Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

20 articles on this Page

BRIDGEND AND COWBRIDGE BOARD…

News
Cite
Share

BOARD OF GUARDIANS. THE APPOINTMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL NURSE AGAIN DISCUSSED. At the usual weekly meeting on Saturday there were present Rev. F. W. Edmondea, M.A. (chair- man), Mr Edmund D. Lewis (vice-chairman), Mrs Randall, Mrs Parry, Colonel Turbervill, Revs. H. Eynon Lewis, H. J. Humphreys, S. H. F. Nicholl, S. Jackson, and D. Davies, Messrs W. Hopkin, E. Wilde, D. P. Thomas, Hopkin Williams, T. John (Llanblethian), W. Jones, W. Howell, W. Howeils, W. Griffiths, John Thomas (Llangeinor), E. Matthews, Edward Lewis, H. O. Irvine, Edward John, H. R. Homfray, C. Phillips, Howel Williams, J. I. D. Nicholl, J. Blandy Jenkins, James Jones, R. Williams, E. Thomas. W. Pen- nant, T. C. Jones, E. Williams, Griffith Edwards, D. H. Price, W. B. Loveluck, J. H. Thomas, Evan Evans, Daniel Samuel. THE "EXTRA NURSE" QUESTION. The appointment of an extra nurse was again considered, and the Chairman asked whether any member had any motion to make. Colonel Turbervill pointed out that the Board had rescinded the resolution in favour of appoint- ing an extra nurse. Was it, therefore, not prac- tically cancelled, or was it still open for discus- sion ? The Chairman The resolution of last Saturday was only the rescinding of the recommendation of the House Committee, and I think the whole subject is open to the Board to-day. Colonel Turbervill: Then I'll bring it on once more. He need not, he said, waste many words, as the matter had already been so much discussed. The doctor had recommended that a second nurse be appointed, and a resolution was passed accor- dingly, but rescinded within a fortnight of its adoption. He moved now—as he had done that day fortnight—that a duly qualified midwife be applied for. Rev. D. Davies, in seconding, reminded the Bo u-d that they passed a resolution which com- mitted them to this policy unanimously in a com- mittee of 50 and he contended that nothing had transpired since to make them alter their opinions. In the Local Government Board circular the practice of employing unqualified people as nurses was strongly condemned, and therefore it was obligatory on them as a Board to pass this resolu- tion. The Vice-chairman moved a direct negative. He need not again repeat his former arguments. The appointment was mainly recommended by the doctor on the basis—or the fact—that a qualified midwife was desired but to place a permanent midwife there to deal with such cases as they had was the height of insanity. Mr W. Griffiths seconded, observing that there was a qualified nurse at present. Mr J. H. Thomas enquired what the actual number of infirm people in the House was at this moment. It had been stated that there were only seven, but he thought there were between 30 and 40. If that were so the Guardians could not expect one nurse to attend oa all these people, it was an unkindness to the nurse, and the Guardians would be failing to do their duties to the poor. It was certainly an expense, but they came there to attend to the poor, and if they failed in those duties they had better resign their seats (laugh- ter). There were, he believed, about 35 people who required the attendance of a nurse. Was there one Guardian who would like to see his wife or sister attending 35 people ? The Clerk, in reply to a qusstion, said there were 72 people in the house who could not be described as able-bodied. The Rev S. Nicholl said because the Guardians were supposed to have neglected their duties to some degree in the past it was now proposed that they should neglect them in future. [The Vice. chairman No, no.] That was poor reason. They were supposed to do a considerable wrong to the poor in bringing them åo the house at all; but having brought them in they were now asked to neglect them. If they brought them in and deprived them of many blessings and advantages outside, they ought to do the best they could to make them comfortable. The infirm poor should not be left at night—as they now frequently were—to the care of pauper attendants. They could not expect a nurse to be in full work all day, and then be attentive to the sick at night. If they brought the poor into the ^touse they ought to have people to look after them who were paid for doing so, and whom they could call to book if they did not do their duty. It was urged that the Guardians should spend the money outside; but because they spent money outside was no reason that they should neglect their duties inside. They should do their duties to the best of their abilities inside. Therefore, let