Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

11 articles on this Page

OUR WAY WITH ANARCHISM-

News
Cite
Share

OUR WAY WITH ANARCHISM- THOUGH Mr. DARLING'S motion for adjourn- ment on Tuesday afternoon was a particularly silly performance, both, in purpose and execution, it cannot be said that it was wholly inopportune, or at least untopical. Anarchism is on the tapis just now in Europe (as it was about this time last year, when disciples of Eavachol were at- tempting to blow up the offices of the Carmaux mine-owners.) The outrage in the Barcelona theatre has beeii followed by two other similar, though happily unsuccessful, attempts in the neighbourhood of the same city, where a state of siege has been proclaimed. spai* seems particu- larly unfortunate in this respect. It is only a few weeks since an Anarchist was summarily exe- cuted for flinging a bomb into the midst of General CAMFOS'S staff at a public review at Madrid. In Paris on Tuesday, a couple of hours after Mr. DARLING had delivered his speech, an unemployed workman stabbed a gentleman in a restaurant. The gentleman happened to be M. GEOBGEVITCH, a Servian statesman. But this fact had nothing to do with the matter. The workman did not know who it was he was stab- bing. He simply went for a man whom he saw eating a good dinner-a typical bourgeois ap- parently-as a protest against society because he could get no work. In a similar manner the Barcelona outrage is only intelligible as a "pro- test against soci ty in thelper.-ons of the class of people who can afford to pay for stalls at a theatre. It must be allowed that at a moment when such things are going on, and when pro- fessed Anarchists are taken note of as holding forth freely in Trafalgar Square, it is not quite ir- relevant to give a thought to our way of dealing with this type of political malcontents. The thing which the mind seizes at once about our way is that it is different from the way of any other nation in the world, and it is no bad reason- ing which will at once put in conjunction with that circumstance the fact that we are less seri- ously troubled with these Anarchist gentlemen than any other nation in the world. This is pro- bably the point which those who have been listen- ing to the suggestion that we ought to alter our methods will think upon with most profit. A second important consideration is that our way is not a new one, not one which came in with Mr. ASQUITH, as the learned constitutionalist from Deptford would persuade the House of Commons, but is as much a part of the ancient spirit of the > constitution as, say, the theory that the discus- sion of grievances should precede the granting of supplies. Of the many priceless ideas and princi- ples which the British race have contributed to political progress there are none so peculiarly our own as our ideas about free speech. And these ideas arise not more from our abstract reverence for liberty than from our equally characteristic quality of common-sense. It has been a mark of English statemanship always to distinguish be- tween the violent word and the violent act, and to hold that there is a certain quality in the free air which renders the former innocuous and, as it were, breaks the current connection between the tfto. We have acted on that principle from the days of JACK CAD* to the present hour. No intel- ligent Londoner is so ignorant as to suppose that 11 violent and eccentric speaking is confined on Sun- days to Trafalgar Square, or so forgetful as not to know thit until Mr. MATTHEWS made an innova. tion Trafalgar Square was a time-honoured forum for tLe discussion of discontents. Any fine Sun- day you turn into Hyde Park you will hear almost every doctrine under the sun-political, social, and religious—preached by enthusiastic propa- gandists to various groups of good-humoured listeners, who saunter from group to group with a critical interest which is largeiy tempered by amusement. This is an immemorial custom, and it is steadily honoured in nearly every park, com- mon, open space, and railway arch, not merely in London, but all over the kingdom. It h a pecu- liarly English institution to which it has often atruck us the attention of our critics has not been sufficiently invited. Every Sunday we seem to in- dulge in a great national letting-off of steam, and <or the rest of .the week the national boiler, so to peak, is soundin, consequence. They manage the hing differently on the Continent, and even in America. In Central Park, New York, the police would not tolerate for five minutes some of the talk that breaks harmlessly upon the air of Hyde Park as regularly as the Sunday hymn, or as the shatter of the fashionable crowd who disport them- selves carelessly beneath the trees within ear-shot of their denouncers. In France a policeman would at- tend every meeting, and stop every allusion to the Government which he did not like. It was put forward in Tuesday's debate, as it often is, that foreign States have reason to complain of us for our toleration of their internal enemies who flee to England for refuge and utter their anathemas here in safety. It is true that England has ever been a sanctuary for -such people. At the present moment LOUISE MicsEL is here for shelter, having left Paris a few days ago at the news of fresh activity amongst the authorities. But our suffi- cient retort upon