Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

9 articles on this Page

ABERYSTWYTH.

News
Cite
Share

ABERYSTWYTH. COUNTY COURT, FRIDAY, AUGUST 9TH.—Before his Honour Judge David Lewis. Administration,— Mr F. R. Roberts applied for an Administration.-M,r F. R. Roberts applied for an order in the matter of Eleanor Jones, deceased, Fair- rhos, in the terms of the Registrar's order.—Mr Hugh Hughes, for the plaintiff, supported the order, and it was granted.-The value of the estate was £ 219. In the matter of Elizabeth Jones v. Morgan, Mr Hugh Hughes applied for extension of time, and it was granted to the October Court. Davies v. Lloyd.—Isaac Davies, mariner, Vulcan- street. summoned John LI. Lloyd, grocer, St. James's- square, for 15s for a ton of coal supplied.-The defence I was that the coal was supplied to Madam Lloyd whom the Judge said he had heard of before.—Judgement was given for defendant. Williams v- Jones.—John Williams, mason, Tanquarel, Bronant, sued David Jones, farmer, Bronfynwent, for 16 damages alleged to have been sustained by sheep trespass, and defendant counter- claimed 1-7 7s 6d— £ 4 7s 6d amount of unsatisfied judgement, and £ 3 damages alleged to have been sustained by trespass by plaintiff.—Mr T. J. Samuel, Bethesda, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr R. G. Smith for defendant.—Mr Samuel stated that in 1892 a claim was mide on defendant for sheep trespass and about £ 5 was paid. In 1893 an action was brought for sheep trespass, and that action was deferred. The present claim was for trespass from April 1S93 up to the present time.—Plaintiff said he rented land from his brother at ;CIO., and kept two cows. Defendant's sheep trespassed on his land from April up to the present time. Each time he Faw the sheep trespassing he made a note of it in a book produced. The names "Dafydd" and "Mary" were the names of defendant'a wife and servant man whom he had seen taking the sheep away after they had trespassed. He charged 3d a head.-Cross- examined There was an action brought against him by defendant in 1S94 for cutting down his (defendant's) fence, and judgement was given for defendant. Some of that judgment had not been satisfied. He did not think j64 had not been paid. He did not counter- claim then for sheep trespass in 1893 as Mr Hughes, his solicitor, said he could not counter-claim, but must bring an action.—In reply to the Judge, Mr Smith stated there had been no appreciable trespass by defendants sheep. He admitted there was trepass in April, but as soon as the sheep were seen they were taken off and the damage did not exeeed 5s.—In further reply to the Judge, who said he could not re-open old affair?, M Samuel said there had been trespass by 171 sheep up to July.—In continued cross-examination, plaintift ad- mitted that he had sent in no claim to defendant but his lawyer sent in a claim about May or June. Though they were neighbours, they did not live on good terms. He had been hound over in respect of defendant, but he would not willingly admit that he had forfeited his recognizances. David Jones had not put up a lot of fencing, but he (plaintiff) had. His fence was not in- tended to keep defendant's sheep out but to keep his (plaintiff's) cattle in. Defendant had put up new fencing, but it was in the middle of his own land.—The Judge asked why defendant should put up a fence in the middle of his own land, and plaintiff said I can't say indeed."—At this point, the Judge allowed time for investigation of books; observing that one of the books appeared to be a sort of ledger.—On resumption of the case, Mr Smith cross-examined and showed that the entries had been made by others than plaintiff, and that the books had been lying about the house.-The Judge said the irregular way in which the book was kept was evidence of authenticity than other- wise. Farmers did not keep books with the regularity of ordinary business men.-Plaintifra daughter, a girl of sixteen, who could not give her evidence in English, said on going to school she saw defendant's sheep which were trespassing being driven off.—In reply to Mr Smith, witness said it was in the winter, but she did not know of which year. She ultimately said it was the winter before last, and she thought the last winter as well.—In reply to the Judge, witness said it was in amser eira. "-On being asked by Mr Smith how many sheep she saw, said she did not know how many sheep or whose sheep they were, but on going into the house from school she mentioned the fact that sheep were trespassing.