority of one who knows what he is talking about, when he says that, as a general library of reference, the collection would be well nigh useless. THE NICKNAME-OF THE-KING OF NAPLES. (Mr Leigh Hont, in Spectator.) Bomba is the name of children's play in Italy, a kind of prisoner's base, or what used formerly to be called in England, King by your leave;" and there was probably an allusion to this pastime in the nickname; especially as Ids Majesty was fond of playing the king, aud had a re1i"ecl ion for childish amusements besides, and for playing at soldiers. But the name, whatever its first cause or its collective significance, is understood to have derived its greatest weight from a charge made against his Majesty of having called upon his soldiers to bom- bard" his people during one of their insurrections. I, BÜlubard'em! Bombard'eni!" lie is said to have cried out—that is to say, Sweep them away, cannonade 'elIJ!" His apologist, Mr Macfarlane, not only denies the charge, but says his cry was the very reverse, to wit, Spurt my misguidedpeoplf! Make prisoners! Do not kill! Mako prisoners!" And he is afterwards said to have rebuked an officer for calling the people canaglia (rascally dogs). Be calm, sir, and do not caU the people canaglia. They arc misguided, but they are still my people. If )-on allow yourself to be transported with passion, there will be great slaughter, and this I would by all means avoid. Take prisoners, but do not kill." The book entitled Naples and King Ferdinand," repeats the charge, hewever, in the strongest manner. It says that he kept crying out, Down with them! down with ¡tern!" adding in a note, what was stated to be the' particular expression," Bombardare;" and hence, says the author, "arose his well-known sobriquet of' Bomba." We are ilso told by this writer, that the king changed his policy on this occasion 11 from hour to hour, indee: from minute to minute; so as to secure a victory, of which he had perhaps little hope at first." What if this vacillation reconciles the two opposite accounts; and that the frightened and exasperated monarch actually said all which is attributed to him by both the writers, according as the fright or the exaspera- tion prevailed? At one o'clock, when matters looked perilous, mercy and flattery may have been in the ascen- dant; and at three, when success was certain, or when it required only the merciless portion of fear, cruelty may have reigned supreme. In one of those interludes in the plays of Moliere, which ought never to be left out of editions of them, for they are as good in their way as the plays themselves, and as deeply grounded in truth, however mad tlie), look with animal spirits and drollery, there is a man who is in danger of being eaten by a bear. The man (wc speak from niemoi-v, but are sure of the spirit ot what we relate) takes at last, as a forlorn hope, to flattering the bear; praises his manners and appearance; calls him all sorts of sweet names; and in the excess and ecstasy of his desperation, addresses him at length as "Your Royal Highness." But hunters coming up, and the bear's attention being diverted, his flatterer scrambles up a tree, and his first word to the hunters is, Shoot him." ROMAN CATIIOLICY AND THE MARGARET- STREET TEMPLE. (From the Tablet.) In so far as it may be regarded as an offering to Al- mightv God, in honour of the mysteries of the Catholic creed, and all the saints" of our calendar, the erec- tion of the splendid church just completed in Margaret- street, must be appreciated by every Catholic, rivalling, as it does, the finest productions of modern times. But we must at the same time confess to a feeling of deep regret that so worthy a temple should not be dedicated to the services of the one true Church, and be conse- crated by the real presence of the Incarnate Saviour. Un.'ortiinately, the clergy who will minister in this beautiful church are not recognised by the Christian world, nor are their ministrations regarded as valid by the Bishops of Christendom or the Vicar of Christ. And in the present instance, moreover, there is the especial danger that individuals may be blinded to the real perils and inconveniences of their position by the fact of so worthy a temple being reared by person- not in communion with the Catholic Church. At the same time, we may be permitted to cherish the hope that (Ila Dr Newman explained III his lectures on Anglicanism), many of those who take part in the services will do so in good faith, and with sincere intentions, and may thus be led on to the higher privileges of full communion with the Catholic Church. So far as this undertaking may be regarded with pleasur e, the seed was sown by persons who have, long ago, submitted themselves to the Apostolic See, especially by Canon Oakeley, of this diocese, with whom the proposal to erect this splendid temple, we believe, first originated. Would that it could be transferred to Islington or Bromptou, or at all events into the hands of those who can alone use aright. PRAISE FOR Mlt. ROEBUCK. (From the Press.) Mr Roebuck is, as he has a perfect right to be, a thoroughpaced as well as outspoken Radical. He knows Lord Derby and the Conservatives are radically op- posed to his Radicalism. Accordingly, he does not like them; it