Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

30 articles on this Page

 M!LL!?M ? uLA?

News
Cite
Share

 M!LL!?M ? uLA? DEAD ms ALLEGED PROMISE. SWANSEA SHIP CHANDLER'S DAUGHTER'S ACTION. REMARKABLE STORY. SIR GRIFFITH THOMAS SUED AS HIS BROTHER'S kxtgu foR. A broach of promise of marriage action of an unusual character, in that the gentleman who was alleged to liave made the promise is dead, was heard to-day in the King's Bench Division, before Mr. Justice Lush and a special jury. The plaintiff was Miss Minnie Magda- lene Quirk, a milliner, of St. Holbein Home, Sloane-square, London, and the formal defendant was Sir Griihth Thomas (executor of Mr. Arthur William Thomas, deceased), of Court Herbert, Neath, Gla- morgan. I'laint,ifT allc:Ps that the promise to marry was made verbally about March, ]:¡7, and the defence d-niv-b the allega- tinn, and savs that the statement of claim discloses no cause for action, while the damages alleged are too remote. Mr. Waugh, R.C., and Mr. J. D. Craw- ford were for the plaintiff, and Mr. Bar- nard Railey, K.C., and Mr. J. H. Watts J <>r the defendant. Mr. Wangh, K.C., in opening the case, said the acuon was of an unusual kind, because the defendant on the record was not the p< 'on who had made the pro- mise. The defendant was the executor and a brother of Mr. Wm. Thomas, now dead. His lordship aeked if the cause of action survived. Mr. Waugli said it did in respect with special daniage only. Mr. Railey, for the defendant, said be did not admit that. Swansea Tradesman's Daughter Mr. Waugh said the damages which plaintiff claimed Mere in respect to the fact that at the request of deceased she fave up a business which brought her in an income. Miss Quirk was the daughter of a ship's chandler who carried on business at Swansea. He dip-d, and the business I. A-, ci»ii\ied Oil by a manager. ill, 11,91i the plaintiff was staying with a sister at Guernsey. Sho there met deceased, who said he was an old friend of her father' He visited her at Swansea, and on another occasion at Guernsey. Ou lith March, 1S97. Mr. Thomas proposed marriage, and she accepted him. Plain- tiff's sister, Mrs. Harrison, was informed of the proposal, hut deceased said the engagement must not be announced, as Lis mother had a strong objection to Roman Catholics, plaintiff being of that religion. It seemed that one of pfa m- tiff's brothers had become a monk against his mother's wish. There was also a Mrs. Williamson, to whom the fe&mo representation was made. In September. 1897, Mr. Thomas, under the most solemn promise of marriage, seduced the plaintiff and gave ier an engagement ring. Plaintiff was then about 24, and deceased was about 4-0. In 1900 demised said he had troubh: at hoipe with his brother, and though he still wrote to plaidliff he ceased to InPet her- In 1961 he wrote to plaintiff, aud said he did not intend to marry her. Plaintiff apparently acquiesced in that decision. Started in Business. At that time, owing to the misapfrrfr-j pr?tjon by a manager of her father s ?usin.'?s, plaintiff had to sd about to (?arn her own living. She th m started in I the millinery bustne?s ill I?oudon, -?nd fvea»ually it became worth some £ 150 a year to her. In May. 1908, plaintiff saw the deceased somewhere, and she wrote > to him. and he came over and saw her. :he would tell the jury what happened on that occasion. In 19D9 they both went over to Harrow, and Mr. Thomas again offered plaintiff marriage, which she again accepted. In August, 1909, while staying with her sister, Mrs. Harrison, plaintiff received a letter from Mr. Thomas, in which he said: Before God I intend to carry out my promise and repair the injury I did to you years ago. That letter was shown by plaintiff to 3wr sister, and this was the first inti- anatioTL MrA. Ha.rri.son had that themi had been undue relations between thein. Fnfortuuately that letter had been de- i stroved. The decased had written another letter, in which he said when they wer» married hfl would not have her relations visiting him. This was because Mrs. Bar- tOOn had upbraided deceased for keeping plaintiff dangling about him for so many years. the cl ef,)sc d r- I In September, 1909, the deceased re- quested the plaintiff to give up her busi- ness in order that defendant might marry her. I-ater in that plaintiff went under an operation for appendicitis and thought slttj woc-ld not live. (Proceeding ).

WELSH CHURCH COMMISSION.I

| NO OEB^aN SHIPS. INOGERMANSHiPS.I

AUSTRIA WARNS RUMANIANS.

PRIVY COUNCIL mum I

! KAISER S W? PLANS I I

.Ll]D,CDU FOR SECRET SERVICE…

CANADIAN BRIDCE BLOWN UP.…

WHERE ARE FRENCH'S DISPATCHES.…

THE SEAS ARE IFRELI

TO BE COHRT MARTIALLED. I

CERMANS ESCAPE AGAIN.I

PRESIDENT WILSON'S GREETING.…

PLANS STOLEN BY KRUPPS I

r GRAIN SEIZED. -! I I I

SEYDLITZ -DAMACED. I

SWED!SH SAILORS KILLED.I

DARDANELLES FORTS DESTROYED.I

SONGS OF HATRED. I

NOaWEGiAH NEUTRALITY.I

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

I ---_uUUUU-I ! FASE ON THE…

ADMIRAL STURDEE'S RETURN.…

BOULDERS ON THE USE. :

 THE BABY WINS

ISWANSEA'S OWN.j

PRUSSIAN LOSSES. ! I

 THE BABY WINS