—Catherine Jones, wife of Thomas Jone3, Brynamlwg, said she saw sheep trespassing many times.—Cross-examined She was some relation of John Williams's. She had seen them in the spring of this year. It was no business of hers to tell defendant.—By the Judge: The fence was not good enough to keep the sheep out.—Thomas Morgans, mason and farmer, Talfryn, said he saw sheep tres- passing in January, and told the man who was looking after the sheep of the fact and he went in that direc- tion.—William Owen, Garregwen, on being sworn to speak the truth, remarked "That is wanted."—The Judge having chalacterized him as the comic man of the case, witness said he saw one sheep trespassing with a pitch-mark like a pair of spectacles.—Benjamin Morgan, who was described by Mr Samuel as The son of Brynucha Farm," a young man who could not give his evidence in English, also gave evidence as to seeing sheep trespassing. He also said he was friendly to defendant.—Mr Samuel having intimated that the witness, on account of his friendliness to defendant, was a hostile witness and that he had given a different number of times of trespass to him (Mr Samuel) that morning than he ap- peared willing to give in evidence, the Judge said he would believe none of it and struck the lot out.-John Jones, farmer, having given evidence of trespass, closed the plaintiffs case,—Mr Smith, for the defence, called the plaintiff by leave for cross-examination, when plaintiff denied that his cattle trespassed on defendant's land in November. He had no sheep at the time his sheep were said to have trespassed in April of this year.—David Jones, the defendant, said the plaintiff's cattle trespassed on his land in Novem- ber. Saw them himself. Sheep were also trespassing and plaintiff was after them." An attempt had been made to get a joint fence and the landlord was willing to pay a share. Plaintiff, however, refused to join.— The Judge observed that both sides seemed to fight shy of the fence question. The common law liability was that a man must put up a fence through which his animals could not get on to his neighbour's land. Defendant replied that he had put up a fence, but the plaintiff had pulled it down. The damage by the sheep was calculated at 3d a head. The damage by cattle was more than 6d as they trespassed in swedes- half-a-crown each. -The Judge said there were thirty- two days by cattle and twenty-six days by sheep.—Mr Smith having proved the balance due for judgment unsatisfied, the Judge said he would give judgment for the defendant for the amount claimed on that account.—In cross- examination by Mr Samuel, defendant said he had made notes of the trespass, but the book was at home. A copy was in court.—Daniel Jones, father of David Jones, said that sheep came to Brynfynwent in October of last year. They were away on the moun- tains afterward for some time. He had gone to fetch sheep back from Tanquarrel and found that they were not his son's sheep, but somebody else's.—Cross- examined His sheep were marked by the figure of spectacles. The sheep which were said to be his belonged to Hafod. Saw the cattle in the swedes once.—Margaret Davies, Pengraig, was called to prove that she saw Tanquarrel cattle being driven off defen- dant's land, but Mr Samuel got her willingly to admit that she was a tenant of defendant's.—Daniel Jones was recalled and said he knew it was plaintiff's sheep he saw in April as they were upon his land, but Mr Samuel said it was sheep belonging to plaintiff's son. The Judge gave a verdict for f I on each side. Griffith v. WiUiams.—John Griffith, retired merchant, Bow Street, sued Hugh Williams, Gwastad, Borth, for dEl 6a for lime.—Mr Hugh Hughes appeared for plain- tiff defendant was not legally represented.—Mr Wm Jones, Brynowen, on leaving the place, let the farm by fields. Defendant took one field on condition that-the landlord supplied for it four tons of lime. The order for lime was given to plaintiff. Instead of four tons, however, Oe ton twelve hundredweight more was delivered. Defendant then told plaintiff he would take the lot and if the landlord would not pay for the whole he (defendant) would. The landlord would only pay for the four tons.-David Jones, Aberceiro, the Brynowen agent, said defendant wanted him to pay for the whole but be declined.