would be strange if he did. But he always understood what he had to expect of them. He had no right to expect much—little but that which he might extract from their weakness. Not so with regard to the Whigs. They led him to expect great things of them; they made his mouth water with the Radical measures which they were to introduce as the reward of the uncom- promising—now and then a little unscrupulous-support given to them by men of Mr Roebuck's political creed. And what, in the result, did he get from them? Why, simply nothing. Not as much even as from the Con- servatives, at whose hands he ought to have expected nothing. No wonder Mr Ruebuck is wroth. He feels he has been humbugged—ay, humbugged for twenty- six long weary years-aud he declares he will stand it no longer. We do not agree with Mr Roebuck's prin- ciples, but we sympathise with his indignation. CIRENCESTER ELECTION. CHARQE OF PREVENTING ADMIRAL TALBOT FROM VOTING. CIRENCESTER, Monday. William Clark, innkeeper of this town, and Peter Ellis Harmer, printer, were charged with" unlawfully, by themselves and others on their behalf, made use of force, violence and restraint, and practised intimidation upon Admiral Charles Talbot, in order to induce and compel him to refrain from voting" at the late Cirencester election, and compelled him to refrain from giving his yote. The magistrates present were, the Rev H. Cripps, W. F. Croome, Esq, F. Cripps, Esq, T. W. G. Master, Esq, Rev T. Maurice, T. D. Hartland, Esq, J. B. Haines, Esq, aud Hutchinson, Esq. Mr W. H. Cooke, barrister-at-law, instructed by Messrs Mullings and Daubeny, appeared for the prose- cution; Mr J. P. Powell, barrister-at-law, instructed by Mr Cooke, solicitor, for the defence. Mr Cooke having opened the case, the following evi- dence was adduced:- Rear Admiral Charles Talbot: I was a voter for Cirencester at the last election. I was in April, and am now, in command of the fleet at Cork. I proceeded from Cork for the purpose of voting, travelling from Mil- ford Haven. I telegraphed from Gloucester to Ciren- cester to have a fly at the station in readiness for me. The train was 20 minutes late on its arrival at the station. I saw a fly at the station. None of the railway officials were there. I left my luggage in the train. I got into the fly, and as it was driving towards the gate I first perceived a crowd. The gates of the station were shut in the horse's face. Some men laid hold of the horse's heads, whereupon the driver began cutting them with his whip. I got out of the fly, which was being turned round on a sort of pivot, and went to the wicket gate, bnt could not get out for the crowd. I then went to the gates and tried to get out, but a struggle followed and I was thrown down. The defendant Clark took hold of me, put his arms round me, and said, I'll pro- tect you, admiral." I kept turning in his arms, trying to get from him, and he kept pushing me back to the station. Finding my getting out was useless, I walked to the station. I was prevented by the violence from voting. Mr Clark, or some one who was with him, pointed out by the station clock that it was past four I was detained against my will, and prevented from exercising the franchise. Cross-examined: I have come from Cork now under a subpoena. I preferred a charge of assault against Clark for this affair, and he was fined 50s for the assault. It was the same which prevented me from voting. I am not preferring this charge. I made my complaint to the magistrates' clerk, and he said, "That is an assault." I did not on that occasion go beyond Cireneester in the train. The train I came by was due at Cirencester on the polling day at 3.40. We were about twenty minutes behind time. When I arrived at the station it wanted about six or seven minutes to four by my watch. I did not ascertain that the flyman was drunk; n' opinion, formed after the fact, was, that he was not :¡;e:in1n;arh half t: fhrwrie::r: s h; King's Head. He was hitting riaht and left when the people were holding the horse. The people were, I think, past reason; they did not say that they held the horse be:ause the flyman struck them with the whip. I fell over Mr Slatter. I have not made any charge of assault or of obstructing me from voting. The gates were, I believe, open when Clark said he would pro- tect me, and there was a great crowd. He did not say that he would get me through the crowd, or that I had no cause for fear. I do not remember he said, If I can prevent the people injuring you, I will." It was three or four minutes after four by the clock to which my attention was called. The Hon Mr Dutton was at the station; he was not in the crowd. I saw a man named Davis there. Re examined: Davis had hold of the horse's head. The yard was quite clear when I arrived at the sta- tion. Major Milligan deposed: The express train is due at Cirencester at 3.40. I went to the station on the poll- ing-day on the chance of meeting Admiral Talbot. I had not heard of the telegram from him. I went in my carriage about half-past three. I heard the train arrive about eight minutes to four. I first saw the admiral as he was running to get into the fly. I ran out of the yard to my carriage, and there was then no impediment to leaving the yard. As soon as I got to my carriage