foreign States is that we pursue the same methods with our own wild people; and that perhaps, looking to results, it might be wiser for foreign States to imitate our methods than to complain of them. There are newspapers here of ld standing, published at a penny, and enjoying large circulations, which make the QUEEN and the Royal Family the butt of weekly revilements, which advocates the overthrow of the monarchy, and preach all sorts of extreme doctrines in the most extreme language. In Germany such news- papers would not be allowed to exist for twenty- four horns. If we were to act on the German plan we, too, might have our native crop of HERR HOSTS and Louisi MICHELS. We take the view that it is wiser to let those who write and those who read such matter perge the humours of their blood by that means, and, on the whole, our ex- perience has well vindicated our judgment. Free speech has been for us a condueting-rod which has carried off elements that have otherwise and elsewhere generated (iestructive force. We are jjot forgetting that we have lapsed from our principle in the case of Ireland; but the excep- tional results whieh have followed our exceptional procedure there are but the very best proofs of the soundness of oar general theory. Of eourse, Anarchism may develop a tendency to increase with the new transformations which society siay be destined to undergo. This is quite possible. Anarchism is the ghost, the Franken- stein of Socialism. It dogs its steps, let honest Socialists do what they will. Mr JOHN BURNS told the House of Commons that he has been fighting against it for the past ten year.?, yet he is driven passionately to defend its advocates, so closely allied, in spite of him, are the two move- jaents. We make no point against Socialism in saying this* The accompaniment of Anarchism is due to no exclusive vice of the system, no vice which it does not share with other systems at the point at which it and they threaten to become tyrannical. Anarchism is not a new thing. As it is popularly and rightly understood, waving tyrannical. Anarchism is not a new thing. As it is popularly and rightly understood, waving aside its so-called scientific" refinements, its bottom principle is the assissination of you by me as a means of substituting my state of society for your state of society. Put in other words, it is a form of revolt against what it believes to be tyranny. The difference is that in the old systems the tyrannical State was embodied in an indi- vidual monarch or Government. Socialism draws for the excited eyes of discontent a picture in which society itself, as it is now organised- "bourgeois" society, "capitalist" society-is represented as the tyrant; and Anarchism simply takes Socialism at its word as regards society as it is, and refuses to believe that society under Social- ism will be any less oppressive-nay, even con- tends that, since all tyranny consists in undue re- pression of individualism, and since Socialism professes to mean the obliteration of individuali m altogether, the Socialistic state may be more op- pressive than any. The new tyrant, too, being not one but many-headed, is the more easily got at. You will find him personified in the first group of people you meet eating a good dinner or enjoying a play from the stalls. In this spirit the Anarchist who attacked M. GKOBGEVITCH went forth, taking care to order a good dinner for him- self, which it was against his principle to pay for, before he proceeded to action. His letter to a friend is an admirable exposition of the Anarchist mind. I will avenge myself as I can," he wrote not having the means to strike a great blow like the sublime EAVACHOL. The arm I have chosen is a tool I work with. This is from delicate feel- ing. In ripping up a bourgeois I shall use the arm which served me to produce what the bourgeois consumed at my cost." A Fabian essayist could not use a neater logic. Thus we see that our advance in Socialistic ideas favours not merely the intensifica- tion and spread of Anarchist sentiment, but the multiplication of its opportunities. We may have a good deal mere of it to cope with than before. Even so, we see no reason for going back on the principle that has hitherto pulled us thiough so well; and we would counsel the Socialistic Government of the future—harassed though they will be by Anarchistic Mr BEBNABD SHAW8, who will manifest their impatience, not by squibs in the magazines, but by pinches of dynamite on the Home Office steps-whatever else they regulate, not to regulate the quality of the oratory in Hyde Park or of the writing in Reynolds' Newspaper. To "drive discontent under the surface" is to prepare a volcano. Let them, as we now do, tem- per tolerance of the violent word with the most vigilant, swift, and condign punishment of the violent act. Let them watch and prevent and punish the doers and the deeds, and let the talkers blaze away. Such lunatical and diabolical doc- trines are their own best antidote. The more they are allowed to be exhibited to whatever public cares to listen to them, the less they are likely to have any following.-The Speaker.

BOARDS OF GUARDIANS.

* BRITISH WORKMAN'S AND GENERAL…

COUNTY RATE BASIS.1\

¡ I POOL & FORDEN HIGHWAY…

CAPTAIN AND MRS. HUMPHREYLA…

+ RECORD PRICE OF CHESHIRE…

^ A MURDER AT CARMARTHEN.

[No title]

,-4 NORTH AND BOUTH 1VAi E,…

TulUl.