Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

15 articles on this Page

BREACH OF PROMISE, j -i

News
Cite
Share

BREACH OF PROMISE, j A RETIRED SWANSEA GROCER SUED BY ELDERLY SPINSTER. An action frw alh>ged broach of pro- rul.e calibe hefol-P, the Under Sheriff (Mr. G. Isaacs), at the Swansea Guild- hall on Friday. The plaintiiF was Miss £ lizabeth Thomas, of St), College- j street, Apuuauford, and formerly oi London, and the defendant was W. J j Mathias, who carried on business as a grocer in Wasauil-equare, Swansea, and since his retirement has lived with re- lative? at Penllergaier. Mr. Moryyn Howcll (instructed by Mr. Yeriey Price) appeared tor the plaintiff. Judgment had been obtained by de- fault. the only question for the jury to decide wæ; the assessment of damages. Plaintiff was about 53 years of age, and the defendant about 13 years her senior. Plaintiff wa.s a oook-tiousekoepor in Falasce-^pardens. London, and sne met the defendant, who is a widower, at Swansea, while on a holiduy. The mar- riage was to ha.ve taken place last Easter, and plaintiff took a house and furnished it at Ammanford, where it a vas undeleted they would reside. The marriage was then postponed till July, I but dtd not take place. The Courtship. I Mr. Met vyn Howell, in putting the case before the jury, related the story of defendant's na?etiiig with plaintiff and the subsequent courtship. Plain- tiff was down in Swansea ou a holiday irom about the middle of August to the I end of September; 1911?, and she was in- troduced by friends to the defendant, who proposed mortage to her, and they subsequently became engaged. The de- iendant intormed plaint-jn that he would allow her 35s. a week to keep! u wee l- to kee,,) "6e, and that he would make a.crange-j ments for providing her wIth £1 a week after his death. He abo prQ- Sliaed to leave her furniture and effects. Arrangements for the marriage .were discuseed. aiwi it was decided that it should take place the following Easter. Defendant promised plaintiff that she should have a pony and trap, and live in the country. He was anxious that plaintiff shoukl not return to her occu- pation in London, but as she was still an service she had to return and givs notice. Her employers at. the time "were in tgypt, and she had to await their return. Her wages were £ 4.0 a year and board and lodgings- Before she returned to London the defendant informed her that he had property "worth 13,250, and he took plaintiff to «-ee his furniture and also to see somo of iis property in Marl borough-road, and a shop in Wassail-square, and he in- formed her he had other property in Aberdyberthi-street and Noaiolk-etreet. Left Her Situation, Plaintiff returned to London about the end of September and ga.v? notice to leave her employment, bbe ba?d bc<eu,l with her employers seven years, and had travelled abroad wi.th them. The plaintiff's employers were very loath to part with her. She bought about £ 20 of articles in London in view of her marriage, and brought them to Swansea to which town she returned on the 15th December 1912. After her return to Swansea defend- ant took her about and introduced her to his friends as his intended wife. De- fendant l>oughr several articles for the house and plaintiff continued to buy articles out of her own money. Plaintiff, with the det'eiKuat's con- 6ent, took the house at Ammanford, and took in boarder* pending her marriage, aud defendant ultimately brought his own furniture there, and for a time lodged at the same hOUle. Defendant took plaintiff about & great deal, and went with j?r to variouc c hurhes and cha.oe ?v?rv Sunday. At the time of the proposal of marriage *be had a Gum of moc?y in the Po?s't Office Savings Bank, and prior to taking: I the house at Ammanford she epsnt ad that money. About Baxter time tho defendant put off the marriage until June. He was under the impression that plaintiff had £ 200 ready cash, but when the plaintiff told him that e had spent all the money she had he seemed surprised, -ad.biö affection began to cool and when June eamc. he stated that he never intended to get married. Defendant did not put in an appear- ance. Plaintiff's Evidence. Plaintiff went into the box and sub- stantiated counsel's statement. She spoke of the comfortable situation which she occupied in a. fashionable part of London, and said plie had travelled with her employers in Canada, Ireland and Scotland. In addition to Iter salary Of L40 a yoar ahe received preoento and gratuities worth £ 25 a yena-. She also got £10 for clothes. She estimated her position was worth £ 250 R year. She had theatre ticket6 al- lowed and f ares for taxis. Mr. Math-kw often told her that his financial posi- tion was worth £ 3,250. Mr. Howei: Did he suggest you jshouM have a motor ew. Plaintiff: NQ, a pony and trap. In reply to further questions-, plain- tiff said she paid 10a. a week inclusive for the h-ouse at Ammanford, and ",he had to maintain herself by keeping I hoarders. Is there very much profit made out of this lodger business .N<>. I just. exist; that is all. I suppose it was not defendant's per- sonal beauty that attracted you?- Hardly- The Under Sheriff: Did Mr. Mathias pay you whon lie lodged with you?- ics, he gave me a pound a Week for two rooms and his board. Miss Rebecca Elizabeth Aubrey, one of plaintiff's Jers at Ammanford, gave evidence in corroboration of plain- tiff's statement regarding dwfendaJit'a financial peeition. He said if he sold the houoe in Wassail Square he thought he should get £ 1,000 for it. The Verdict. The jury awarded £.5()0 damages, with costs.

Advertising

IDEAL USE OF LAND. I

THE DANGER OFI INDIGESTION.

FEBRUARY FAIRS..I

.1.TEACHERS' SALARIES. I

" CURE OF SOULS." I

Advertising

SALE TIME. I

!THREE MODELS. I

FALLING HAIR MEANS; DANDRUFF…

NORTH-WEST DURHAM.1.

Advertising

I THE FREE CHURCH COUNCIL..…

Advertising