I turned round, but could not see the fly. I returned to the station, and tried to get in at the wicket-gate. Harmer was standing outside the gate, and would not let me pass. He said I must go to the large gates. I squeezed in. The admiral was in the midst of a crowd, and was trying to get away. He was in Clark's arms. I heard some one call out It is four o'clock," and then Clark let the admiral go. Cross-examined: There were six or eight other per- sons at the wicket-gate besides Harmer. I asked Harmer to let me go through. I am not a voter fur Ciiencester. I went to the station expecting to see the admiral. I saw Clark with his arm round the admiral immediately I got inside the gate. There was a crowd encircling the admiral. I first saw the admiral about six or seven minutes to four. The hustings were oppo- site the King's Head Hotel. When I saw the admiral in Clark's arms it was about three minutes to four. I heard Clark say, I'D take care of the admiral." I did not see the admiral fall, or hear Clark say the admiral had no cause to fear, or would take care of him from the people. Re-examined: When Clark said he would take care of the admiral he was impeding him, but whether sta- tionary or pushing him back I cannot say. By Mr Powell: There was a band of music near the station. Mr Cooke: That is another infraction of the statute (a laugh.) Witness: I remonstrated with Harmer for not allow- ing me to pass. He said I must go to the big gates. Mrs Cambridge: I was at Mill's shop near the station about four o'clock on the polling day. A band of music came up and a crowd, and they went into the station. Harmer and Merchant were standing outside the wicket gate, and Clark was inside. I saw Major Milligan trying to go into the wicket gate, He was being pushed about. Harmer and Merchant were pushing. I saw a man inside the gate with the pole of a carriage in his hand. I saw Harmer take out his watch and look at it. He said, "It is no use waiting any longer-the time is up." They then went away, and the gate was opened. Cross-examined: There was no crowd at the gate until Harmer came up. There was a great crowd with the band. I am a dressmakr, I have not asked for a situation of housekeeper. I have not been promised the situation of housekeeper to Mr Joseph Crips, of Cox- well street, since this business. Thomas Slatter: I was at the Gloucester station on the polling dav, and came to Cirencester in the same train as Admiral Talbot. There was a fly at the station. The driver was not quarreling with any person at the time the admiral got into the fly, and the fly started. A number of persons who were in the yard took hold of the reins and backed the horse until they broke the shafts. I and Mr Vaiscy went up and advised the admiral to get out. Some of the crowd held the door to prevent him from getting out. He got out the other side, and I went to the wicket gate with him. Some persons were standing inside and outside the gate. The admiral wished them to let him pass, but they would not. We went towards the other gate. I was knocked down, and when I was about to get up six or seven people seized me by the hair and kept me down. I went to the station, and complained to Clark of the treatment I had received. He said, You are a Conservative, and we are Liberals, and we have a right to do what we can o win the election," or words to that effect. Cross-examined: I was here when the charge of assault was gone into, but did not give evidence. Mr Vaisey confirmed the testimony as to the crowd preventing the admiral from leaving the station. It wanted between five and six minutes to four as he was leaving the station with the admiral. Nathaniel Holdland: I am a voter and was at the hustings about twenty minutes to four, I saw Clark about the hustings, and should say he is a person who takes an active part in elections. I afterwards saw him running towards the station. He called out, to the station," and a crowd of persons followed him, one with a loaf on a stick. I went to the station. Harmer was standing inside the wicket gate, and afterwards on the outside. On my way to the station I asked Harmer if the train was in; he said it was not. I said it is Idte," and he said, Yes, it is water-logged between this and Cork." I heard Clark say, "Close the gates." The admiral was then in the fly coming towards the gates. I saw Clark with his hand oa the gate. Isaw some persons seize the horse's head and force it back. The crowd shouted" Keep the admiral in." I afterwards saw Major Milligan at the wicket gate. Cross-examined: I was standing only about a yard from Clark when he shouted, Close the gates." He had his hand on the gate, and called other persons to his When I first saw Harmer he was stand- ing inside with his back against the gate, and the gate closed. Another person was there. The Admiral viad arrived when Clark called, Shut the gates." When I went up first the gates were not closed. By the Bench: The wicket gate opens to the in- side. Charles Mills: I went to the station on the polling day, a little before four o'clock. The large gates were closed. There were a few boys on the outside. I forced my way inside. There was a fly there, and a man was holding up his hand before the horse. I was knocked down. I cannot say I saw