—Defendant denied that he had spoken to the agent in respect of the matter.—Judgment was given for the amount claimed. Ba)ak,rtil)tcy.-Alr Hugh Hughes applied for the dis- charge of Thomas Hughes, bankrupt under the 1869 Act.—The matter having been carried on under the 1869 Act, no report was made by the Official Receiver, and no creditor opposing, the Judge granted immediate discharge. b' RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL, MONDAY, AUGUST 12TH.—Present Mr James Jones, Tyllwyd, chair- man, presiding Mr J. M. Williams, Ynysybwl, vice-chairman Messrs John Jones, Caelanymaes- mawr T. R. Morgan and Lewis Richards, Cwm- rheidol; Hugh James, Cyfoethybrenin J. B. Morg m, Cynnullmawr John Morris, HenlJys W. A. Miller, Issayndre William Mason, Llaucynfelin Thomas Powell, Llanfihangel Upper David Davies, Llanfihangel Lower E. J. Evans. Llangwyryfon Daniel Morris, Llanilar; FvanLewis.Llanrhystya Haminiog; Charles Davies, Llanychaiarn Thomas James, and Richard Davies, Trefeirig; Mr Hugh Hughe?, clerk; Mr J. Rowlands, sanitary inspector. .Finaitce.-The Finance Committee, which met in the morning, submitted bills in respect of roadmen's wages and other claims, and recommended their payment.— The recommendation was adopted. Enc;-oacli,me)qt. -With regard to the encroachment on the road by the river near Moriah, the Surveyor (Mr Morgan Davies) submitted an estimate of the probatle cost of the repair of the damaged road, amounting to i ;ES.-A letter was read from Mr Powell, Nanteos, agreeing to contribute f.4 towards the work.—The offer was accepted.—On the proposition of Mr Thomas James, the Surveyor was directed to carry out the necessary work.—A communication was read from the Parish Council of Llangwryfon, calling attention to an encroachment by the river to some waste land near Troedyfoel Farm in that parish.—On the proposition of Mr E. J. Evans, seconded by Mr Charles Davies, the Surveyor (Mr Morgan Davies), was directed to demand possession of the land from the Parish I Council. Petition.-The petition to be presented to the County Council urging them to transfer the maintenance 01 tne roads in the Aberystwyth District to the Rural Dis- trict Council was submitted.—On the proposition of Mr Miller, the seal of the Council was affixed to the petition, and the Clerk w as directed to forward it to the County Council forthwith. Proponed New Road.- With regard to the new road which it is proposed to construct through the parish of Caelanymaesmawr, the Rev J. Davies, chairman of the Parish Council attended, and said he was present at the joint committee of members of the Rural Dis- trict Council and Parish Council of Caelanymaesmawr, which met at Talybont. They considered the question of the new road, and they decided to have it con- structed. He had been asked to attend that meeting to explain matters, if necessary.—Mr J. M. Williams said he was a member of the Committee which met at Talybont to consider this matter and, in fact, he voted in favour of constructing the road as planned by the Surveyor, although he had not visited the place. He was subsequently persuaded, however, to visit the line of the new road, which he did, and he had come to the conclusion that if the old road through the valley up to the mine was repaired it would be more suitab'e to the neighbourhood.—Tne Rev J. Davie3 pointed out that only three farms would benefit by making the road, whereas if the new road was constructed all the parish would be 'benefited.-The Sur. veyor estimated the cost of making the new roa.d at £ 14 10s. for a length of 450 yards.—Mr J. M. Williams did not think it could be made for that amount as the ground was peaty and would require a large quantity of metalling.—Mr Mason agreed.—Mr John Jones also said that the road through the valley, if put in proper state,would bemorecouveuient forthe parish than the proposed new road.—Mr J. B. Morgan pointed out that the Parish Council favoured the new road as being more convenient for the use of the parish and thought the Council should resolve to construet the new road. To repair the old road would be much more expensive than constructing the new road, there- fore he proposed that the new road be constructed ae- cording to the plan submitted, and that the portion of the road to Parcbach be properly repaired. —Mr Mason seconded the proposition.