them look upon the facts of the case. They bad a number of sick people on whom one sick person could not possibly attend and they could not have the work properly done unless they had a paid attendant. It was not a matter of money, but a matter of duty. (Hear, hear). Mr Griffith Edwards spoke against the motion. He did not see that the house in its present position required an additional appointment. The house was crammed, and the appointment of another nurse would mean that they must have more room. A member had spoken as if the duties were being done by one officer, whereas there were the master and matron, nurse, assistant-matron and servants and there was the doctor as well, and between them all he thought that the poor were well cared for. Mr Edward John said if there were inmates who required attention at night, the Guardians would be failing in their duty if they did not make provisions accordingly. But they had no returns to guide them—as to how many people in the house actually required attention night and day. If a number of people required attention night and day, it was impossible for one nurse to do the work. He would not vote until he knew exactly how many people required attention nifht and day. Mr J. Blandy Jenkins joined Mr John in asking the master how many persons required the attention of a nurse. The Master replied that there wer3 about 30 in the sick wards, and there was not one of them who nould be said not to want a nurse during the night, They were in such a state that they might require nursing at any time. Rev Eynon Lewis asked who had attended the sick people before the time of the present nurse, who was only appointed a few months ago. The Chairman: We had nurses before; but this one is a trained nurse. The Vice-chairman asked what number was permanently in bed ? j The Master: About a dozen—who only get out of bed to be put back again. Rev S. Nicholl: Do they require Attention by night as well as by day ? The Master: I should think so, sir. Rev S. Nicholl: Has the nurse ever complained to the Board of her inability to look after the sick and the infirm under her charge. The Chairman She has never complained to the Board she might have done to the Committee. The Vice-chairman As Chairman of the House Committee I have never heard a single complaint. Rev. D. Davies Has not the Medical Officer, who is the responsible person, complained of the lack of nursing ? Rev. Eynon Lewis: The Medical Officer has complained of many other things which have nob been attended to. Mr Blandy Jenkins asked if all the assistants who had been mentioned were supposed to assist in the nursing. Perhaps they nursed by day and the nurse only by night. The Chairman Take the Matron. She has the whole of the superintendence of the House, but I do not think it was within her duties to nurse the sick at night. What do you think, Mr Cox ? Mr Cox: No. Mr Jenkins: How about the day ? Mr Cox It is only her duty to superintend the nursing. The Vice-chairman How was the nursing in the House done 10 years ago, when there was only the Matron herself, while there are four assistants now? The Chairman We must confine ourselves to the motion. Mr T. C. Jones asked if there were any paupers now engaged to do night nursing ? The Master Yes; we keep one or two up every night. Mr Richard Williams supported the negative. The resolution having been once rescinded, he argued that it was very unfair to bring the matter forward again. Mr Blandy Jenkins moved as an amendment that a committee be appointed to report to the Board how the nursing was now carried vn, and the number of hours the nurse was supposed to work. Mr Edward John seconded, and expressed a hope that when the report was received the members would act not in a spirit of cliqueism, but as commonsense people. The Vice-Chairman asked the Chairman to explain his ruling. It had been moved and seconded that the application be not made. Now another amendment had been moved, which would confuse the issue. Why had not the motion been put before the amendment ? The Chairman: You moved a regative a negative is not an amendment. Co 1. Turbervill, speaking as to Mr Jenkins' amendment, said they were told on the previous Saturday that there were only seven inmates who were bedridden; now the Master told them there were 30 who required treatment, and who might at any time require night treatment. He did not think further investigation was necessary. They had a master—He did not suppose any guardian suggested that he should nurse (laughter). They had a matron; they knew what she must do in the ordinary superintendence of the House. There was the assistant-matron, who had