Clark or Harmer there. I was pushed down again. I asked why they did not let the admiral vote. I did not know any man I saw there, except a man with a red waistcoat, and I don't know who he was (laughter.) Tiiis was the case for the prosecution. Mr Powell then addressed .the magistrates for the de- fendants. He contended that the present was merely a retaliatory prosecution, for the prosecution instituted by the Liberal party against some persons at Cirencester for drugging a voter to prevent him from giving his vole. With regard to Clark, the learned counsel said hogrounded his defence entirely upon the principle of English law, that the defendant had already been found guilty of an assault, arising out of the circumstances upon which the present charge was made. The same evidence had already been given, and would have pro- cured a conviction. The Chairman asked whether the statement of Clark that he was a Liberal, and had a right to win the election as he pleased, had anything to do with a charge of assault? Mr Powell said certainly, and he believed had been given, but Clark denied that he ever made use of any such expression. If the magistrates were determined to send the case for irial at the assizes he could not prevent their doing so, but he maintained that the adjudication in the case of assault was a bar to any further proceed- ings in this case. As to Harmer, he should call evidence to show he bad gone to the station to meet his son, who was expected by the train, and had nothing to do with the row that took place. He should also show that in consequence of the late arrival of the train it was impossible for Admiral Talbot to have voted, and that therefore he could not have been impeded from voting. Alfred Thomas Harmer, son of the defendant, over- seer in the office of the Stroud Journal, deposed that he wrote to his father, stating that he was coming to Cirencester on the polling day, but was prevented from coming. The letter was put in and read. There was no post mark to it, and the envelope was not produced. William Newcome, stonemason, of Cirencester, said- I was at the station-gates about four o'clock, and saw Harmer standing outside the wicket-gate at the time the admiral was at the gate. Harmer was taking no part in what was going on. He was in conversation with Major Milligan, who, he thought, used some insult- ing language towards him. I am a politician, and take some interest in the election. I went to look for a voter named Lane. I had heard the admiral had not come. Clark was outside, and I heard him say three times, Let him out." I returned to the hustings, and the poll was declared, and the members had spoken and were leaving. Mr Powell said he proposed to call Clark as a witness. Mr Cooke said they could not call one of the defen- dants as a witness for the other. The Bench said they declined to hear the witness. Mr Powell requested that a note might be placed on the depositions that he had tendered Clark as a witness. George Turner, the driver of the express train to Cirencester on the day in question, said he arrived at the station within half a minute of 3.55, and he noticed that on that same day the Cirencester clock was about three minutes before the railway time. Mrs Merchant: I live opposite the wicket-gate at the station. I saw Harmer there on the polling day. He was not inside. He might have been there six or eight minutes or better; he was looking on like other people. I did not see him take any part with the mob. If he had been there I should nave seen him. Cross-examined: I did not see Major Milligan talking to Harmer. Mrs Pash: On the polling day for Cirencester I was standing at the Marlborough Tavern door, and saw the band come up. Harmer came after the band. I saw him all the time. He did not go within the wicket-gate once, and did not take any part with the mob. Cross-examined: I did not see Harmer talking to Ma- jor Milligan. I had heard that Admiral Talbot was ex- pected, and that he was inside the gate. Mr Cooke then addressed the bench on the plea of autrefois acquit, contending that the assault of which Clark had been found guilty was an entirely different offence to the misdemeanour with which he was now charged jointly with other persons; and, moreover, that this defence could only be raised before the court of 81- size. Mr Powell, in reply, maintained that whatever the offences might be called, they were the same, and the defendant had already been punished. The magistrates retired to consider their decision, and after an absence of some time, The Rev Mr Cripps (the chairman) stated that the bench considered that the case against Clark ought to be sent,to the assizes for trial, but as there was some doubt as regarded Harmer the bench would give him the benefit of the donbt, and dismiss the charge. Clark was admitted to bail in his own recognisance of £ 100, and two sureties in X50 each. There was another case against Clark for the abduc- tion of a voter, but it was withdrawn, as the defendant had been committed on the above charge.

[No title]

HANDEL COMMEMORATION AT THEI…

|— = I THE SPEECH DAY AT ETON…

[No title]

|AN ENTHUSIAST.I

¡ DISTURBANCESHAT-ST-(iEORGE'S…

[No title]

IMISCELLANEOUS.

ITHE EMPEROR AND THE SOLDIER.

THE NEW MAN OF SIN.

[No title]