—Mr J. M. Evans remarked that the Council would form a different opinion of the proposed new road if they visited the spot through which it was proposed to run it.—The proposition was agreed to. Llangwyryfon Bridge.—The Surveyor submitted his estimate of £ 23 for the erection of a stone bridge over a stream in this parish, as requested at a previous Council.—Mr J. B. Morgan asked if a Committee was not appointed to consider this matter, and the Chair- man replied that he did not know.—Mr J. B. Morgan (reflectively) I believe a Committee was appointed.—Mr E. J. Evans stated that he was one of a Committee of three delegated to consider this question, but he was the only one who turned up on the appointed day. There was no doubt a bridge should be erected on accouut of the heavy traffic on the road, which ran through the stream. After a flood the road was much damaged and in winter it was impassable owing to the stream being frozen, which was very dangerous.—Mr Evan Lewis, on being asked his opinion relative to the subject, re- marked that a worse state of things existed in his parish.—The Chairman invited a proposition, remark- ing that unless a proposal was made the matter would fall through and could not be again raised for six months.—After a pause Mr E. J. Evans moved that a I bridge be erected, whereupon the Chairman said it was too late and the matter would have to stand in abey- ance for six months.—Mr Evans observed the Chair- man's ruling was unfair, and the subject was then dropped. Llyniardde.—The Surveyor also submitted an estim- ate for the erection of a bridge at the above place, amounting to f24, but as no one took notice of the matter it was allowed to drop. Motion.-In accordance with a notice previously given, Mr David Davies moved that a former resolu- tion that the workmen should work until six o'clock on Saturday be rescinded and that the workmen be allowed to cease work at four o'clock.— Mr Thomas Powell seconded the proposition, which, after some I discussion, was carried. Inspector's Rep-rt.-The Inspector submitted his monthly report, and instructions were given thereon. In regard to the proposed drainage of Pwllhobi, he suggested the appointment of a Committee to visit the place and report. He stated that he had found that the cesspools, which at first it was proposed to make would be flooded in winter, therefore he suggested that a Committee be appointed to consider this ques- tion.—Mr J. M.Williams proposed that the sugges- tion be adopted, and it was agreed to.—Messrs W. A. Miller, Simon, and David Lloyd were appointed to constitute the Committee for the purpose. Slaughter Houses.—The names of persons applying for licenses for slaughter-houses were submitted by the Surveyor, and the Council fixed the sum of 5s for each license. PETTY SESSIONS, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4TH.— Present|:—John Morgan, J. J. Griffiths, C. M. Williams, and Thomas Hugh Jones, Esqrs. Adiournedo-The case against Benjamin Davies, Brewer-street, who was charged by his wife with assault was further adjourned for a week.—The cases against Edw. E, Jenkins, Talybont, for deserting the Militia, and against Wm. Foley, 158 High-street, Aston, Bir- mingham, with neglecting to maintain his wife, were also adjourned for a wc'ek. Drunk and Disorderly.-Robert Williams, St. James's-square, barber, was charged by P.C. Edwards with having been drunk and disorderly at Aberystwyth on the 6th August.—Fined 5s. and costs. Assaulting the Police.—David Griffiths, South-road, foundryman, was charged by P.C. Edwards with having assaulted him while in the execution of his duty on the 6tb August.—Defendant said that he accidentally struck complainant instead of the last defendant.—The Bench took this view of the case, and inflicted a fine of 5s. including costs. COUNTY POLICE COURT, TUESDAY, AUGUST 13TH. -Before Dr Gilbeitson and David Thomas, Esqrs. Larceny. -Llewelyn Owens, Corris, Merionethshire, labourer, was charged by David Edwards, Black Lion Hotel, Talybont, postboy, with having stolen three- and-a-half ounces of tobacco of the value of Is., on August 12th.-Accused, who said he was eighteen years of age, admitted the charge.-The' Bench fined the accused £ 1 including costs, and allowed him four- teen days to pay.

LIFEBOAT SATURDAY.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOARD .ENQUIRY.

ABERAYRON.

MACHYNLLETH.

BARMOUTH.

TOW5TN.

CARDIGANSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL.

CAMBRIAN RAILWAY COMPANY.