given details of her work. The Vice-chairman: That question is now under consideration, and has not yet been disposed of. Mr J. H. Thomas next spoke, and was proceeding to traverse the whole of the old ground over again when there were loud cries of divide." Mr Thomas endeavoured to proceed, but the interrup- tions grew louder and louder. Turning to the Vice-chairman (who was one of those who cried "divide)" Mr Thomas said: I don't want to say anything disagreeable, Mr Vice-chairman, but —— (laughter). The Vice-chairman (laughing): You can say what you like. Mr Thomas then sat down. The Chairman, before putting the amendment, said it was quite possible the report of the committee might strengthen the hands of those who supported the appointment of an additional nurse. Colonel Turbervill thereupon (with his seconder's acquiescence) withdrew his motion, and Mr Jenkins' amendment, was carried. Mr Jenkins proceeded to name his committee as follows :—The Chairman, Vice-chairman, Colonel Turbervill, Revs. S. Jackson, Eynon Lewis, Messrs E. Edwards, and J. H. Thomas. "What about the ladies ?" asked a chivalrous member. Oh I beg your pardon," said Mr Jenkins to the ladies, with a graceful little bow, I thought they were cx-officio members of every committee" (laughter). Mr Pennant: We have no ex-ojficios here now. Mr Jenkina I also nominate Mrs Randall and Mrs Parry to be on the committee. Mr Howell (Pencoed) here rose and said I object to the names. The committee is one-sided. I object to the committee. Mr Jenkins I don't mind who's on the com mittee. I moved some one on both sides. The Vice-chairman proposed that Messrs W. Howell, W. Griffiths, and W. Howeils (Wick) be added to the committee. Mr W. Howells refused to act, and Mr R. Williams was nominated in his place. Mr Edward John proposed the addition of Mr T. John (Llanblethian). Mr Jenkins accepted the additional names. Mr D. H. Price proposed that Mr W. Pennant be added. Mr W. Pennant: I beg to object to the three nominated by the Vice-chairman in the same way as he objected to the others. They are entirely one-sided. The Chairman We must trust to the com- mittee to present a fair report. They are to ascertain certain facts, and we, as reasonable human beings, trust to them (hear, hear). The Master was directed to get up certain information to lay before the committee. ENGLISH AND WELSH. It will be recollected that at the last meeting Mr Bircham advised the Guardians to obtain copies of his pamphlet (price 3d.) containing a summary of the chief duties of a guardian. Mr J. H. Thomas moved that the clerk obtain a copy for each guardian, the Board to pay. The Vice-chairman moved as an amendment that each guardian should pay for a copy if he desired one. Rev Eynon Lewis seconded. The Chairman (to the Clerk) Get a copy for each guardian, and I'll bear the cost. Mr W. Howells (Wick) Make it four dozen, and 111 go half. (Laughter). Get them all in English; I understand it better. (Derisive laughter). Mr Evan Evans I move that it be 80. The Chairman (jocosely): Perhaps I won't pay for 80. (Laughter). Mr Evan Evans I'll make up the difference. (Laughter). Mr Pennant: We must have some in Welsh. Mr W. Howells (Wick) All English I under- stand English better. (Laughter). Mr D. H. Price moved that the Clerk order six dozen in English and one dozen in Welsh, the Clerk to pay for them. Mr Pennant seconded the motion, which was carried by 15 to 13. Mr Homfray suggested that every guardian and officer have one each. Mr Evan Evans I second that, if you'll have one dozen in Welsh. Mr Homfray No. Mr Howells (Wick): I second—and that it be all English. (Laughter). Mr G. Edwards moved that a copy for each guardian and each officer be obtained, a dozen of them to be in Welsh. Rev. Eynon Lewis seconded, and it was carried. NOTICES OF MOTION. Colonel Turbervill gave notice of motion—that in future it be a rule that a resolution arrived at after due notice has been friven shall not be rescinded within six months, except by a two- thirds majority of those present and voting. Mr D. H. Price gave notice of motion that the Guardians consider the penalty to be fixed in case of a member resigning his seat.

Advertising

SUNDAY TRADING AT NEATH. .

A MUSIC LICENCE CASE AT NEATH.

NEATH COUNTY POLICE.

DEATH OF MRS THOMAS, I NEATH.…

TEA AND DANCE AT BRITONFERRY.

INQUESTS.

GARW FECHAN FRIENDLY SOCIETY.…

GLAMORGANSHIRE ROADS .COMMITTEE.…

BRITISH WOMEN'S TEMPERANCE…

DEATH OF WELL-KNOWN INHABITANTS…

Advertising

ALLEGED ADULTERATION OF MILK…

STRANGE NEWS FROM DUNGENESS.…

Advertising

THE COUNTY MEDICAL OFFICER…

THE BRIDGEND TOWN HALL »

THE NEATH COMMITTEE OF THE…

Advertising